On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Pierre Allix
pierre.allix.w...@gmail.comwrote:
I think it does not follow principle of least astonishment. I would have
expected to convert only the first character. Moreover converting the other
characters make the function almost useless, I for instance had
@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
Grant Rettke
Here[1] is an enhancement to parenface[2] that adds support for the
editor and REPL for Clojure, Jess, and Elisp.
1 http://marmalade-repo.org/packages/parenface-plus
2 http://marmalade-repo.org/packages/parenface
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Mikera mike.r.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Any thoughts / ideas / feedback?
What if you try keeping it pretty close to the current POV syntax/format?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Clojure feels like a VERY simple language with almost no
syntax. Having recently read more Scheme / CL code, I can see how folks
coming from those languages think Clojure is cluttered.
Why do they think it is
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code that looks like this:
What problem does this solve given you can do the
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org wrote:
It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not
common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only,
which is not encouraged in Clojure, and rarely needed. Certainly
sometimes it's the best way
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, JvJ kfjwhee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before, but I'm fed up with writing
code
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
(- ((fn []
(let [a 1]
(println this is a: a)
a)))
((fn [a]
(let [b 2]
(println this is b: b
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ben Wolfson wolf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
It isn't side effecting it is sequencing.
Clojure's let is already sequential, like Scheme's let*: The bindings
are sequential, so each binding can see
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way works well. I think Evan's way results in somewhat more compact
code for the common case, whereas Cgrand's way feels a little more versatile
(and his flatter cond is what I use). I strongly urge you to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way works well. I think Evan's way results in somewhat more
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:32 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
When you use def inside a defn is it equivalent to a let binding like
this?
(defn foo []
(def a 1)
(println a))
(defn foo []
((fn
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
Woa, I see, thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Mark Engelberg
mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
A def, even inside defn, creates and binds a global variable.
Woa, I see, thanks!
Anyone voted for internal define lately?
--
You received
email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
Grant Rettke | ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE
gret...@acm.org | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
Wisdom begins in wonder.
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
--
You received
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:05 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
Anyone voted for internal define lately?
At this point I think it's highly unlikely to change - the behavior is
pretty well documented:
I see. Just
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM, gaz jones gareth.e.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 3 blog posts I wrote to help some colleagues get up to speed
with clojure / emacs:
Looks great. You never know what is the best thing for everyone, so
what works for you will probably work for others, too.
--
Please port ultramasterdethris to clojurescript.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Timothy Washington twash...@gmail.com wrote:
Oooh, I just got hooked on it for about 10 mins. Of course I was just
testing it.. ahem :)
Lots of fun !!
Tim
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Andreas Liljeqvist
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Michael Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
Any existing solutions or interest in something like this?
There are no _public_ solutions as far as I know,
So everyone has their private custom approaches I guess? I'm curious
if people would share them.
although I
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Gary Johnson gwjoh...@uvm.edu wrote:
A lot of scribble's features are geared towards providing tooling for
Literate Programming,
I didn't read into Scribble like it's goal was LP, but I could have
missed that and not known enough about LP, too.
and currently
, or info
format directly, you are welcome to do so. I'm not sure I have the time or
motivation to modify the program for that purpose, unless it is very similar
to one of those.
Andy
On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I know I saw an explanation of this on some obscure page, but I can't find
it now. What's up with the symbols with stars at front end?
http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/style.txt
--
You received this message because
Gosh I thought it was in there... maybe it is not. Sorry.
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I know I saw an explanation of this on some obscure page, but I can't find
it now. What's up
executed
and potentially unit tested, making it a very nice to know.
Best wishes,
Grant Rettke
--
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
The only changes since the previous version are to add a mention of
*unchecked-math*, and
Nice! Is there one in Info format out there? I can't find it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi,
May you please share your experience or preferences for rules engines
written in or used from Clojure?
My goal is to:
1. Allow rule definitions separate from the code (though I view rule
definitions as programming to be performed by the programmer).
2. Allow rules to be defined in modules.
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Brian Craft craft.br...@gmail.com wrote:
The two second
delay to...
do anything...
is making...
me crazy.
Although JRebel is for JEE, it seems like an interesting thing for a fast REPL.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
REPL restarts are slow and costly, but the freshness they provide is
obviously so valuable, too.
Has anyone experimented with something like JRebel or some alternative to
provide super-fast like fraction of a section REPL restarts?
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Stuart Sierra
I loved Mathematica's documentation that had lovingly maintained
by... in the sidebar or something to that effect. It was really
apparent that the maintainer did lovingly maintain it. Can't seem to
find it at the moment though.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Brent Millare brent.mill...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Michael Fogus mefo...@gmail.com wrote:
readevalprintlove looks like a fancy playground so far.
You say that as if it's a bad thing. I'm of the opinion that these
kinds of efforts should have a low barrier to contribution and be fun.
It's difficult to motivate
You guys are over-thinking it. Set up a new site, get users, tweak it,
perfect it, it will become the defacto site, and you will make it
really easy for Rich et al to make the switch :). It may take loads of
hard and unappreciated labor though :(. That is why it has to be a
labor of love.
On Wed,
The Joy of Clojure book touches on this, it is an important design and
style decision. Great book, good question too. I'm learning about all
this stuff right now and it is all good stuff.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
It is surprising at first,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.com wrote:
It depends.
Are you trying to optimize for speed? Teaching a particular style of
programming? Code size? Range of input values handled correctly? Time
to write it?
Something else?
The most Clojury way of
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke gret...@acm.org wrote:
This naming of a helper function to loop is non-idiomatic, because there
is a built-in construct loop, which works somewhat like named let
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:13 PM, aboy021 arthur.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
The getting started issue is an ongoing problem for Clojure. It's an issue
that keeps coming up in the surveys and on the mailing list. Other languages
are doing it really well, Scala is just a convenient example. What does
(ns power.examples)
(defn non-acc-pow [base exp]
(if (zero? exp)
1
(* base (non-acc-pow base (dec exp)
(defn acc-pow [base exp]
(letfn [(loop [base exp acc]
(if (zero? exp)
acc
(recur base (dec exp) (* base acc]
(loop base exp 1)))
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, arekanderu arekand...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to port an ugly piece of code from Ruby to clojure.
May you share the original code?
So far I
have only ported it to clojure by keeping the same way it was written in
Ruby and i am trying to re-write it the
Same goes for ICFP:
http://icfpconference.org/icfp2012/accepted.html
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Jianshi Huang jianshi.hu...@gmail.com wrote:
Just curious, why there are no Clojure speakers and papers?
I think projects like cascalog, clojure.logic and light table are
brilliant showcases
I'm reading _The Joy of Clojure_ right now, and they touch on it,
which is nice coming from Scheme/Racket.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Russell Whitaker
russell.whita...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:26 AM, arekanderu arekand...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Meikel for your so
It is never too late to learn something new. If you start with Scheme
then you will find loads of excellent pedagogical material that has
been heavily vetted over the years, and you are bound to find that one
of them will speak to you. The excellent thing about starting is
that you can leverage
41 matches
Mail list logo
