Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Shoot, that was not the link I meant. I meant: http://clojure.org/community/contributing_site On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 4:33:14 PM UTC-5, Alex Miller wrote: > > Well there's a whole page about it at the link mentioned in the message > below - https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site > > I

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Well there's a whole page about it at the link mentioned in the message below - https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site I also have an outstanding ticket to add a link from every page to the source file in the footer. I think that will be sufficient. On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 4:24:59 PM

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Alex - I could not find a link to the Clojure.org github project on the clojure.org site. Should one be added under "Contributing" somewhere? Alan On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45:06 AM UTC-8, Alex Miller wrote: > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

It’s probably just me but I always think tech companies that don’t do SSL reflects badly on them, like they couldn’t be bothered :-). Can’t really justify that prejudice, but anyways, glad this is working now. (There is also

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

You can now access https://clojure.org, thanks for the push. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 2:25:42 PM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > Noted, I will bump it up the priority list. > > On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 1:49:55 PM UTC-6, Laurens Van Houtven > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Jan 14, 2016,

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Reid, Thanks for the explanation - I did not realize the differences. I've been landing on clojuredocs primarily due to page rank but will be sure to include/check grimoire because I want/need the enhanced doc strings. Terseness is great when you are an expert but I'm not there yet and can still

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Grimoire was originally built to replace ClojureDocs when it had been inactive for some time, and as it turns out mere months prior to the big update which is now live. That I continue to operate Grimoire now that ClojureDocs has been updated is I suppose competition at some level. Yes

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Reid, thanks very much for the explanation, and thanks for all of the work. Knowing that the docstrings may be different on Grimoire is very helpful. On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 1:54:48 PM UTC-6, Reid McKenzie wrote: > > Grimoire was originally built to replace ClojureDocs when it had been

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Have you considered linking to or embedding Rich Hickeys videos "Clojure for Java programmers", "Clojure for Lisp programmers" and "Clojure data structures"? When I was learning the language they served as excellent introductory material and among facts really conveyed a "feeling" for the

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Hum... if this is true it's because I've diverged from Andy's cheatsheet builds and haven't synced back up. Grimoire has 1.7 content and will promptly support 1.8. Looking into this. Reid On 01/15/2016 02:36 PM, Mars0i wrote: > I like the new look a lot. Thanks. > > One comment: The cheatsheet

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Actually, I was using an old version of the cheatsheet and have updated. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Reid McKenzie wrote: > Hum... if this is true it's because I've diverged from Andy's cheatsheet > builds and haven't synced back up. Grimoire has 1.7 content and will

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

That this is an afterthought I suppose indicates my priorities, but if you have particular complaints about the present design of Grimoire I'd be delighted to hear them over on the bugtracker [1]. I'm well aware that Grimoire lacks some amount of UI/web N+1 polish, however as I'm no UI/UX expert

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Okay. Thanks for the quick reply Alex. Reid On 01/18/2016 05:39 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > Actually, I was using an old version of the cheatsheet and have updated. > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Reid McKenzie > wrote: > > Hum... if

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 6:24:06 PM UTC-6, Reid McKenzie wrote: > > That this is an afterthought I suppose indicates my priorities, but if you > have particular complaints about the present design of Grimoire I'd be > delighted to hear them over on the bugtracker [1]. I'm well aware that

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

On Friday, January 15, 2016 at 2:36:46 PM UTC-6, Mars0i wrote: > > I like the new look a lot. Thanks. > > One comment: The cheatsheet now links to Grimoire pages that seem to be > for Clojure 1.6.0. The old default cheatsheet linked to ClojureDocs, which > looks better and includes a few more

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

I think another useful way to look at the issue that Alan brings up is to view it as a top down vs bottom up approach to learning the language. The site favors a top down approach, leading with the rationale and concepts rather than examples that can act like hooks that encourage the reader to

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

The site does does not have any "learning" material at all. The material on the existing site is intended to be authoritative reference material, written by Rich (or in a few cases me). We will add more learning / getting started material - this is definitely the biggest gap in the existing site

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

I like the new look a lot. Thanks. One comment: The cheatsheet now links to Grimoire pages that seem to be for Clojure 1.6.0. The old default cheatsheet linked to ClojureDocs, which looks better and includes a few more useful features, such as links to related functions and to the source.

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

+1 Looks good. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Bozhidar Batsov wrote: > Great work! This was long overdue, but I'm extremely happy we made this > solid first step! > > On 15 January 2016 at 04:11, Eunmin Kim wrote: > >> Great!! >> >> -- >> You

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Great job everyone! I really like the layout and the color scheme, very pleasing to the eye and professional looking. My *only* constructive comment is that a total newbie landing on clojure.org is faced with a lot of reading when maybe they should be presented with super basic code examples,

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Very nice! Good job all. On 14 January 2016 at 15:45, Alex Miller wrote: > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a > new shinier package). However, the site is now sourced from the public repo > at

[ANN] New clojure.org!

The new http://clojure.org is alive! Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a new shinier package). However, the site is now sourced from the public repo at https://github.com/clojure/clojure-site and is open for contribution. Contributions (via pull request)

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

t <clojure@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> Reply-To: Clojure Mailing List <clojure@googlegroups.com> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45 AM To: Clojure Mailing List <clojure@googlegroups.com> Subject: [ANN] New clojure.org! The new

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

m > <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>> on behalf of Alex Miller > <a...@puredanger.com <mailto:a...@puredanger.com>> > Reply-To: Clojure Mailing List <clojure@googlegroups.com > <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>> > Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45 AM > To: Cl

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

The new website is great ! Cheers, Jeremy. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:08:41 PM UTC+1, Colin Yates wrote: > > +1 this is really great. > > > On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:07, Stephen Gilardi > wrote: > > > > +1 great fresh look and process! > > > >> On Jan 14, 2016, at

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Great!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Awesome! Every time - every single time - I've ever pulled up the api docs in a browser, for a split second I feel a tinge of embarrassment to be part of a community that has a language this good but a docs site that *#@&$#!& bad. The new site is a quantum leap forward. Everyone involved take

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

New site looks great! I feel like https://clojuredocs.org should be added to the community resources. Personally, it's my main reference website, and it has been extremely helpful. I'm sure it will be for other people too. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 9:45:06 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote:

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

ng List <clojure@googlegroups.com> > Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45 AM > To: Clojure Mailing List <clojure@googlegroups.com> > Subject: [ANN] New clojure.org! > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is the same co

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Great work! This was long overdue, but I'm extremely happy we made this solid first step! On 15 January 2016 at 04:11, Eunmin Kim wrote: > Great!! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Amazing. I really like the clean and minimalistic design. Congratulations! On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 4:45:06 PM UTC+1, Alex Miller wrote: > > The new http://clojure.org is alive! > > Most of the content on the site is the same content as before (but in a > new shinier package). However,

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Noted, I will bump it up the priority list. On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 1:49:55 PM UTC-6, Laurens Van Houtven wrote: > > Hi, > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > > The clojure.org has never, and does not now, support https. It is an > entirely static

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Hi Ritchie, There are actually two different places where "resources" exist (just a by-product of the transition into the new structure really): - http://clojure.org/guides/getting_started - has a ton of things at the end, including clojuredocs - http://clojure.org/community/resources - more

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

y-To: Clojure Mailing List <clojure@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>> >> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 7:45 AM >> To: Clojure Mailing List <clojure@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com>> >> Subject: [ANN

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

+1 this is really great. > On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:07, Stephen Gilardi wrote: > > +1 great fresh look and process! > >> On Jan 14, 2016, at 11:01 AM, Marc O'Morain wrote: >> >> Very nice! Good job all. > > -- > You received this message because you are

Re: [ANN] New clojure.org!

Long overdue, and an excellent start. I hope to squeeze in some time to provide some contributions! On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Alex Miller wrote: > Hi Ritchie, > > There are actually two different places where "resources" exist (just a > by-product of the transition