On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 05:53 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Rsync is able to transfer only the differences between two files
provided a version of the file being transferred exists on the source
and the destination. In addition, rsync will not transfer anything if
it
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 21:19 +0100, Steve Basford wrote:
I did see an interesting idea on the devel mailing list from David I
have a feature suggestion: Incorporate the version number in your
DNS TXT records and download URLs. Your download mirrors can use
symlinks in most cases (when
On 4/18/2010 5:16 PM, Hauke Duden wrote:
I did what you asked me to do and it seems that the problem is not in
clamav. The files in question are marked as having a size of 4096, but
when I open them I only get a few bytes of data. The strange thing is
that they are all in /sys. Some in
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:14 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Obviously this is not a retroactive solution, but now that they know
this may be necessary, something can be changed so that it can be dealt
with more smoothly in the future.
It already has been. 0.95 recognizes signatures which can tell
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 16:00 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
Older versions of clamd were going to crash on signatures that newer
versions would accept, and the devs have been prevented for at least 6
months from using that type of signature. They have posted since then for
people to
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 22:30 +0200, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
So ClamAV should obey to the rules governing the open-software community.
One is that everybody is free to run it own copy of the software, in
whichever shape he/she likes it.
You can use ClamAV how ever you like. You just can't
On 4/16/2010 7:08 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
This is not a matter of missing upgrades. This is a matter of
proactively
breaking running systems.
Exactly. They proactively broke the scanner so people would know why
it
broke, rather than letting it die with nothing more than an obscure
Christopher Checca wrote:
I will be out of the office until 08-04-2008.
Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com
Wonder if he's gone on holiday?
401
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:29 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, G.W. Haywood wrote:
If you know a gunzip option that will NOT delete the compresed file,
that would be the prefered method.
cat file.gz | gunzip file
That's not a gunzip option -- that's
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 10:08 -0500, Cormack, Ken wrote:
What filesystem type are you using, that the .journal file is visible, in
the first place?
I'm assuming you're using the EXT3 filesystem type? If so, those
filesystems, IF properly mounted with proper /etc/fstab entries, should
render
I notice that Diego d'Ambra sometimes posts to the virus update list.
He signs his posts with PGP, but I can't find his public key anywhere.
It is not listed on the team page ( http://www.clamav.net/team.html )
like most of the other developers, and it is also not on any of the key
servers I have
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 11:51 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Maxim Britov wrote:
P900\Beyonce Knowles - Crazy In Love (2).wav: Exploit.W32.MS05-002 FOUND
I don't know, but size is ~50-100KB.
If they're tiny files, are you sure they're actually wavs?
Maybe someone
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 12:12 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
If it's a bunch of flashy graphics telling you to visit a website for
fantastic deals on hiding money from third world countries while
getting fantastic mortgage rates on your pen1s enlargement ointment,
it's for a spam filter.
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 11:47 +0200, Scott Ryan wrote:
Maybe you want to read the mail i sent again.
I use clamdscan not clamscan
# man clamdscan
Then do you have the ScanMail option set in the clamav.conf file set?
--
Chris
---
This
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:55 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
This thread on Trojan.JS.RunMe had me thinking: Hourly virus updates is
better than any of the commercial virus scanners, but obviously still has
issues, especially since a bunch of us obviously submitted updates that had
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 21:00 +0100, Matt wrote:
Hello all,
This isn't a specific Clam question, but what are the main type of
archive/compression methods used on virii, when being sent as email
attachments? Does it tend to be just zip/rar as a rule, or are there more
variations?
I believe
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 14:06 -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
Am I the only one here whos existing installation is catching MyDoom.M?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav]# grep -i mydoom /var/log/clamav/clamd.log
Tue Jul 27 13:32:23 2004 -
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 21:17 +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 6:54 pm, Jona Tallieu wrote:
Hi All,
Just upgraded to 0.75 on OSX 10.3.
When checking CLAMAV version to be sure the upgrade was ok I get:
mail:/usr/local/bin root# ./clamscan --version
clamscan /
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 13:36 -0400, Ken Morley wrote:
I've just installed RedHat Enterprise ES V3 and patched to the latest
revision. I then installed ClamAV 0.70, ran freshclam and did a clamdscan
against the entire drive.
I was surprised when clamdscan reported:
//proc/kcore:
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 14:33 -0500, John Madden wrote:
#!/bin/sh
VIRCOUNT=`grep -c FOUND /wherever/is/your/clamd.log`
I blend in a little perl to print per-virus totals sorted by name:
grep VIRUS /var/log/messages | perl -e 'while(){ $_ =~ /VIRUS:(.*)\)/;
$v = $1; $hash{$v}++;} foreach
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 08:56 +, Trog wrote:
Well, you appear to be the only one seeing a leak. We (the devs) do
check for memory leaks quite frequently, and so are pretty sure there
are no big leaks.
Does that include the RAR scanner? I have yet to enable it because of
the comments in the
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 09:41 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Silly question time...
While I suppose the questions about the standard naming sequences may
help, I would propose one other idea (along with asking for help with
my question :-)
First: I see a hit in my logfiles for
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 17:40, Damian Menscher wrote:
There are three cases to consider:
1 - virus from infected machine
2 - virus relayed through another server
3 - false positive
Everyone agrees we don't want to generate a notification for case 1.
Everyone agrees we *do* want to
Submission: 2005
Sender: Fisher
Submitted virus name: Unknown Virus
Virus name: Worm.Bagle.Gen-rarpwd
Notes: Signature added through daily.cvd version 187 to
Notes: detect password protected RAR files.
Added: No
Is this signature in effect for all scans, or only those with the
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with my
anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in any
way a negative thing?
I don't think it hurts, and from the
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 18:41, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting; do you have any info on ICAP? Will the old network
www.icap.org
International Center for Alcohol Policies? Now what exactly will the
new
Seve Ho wrote:
I am trying to use Clamav-milter with sendmail. I found it cannot clean
up it socket file(.sock) opened after killing the milter process.(I use
kill -9 to kill the process, is there other prosper way to stop the
milter?) And this make me have to remove the .sock file first
Paul Boven wrote:
How about only trying every word in the mail-body as a key to try,
instead of brute-forcing? The virus(-writer) cannot afford to fudge the
password in the mail-body: One would hope that the subset of users that
is clever enough to reconstruct the password, yet stupid enough
28 matches
Mail list logo
