Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 21.02.2018 um 14:51 schrieb Bill S: >> >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> why not use

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > you post is crap because you don't point to any refereneces (url to said > patch and son on) nor talking what is a "newer GCC" in your point of view > and especially in the context of the problem My apologies. I

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, SCOTT PACKARD <scott.pack...@raytheon.com> wrote: > Bill S - > I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads > verbiage. > > I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package name. > Once I fou

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Kees Theunissen wrote: >>I have not had much luck finding a binary package that is not part of >>a non Slackware install. If anyone finds such a package in their >>travels I would be very grateful for a link. > > Have a look at

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > point was that there are binary packages which working fine all over > distributions I have not had much luck finding a binary package that is not part of a non Slackware install. If anyone finds such

[clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

I think there was a patch issued over a week ago for the problem 0.99.3 has with newer versions of GCC. Based on that I have two questions. 1. Will version 0.99.3 ever be revised so you do not have to use the patch? 2. If the answer to question 1 is “No”, what are the pros and cons of staying