Mark,
I had not heard about Java changing the substring operation from O(1) to
O(n). Do you have a link to any further info about this change?
I'm guessing that the implementation is changing from the O(1) create a
new String object that is a reference to a portion of the original String
object
And to answer my own question about a reference for this change in
behavior, which appears to have been made in Java 7:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16123446/java-7-string-substring-complexity
Andy
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
Mark
Your comparator #(if (= %1 %2) 0 1) may happen to give the correct answers
for your example sorted-maps, but it is also a bad comparator that will
fail for larger examples:
user= (:a (sorted-map-by #(if (= %1 %2) 0 1) :z -26 :b 1 :a 2 :c 3 :m 13
:h 8))
nil
user= (:z (sorted-map-by #(if (= %1 %2)
:02，Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com写道：
Your comparator #(if (= %1 %2) 0 1) may happen to give the correct answers
for your example sorted-maps, but it is also a bad comparator that will
fail for larger examples:
user= (:a (sorted-map-by #(if (= %1 %2) 0 1) :z -26 :b 1 :a 2 :c 3 :m 13
I've worked on hardware logic design, where the time and effort required to
create good tests that find subtle bugs rivals the complexity of the
hardware being designed itself. In this context, much of the testing has
often been generated using pseudo-random streams similar to test.generative
and
clojure.lang.RT.mapUniqueKeys was added to Clojure 1.5, and did not appear
in 1.4 or earlier. It was added to Clojure 1.5 as part of this change:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#210-set-and-map-constructor-functions-allow-duplicates
But yes, as Michael said, it means
If (map find-records query-parts) is returning this expression:
(({:a2p-id 1, :dh-uuid abc-def-ghi-klm} {:a2p-id 2, :dh-uuid
def-ghi-klm-opq} {:a2p-id 3, :dh-uuid nil}) ({:a2p-id 1, :dh-uuid
abc-def-ghi-klm} {:a2p-id 2, :dh-uuid def-ghi-klm-opq} {:a2p-id 3,
:dh-uuid nil}))
then especially note
, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
If (map find-records query-parts) is returning this expression:
(({:a2p-id 1, :dh-uuid abc-def-ghi-klm} {:a2p-id 2, :dh-uuid
def-ghi-klm-opq} {:a2p-id 3, :dh-uuid nil}) ({:a2p-id 1, :dh-uuid
abc-def-ghi-klm} {:a2p-id 2, :dh-uuid def-ghi-klm-opq
Try adding (flush) after the print call.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Jim - FooBar(); jimpil1...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I am trying to do something very simple like asking the user whether he
wants to continue or not (a-la bash). However, sometimes the print
statement is printed
I'll be more blunt than Sean was :-)
Is there a reason why you *must* use Clojure 1.2? If so, what is it?
If there isn't such a reason, you will likely get much better support from
other Clojure users if you use Clojure 1.4 or 1.5.1 (1.5.1 was released a
couple of months ago, so many are still
What you are attempting to do is sometimes called bashing a transient in
place. See these links for some discussion and examples:
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/assoc!
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/dissoc!
Andy
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 3:51 PM,
I have not heard of this before. Wanted to pass on the word in case anyone
was interested in applying. $2000 grand prize, and a chance to speak at a
conference about your project.
http://lispinsummerprojects.org
Andy
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
If the issue is that the GC implementation in Oracle's JVMs typically has a
sequential bottleneck in it with default parameters, then yes, Amdahl's law
is striking *for that GC implementation*.
For problems that are embarassingly parallel (little or no communication or
shared memory between
There may be more relevant or up-to-date links, but do a Google search for
clojure objective c, and you will see this has been discussed a little
bit in this group:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/clojure/6i9D5QOq7Cc
Also, one person started a couple of projects on
on what's going
on?
Thanks
Ray
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 09:51:21 UTC+2, Mond Ray wrote:
Just tried again - using lein repl (clojure 1.4.0) and it worked fine.
It was late - who knows what I did ;-)
Thanks for checking guys.
On Saturday, 20 April 2013 02:37:14 UTC+2, Andy Fingerhut wrote
I fired up a Clojure 1.5.1 REPL, did (require '[clojure.string :as s])
first, then copied and pasted those two function definitions, and did not
get the errors you are seeing. I don't have a good guess why you are
getting those errors. Did you do the require first? What version of
Clojure are
A document that may perhaps contain more than most people want to know
about Clojure = and ==
https://github.com/jafingerhut/thalia/blob/master/doc/other-topics/equality.md
Andy
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
The document on comparator
The description of legal symbols at http://clojure.org/reader could be
somewhat more explicit on this. One could read it to mean that since :m/7
starts with an non-numeric m after the :, it is legal. One could also
infer from it that since within namespace m you could not use :7 (since
that
Since you are dealing with maps, this might not be exactly what you need,
but try it out and tweak it as needed:
(mapcat f coll) = (apply concat (map f coll))
Andy
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:03 AM, rebcabin bc.beck...@gmail.com wrote:
The workarounds seem to be disabling or removing the #= reader macro or
writing my own custom reader (in addition to a custom evaluator).
Disabling #= by binding *read-eval* to false would cause an exception if
such an
I think the general pattern here is equality being a function of _part_ of
the value, but not all of it. For Clojure's = on lists/sequences/vectors,
it is based upon the sequence of values, but not whether it is a list,
sequence, or vector. For Perverse?'s equals it is quite explicit in its
I am seriously considering the idea of working on some extended doc
strings for Clojure functions. Having only scratched the surface so far,
I have learned that it could take a *lot* of hours to write such
documentation for every function distributed as part of Clojure, at least
if written in the
, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com
wrote:
(defn print-regex-my-way [re]
(print #regex )
(pr (str re)))
That might be closer to what you want.
Yes. That does the trick. That extra level of converting the regular
expression to a string does the trick because pr
Up at the top of the page you link to, there is a button labeled Issues
(at least if you are logged in with a free-to-create Github account), and
you can create an issue for this there.
Andy
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Cedric Greevey cgree...@gmail.com wrote:
Look in the Clojure source, file LispReader.java, classes RegexReader and
StringReader for the code that reads strings and regular expressions.
Basically the difference for regular expressions is that since things like
\d to match a single decimal digit, or \s to match a single whitespace
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
However, the first and last example print as:
#a
b
Follow up question:
Is there any way to make (re-pattern a\nb) print as
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm on 1.5.1 and I get that too, but even though:
(pr #a\nb) prints in a sane, readable way
(pr (re-pattern a\nb)) does not.
The latter is what I need to print in a nice way.
Sorry, I missed that fine point.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
When you say a sane, readable way, do you mean human-readable, or
readable via clojure.core/read or clojure.core/read-string?
I
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Paudi Moriarty
pmoria...@annadaletech.comwrote:
IBM JDK 6 is part of the clojure build matrix (though the last stable
build is from over a year ago:
http://build.clojure.org/job/clojure-test-matrix/jdk=IBM%20JDK%201.6/lastStableBuild/
)
I don't have any
I would suggest that the finer points of economical video production and
distribution be discussed further in another forum. I know we started out
on Clojure, but have drifted fairly far afield for a while.
Andy
P.S.: It is OK to go to bed now. http://xkcd.com/386/
--
--
You received this
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Jim - FooBar(); jimpil1...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24/03/13 17:49, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
In this case, making the type immutable is probably encouraged but not
mandatory
yes true, it's not enforced or anything like that, but I'd say it is more
than just
Links to pages where you can file problem reports using JIRA, for Clojure
and all of its contrib libraries (of which tools.logging is one) can be
found here:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#all
You will need to create an account to be able to create a new ticket.
Click
clojure-contrib 1.2.0 probably still compiles reasonably well with Clojure
1.2.0, but since Clojure 1.3.0 support for the older contrib libraries has
been gradually waning.
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Where+Did+Clojure.Contrib+Go
Andy
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Jim - FooBar();
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Marko Topolnik
marko.topol...@gmail.comwrote:
On Monday, March 18, 2013 8:37:19 PM UTC+1, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
this works pretty well, at least better than I expected, e.g.:
user= (def r1 #(\s.))
#'user/r1
user= (def r2 #([abc]))
#'user/r2
user=
On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Taegyoon Kim wrote:
But then(putting RT.init()),
Compiler.load() works, but Console (stderr?) says
No need to call RT.init() anymore
So I think this problem should be fixed.
2013년 3월 13일 수요일 오전 11시 32분 5초 UTC+9, Andy Fingerhut 님의 말:
Yegor Bugayenko
Yegor Bugayenko posted in a comment on ticket CLJ-1172 (
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1172) that calling RT.init() before
Compiler.load() solved what looks like a similar problem for him.
Andy
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Taegyoon Kim stelofl...@gmail.com wrote:
A new error
There is clojure.data/diff, but whether it would work for you would depend on
whether Clojure's = would compare your Java objects for equality in the way
that you wanted. You could try it out on some test case to see.
http://clojure.github.com/clojure/clojure.data-api.html#clojure.data/diff
What OS and version of Java are you using (output of java -version, and if on
Linux lsb_release -a and uname -a).
Are you doing these commands one after another in a single REPL session? If
so, how did you start that REPL?
I've tried the commands you mention on these OS and JDK combos with
I may be wrong, but I think this, and anything else that tries to solve
this problem after read time, will fail for one of the primary uses of
feature macros: Java packages/namespaces that exist for Clojure/JVM but not
ClojureScript, and JavaScript namespaces that exist for ClojureScript but
not
http://jafingerhut.github.com
Note that the doc strings in the tooltips, for those versions of the cheat
sheet with tooltips, are from Clojure 1.5. While most doc strings remained the
same from Clojure 1.4 to 1.5, a few have changed, and reflect new behavior in
Clojure 1.5 that you cannot
As noted in the readme.txt file:
To build locally with Ant:
One-time setup:./antsetup.sh
To build: ant
Clojure has a form of tail recursion using the recur form within loops and
within functions, but it does not do tail calls unless you use the recur form.
I do not
Although the cheat sheet is hosted on clojure.org, I'd hesitate a bit in
inferring from its contents that .indexOf and .lastIndexOf are officially
suggested options. More precise would be to say that when I was updating the
cheatsheet a year ago to add many things that weren't already on
On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Marko Topolnik wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:59:25 PM UTC+1, Isaac Gouy wrote:
(defn blank? [s] (every? #(Character/isWhitespace %) s))
Have you ever wondered about its performance?
No. Why would I wonder about the performance of a one line
I've got a github repo with submissions for the Benchmarks Game web site for
Java and Clojure, with several different Clojure programs for most problems:
https://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-benchmarks
If people would like to submit what they consider idiomatic Clojure programs
for any
On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Marko Topolnik wrote:
On Sunday, February 24, 2013 2:50:01 PM UTC+1, bernardH wrote:
FWIW, I, for one, am really glad that Clojure allows us to select precisely
which nice tools we want (have to) throw away (persistent data structures,
dynamic typing,
On Feb 24, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Marko Topolnik wrote:
Take a look at any of the Common Lisp or Haskell submissions to the Computer
Language Benchmarks Game web site, and you will see some programs that are
nowhere near what people typically write in those languages, and certainly
not what
I believe anyone should be able to create an account at this web site and then
create a ticket. If you have any trouble doing so, let me know.
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJCLR
Andy
On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Frank Hale wrote:
I wanted to report an issue with Clojure-CLR
^objects is a Clojure synonym for ^[Ljava.lang.Object;. Note that there are
such synonyms for only a few Java types, not everything, e.g. there is no
^strings.
What you are hinting is that a1 and a2 are Java arrays of objects. I think
this might speed up (aget a1 i) expressions, since it is
Integer is a boxed integer in Java. It is a full Java Object. The
java.awt.Color constructor you are calling takes 4 primitive int parameters,
not Integer. Try this:
(set! *warn-on-reflection* true)
(def a 1)
(java.awt.Color. (int 0) (int 0) (int (or a 0)) (int 0))
I'm not so sure what you
This won't get you all of the way to Java speeds, or at least it didn't for me,
but try these things:
Use:
(set! *warn-on-reflection* true)
(set! *unchecked-math* true)
The first won't speed anything up, but it will warn you about some things that
are slow.
The second will use unchecked
There's a ticket requesting that enhancement:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-863
Andy
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Denis Washington wrote:
Hi,
I just solved the Replicate a Sequence problem on 4clojure [1] using
interleave. However, I noticed that interleave cannot be called
Jules:
Did you see this page on clojure-doc.org before?
http://clojure-doc.org/articles/tutorials/eclipse.html
I don't know if it covers any of the difficulties you found, or documents
anything that you'd like to see documented, but Michael Klishin and others that
maintain clojure-doc.org
I don't know if it would be within the scope of what GSoC would be interested
in funding, or if anyone would be interested in doing it, but from some of the
messages in the Why is it so hard? thread, there are people interested in
seeing Clooj stay up to date and maintained.
Andy
On Feb 14,
Eric:
1 was a result of a change made by choice:
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#210-set-and-map-constructor-functions-allow-duplicates
The ticket linked there has a link to a design page on it, which in turn has a
link to an earlier discussion thread on the
On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:27 PM, AtKaaZ wrote:
The goal is to can write this form:
= (let [a java.lang.RuntimeException]
(new a)
)
CompilerException java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Unable to resolve
classname: a, compiling:(NO_SOURCE_PATH:2:3)
attempt with macro:
=
On Feb 12, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
Andy Fingerhut writes:
Examples of dangerous side effects that can occur with
clojure.core/read and read-string in Clojure 1.4 and earlier:
;; This causes precious-file.txt to be created if it doesn't
;; exist, or if it does exist, its
On Feb 12, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
Andy Fingerhut writes:
It isn't just clojure.core/read executing code that can consume CPU
cycles that is the issue, it is clojure.core/read executing code that
can wreak havoc with your system and allow attackers to gain remote
control
Following up on the thread *read-eval* vulnerability, I started writing some
documentation for how to read Clojure data safely. That isn't ready yet, but
before I get the time to finish that I wanted to quickly get out a warning that
is obvious to some, but probably not all:
NEVER use
And just in case it gets edited by someone else before you have a chance to
read it, I've copied and pasted the current version below for reference.
Correction/comments/questions all welcome.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
Following up on the thread *read-eval
11, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
And just in case it gets edited by someone else before you have a chance to
read it, I've copied and pasted the current version below for reference.
Correction/comments/questions all welcome.
On Feb 11, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Andy
On Feb 11, 2013, at 6:28 PM, John Fries wrote:
How are people currently handling this situation? Is it part of most
people's clojure/emacs workflow to
1) Just insert the newlines by hand? (perhaps I'm the only one finding
this repetitive)
I find inserting newlines by hand less repetitive
That is nowhere near the Clojure group's 7000+ members, but it is a good start
for only existing since Jan 23.
Don't worry, I won't mention its existence here every 2 weeks. I will in
another 6 months or so, as a note to any new Clojure group members who are
especially interested in
clojure.set/intersection is documented to work on input sets. In Clojure,
all sets are finite. (range) is a lazy sequence, which isn't a set. You could
attempt to make a set out of it with (set (range)), but that won't work because
it will try to consume the entire unending sequence.
I
You can create a ticket for java.jdbc here if you wish that describes the
problem and what you think will fix it. Then any of the 500+ Clojure
contributors can take a shot at fixing it:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/JDBC
Andy
On Feb 5, 2013, at 7:07 PM, a...@bitlimn.com wrote:
Hey
can't be
resolved.
Reflection warning, NO_SOURCE_PATH:29 - reference to field newLine can't be
resolved.
Reflection warning, NO_SOURCE_PATH:20 - reference to field newLine can't be
resolved.
Thanks!
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 4:38:38 PM UTC-5, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
Can you post
Can you post a larger chunk of code for us to examine, perhaps on github or as
a gist if it is over 30 lines of code or so? Many of us have had good success
with eliminating reflection using type hints, so it should be possible to make
it work.
Andy
On Feb 3, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Kanwei Li
I was able to open an X windows emacs session using:
(require '[clojure.java.shell :as sh])
(sh/sh emacs)
on my system. The REPL did not give another prompt until I quit that emacs
invocation. I was able to get another REPL prompt immediately using this:
(future (sh/sh emacs))
Roger, tryclj.com is limited in what it can do. The Clojure code you type in
there is running on the web server across the network from you, not on your own
local machine. That file isn't accessible there.
Also for that reason many symbols are not allowed to be used in tryclj.com
This isn't what you are asking, but I wanted to make a comment that there is a
proposed patch to Clojure attached to ticket CLJ-904 that adds warnings to read
and read-string about how their behavior depends upon the value of *read-eval*:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-904
Also,
Out of curiosity, I made a patch to Clojure that causes the default value of
*read-eval* to be false instead of true, to see if any of the tests pass, and
to let other people try it out in case it breaks things that would be
surprising and/or disruptive. It is attached to this new ticket:
Bug fixed in the forthcoming Clojure 1.5:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-667
% java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main
Clojure 1.5.0-master-SNAPSHOT
user= (try nil (finally (doseq [x (range 10)] (println x
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
nil
Andy
On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:42 AM, nick rothwell
Josiah mentioned requesting a free trial of the ZIng JVM. Did you ever get
access to that, and were able to try your code running on that?
Again, I have no direct experience with their product to guarantee you better
results -- just that I've heard good things about their ability to handle
On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:11 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Anthony Grimes wrote:
In closing, I propose the following. If we're going to continuously deny
people things they are accustomed to, instead of treating them like angry
children having tantrums, why don't we get
I do not know exactly what is going on, but suspect it is something to do with
conversion between float and double (or Java Float and Double).
Try replacing the argument 19.1 with each of these possibilities, and you
should see what I mean:
(double 19.1)
(Double. 19.1)
(float 19.1)
(Float
CLJ-1098 fix committed to Clojure master today as part of 1.5.0-RC3:
http://build.clojure.org/job/clojure/changes
Andy
On Jan 14, 2013, at 4:24 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 08:15 -0800, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
The CLJ-1098 ticket was categorized as a minor
An interest was expressed by a few in having a separate ClojureScript mailing
list.
If it is a Google group, that requires moderating messages sent to the group,
via manual approval. I suspect early on there will be many people posting to
the group for the first time that have long worked
., then it is not welcome
on the ClojureScript group. Please send it to the Clojure group instead.
If it is not specific to any one flavor of Clojure, but you prefer to send it
to the ClojureScript group, go right ahead, but realize that your audience may
be smaller than if you send it to the Clojure group.
Andy
Michael, I would also love it if bugs got fixed in master more quickly. I've
done some things to try to make that happen, but for all I know I've only
exacerbated the issue. I'm still searching for ways to improve that.
One thing I know at the base of all such suggestions is: I am not going
On Jan 21, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 12:20, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
If one wanted *slightly* more editorial control of what appeared
in those doc strings, they could publish a not-very-large file of
new improved doc strings and make a macro like doc and cdoc
Yes, those things can happen, but I think they can all be handled without big
troubles. Note that Rich Morin specifically mentioned using something like
codeq to notice when particular functions change, and thus their documentation
bears re-examining. diff also works, at a file granularity
There currently is such testing of patches submitted to Clojure, which I've
implemented with some Clojure programs I've cooked up. It tests all patches
attached to Clojure JIRA tickets to see if they apply cleanly and whether the
code compiles and passes existing unit tests. I've been
On Jan 20, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Anthony Grimes wrote:
In closing, I propose the following. If we're going to continuously deny
people things they are accustomed to, instead of treating them like angry
children having tantrums, why don't we get a response from clojure/core and
have it
On Jan 18, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andy Fingerhut
andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue that Clojure, its contrib libraries, and ClojureScript do not
accept github pull requests has been brought up several times before on this
email list
Irakli:
I am curious about the possibility of auto-creating patches from git pull
requests, in case that would bridge the divide between people that would prefer
submitting pull requests, and Clojure screeners that would prefer evaluating
patches and JIRA tickets.
Causing a new git pull
This issue appears to be unique to using a Leiningen version 2 REPL.
It does not occur if using java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main to get a REPL,
nor with Leiningen version 1.7.1.
CCing nrepl developer Chas Emerick in case this might be an issue with nrepl,
but I haven't attempted to localize
The issue that Clojure, its contrib libraries, and ClojureScript do not accept
github pull requests has been brought up several times before on this email
list in the past. Feel free to search the Google group for terms like pull
request. Short answer: Rich Hickey prefers a workflow of
is affected,
though.
- Chas
On Jan 18, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
This issue appears to be unique to using a Leiningen version 2 REPL.
It does not occur if using java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main to get a
REPL, nor with Leiningen version 1.7.1.
CCing nrepl developer Chas
Looks nice.
Have you considered submitting pages like these to the clojure-doc.org site? I
don't know if Michael Klishin would be interested in this material, but it
certainly wouldn't be out of place there if he was willing to take it.
There is a much shorter list of examples here that I
java.jdbc is one of several Clojure contrib libraries, others of which you can
see listed in the two places below:
https://github.com/clojure
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Where+Did+Clojure.Contrib+Go
They are like Clojure in that they are released under the same Eclipse Public
I have no inside information on whether it is an oversight or a conscious
design decision, but there are other possibilities besides those two.
The CLJ-1098 ticket was categorized as a minor enhancement when it was created.
Defects (i.e. bugs) are considered with higher priority.
Also Clojure
Ticket with patch submitted:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1143
Andy
On Jan 10, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
yes
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 11:32:41 AM UTC-5, wujek@gmail.com wrote:
The documentation of clojure.core/ns says nearly to the end of its
On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:37 AM, wujek.sru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I am currently learning clojure, which is a nice experience, but you all
know that.
I have question about certain metadata definitions, which I couldn't find a
straight answer to on the net, and in none of the books I'm
Is there any chance a patch to remove all the obsolete :static keywords from
Clojure's core.clj would be accepted? Or perhaps there isn't much point in
doing so?
I've removed :static as an example keyword in the Metadata section of the
latest Clojure cheatsheet published here:
For most of the documentation on clojure.org, only a few people have
authorization to modify it. You could create a JIRA ticket suggesting a change
here:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ
Such tickets can take anywhere from a few days to many months before someone
acts upon them,
I don't know the history of the answer to why, except perhaps as hinted by
Evan's answer, which is that it becomes implicit how to combine the results of
the multiple values to get the final true/false for the if condition. You
imply and, which is a perfectly reasonable choice.
My main reason
:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:45:50PM -0800, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
Are there no other RPMs that require Internet access to complete their
build?
e.g. no others that use Maven to pull in dependencies before building?
Dependencies should be solved by the specification of BuildRequires
On Dec 23, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Were any breaking changes made between alpha3 and RC1? I haven't spent much
time trying to track down causes so it's very possible I'm mistaken, but I
seem to be running into some weird behavior under RC1.
Specifically, seem to be
interpose and str should still work, but clojure.string/join might be slightly
more concise.
Andy
On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
I found an older article from Oct 2011, but what is currently the best way to
build a statement like this?
[select question_id,
, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am not saying that one would *have* to give up O(1) subvec in order to
support other operations.
I am guessing, without having done a thorough analysis, that an O(log n)
subvec based on RRB Trees would make most
If you don't get a flood of responses, I think it is because in this thread and
the one linked earlier that Leon Adler started, several different people have
explained evidence that Clojure on the JVM has had active development for five
years, it is open source, and no one knows of any evidence
501 - 600 of 890 matches
Mail list logo
