On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:13:50 GMT, Roman Marchenko wrote:
>> Fixed `com.sun.beans.introspect.MethodInfo#MethodOrder` to make
>> `Introspector.addMethod()` working properly when filtering methods out.
>>
>> Also fixed the test, and added the approptiate test case.
>
> Roman Marchenko has updated t
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 18:40:07 GMT, Rajat Mahajan wrote:
> **Issue:**
> The JNI method `Java_sun_awt_windows_WTaskbarPeer_setOverlayIcon `calls
> `CreateIconFromRaster `that can throw a C++ exception.
>
> The C++ exception must be caught and must not be allowed to escape the JNI
> method. The cal
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:52:48 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> I tested different ways to merge this block with the below blocks. I'm not
>> sure if it makes sense to do so now because it wouldn't be as simple as
>> adding `|| focusOwner == null` to the first if-statement or appending the
>> l
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:11:15 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> What tests have you run?
>
>> What tests have you run?
>
> Had this in our internal test queue with jtreg / JCK plus some additional
> SAP internal tests. No issues seen.
> However I think I have to run some more manual tests on clien
> FileDialogIconTest.java has been updated.
>
> Following changes were made.
>
> - Test instructions updated
> - BugID associated with the test is updated to the correct one
> - setIconBufferedImagesToFrame and setIconBufferedImagesToDialog btns added
> to the frame.
> - other minor cleanups
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:18:47 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> FileDialogIconTest.java has been updated.
>>
>> Following changes were made.
>>
>> - Test instructions updated
>> - BugID associated with the test is updated to the correct one
>> - setIconBufferedImagesToFrame and setIconBufferedIma
> FileDialogIconTest.java has been updated.
>
> Following changes were made.
>
> - Test instructions updated
> - BugID associated with the test is updated to the correct one
> - setIconBufferedImagesToFrame and setIconBufferedImagesToDialog btns added
> to the frame.
> - other minor cleanups
FileDialogIconTest.java has been updated.
Following changes were made.
- Test instructions updated
- BugID associated with the test is updated to the correct one
- setIconBufferedImagesToFrame and setIconBufferedImagesToDialog btns added to
the frame.
- other minor cleanups
-
C
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 19:50:03 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> FileDialogIconTest.java has been updated.
>
> Following changes were made.
>
> - Test instructions updated
> - BugID associated with the test is updated to the correct one
> - setIconBufferedImagesToFrame and setIconBufferedImagesToDi
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 05:26:10 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> When JRadioButtonMenuItem is called with imageIcon, then only imageIcon is
>> shown without radiobutton in WIndowsLookAndFeel as there was no provision of
>> drawing the radiobutton alongside icon.
>> If icon is not there, the radio
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 17:29:58 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> Is it needed? If there are no failures, I see no reason to increase the
>> tolerance.
>
> If it test runs fine on CI then it should be okay. Previously, I came across
> few tests which required increasing tolerance value (although not i
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 05:26:10 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> When JRadioButtonMenuItem is called with imageIcon, then only imageIcon is
>> shown without radiobutton in WIndowsLookAndFeel as there was no provision of
>> drawing the radiobutton alongside icon.
>> If icon is not there, the radio
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:34:20 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/awt/Toolkit/ScreenInsetsTest/ScreenInsetsTest.java line 47:
>>
>>> 45: private static final int SIZE = 100;
>>> 46: // Allow a margin tolerance of 1 pixel due to scaling
>>> 47: private static final int MARGIN_TOL
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:45:43 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> While working on [JDK-6899304](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6899304),
>> we discovered that there are two tests meant to perform the same task.
>>
>> The first test is located at
>> test/jdk/java/awt/Multiscreen/MultiScreenInset
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:08:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> What tests have you run?
Had this in our internal test queue with jtreg / JCK plus some additional SAP
internal tests. No issues seen.
However I think I have to run some more manual tests on client like setups.
Unfortunately my Li
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:48:06 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
>> We (SAP) try to introduce the ‘IBM Open XL C/C++ for AIX 17.1.2’ (based on
>> clang 17) as a feasible compiler for jdk25, because in combination with the
>> 17.1.3 runtime this would enable the support for ubsan.
>> Unfortunately, the new
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 13:52:49 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
> But building it with SIZE optimization m
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 06:57:01 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> When you say "Testing looks good" you mean the normal jtreg client testsuite
> or any other specific testing that was done?
normal jtreg client testsuite + manual testing
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/2
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 05:28:28 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> It seems in windows 11, the menuitem text location is dependant on presence
> of menuitem icon. As per this screenshot, the bullet/checkmark seems to be in
> its fixed location but text is shifted depending on menuitem icon.
That's
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:50:36 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>>> Nothing stops you from doing so…
>>
>> I agree but I have never seen any application which is having a single
>> RadioButton for selection.
>>
>>> I still think the condition in the radio button case should be the same:
>>> Object.equ
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 03:10:03 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
> I am not sure if we can satisfy both windows 10 and windows 11 simultaneously
> as both design is different for this logic...
We absolutely can… I'm not proposing using different rendering, instead I'm for
following Windows 11 rende
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:03:16 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> The splashscreen lib is currently built with LOW optimization.
>> This might be fine because it is not very performance critical (and LOW is
>> not really low when looking at the opt-flags used).
>> But building it with SIZE optimization
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 18:14:26 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>You are the only person who reads it this way.
So do you think that kcms/lcms do not follow the icc specification? and the
whole feature to support lcms specific and custom/applications specific intents
are useless? Its even described in the d
> Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349350. It's impossible to use
> more that one print option.
>
> **Reason of the bug**:
> execCmd array uses one index per print flag, but 'OPTIONS' flag can use two
> indexes for the options.
>
> **Fix description**:
> make the size of the exec
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:13:50 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> The format is space delimited values, each value is a "key=value".
>> There is no difference between Linux and Mac and there are no changes in the
>> format of the options.
>
> If it's a space delimited values, then can't we use "op
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:50:36 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>>> Nothing stops you from doing so…
>>
>> I agree but I have never seen any application which is having a single
>> RadioButton for selection.
>>
>>> I still think the condition in the radio button case should be the same:
>>> Object.equ
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 08:08:39 GMT, GennadiyKrivoshein wrote:
>> src/java.desktop/share/classes/sun/print/PSPrinterJob.java line 1578:
>>
>>> 1576: }
>>> 1577: if (options != null && !options.isEmpty()) {
>>> 1578: optionArgs = options.trim().split("\\s+");
>>
>> In wha
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:38:30 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan
wrote:
>> Fix for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349350. It's impossible to use
>> more that one print option.
>>
>> **Reason of the bug**:
>> execCmd array uses one index per print flag, but 'OPTIONS' flag can use two
>> indexes for
29 matches
Mail list logo
