Thanks Mikera and Andrew for the ideas. Some interesting suggestions there.
I'll discuss these with my fellow devs. Much appreciated.
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 1:14:11 AM UTC+1, Andrew Chambers wrote:
Clojure logic programming with core.logic (something akin to a sudoku
solver
Hello,
I like to try clojure.
I have little or none programming background but I know I learn the best by
reading a piece of text
and then do exercises about it so I can check if I really understand it.
What is then the best way to proceed ?
Roelof
--
You received this message because you
Try 4clojure.com
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I like to try clojure.
I have little or none programming background but I know I learn the best
by reading a piece of text
and then do exercises about it so I can check if I really understand
Even a tutorial on how to read normal stack-traces would be cool to help take
an eager beginner from not knowing anything at all to having a good idea.
Sometimes you just need that resource to point something out to you: this is
the filename. This is the line. etc.
And honestly, if 4clojure
Thanks,
Can this site also be good : http://www.braveclojure.com/
Roelof
Op woensdag 16 april 2014 09:07:36 UTC+2 schreef Bruce Wang:
Try 4clojure.com
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Roelof Wobben
rwo...@hotmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hello,
I like to try clojure.
I have
Can core.logic be used to implement something like
http://www.optaplanner.org ?
Josh
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:36 AM, utel umeshtel...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mikera and Andrew for the ideas. Some interesting suggestions
there. I'll discuss these with my fellow devs. Much appreciated.
On
more exercises here http://clojure-euler.wikispaces.com/Problem+001
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
Can this site also be good : http://www.braveclojure.com/
Roelof
Op woensdag 16 april 2014 09:07:36 UTC+2 schreef Bruce Wang:
Try
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 06:26:33 UTC+1, Andrew Chambers wrote:
Is there a way to rerun the whole notebook top to bottom with a hotkey?
Coming soon :-)
https://github.com/JonyEpsilon/gorilla-repl/issues/93
Jony
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
So yeah, I think that exposing a list will get us pretty far. The missing
piece, then, would be the ability for a a client to send a connection
request for a specific channel.
I'll be honest I'm a little hesitant to add any kind of room/subscription
facilities to Sente itself...
My
I suggest read up on Clojure for the Brave and
Truehttp://www.braveclojure.comand Clojure
from the Ground
Uphttp://aphyr.com/posts/301-clojure-from-the-ground-up-welcome, then start
on 4clojure's
exercises http://www.4clojure.com. I'd recommend it over sites with euler
problems, since those
Hello,
I try to learn coljure by using this tutorial: http://www.braveclojure.com
Im now at point 7 : http://www.braveclojure.com/basic-emacs/
There I must paste a text into emacs.
But as far as I know there is no mentioned how I can paste text into emacs.
Roelof
--
You received this
Thanks,
At this point Im following the first tutorial.
Roelof
Op woensdag 16 april 2014 12:45:33 UTC+2 schreef Niels van Klaveren:
I suggest read up on Clojure for the Brave and
Truehttp://www.braveclojure.comand Clojure
from the Ground
Try control y
google usually returns good results when I search for emacs stuffs.
Regards,
Kashyap
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I try to learn coljure by using this tutorial: http://www.braveclojure.com
Im now at point 7 :
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
I try to learn coljure by using this tutorial: http://www.braveclojure.com
Im now at point 7 : http://www.braveclojure.com/basic-emacs/
There I must paste a text into emacs.
But as far as I know there is no mentioned
Sorry for the confusion! As Kashyap mentioned, ctrl-y should work. You can
also try your normal keyboard binding for pasting (ctrl-v or cmd-v), that
might work as well.
Also, if Emacs is too difficult to work with, then it's definitely ok to
use whatever editor you like most :)
Thanks,
Op woensdag 16 april 2014 12:57:41 UTC+2 schreef Roelof Wobben:
Hello,
I try to learn coljure by using this tutorial: http://www.braveclojure.com
Im now at point 7 : http://www.braveclojure.com/basic-emacs/
There I must paste a text into emacs.
But as far as I know there is no
hello,
ctrl-y did the job.
Roelof
Op woensdag 16 april 2014 13:36:44 UTC+2 schreef Daniel Higginbotham:
Sorry for the confusion! As Kashyap mentioned, ctrl-y should work. You can
also try your normal keyboard binding for pasting (ctrl-v or cmd-v), that
might work as well.
Also, if
a little cheatsheet with things like that for emacs (you have your C-y to
paste there, and other stuff like that)
http://sachachua.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/How-to-Learn-Emacs8.png
Have fun!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
hello,
ctrl-y
I found this to be very useful
http://clojurekoans.com/
Kranthi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
I did this https://wiki.helsinki.fi/display/clojure2011/Home
This appears to be more updated, but I haven't tried it.
http://iloveponies.github.io/120-hour-epic-sax-marathon/index.html
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:56:07 PM UTC+7, Roelof Wobben wrote:
Hello,
I like to try clojure.
I have
Some months ago I decided to learn a new language. In the end, I had to
choose between Scala and Clojure and I chose Scala because Clojure was too
alien to me.
I was looking for a language to write web apps and Scala, with Play 2,
seemed like a natural choice to me. The fact that Clojure had
For anybody interested, I manage to improve performance up to ~2x slower
than standard hash-map and pushed it to clojars.
https://github.com/frankiesardo/linked
linked-set is still a bit slow so I'll keep investigating on it.
On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:31:14 PM UTC+2, Frankie Sardo wrote:
Welcome, Massimiliano! Judging from you name, we seem to share some common
cultural background ;)
I hope that you'll enjoy learning and using Clojure, and more importantly
that you'll reap the advantages that comes from learning and applying its
Welcome aboard! Fasten your seatbelt, it will be a wild (and exhilarating)
ride. I'm still relatively new, but I've learned enough to know that clojure
(and clojurescript and Datomic) are what I need to be focusing on. Besides all
the other benefits, it's just plain fun. I haven't had this
On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:56 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
I like to try clojure.
I have little or none programming background but I know I learn the best by
reading a piece of text
and then do exercises about it so I can check if I really understand it.
What is then the best
Op woensdag 16 april 2014 16:43:09 UTC+2 schreef Charlie Griefer:
On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:56 PM, Roelof Wobben rwo...@hotmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I like to try clojure.
I have little or none programming background but I know I learn the best
by reading a piece of text
and then do
I'm getting this error in a web service call on Heroku with Clojure:
SSLPeerUnverifiedException javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException: peer
not authenticated
Has anyone figured out how to disable peer authentication with clj-http?
I'm running clj-http 0.7.6
--
You received this message
Jame's tutorial was right on the money and following it I was able to make
a comparable version with Skeletor collecting magic gems in a desert. I am
interested in leveraging Clojurescript and async for browser-game
development, though, and while there is a core.async Dots game tutorial,
it
I would suggest 4clojure.com for the following reasons:
1. Problems are tuned towards learning idioms of Clojure
2. In many cases problems are tuned towards making you thinking
functionally.
3. Once you solve the problem, you get to compare it with some of the other
submitters. This point is
Thank you both for the warm welcome!
Right now I'm reading Clojure for the Brave and True. I'm not new to
functional programming, but I'm not familiar with LISPy languages.
I can see the value of having such a regular syntax (or absence of it) but
it takes a while to get comfortable with it.
One
Nice video, very cool.
Some notes:
- you can omit comma ',' in maps {:key value :another value}
- can omit contains? in filter:
user= (filter :apple? [{:apple? true :x 6} {:apple? true :x 4} {:player?
true :x 550}])
({:apple? true, :x 6} {:apple? true, :x 4})
Thanks again,
Eduard
On
Probably. Things like OptaPlanner are the big business use-case for logic
programming, IIRC.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Josh Kamau joshnet2...@gmail.com wrote:
Can core.logic be used to implement something like
http://www.optaplanner.org ?
Josh
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:36 AM,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli kiuhn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you both for the warm welcome!
Right now I'm reading Clojure for the Brave and True. I'm not new to
functional programming, but I'm not familiar with LISPy languages.
I can see the value of having such a
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:06:57 PM UTC+2, Massimiliano Tomassoli wrote:
Thank you both for the warm welcome!
Right now I'm reading Clojure for the Brave and True. I'm not new to
functional programming, but I'm not familiar with LISPy languages.
I can see the value of having such a
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:27:03 PM UTC+2, Dan Cross wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Massimiliano Tomassoli
kiuh...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Thank you both for the warm welcome!
Right now I'm reading Clojure for the Brave and True. I'm not new to
functional programming,
The docstring for iterate says that it returns a lazy sequence, but it
returns a Cons wrapped around a LazySeq. This means, for example, that
realized? can't be applied to what iterate returns. Is this a problem with
the iterate docstring? Or should realized? be applicable to Conses? I
I second Dan Cross's comment. You also need to get used to *reading*standard
Lisp code indentation. It's not hard, but it's different from
what's common for most languages. Then when your editor reformats your
code, you easily can see whether there's something wrong with your
parentheses.
It's almost cliche to say it, but you really do get used to the parenthesis.
Once you do, you won't give it a second thought, and for me at least, it's the
other languages that start to look weird with their irregular syntax. And at
least one a week I catch myself writing (if ... or (for ...
What's harder than parentheses is the fact that any sort of semantics can
be hidden under simple words in the call position, and everything looks the
same.
It changed how I read code, and it took a while to get used to that.
I wonder if there's a study somewhere on the ergonomics of lisp.
Code
you can omit comma ',' in maps {:key value :another value}
In the interest of readability, I usually add commas when I have multiple
key-value pairs on the same row.
can omit contains? in filter:
Cool - thanks for the tip!
Also, thanks to everyone else for your comments. :-)
Cheers,
James
Syntax-highlighting helps, although not for user-defined functions (at
least not in Vim, which is what I use).
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:30:45 PM UTC-5, Gary Trakhman wrote:
What's harder than parentheses is the fact that any sort of semantics can
be hidden under simple words in the
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 7:25:54 PM UTC+2, Mike Haney wrote:
It's almost cliche to say it, but you really do get used to the
parenthesis. Once you do, you won't give it a second thought, and for me
at least, it's the other languages that start to look weird with their
irregular
this issue on core.typed
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CTYP-96
in particular the comment:
This is starting to make me rethink what a clojure.core docstring means
exactly by a lazy sequence
cheers,
Gianluca
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:45:01 PM UTC+2, Mars0i wrote:
The docstring for
Has anyone tried Light table as a IDE instead of Emacs ?
Roelof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
As one who has been immersed in Clojure since the beginning of the year,
I'd say use 4Clojure judiciously.
For one thing, the format of the exercises adds an extra layer of
complexity: Most of the time, you can't just solve the problem, you must
solve the problem and then try to figure out how to
Ah so it seems a lazy sequence implements IPending?
Thanks,
Ambrose
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:39 AM, gianluca torta giato...@gmail.com wrote:
this issue on core.typed
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CTYP-96
in particular the comment:
This is starting to make me rethink what a
Lots of people use it, including me. I don't think it's a bad choice for
beginners at all.
The conventional wisdom seems to be that you will end up learning emacs
eventually if you spend any amount of time doing clojure or lisp, so you might
as well learn it from the start. That is
I assume that there's a good reason that iterate returns a Cons
instead of a LazySeq.
IIUC, this particular case arises because iterate's body is implemented
as
(cons x (lazy-seq (iterate f (f x
rather than
(lazy-seq (cons x (iterate f (f x
Can anyone comment on whether
On Apr 16, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Massimiliano Tomassoli kiuhn...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going to use LightTable which seems to have great support for Clojure.
emacs terrifies me :)
I'm using LightTable for all my editing these days - and for ClojureScript it's
truly amazing!
Welcome to Clojure /
In my humble experience, the best way to learn a language is to follow your way
to learn a language, that means the same way you were already successful with
the latest language you learnt.
Hopefully in the future CLJ could become the very first language the new
generation will learn (today I
On Apr 16, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Roelof Wobben rwob...@hotmail.com wrote:
Has anyone tried Light table as a IDE instead of Emacs ?
Yes. I used Emacs back in the 17.x / 18.x / early 19.x days and then went on to
other editors. After a long break, and after starting to use Clojure daily, I
went
On 16 Apr 2014, at 23:10, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
I used Emacs for just over two years before switching to LT, BTW (well, after
a near 20 year break from Emacs before that).
which means you stopped to use emacs because of Java like I did 20 years ago?
Have you noted that your
Hi Massimiliano,
You may also want to give ClojureScript or LiveScript (which compiles to
JavaScript and run on node.js) a try!
LiveScript is quite functional and the callback hell is somewhat eased.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
I think LightTable is a good choice for Clojure beginners, certainly it's
much more approachable than Emacs. Other options you might consider are
Cursive (based on IntelliJ, at http://cursiveclojure.com) or
CounterClockwise (based on Eclipse, at
https://code.google.com/p/counterclockwise) which
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Colin Fleming
colin.mailingl...@gmail.comwrote:
Standard disclaimer: I develop Cursive.
How's Cursive coming along? The website still says it's only for those who
are feeling brave.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On Apr 16, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Mimmo Cosenza mimmo.cose...@gmail.com wrote:
which means you stopped to use emacs because of Java like I did 20 years ago?
Yup, that was pretty much why. For a while I was very enamored with Together/J
which integrated UML diagramming and Java code editing and
I use Cursive for my Clojure development and it's great! I'm a big fan.
Standard disclaimer: I was already firmly entrenched in Intellij beforehand.
Sent from my mobile doohickey
On 17/04/2014 11:12 AM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Colin
On Thursday, 17 April 2014 03:57:56 UTC+8, Mike Haney wrote:
Lots of people use it, including me. I don't think it's a bad choice for
beginners at all.
The conventional wisdom seems to be that you will end up learning emacs
eventually if you spend any amount of time doing clojure or
On Thursday, 17 April 2014 04:28:02 UTC+8, John Mastro wrote:
I assume that there's a good reason that iterate returns a Cons
instead of a LazySeq.
IIUC, this particular case arises because iterate's body is implemented
as
(cons x (lazy-seq (iterate f (f x
rather than
Sean - funny, I used Together/J when it first came out, way before Borland
bought it. It's been a long time, but I remember being quite enamored with it
as well. It was certainly ahead of it's time.
Then we switched to Visual Age for Java, which was pretty cool at first. Until
it corrupted
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:39:24 PM UTC-5, gianluca torta wrote:
this issue on core.typed
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CTYP-96http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.clojure.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FCTYP-96sa=Dsntz=1usg=AFQjCNFtiMksWlWr1XT8J0zwKsQ1xvo2jQ
in particular the comment:
On Apr 16, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Mikera mike.r.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 17 April 2014 03:57:56 UTC+8, Mike Haney wrote:
The conventional wisdom seems to be that you will end up learning emacs
eventually if you spend any amount of time doing clojure or lisp, so you
might as
62 matches
Mail list logo
