On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Alyssa Kwan wrote:
> Yes, but why isn't persistence of closures generating more
> interest. ;)
>
> Persistence is "solved", if you're OK with not being truly ACID...
>
> Seriously though, everyone has their own backends. I don't think
> anyone wants to be tied to
Yes, but why isn't persistence of closures generating more
interest. ;)
Persistence is "solved", if you're OK with not being truly ACID...
Seriously though, everyone has their own backends. I don't think
anyone wants to be tied to BDB JE.
Would there be interest in lazy-loading and -unloading
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mark wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm surprised your work doesn't generate more interest from folks. I
> wish I had more time, I would definitely jump in and help.
Persistence doesn't seem to generate much interest in general. I
posted my own stab at a way of persisting the
Hi -
I'm surprised your work doesn't generate more interest from folks. I
wish I had more time, I would definitely jump in and help.
On Nov 24, 3:37 pm, Alyssa Kwan wrote:
> Extension
> ofhttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/7c917e983...
>
> Hi everyone!
>
> I've extende
Extension of
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/7c917e983f345723/a7ee771a7bcaaefc
Hi everyone!
I've extended the Clojure core to extend durability to functions and
closures.
1. Functions with lexical and dynamic bindings are now supported. This
includes functions that g
