I'm just following what seemed to be a convention -
https://github.com/clojure/core.unify/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/core/unify.clj
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
On Oct 9, 12:31 pm, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I've removed some
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:31 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
- return nil instead of throwing if no match found to mirror the behavior
of cond
I don't like this.
I'm definitely
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
While we're on the topic of conventions, I think the most important
convention match is breaking
is using the destructuring syntax to mean something less generic by default
(only vectors).
(match
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Rob Lally rob.la...@gmail.com wrote:
If it only makes the non-vector seq case slower, I'd certainly make that an
available option - people are going to have to manually convert other
sequences into vectors anyway which creates a coding overhead and also makes
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
How about:
`match` - defaults to :seq, returns nil
`match-debug` - defaults to :seq, w/ error checking, w/ comprehensiveness
check
`matchv` - defaults to :vector
Ambrose
I think we can just
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.netwrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 06:57, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:31 AM, David Nolen
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Steve Miner stevemi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just been playing around a bit with match so please forgive me if I've
missed some prior discussions regarding issues that are considered settled.
One of my first attempts was to match a vector of two of the same
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Steve Miner stevemi...@gmail.com wrote:
match-let looks good. I see that you are Clojure contributor - I'm more
than happy to include this.
Yes, I'm a registered contributor. It's all yours.
I'll take a look at the code and see if I can fix things for
As a language - not much exciting stuff. ClojureScript by targeting lowest
common denominator JavaScript is portable in a way that Dart is not.
I'm skeptical that Dart will see much uptake from various vendors - but only
time will tell.
David
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:47 AM, ivo
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stephen Wrobleski st...@localtoast.orgwrote:
I think a match-debug is barking up the wrong tree. If throwing an
exception
is the right thing to do to track down an unaccounted case, why make a
different macro just for a slightly different default behavior that
Looks like a bug, ticket created -
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-85
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Praki praki.prak...@gmail.com wrote:
In Clojure (read-string :a:b:c) returns :a:b:c (a keyword with two
embedded colons) whereas ClojureScript returns :a. In ClojureScript
reading of
Apologies in trying to fix CLJS-84, I broke some things. This is backed out
now and in its own branch.
David
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Dave Sann daves...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have been trying to get the browser repl to work tonight.
I can't get this to work and have tracked the
Relevant IRC thread -
http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2011-03-01.html#12:41
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Brian Marick mar...@exampler.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote:
I suppose you could iterate over all known Vars and construct a map from
fns to the Vars
Thanks for the report, CLJS-62 reopened,
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-62
David
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Praki praki.prak...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running into a problem with memoized functions in ClojureScript.
Functions which take a single argument work okay but functions
Nice! I think :target :nodejs is just about guaranteeing that some Node.js
definitions like 'require' are in place and providing a more sensible print
fn.
David
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM, kurtharriger kurtharri...@gmail.comwrote:
I took a stab at writing a repl for nodejs.
The node
Fixed in master.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:22 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the report, CLJS-62 reopened,
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-62
David
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Praki praki.prak...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running into a problem
Also fixed in master.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:17 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like a bug, ticket created -
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-85
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Praki praki.prak...@gmail.com wrote:
In Clojure (read-string :a:b:c) returns
Ryan Senior has put together an excellent post on appendo - a relation from
core.logic. Highly recommended.
http://objectcommando.com/blog/2011/10/13/appendo-the-great/
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send
ClojureScript can access globals via js/foo. You can easily interact with
your existing codebase using this simple feature. For example:
(ns foo.bar)
(def j js/jQuery)
(.text (j div#foo) jQuery works!)
Were you looking for something more sophisticated then this?
David
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at
Frank,
Apologies, ClojureScript at the moment is designed with a bit of a bias
towards people to who already know Clojure. This is unfortunate since there
are many people who could use ClojureScript *today* who don't need or want
to invest in Clojure on the JVM.
Because of the bias some obvious
Sorry I didn't copy my perspective over here from clojure-dev as someone
who's been working as a JavaScript dev for the past 6 years
-
The proposed change is not optimal and I think it clashes with the realities
of JavaScript interop.
(.property foo)
Currently gives us a notion of place,
Vectors are not JavaScript arrays. No need to use the js/Array constructor:
(array 1 2 3)
Should work fine. Given how often JS frameworks want to be fed nested
objects like this, a patch for
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-37would be nice.
David
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Frank
is appreciated. The
proposed solutions sounds great.
-FS.
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:47 PM, David Nolen wrote:
Vectors are not JavaScript arrays. No need to use the js/Array
constructor:
(array 1 2 3)
Should work fine. Given how often JS frameworks want to be fed nested
objects like
Are you using ClojureScript HEAD? If you are and you are still seeing this
under what conditions (advanced mode, browser REPL, etc.) ?
David
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg
odysso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it, clojurescript uses some unicode
18, 2011 at 1:16 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you using ClojureScript HEAD? If you are and you are still seeing this
under what conditions (advanced mode, browser REPL, etc.) ?
David
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg
odysso...@gmail.com wrote
:9)
at clojure.lang.Compiler.eval(Compiler.java:6424)
... 31 more
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:25 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Does the same problem occur when trying this at the REPL (say via
script/repljs) ?
David
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Jonathan Fischer
, and the result is as expected.
In the browser I still get the extra characters however.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:04 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Have you rerun the bootstrap script since the Rhino upgrade?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg
, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:22 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Try removing the following:
file.js
out
and recompiling. I also recommend compiling one of the ClojureScript
samples that you haven't checked out yet to see if the issue is
reproducible.
David
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11
233 messages long thread from June 2010,
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/c8c850595c91cc11/171cacba292a0583
David
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:00 PM, nathanmarz nathan.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I recently started upgrading Storm to Clojure 1.3, and I ran into
Such a change would be make Clojure's numeric design inconsistent. You keep
saying that Clojure is changing the types - that's probably not the right
way to look at it.
It's a semantic change, Clojure now only has 64bit primitives - the same way
that JavaScript only has doubles.
Prior to the 1.3
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:45 PM, nathanmarz nathan.m...@gmail.com wrote:
But Clojure is already inconsistent. ints and Integers in interop are
treated differently. The only way to make Clojure consistent is to
either:
Clojure is consistent. Whether or not that makes *interop* easier or
Hmm I get no errors. But it doesn't work. I agree that would be a *real*
killer app for ClojureScript. Debugging JS on mobile browsers is a big pain.
I will try looking into it if no one else gets to it first, ticket created
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-92
David
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011
Collections often include false as a value. You will have to handle it by
using some other value like ::not-found.
David
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
I've always felt that Clojure's treatment of nil was somehow inconsistent
with the elegance
Just because we have dynamic types does not give us the freedom to not
consider them.
(when s
...)
Does not communicate anything about collections - only nil, false or
something else.
(when (seq s)
...)
(when (empty? s)
...)
Clearly express a consideration about the types at play.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:41 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just because we have dynamic types does not give us the freedom to not
consider them.
Oh, I definitely considered the types when I
On Oct 21, 8:53 am, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm I get no errors. But it doesn't work. I agree that would be a *real*
killer app for ClojureScript. Debugging JS on mobile browsers is a big
pain.
I will try looking into it if no one else gets to it first, ticket
createdhttp
ClojureScript Birds of a Feather (I'm not going to lead this one though, but
it seems like an obvious add)
miniKanren / core.logic Birds of a Feather (I'm open to leading this one)
David
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that nothing is too humble!
BTW, is this meant to be editable by anyone else? Or are you going to
collect the ideas off this thread and enter them?
David
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
We talked about the possibility of getting some ideas about
extracurricular activities during
The biggest change is the removal of the infix or pattern syntax. Feedback
appreciated.
Fixes
* MATCH-34: no more infix or pattern syntax
* MATCH-10: support maps with keys of heterogenous types
* MATCH-30: throw if same binding name used in row
* MATCH-33: fix readme typo
Enhancements
The documentation has been updated to account for the changes:
https://github.com/clojure/core.match
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Michael Jaaka michael.ja...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Can you give examples of usage for each position?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
There's a ticket, http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-37
However things get fixed faster if you submit a patch ;) If you're excited
about ClojureScript, then consider submitting a CA and helping out.
David
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, David Powell d...@djpowell.net wrote:
I'm
I added the compiler macros to make this work in a branch:
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/compare/37-support-for-js-literals
Feedback appreciated.
David
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:04 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a ticket, http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse
Larent Petit pointed out this fun challenge:
http://beust.com/weblog/2011/10/30/a-new-coding-challenge/
To get a sense of how cool cKanren and constraint logic programming is I
recommend reading my post about solving it using cKanren
http://dosync.posterous.com/a-taste-of-ckanren.
This is what
Heh, as someone pointed out this doesn't actually solve the puzzle since
I'm not considering putting stones on either side of the scale. Still I
think the idea of what cKanren can do is communicated :)
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Brent Millare brent.mill...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks really
Here's a correct version that solves the puzzle in ~12ms,
https://gist.github.com/1329580. A bit longer but it fun to combine
constraints w/ search.
Will try to find some time to write a more detailed explanation.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:00 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Heh
A blog post explaining the solution step by step
http://dosync.posterous.com/another-taste-of-ckanren.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:36 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a correct version that solves the puzzle in ~12ms,
https://gist.github.com/1329580. A bit longer but it fun
(isa? (type '(:foo :bar)) clojure.lang.IPersistentList) = true
(isa? (type ()) clojure.lang.IPersistentList) = true
(isa? (type (list)) clojure.lang.IPersistentList) = true
2011/11/1 Sebastián Galkin paras...@gmail.com
Can somebody explain the rationale behind this?:
(isa? (type '(:foo :bar))
n is stored in a var and thus boxed. You can cast it to primitive long with
(long n).
On Tuesday, November 1, 2011, redraiment redraim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
My environment is, Kubuntu 11.10, Clojure v1.3 and sun-java6-jdk. I
issued the following forms in REPL:
user= (def n 1)
Just cut a new release that hopefully makes playing with core.logic a lot
less tedious.
From 0.6.4 to 0.6.5
Enhancements
---
* Consolidate all the useful name spaces into clojure.core.logic
* We now only overload ==, no more need to exclude reify or inc
You can use core.logic in your own
They are still there just renamed so as not to conflict with clojure.core:
-reify, -inc
On Wednesday, November 2, 2011, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to reify and inc?
Ambrose
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com
Any thoughts about when / where these events can take place? Is it possible
to get access to a projector? Or do we have to fend for ourselves?
David
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011, Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
We talked about the possibility of getting some ideas about
extracurricular
Accessing this is supported via this-as
https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/commit/09ff093dc86b455e3090ce3612c5e01f3b5bada6
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:51 AM, olivergeorge olivergeo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This must be obvious (pun unintended) but I'm struggling to work out
how to
Look at the sources for ClojureScript, Ring, Clache.
David
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:23 PM, aboy021 arthur.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
I very much enjoyed Rich's talk on Simple Made Easy (http://
www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy). It seemed to address a
great many of the frustrations
Wow that would be awesome!
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Gary Trakhman gary.trakh...@gmail.comwrote:
I can offer my personal projector if it's needed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
For wildcards you can use symbol-macrolet from tools.macro
(macro/symbol-macrolet [_ (lvar)]
(all
(== [_ _ [_ _ 'milk _ _] _ _] hs)
))
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
abonnaireserge...@gmail.com wrote:
I gave the wildcard requirement a bit of thought,
I would probably write the code like this:
(defrel permission role op state)
(defn add-permision [roles ops states]
(doseq [r roles o ops s states]
(fact permission r o s)))
(add-permision #{:admin :operator} #{:reject :accept} #{:applied})
(defn permissiono [role op state]
(run* [q]
tutorial for core.logic? By fine I mean
something like learn haskell for great good.
On 5 Lis, 20:26, Michael Jaaka michael.ja...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now is ok, easy to grasp. How the lein dep declaration and clj import
looks?
Thank you both.
On 5 Lis, 20:11, David Nolen dnolen.li
If you want to have a lot of database options you could target Node.js.
David
On Sunday, November 6, 2011, Antonio Recio amdx6...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to use ClojureScript to interact with databases.
Which is the database engine that you recommend me to use with
ClojureScript?
Is
Yup. core.logic uses persistent hash maps to store logic variable bindings.
David
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:32 PM, daly d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
One of the benefits of immutable data structures is the
ability to do speculative execution. You can compute an
answer and if you don't like
Excellent!
David
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Redinger redin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2011 3:46:40 PM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
Any thoughts about when / where these events can take place? Is it
possible to get access to a projector? Or do we have to fend
Anybody mind if the miniKanren / cKanren presentation happens at 6pm
Thursday in the main ballroom?
David
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Redinger redin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, November 3, 2011 3:46:40 PM UTC-4, David Nolen wrote:
Any thoughts about when / where
Functions that are going to be used in core logic must return goals.
(defn parents-of [m f c]
(parent m c)
(parent f c)
(!= m f))
In this case you only return the (!= m f) subgoal instead of the goal that
represents the conjunction of all three subgoals.
(defn parents-of [m f c]
Can you reorder your statements without changing the meaning of your
program? For example you cannot move the placement of the return
expression.
David
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Jules julesjac...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a new program. Perhaps you would consider this declarative:
def
(define (matches n)
(run #f (q)
(fresh (a b c d s1 s2)
(== q `(,a ,b ,c ,d))
(domfd a b c d s1 s2 (range 1 n))
(all-differentfd `(,a ,b ,c ,d))
(== a 1)
(=fd a b) (=fd b c) (=fd c d)
(plusfd a b s1) (plusfd s1 c s2) (plusfd s2 d n)
(checko
Excellent point Ambrose ;) And here it is:
(define (subchecko w sl r o n)
(conde
((== sl ())
(fresh (a d)
(domfd a (range 1 100))
(conde
((conso a d r) (plusfd a 1 w)
(conso w r o))
((== r '()) (conso w r o)
((fresh (a b c
Also note that even given all this generality over the Python code - the
earlier Python implementation takes ~300ms and this implementation takes
900ms on my machine.
Quite a bit slower than ~12ms. Inferring 40 takes even less time of course
- ~8ms.
But really the execution time is just icing on
:16, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Also note that even given all this generality over the Python code - the
earlier Python implementation takes ~300ms and this implementation takes
900ms on my machine.
Quite a bit slower than ~12ms. Inferring 40 takes even less time of
course
, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Also note that even given all this generality over the Python code - the
earlier Python implementation takes ~300ms and this implementation takes
900ms on my machine.
Quite a bit slower than ~12ms. Inferring 40 takes even less time of
course
- ~8ms
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jules julesjac...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a slight modification of the previous program that can be
executed in two directions:
N = [40]
A = range(1,40)
B = range(1,40)
C = range(1,40)
D = range(1,40)
def valid(a,b,c,d,n):
weights =
This would be awesome. From his talk it sounds like it shouldn't replace
PersistentVector at all, in fact you should be able to share structure with
PersistentVector right?
David
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Krukow karl.kru...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I don''t see it as a replacement
You should definitely look at gvec.clj. It's a PersistentVector
implementation in Clojure but for the various primitive types.
David
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Karl Krukow karl.kru...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/11/2011, at 18.14, David Nolen wrote:
This would be awesome. From his talk
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Konrad Hinsen
googlegro...@khinsen.fastmail.net wrote:
On 15 Nov, 2011, at 6:51 , Cyrus Harmon wrote:
I've been wanting this for some time. Obviously the java interop stuff
poses challenges, but the clojure data types, protocols, immutable objects,
clojure
(def x (doall (map fn coll)))
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:52 AM, labwor...@gmail.com wrote:
I understand that lazy sequences are very useful but sometimes, I want to
compute everything, go away, and have it there when I come back.
How do I do that with a map?
(def x (map fn coll))
--
You
:use-macros is now supported.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:18 PM, kovas boguta kovas.bog...@gmail.comwrote:
Bump.
Is this still the case? That its not possible to have user-created
macros targeting clojurescript without namespace prefixes?
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kevin Lynagh
setDate mutates the date and does not return a value.
David
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Base basselh...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
I am attempting to manipulate a goog.date.Date object and am a little
confused on how to call a method on this object in ClojureScript
If I have a date object,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Base basselh...@gmail.com wrote:
It mentions:
The one important difference is in calling no-argument methods. In
Java (. x toString), where toString is a method, would unambiguously
mean call the toString method of x. JavaScript is more flexible,
separating
I haven't seen performance gains from advanced optimization.
David
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Paul Richards paul.richa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in the differences between the default ClojureScript
compile, and the {:optimizations :advanced} mode.
Aside from loading times
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Robert Levy r.p.l...@gmail.com wrote:
See: http://gallium.inria.fr/~naxu/research/dana-phd.pdf
What do you think about this idea? I have just started reading the above
pdf... I don't see much of interest when googling for 'static contract
Racket' but that
Please open a ticket for this in JIRA, thanks -
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS
David
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Jeff Valk jv-li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Hello all,
I ran into an extend-type issue with the ClojureScript compiler output. If
there's a better place to report such
Thanks! Patches welcome as well :)
David
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jeff Valk jv-li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
Issue opened: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-104.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to
Have you looked at this,
http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started+with+Emacs ?
David
2011/11/21 Michael Jaaka michael.ja...@googlemail.com
Hmmm... When trying to do
http://riddell.us/ClojureSwankLeiningenWithEmacsOnLinux.html
especially
Add the following:
(defproject
Note that none of the following branches are promises of features. I'm
merely bringing them up to get feedback from ClojureScript users:
prop-lookup
New property syntax so that method calls and property lookup are no
longer ambiguous
33-type-fn
Nicer printing of types defined via deftype and
Sounds interesting. I can't offer much guidance on how to build such a
system but I'm certainly interested in improvements to core.logic's
interface to make implementing such things simpler.
What exactly do you expect core.logic to do in this case?
David
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Mark
Seems possible but I can't say much more than that. core.logic operates on
tuples, so you could extract the resultset form the DB and pass them along
to core.logic to constrain further without much difficulty.
David
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Mark markaddle...@gmail.com wrote:
It occurs
/path/to/repl/script/browser-repl
NOT
/path/to/repl/script/repljs
I just tried browser-repl and it works just fine for me. What do you mean
by hangs? Do you see the REPL prompt?
David
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Wilkes Joiner wilkesjoi...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm seeing the same
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Baishampayan Ghose b.gh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Wilkes Joiner wilkesjoi...@gmail.com
wrote:
The server appears to start up fine as the inferior-lisp process, but
when I
enter an expression it is never evaluated. Looking in the
You said the REPL hangs, do you don't see a prompt?
David
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Wilkes Joiner wilkesjoi...@gmail.comwrote:
No dice on the browser refresh. I'm wondering if it something with my
emacs config. I'm going to strip it down to the simplest set up I can
manage and see
And you don't see a JS error in the browser JS console?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Wilkes Joiner wilkesjoi...@gmail.comwrote:
I see a prompt. It just never evaluates an expression.
--
Wilkes Joiner
On Thursday, November 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, David Nolen wrote:
You said the REPL
Joiner
On Thursday, November 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, David Nolen wrote:
You said the REPL hangs, do you don't see a prompt?
David
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Wilkes Joiner wilkesjoi...@gmail.comwrote:
No dice on the browser refresh. I'm wondering if it something with my
emacs config
Did you remember to include utf-8 meta tag in your html page?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Wilkes Joiner wilkesjoi...@gmail.comwrote:
I got it working, sort of. If I launch inferior-lisp from the
$CLOJURESCRIPT_HOME/samples/repl/src/repl/test.cljs, then I can pull up my
apps page that
As Mark said you can avoid the graph issue with tabling. core.logic has
tabling. If you look at the tabling section here -
https://github.com/clojure/core.logic, you should see something related to
your problem.
While defrel/facts are neat - they are really intended for people who don't
already
on this front and will certainly help move things along if
someone is willing to do the design work.
David
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:15 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
As Mark said you can avoid the graph issue with tabling. core.logic has
tabling. If you look at the tabling section here
(quote foo) should be interpreted as a literal match. I thought this was
addressed by a previous user submitted patch but it doesn't look like
that's true.
We currently use seqs as a marker of custom syntax, we dispatch either on
the first or second element of the seq. For example this is how we
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Steve Miner stevemi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 30, 2011, at 3:04 PM, David Nolen wrote:
(quote foo) should be interpreted as a literal match. I thought this was
addressed by a previous user submitted patch but it doesn't look like
that's true.
I wrote
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Sam Ritchie sritchi...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you guys taken a look at Cascalog? (
https://github.com/nathanmarz/cascalog) It's a datalog implementation in
Clojure that compiles down to MapReduce jobs. Cascalog's host, Cascading,
allows you to pull information
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
;; plus is a symbol to match, _x, _y are variables
(let [e '(plus 2 3)]
(match [e]
[([plus _x _y] :seq)] (+ _x _y)))
To me, that gives them a placeholder feel and plays well with the
use of _. This would break
Looks good patch applied.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
Ha, I wrote the identical patch locally and it seemed good to me. So
it gets my ok!
On Nov 30, 5:00 pm, Steve Miner stevemi...@gmail.com wrote:
I filed the bug and attached a patch. The
If you run out stack in Scheme the code is not properly tail recursive. Who
care when it blows?
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:09 PM, john.holland jbholl...@gmail.com wrote:
I was studying clojure for a while, and took a break to work on SICP in
scheme. I found that they do numerous things that are
I didn't mean the response to sound overly curt. You can set the stack size
on JVM.
But the point is, that quick sort is simply wrong if you do not want to
grow the stack, whether in Scheme or in Clojure.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
If you run out
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:03 AM, John Holland jbholl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been looking into Clojure and now Scheme for a while. Currently
it's been SICP.
I notice that SICP has examples of recursion such as a binary tree
builder that is something like the following:
(define (tree top
701 - 800 of 2038 matches
Mail list logo
