On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
ClamAV version 0.67-1, clamav-milter version 0.67a
Please be more specific by:
(b) giving an example of a message that you think is missing some
information, since all the messages I see already contain the
[Please point me to the right place to send an RFE, if this isn't it.
The clamav-milter should be a bit more descriptive than just saying a
virus was found. Like saying the Klez virus was found, for example.
Also, there should be a way to reject a message 5xx status while still
saving a copy
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2004 10:28 am, Damian Menscher wrote:
The clamav-milter should be a bit more descriptive than just saying a
virus was found. Like saying the Klez virus was found, for example.
Please be more specific by:
(a) quoting the version of clamav-milter you're running
(b) giving an
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Wednesday 10 Mar 2004 10:28 am, Damian Menscher wrote:
The clamav-milter should be a bit more descriptive than just saying a
virus was found. Like saying the Klez virus was found, for example.
Please be more specific by:
(a) quoting the version
Damian Menscher wrote:
Also, there should be a way to reject a message 5xx status while still
saving a copy for archival purposes.
Finally, freshclam -d should be started in the clamd startup script.
I think no. Some people using different technique for virusdb updates as
rsync, local mirror
Please be more specific by:
(a) quoting the version of clamav-milter you're running
The latest released version: 0.67-1
That's a version of clamAV, not clamav-milter. Please run
'clamav-milter --version'.
(b) giving an example of a message that you think is missing
some information,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
Please be more specific by:
(a) quoting the version of clamav-milter you're running
The latest released version: 0.67-1
That's a version of clamAV, not clamav-milter. Please run
'clamav-milter --version'.
ClamAV version 0.67-1, clamav-milter
On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 09:31 pm, Damian Menscher wrote:
By the way, while I'm being picky, perhaps sending a bounce message (as
opposed to rejecting the message) is not an appropriate default?
That isn't the default action. You have to give the --bounce option for
a bounce to be
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 09:31 pm, Damian Menscher wrote:
By the way, while I'm being picky, perhaps sending a bounce message (as
opposed to rejecting the message) is not an appropriate default?
That isn't the default action. You have to
