We're going to bring Confluence down for maintenance. This will start
at 9pm Eastern. I anticipate it should only be down for less than 30
minutes.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
This maintenance has finished.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Christopher Redinger redin...@gmail.comwrote:
We're going to bring Confluence down for maintenance. This will start
at 9pm Eastern. I anticipate it should only be down for less than 30
minutes.
--
You received this message
Clojure/core wants to take our training course on the road this summer! We
are looking for the cities that are the most interested in learning more
about Clojure so we can bring our training there. I've posted more details
about the roadshow on our blog, at:
I've created a new page in Confluence with questions from the application.
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Google+Summer+of+Code+2012+Application+Questions
If some people can take a pass at getting answers posted to those
questions, I can submit the application this week.
Also needed:
Core has not submitted the application. The application process just opened
Monday and goes until March 9th. There have been some leaders among
Clojure/dev that have stepped up to organize things. Keep
watching http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Google+Summer+of+Code+2012
for more
Over 50 new CAs have been signed. If you have signed one, you should see
your name on this list: http://clojure.org/contributing.
Thanks everybody!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Thursday, November 3, 2011 3:46:40 PM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
Any thoughts about when / where these events can take place? Is it
possible to get access to a projector? Or do we have to fend for ourselves?
We have modified the contract with the hotel to keep the projector in the
main
On Friday, November 4, 2011 9:16:08 PM UTC-4, Fogus wrote:
At this point it would be great if a Conj-planning heavyweight could
step in and provide some additional ideas... although solutions would
be great too. :-)
Oh, I guess that's me.
See the
-Mannschott
Benjamin Teuber
Brian Hurt
Chas Emerick
Chouser
Christophe Grand
Christopher Redinger
Colin Jones
Cosmin Stejerean
Daniel Solano Gómez
David Miller
David Powell
David Rupp
Fogus
George Jahad
Jason Wolfe
Juha Arpiainen
Justin Balthrop
Kevin Downey
Luke
Clojure 1.3 RC0 is now available at http://clojure.org/downloads
Changes since Beta 3:
* Optimization should not demote BigInts (CLJ-836)
* Added Intrinsics
* fix nary-inline so *unchecked-math* works again
Please download it and let us know how it works for you. 1.3 is getting
close.
--
You
On Thursday, September 8, 2011 5:36:17 PM UTC-4, Brian Marick wrote:
I'd be willing to do the implementation work to allow us to run this
experiment at the Conj during after-hours or other hacking time. I'd need to
know there were interested participants and someone from the Conj
Clojure 1.3 Beta 3 is now available at
http://clojure.org/downloads
The list of changes:
* Load resources when baseLoader() is null (CLJ-673)
* Equiv overload added for primitive booleans
* Documentation updates for juxt and defrecord (CLJ-815, CLJ-736
respectively)
We think this is ready to
I checked in a change this morning that fixes this.
On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:25:54 AM UTC-4, Mark McGranaghan wrote:
On Jul 28, 4:50 pm, Anthony Grimes discip...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh! I apologize. I was replying via the google interface and didn't
realize
it wasn't quoting.
Clojure 1.3 Beta 2 is now available at
http://clojure.org/downloads
The list of changes:
* clojure.test/*/*-report vars made dynamic for use with external
tools.
* Calls favor arg vectors :tag over var :tag (CLJ-811)
* BigInt ops made faster when values are small enough to be treated
Call For Speakers
Clojure/conj 2011
Raleigh, NC
Nov 10-12th, 2011
http://clojure-conj.org
This is a reminder that the Call for Speakers for the second annual
Clojure/conj is ending soon - August 19th at midnight Eastern to be exact!
We would still love to receive your abstracts for this
On Friday, August 12, 2011 2:42:04 PM UTC-4, Christopher Redinger wrote:
Speakers will receive:
* A catered speakers dinner on Thursday night.
Correction: Wednesday night.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group
In case you missed the announcement streamed from this evening's NYC Clojure
Group.
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
Clojure to JS compiler. Power of Clojure. Reach of JavaScript.
Please use this Clojure mailing list for ClojureScript discussion.
We plan to have a recording of
I am also on Google+
https://plus.google.com/u/1/103589339577092342191
Please freel free to add me to you Clojure circles.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 1:14:20 PM UTC-4, Tassilo Horn wrote:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No distinct mapping found
at clojure.core$min_hash.invoke (core.clj:5805)
Can you supply a small example where this is happening?
For reference, this code that failed in alpha6:
user=
On Saturday, May 14, 2011 7:21:06 PM UTC-4, Praki wrote:
bit-clear documentation doesn't explicitly state that index is zero-
based but I would think so. Alpha7 seems to have broken this function.
Thanks, I've created CLJ-795 and put it into Release.next.
On Sunday, May 15, 2011 8:34:06 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
I'm not on alpha7 yet, but what about (case 49 1 'string 49 'int)?
1 hashes to 49, so there's a hash collision.
user= (case 49 1 'string 49 'int)
int
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
).
If you are the kind of person who used to track master by building
from source, but no longer do so because you are using maven or
leiningen, alpha releases are for you.
Christopher Redinger
Clojure/core
http://clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
.
Christopher Redinger
Clojure/core
http://clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post
Hi Bruno,
Unless Rich has received your CA within the past couple weeks, I would say
he never received it.
The compete list of CAs that he is received (within the past couple weeks)
is here:
http://clojure.org/contributing
I'm assuming you sent it to the PO Box listed? Did you do anything
We've got a good start to the list going
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Clojure+Success+Stories
Any more we should get listed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
ch...@rubedoinc.com wrote:
Rubedo, inc.
14580 Beltwood Pkwy E Suite 103
Farmers Branch, TX 75244
When: 630PM Monday May 2nd
What: Clojure Interest Group
Topic: 1st meeting, what our goals are, and how to take over the world
with Clojure
Hi Chris! Thanks for offering to host the group.
the description. We'll gather this
information post the results here as a one-stop place to send people that
want the answer to this question.
I'll update that page as I receive info.
--
Christopher Redinger
http://clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
If you are interested in speaking at this year's Clojure Conj, please send us
your talk ideas!
Visit http://clojure-conj.org for more details.
--
Christopher Redinger
http://clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post
again this year!
--
Christopher Redinger
http://clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first
1.3. If you are in the camp of not caring what the next version
number is, then you do not have a strong objection. I.e. you are not morally
opposed.
On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Christopher Redinger wrote:
As you can see on the Release.Next Planning page [1], there is an open
question about
://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Release.Next+Planning
--
Christopher Redinger
http://clojure.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
Hey all!
Just wanted to announce that we have formed TriClojure, the Triangle
Clojure Users Group. Tomorrow night, Jan 11th, we are co-hosting with
TriFunc a talk from Clojure/core member Aaron Bedra title Building
Analytics with Incanter Compojure. If you are in the area, please
drop by the
32 matches
Mail list logo
