On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
consistent and safe updating of our virus signatures?
There's a special option in
On 2008-10-17 05:11, René Berber wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
[snip]
Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
the CPU at 100% for a long
There's a special option in freshclam (--submit-stats, currently
deactivated)
Hi Tomasz, from how I'd use it here, it'd certainly be a good idea to
enable this option.
As a side note, for users of the windows port... they'd normally run
freshclam damonised... and then could run the special
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:52 +0100 (BST)
Steve Basford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a special option in freshclam (--submit-stats, currently
deactivated)
Hi Tomasz, from how I'd use it here, it'd certainly be a good idea to
enable this option.
As a side note, for users of the
Török Edwin wrote:
Scanning test/.split works here:
Thanks, I'm probably hitting an obscure system bug...
What OS/compiler are you using?
...in unsupported Cygwin. Almost everything else seems to work,
exceptions being 'clamscan --debug', and the programs used to check the
build.
I'll
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
consistent and safe updating of our virus signatures?
You
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:11:16PM -0500, René Berber wrote:
Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
the CPU at 100% for a long time... I've killed it on two runs.
no problem here:
Compiles cleanly on OpenBSD 4.3 Release i386 on AMD Opteron
Best regards,
Walter.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Nigel Horne wrote:
Folks,
We are pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate
for ClamAV 0.94.1. 0.94.1RC1 is scheduled for release on Wednesday (15/10/08).
Nigel,
Everything works on gcc-3.3.6 with Redhat FC1. I managed to install
check and perform the checks with
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:19:54AM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
consistent and safe
For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
overview please refer to http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
Nigel, does the stats sent... only send information regarding ClamAV
default signatures (when detected)... or does this also include detections
by
Steve Basford wrote:
For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
overview please refer to
http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
Nigel, does the stats sent... only send information regarding ClamAV
default signatures (when detected)... or does this
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:12 +0100
Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't had the time to check the source code.
How does it send it? What protocol and port, to which servers?
Anything that firewall admins will need to be aware of?
It sends information about a file name, malware
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:12 +0100
Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't had the time to check the source code.
How does it send it? What protocol and port, to which servers?
Anything that firewall admins will need to be aware of?
It sends information
Folks,
0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
overview please refer to http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
We encourage as many people as possible to test this release candidate by
downloading
it from
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:20:27 +0100 (BST)
Steve Basford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
overview please refer to http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
Nigel, does the stats sent... only send information regarding
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:12 +0100
Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't had the time to check the source code.
How does it send it? What protocol and port, to which servers?
Anything that firewall admins will need to be aware of?
It sends information
up and running in 5m on FreeBSD 4.8 :-)
+++ Started at Thu Oct 16 21:48:29 2008
Thu Oct 16 21:48:29 2008 - clamd daemon 0.94.1rc1 (OS: freebsd4.8, ARCH: i386,
CPU: i386)
Thu Oct 16 21:48:29 2008 - Running as user clamav (UID 1028, GID 1001)
freshclam.conf
+
# When enabled freshclam will
Nigel Horne wrote:
Folks,
0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
Built fine but installed with errors on Solaris 9. Solaris has obsoleted
ranlib but has a stub file, /usr/ccs/bin/ranlib. Configure found it and
of course it failed. I renamed it and clamav built and installed fine.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:51:32PM -0700, Dennis Peterson said:
Running diff on the new config files and old config files did not reveal
any new options.
Freshclam has one new option, disabled by default - fairly harmless for
upgrades, but useful for redistributors to note if they handle that
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:51:32PM -0700, Dennis Peterson said:
Running diff on the new config files and old config files did not reveal
any new options.
Freshclam has one new option, disabled by default - fairly harmless for
upgrades, but useful for redistributors to
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Freshclam also submits information about detections with 3rd party signatures.
We only have one host in our environment that does freshclam (or any of
the other virus signature update mechanisms). It verifies the validity
of the data (makes sure nothing will die as a
Nigel Horne wrote:
0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
[snip]
Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
the CPU at 100% for a long time... I've killed it on two runs.
--
René Berber
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700, John Rudd wrote
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Freshclam also submits information about detections with 3rd party
signatures.
We only have one host in our environment that does freshclam (or any of
the other virus signature update mechanisms).
Same here.
24 matches
Mail list logo
