On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Ken Wesson kwess...@gmail.com wrote:
Under 2) would be a guide for setting up Emacs (immediately divided
into Mac, Windows, Linux). At the end would be a list of alternative
options: Eclipse, Netbeans, IntelliJ, etc.
No.
No, no, no, no, no!
That will kill
Hi Aaron Bedra,
Thanks for your quick response. Sorry I could not get back to you with the
information you asked for sooner..
I am using
user *clojure-version*
{:major 1, :minor 2, :incremental 1, :qualifier }
My project.clj is as follows...
(defproject bitvector 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
here is the list of jar files in my lib directory
github@eagle ~/bitvector/lib#tree
.
|-- clj-iterate-0.95-20110417.030036-2.jar
|-- clojure-1.2.1.jar
|-- clojure-contrib-1.2.0.jar
`-- dev
|-- cdt-1.2.6.1-20110417.030036-6.jar
|-- clojure-1.2.1.jar
|-- clojure-contrib-1.2.0.jar
Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Sean,
If you specify the Sonatype snapshots repository, you can pull nightly
builds:
:repositories { sonatype { :url
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots; } }
:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure 1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT]]
I do not think we should attempt a recommended IDE (not even Clooj).
We should offer a path for all existing IDEs / editors.
...
Use an editor not listed here? Try Clooj
(i.e., use this as a simple catch-all if we haven't covered what you
already used today).
That's one way of
On Jul 23, 4:06 pm, Dmitry Gutov raa...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahem.
Here is a more idiomatic version that runs under half a second, no
annotations required.
I did that from the beginning, but as I really needed 4e6 and not 1e5
elements, that map got very big. And I didn't remember the argument to
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:28 AM, pmbauer paul.michael.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on clooj.
One click and you have a working build environment, REPL, and REPL-aware
editor.
https://github.com/downloads/arthuredelstein/clooj/clooj-0.1.5-standalone.jar
This URL is somewhat unfortunate. For some
Yep, Github URLs suck like that.
FWIW this is probably close what you're looking for:
https://github.com/arthuredelstein/clooj/downloads
Ambrose
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
ClojureScript release has changed things now and I guess that getting
started with ClojureScript will probably change as it gets closer to a
release. But anyway, I suggest a getting started page along these lines:
* *Meet Clojure*
- Try Clojure online http://try-clojure.org/ or on your
I just thought - Java Webstart based clooj direct from try-clojure.org.
Mark
On 25/07/2011, at 6:51 PM, pmbauer wrote:
For usability, nothing beats the single-click. In seconds, Clooj gives her a
one-stop-shop.
So I see Clooj as something worth putting right along with try-clojure.org.
It
Oracle announced/talked about Nashorn at the recent JVM Languages summit, this
is an Invoke Dynamic based Javascript runtime which is (aiming) for inclusion
in JDK8.
I do so hope however that someone manages to pull that out for a lets run this
NOW on Java 7 as that would be a great
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:51 PM, pmbauer paul.michael.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
But think of the casual dev wanting to know what Clojure and a typical
Clojure toolchain can do for her ASAP.
I find it hard to imagine a casual dev that doesn't already have a
preferred editor - but I'm certainly not
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
The only issue is that with the
repo above, version ranges don't work. If I say
:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure [1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT,)]]
Your Maven-fu is far off the scale - I didn't even know that kind of
I just thought - Java Webstart based clooj direct from try-clojure.org.
On 25/07/2011, at 6:51 PM, pmbauer wrote:
For usability, nothing beats the single-click. In seconds, Clooj gives her a
one-stop-shop.
So I see Clooj as something worth putting right along with try-clojure.org.
It not
On 24 Jul 2011, at 23:10, Eric Lavigne wrote:
Also, look for a recent post by Peter Taoussanis. It sounds like he has come
up with a very good workflow for ClojureScript development.
That certainly looks very interesting and exactly the kind of thing I was
looking for.
Also, with respect
On 25 July 2011 09:41, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:51 PM, pmbauer paul.michael.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
That's why I would give Clooj some prominence rather than burying it at the
bottom of the decision tree.
Well, then put it at the top with
* *Meet Clojure*
That's also an upcoming book on Clojure:
http://meetclj.raynes.me/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
Absolutely nothing to add to the argument as such except to say that I am
quite surprised at the level of resistance to James' thread. I can see the
argument if this was the 'dev' mailing list.
I have been reading this mailing list for a long while now (even if I
haven't contributed much to it)
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
Absolutely nothing to add to the argument as such except to say that I am
quite surprised at the level of resistance to James' thread. I can see the
argument if this was the 'dev' mailing list.
I have been reading this
Clojure 1.2.1 here.
4e6 takes about 10 seconds, the process uses ~500Mb of RAM. `lein
repl` is fine with that.
Python takes 5, but that's acceptable difference, I think, considering
we're talking immutable vs mutable here.
If you still have the old code, I'd like to take a look.
On Jul 25,
Clojure newcomer here, but here's the thought that's frontmost in my
mind about ClojureScript...
I'm used to Clojure as a language that's solidly spot-welded to the
JVM and the Java libraries. Just as [1 2 3] is legal portable
Clojure code, so is (.start (Thread. #(...))) despite it being a
Right, Rich, please allow me to reply to the points you mentioned; I
declined from doing so last night as I sensed some unintentionally
irritated feelings, which I hope have eased a bit by now. I believe
all my posts in this discussion are purely technical concerns and I
believe them to be
On Jul 25, 7:51 am, cljneo cljneoph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have started reading about ClojureScript and Closure and had some
questions which I am sure will eventually be answered as I move along.
But I am too eager to know now so I thought of asking instead of
waiting.
- On page 2 of
On Jul 24, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 1:11 PM, bernardH
un.compte.pour.tes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2:30 pm, Chas Emerick cemer...@snowtide.com wrote:
You should be using 1.3.0-beta1 of Clojure 1.3 -- anything with
-master-SNAPSHOT is woefully out
On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:47 AM, Sean Corfield wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
The only issue is that with the
repo above, version ranges don't work. If I say
:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure [1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT,)]]
Your Maven-fu
Type annotations are used at compile time to generate direct method
calls (as opposed to using reflection).
`cast` is a function, so it doesn't do anything until runtime, and it
just delegates to Class#cast.
I don't think it is used much. In the core, it's only called in single-
arity cases for *
In the middle of what? I look at ClojureScript code and it looks like
Clojure to me. Google Closure is under, and it is no more annoying
there than Java is under Clojure - an implementation detail, and a
rich source of production-quality code.
I respectfully dispute that; for what they
With clojurescript just launched, I thought there might be some
interest in this podcast by Scott Hanselman.
JavaScript is Assembly Language for the Web -
http://www.hanselminutes.com/default.aspx?showID=294
Some discussion regarding the podcast.
I just thought - Java Webstart based clooj direct from try-clojure.org.
On 25/07/2011, at 6:51 PM, pmbauer wrote:
For usability, nothing beats the single-click. In seconds, Clooj gives her a
one-stop-shop.
So I see Clooj as something worth putting right along with try-clojure.org.
It not
Also, with respect to the lack of ability to interact with the browser
directly through the REPL or editor like with emacs-swank-slime, is it fair
to assume that this is just due to the current implementation being
Rhino-based? Also ClojureScript doesn't support eval, I'm assuming
Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Sean,
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
The only issue is that with the repo above, version ranges don't
work. If I say
:dependencies [[org.clojure/clojure [1.3.0-master-SNAPSHOT,)]]
Your Maven-fu
Oracle announced/talked about Nashorn at the recent JVM Languages summit,
this is an Invoke Dynamic based Javascript runtime which is (aiming) for
inclusion in JDK8.
I do so hope however that someone manages to pull that out for a lets run
this NOW on Java 7 as that would be a great
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Sam Aaron samaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, with respect to the lack of ability to interact with the browser
directly through the REPL or editor like with emacs-swank-slime, is it fair
to assume that this is just due to the current implementation being
Colin,
I don't think anyone responding was doing so with the mindset of my way or
the highway and we must defend the great leader's achievements. Speaking
for myself, I responded to an argument that did not make sense, that
argument being basically: Crockford says javascript can be written a
I'd say Google Closure/Libray is more idiomatic JavaScript than jQuery;
jQuery is more sugary and has a different feel to it.
I like jQuery, but I completely see why that is not a the most optimal base
to build on when something like Google Closure exists. Rich mentioned,
however, that people
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Mark Rathwell mark.rathw...@gmail.com wrote:
Colin,
I don't think anyone responding was doing so with the mindset of my way or
the highway and we must defend the great leader's achievements. Speaking
for myself, I responded to an argument that did not make
There is some small mentions about mobile around Clojurescript.
What is the plan for Mobile integration?
Why wouldn't Clojure be a better fit on the androidplatform? (performance
and build problems aside)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
Yes. And somebody said that Java is the assembly language of the JVM. So
true.
Frank.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jimmy jimmy.co...@gmail.com wrote:
With clojurescript just launched, I thought there might be some
interest in this podcast by Scott Hanselman.
JavaScript is Assembly
On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
On 25 July 2011 09:41, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:51 PM, pmbauer paul.michael.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
That's why I would give Clooj some prominence rather than burying it at the
bottom of the
Except for the fact that it is categorically wrong, it's some
intuition behind the statement that might be valid.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Frank Gerhardt
f...@gerhardtinformatics.com wrote:
Yes. And somebody said that Java is the assembly language of the JVM. So
true.
Frank.
On Mon,
Hi Peter,
I would also love to know how you set this up in a little more detail. It
really sounds like an excellent approach…
Sam
---
http://sam.aaron.name
On 25 Jul 2011, at 05:46, FL wrote:
On Jul 24, 1:44 pm, Peter Taoussanis ptaoussa...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I am, literally,
On Jul 25, 7:54 pm, James Keats james.w.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Best regards; love you, man, and sorry again for any misunderstanding
or unintended miscommunication.
My humble suggestion is when you find yourself in your 5th or 6th
paragraph of an opinion piece there's a reasonable chance what
+1 - I think an etiquette document needs to be written.
On 25 July 2011 15:10, Steve stephen.a.lind...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 25, 7:54 pm, James Keats james.w.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Best regards; love you, man, and sorry again for any misunderstanding
or unintended miscommunication.
This could be the same issue that Kevin Baribeau has found with
clojure.contrib.profile here:
https://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/pull/2#issuecomment-1385392
(Yes, we know he needs a CA, etc. - he mentions requesting assembla access
before closing that pull request.)
TL;DR - might
James,
The reason you are experiencing resistance is because you are
proposing changes to things that will never change. Rich came up with
the Rationale before designing ClojureScript and long before writing
any code. All of the design work was informed by this. You are arguing
that there should
Is there a documented way to get ClojureScript working on Windows?
While I'm familiar with Linux, and use it in several server
environments, all my development is on Windows, so I don't really have
access to a Linux box for development.
Timothy
--
“One of the main causes of the fall of the
I've gotten the basics working. Haven't had the time to write up a full blog
post, though. Basically I used Cygwin so that I could run the bootstrap
script. In any of the shell scripts where it sets a classpath you'll have to
change the colons to semicolons.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:59 AM,
Also, VirtualBox (http://www.virtualbox.org/) is free, if you were
interested in linux for some development.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Tamreen Khan histor...@gmail.com wrote:
I've gotten the basics working. Haven't had the time to write up a full
blog post, though. Basically I used
From an historic perspective it's absolutely right. It happened in the past
already.
When you end up writing thousands of lines of code to achieve what should
be a simple objective and you need assistance from sophisticated tools to
get the task done, it means that the language used is at a very
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:19 AM, James Keats james.w.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Google Closure is too Java. It's not idiomatic JavaScript. I find it
disappointing that rather than porting from a functional language like
Clojure straight to another functional language like Javascript, the
google
So, you could use ClojureScript and jQuery to write a snappy little
demo and prove to everyone the value of that approach. I'm sure I'm
not the only one that would be interested in seeing such a demo.
I think Rich's point in his talk is good to re-iterate here. Is jQuery
cool? Yes! I would
- On page 2 of the Closure book, there is a workflow figure on using
the Closure tools, how would ClojureScript change this workflow? It
would be great to post such a modified diagram to the closure wiki.
Some quick notes on this:
1) calcdeps.py and the compiler are taken care of for you by
How about making the main suggestion be clooj instead, with emacs,
eclipse, netbeans in the list of alternative options? :)
Sounds like consensus around Clooj. Released on July 18th, top option
on July 25th! Things move at lightspeed around here
The one thing I want to say about Emacs is
It will be a only a matter of time before people realize it doesn't
matter whether jQuery integrates or not. The examples/blog posts
coming out already are spectacular.
On Jul 24, 1:44 pm, Peter Taoussanis ptaoussa...@gmail.com wrote:
Just want to throw in on this real quick. I am -dumbfounded-
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Chas Emerick cemer...@snowtide.com wrote:
(I think the only useful artifacts at build.clojure.org that aren't in
central already are old versions of clojure-contrib (1.0.0 and 1.1.0 AFAICT).
Is that what's keeping build.clojure.org/* in Leiningen's default
Hi,
today I've been working on cljs-devmode:
https://github.com/maxweber/cljs-devmode
It is a really primitive prototype of a development mode for
ClojureScript. For an explanation take a look at the README on the
GitHub repo. I'm in a hurry so I'm going to continue the work on cljs-
devmode
And then goodbye statical analysis ... :-)
2011/7/20 Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 20. Juli 2011 06:38:27 UTC+2 schrieb Chas Emerick:
Try:
(ns myfuns
(:require
(foo.baz [a :as a]
[b :as b]
[c :as c]))
I think he wants more
+1 to writing an etiquette document. I have to confess I wrote a long
post a few weeks ago without realizing these sorts of posts belonged
on blogs (it was, oddly enough, another James Keats thread, on the
subject of Steve Yegge. I figured if \Yegge writes long blogs).
I didn't intend to
Rich, the pseudo class model with the new keyword is a syntactic
obfuscation, semantically javascript is prototypical inheritance. It's
class free. In addition to the pseudo class inheritance advocated by
google closure and the prototypical inherent in javascript, others
like Doug Crockford
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:59 PM, nchurch nchubr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to writing an etiquette document. I have to confess I wrote a long
post a few weeks ago without realizing these sorts of posts belonged
on blogs
Not everyone *has* a blog, you know.
Ken was helpful to me then when he
Fair point, but Rhino doesn't always have the correct semantics.
For example, one common JS idiom for default params:
eval(undefined || 2 + 2) = returns true instead of 4
But mostly, Rhino is just a JS engine with no DOM, so is less than ideal for
browser UI development.
I do so hope
nchurch, I arrest you, try you, and find you guilty of the heinous
charge of top-posting, thou knave, thou scum, thou waster of
bandwidth!
I confess that I have erred and strayed from thy ways like a lost
sheep
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, nchurch nchubr...@gmail.com wrote:
nchurch, I arrest you, try you, and find you guilty of the heinous
charge of top-posting, thou knave, thou scum, thou waster of
bandwidth!
I confess that I have erred and strayed from thy ways like a lost
sheep
For
Salut Laurent,
Am 25.07.2011 um 18:54 schrieb Laurent PETIT:
And then goodbye statical analysis ... :-)
I didn't say, that I think it's a good idea to do this. :)
On the other hand I'm not afraid of dynamic analysis either. That's what
VimClojure does at the moment anyway. Static analysis is
On 25 Jul 2011, at 17:33, Max Weber wrote:
Hi,
today I've been working on cljs-devmode:
https://github.com/maxweber/cljs-devmode
It is a really primitive prototype of a development mode for
ClojureScript. For an explanation take a look at the README on the
GitHub repo. I'm in a hurry
IMO, it's a very good idea to give much more accent on the easiest options
for newcomers.
Other than not recommending Emacs, do people think that the overall
organization I suggested is a good idea? I should reiterate that
other information needs to be accessible; for now I'd just like to see
Hi,
Is there an idiomatic/built-in way to parse double with a default value
if there's exception? Currently we use a generic with-default macro to
ignore exception and return default value as follow:
(with-default 0.0 (Double. my-value))
--
You received this message because you are
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 09:59 -0700, nchurch wrote:
+1 to writing an etiquette document.
In place of an etiquette document I suggest the book
called Producing Open Source Software.
In this generally useful book there is some advice,
mostly directed at project leads but this section is relevant:
I have a web application that returns data that is pipe-delimited and
looks like this:
AT|1 Kenilworth Rd||Soapville|ZA|99901-7505|Option value=A == Normal
street matchOption value=T == ZIP+4 corrected|013|C065|
What I want to do is take the zip-zip4 field, split the zip and zip 4
apart, and add
siyu798 siyu...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
Is there an idiomatic/built-in way to parse double with a default
value if there's exception?
Not that I know of.
Currently we use a generic with-default macro to ignore exception and
return default value as follow:
(with-default 0.0 (Double.
Do you want something like:
(vec (.split some-string \\|))
(vec (.split AT|1 Kenilworth Rd||Soapville|ZA|99901-7505|Option value=A ==
Normal street matchOption value=T == ZIP+4 corrected|013|C065| \\|))
= [AT 1 Kenilworth Rd Soapville ZA 99901-7505 Option value=A
== Normal street matchOption
octopusgrabbus octopusgrab...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
What I want to do is take the zip-zip4 field, split the zip and zip 4
apart, and add them as separate fields right after state ZA. I want to
do some other things too (like remove from Option value... through
013), but that's the next step.
Tassilo,
The reason a generic default macro being used here is because we can use
the same macro to parse other data type like integer:
(with-default 1 (Integer. my-value))
Thanks,
siyu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
On Jul 25, 1:18 pm, siyu798 siyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Tassilo,
The reason a generic default macro being used here is because we can use
the same macro to parse other data type like integer:
(with-default 1 (Integer. my-value))
Thanks,
siyu
You can still do the same with a function:
Hi there,
I have some state which I'd like to set to some default value, A. I'd then like
to update A to a new value A' and then, if (not (= A A')) I'd like to fire off
a function - say print to stdout that A has changed. If (= A A') I'd like
nothing to happen at all. Additionally, I'd like to
On 25 Jul 2011, at 21:45, Sam Aaron wrote:
(defn update
[]
(let [changed? (dosync
(let [old-a @a
new-a (ref-set a (new-val))]
(= old-a new-a)))]
(when changed? (changed-fn
Clearly I meant (not (= old-a new-a)) :-)
Sam
Hi,
you want a watch.
(def a (atom 0))
(add-watch a ::your-id (fn [_your-id _a old-val new-val] (when (not= old-val
new-val) (println New value: new-val
(swap! a inc)
(reset! a 1)
(swap! a inc)
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Thanks. I finally got part of my problem when I changed the regex to
#\d\d\d\d\d-\d\d\d\d to match the zip-zip4, and when that
disappeared, I realized what was going on.
On Jul 25, 3:51 pm, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
octopusgrabbus octopusgrab...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
What
Thanks for the suggestion. I will try this tomorrow and report back.
On Jul 25, 3:46 pm, Islon Scherer islonsche...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want something like:
(vec (.split some-string \\|))
(vec (.split AT|1 Kenilworth Rd||Soapville|ZA|99901-7505|Option value=A ==
Normal street matchOption
Hi Meikel,
On 25 Jul 2011, at 21:51, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
you want a watch.
(def a (atom 0))
(add-watch a ::your-id (fn [_your-id _a old-val new-val] (when (not= old-val
new-val) (println New value: new-val
(swap! a inc)
(reset! a 1)
(swap! a inc)
That's cool to know -
Just saw this neat ClojureScript demo, which can be used as a starting
point to create a Javascript game.
http://jng.imagine27.com/articles/2011-07-23-101007_clojurescript_demo_convex_hull.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post
Hi,
Am 25.07.2011 um 23:12 schrieb Sam Aaron:
So what if I would like #'update to return a boolean representing whether the
state has changed rather than call #'changed-fn internally? (which is
actually what i'm trying to do, I just refactored the example to be a lot
simpler and hopefully
Hi Meikel,
On 25 Jul 2011, at 22:46, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 um 23:12 schrieb Sam Aaron:
Since this is callback based, you can't return a value. Do you want more
something like a polling solution? Then you'll have to roll your own with an
atom and a
Perhaps I should've just looked for a blog about knitting or cupcakes
and posted what I did here about clojure/clojurescript in it. That way
you fine folks won't get to read it, eventhough no one here is obliged
in any way to read my posts or any in this thread. Yeah, definitely,
that way I
Alan,
Your with-default fn is neat. So it appears there's no
idiomatic/built-in clojure fn/macro to do parsing and wrapper functions such
as follow would be needed to avoid typing the whole expression every time.
(def parse-double (with-default #(Double. %) 0.0))
(def parse-int
Tassilo and Alan,
Thanks for responding. We're new to clj and don't have a good feel of
when to you use macros over functions.
(defmacro with-dflt
Runs body in a try/catch returning result of body
if no exception otherwise default
[default body]
`(try
(do ~@body)
(catch
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, nchurch nchubr...@gmail.com wrote:
Other than not recommending Emacs, do people think that the overall
organization I suggested is a good idea?
Yes.
for now I'd just like to see
us not presenting people with twelve options as their first view of
Getting
Hi Sam,
A nice late night exercise...
Not very practical, but if you want a safe transaction-free operation
on an atom which returns whether it was changed, you can perhaps hack
it by embedding the change state into the atom itself:
(def a (atom {:value 45 :changed? false}))
(defn
James,
If I've misread and/or mischaracterized your intentions, I do apologize for
that. I was, and still am, unsure as to your desired outcome from this
post.
If the intent was for the core team to rewrite ClojureScript to target
jQuery instead of GClosure, we both know that was not going to
Of course, once posted, I realised the conditional could be
eliminated:
(defn update-and-check-whether-modified?
[update-fn]
(:changed?
(swap! a (fn [{v :value _ :changed?}]
(let [new-v (update-fn v)]
{:value new-v :changed? (not= v new-v)})
--
You
2011/7/25 Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de
Salut Laurent,
Am 25.07.2011 um 18:54 schrieb Laurent PETIT:
And then goodbye statical analysis ... :-)
I didn't say, that I think it's a good idea to do this. :)
On the other hand I'm not afraid of dynamic analysis either. That's what
Taking a look at the content of some of these scripts, I would not be
surprised if a lein plugin, and probably also a maven archetype, would come
up rapidly (if not already under my radar !)
Cheers,
--
Laurent
2011/7/25 Timothy Baldridge tbaldri...@gmail.com
Is there a documented way to get
Hi, I'm just back after some vacations without Internet connections. Please
give me a couple more days to emerge from the tons of emails and workload,
and I'll gladly help you in any possible ways.
Cheers,
--
Laurent
2011/7/18 Arthur Edelstein arthuredelst...@gmail.com
On Jul 18, 2:31 am,
Anyone successfully stated this thing on windows yet?
I tried in no avail ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be
On Jul 25, 6:11 pm, James Keats james.w.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
I ask, what is it that I did other than seriously inquire about the
rationale?!
You started a thread with the non-serious title, Alright, fess up,
whose unhappy with clojurescript?
instead of the more serious Comments on the
I also experience this problem; switching nodejs versions (0.4.11-pre
== v0.4 branch, 0.4.10 and 0.5.2) did not have any effect.
When compiling with:
bin/cljsc samples/nodehello.cljs '{:target :nodejs :optimizations
:simple :pretty-print true}' nodehello.js
the (first) relevant line for this
I'm going to listen to Aaron's initial advice and follow the path of
least resistance by switching from OpenBSD to Linux (Arch) for Clojure
development.
Thanks all for your help.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group,
I would also love to know how you set this up in a little more detail. It
really sounds like an excellent approach…
Sure: it's not complicated! I'm writing this in a hurry though- so
hope it's still clear.
Basically I just define a memoized dynamic scripts function that
returns a map with a
Hi,
I am using the Lobos library - https://github.com/budu/lobos
In it there's a function create, which is called like this - (create db
(table :some-name)), where db is earlier defined as - (def db
{:classname org.postgresql.Driver
:subprotocol postgresql
:user postgres
99 matches
Mail list logo
