On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 5:44:29 PM UTC+2, Luc wrote:
Sure, indentation is what gets the code running on metal :))
Not ranting here, just my abs dying from the pain as I laugh :))
Comments like that are often linked as an expample of Functional
Programmers attitude.
Let's not do
Many people feel this way, but ultimately Clojure is Rich's project and I
guess Cognitect's to some extent. If they don't want to run it like other
more open contribution-friendly OSS projects this is obviously their
right.
Similar concern and attitude caused apearence of io.js. Do we want
Hey Alex,
Looks terrific, thank you! Particularly excited about CLJ-703 and tuples.
Quick question: are tuples intended to implement :kv-reduce?
Currently (with 1.8.0-alpha2):
(reduce-kv (fn [acc idx in] acc) nil [1 2 3 4 5 6 7]) ; = nil
(reduce-kv (fn [acc idx in] acc) nil [1 2])
;; = No
I've been working with agents and it looked like messages are often
processed in the reverse of the order received. I
checked http://clojure.org/agents and confirmed that Actions dispatched to
an agent from another single agent or thread will occur in the order they
were sent, potentially
Oh, I could be all wet about the code. It is probably a ring being used to
create an immutable queue. I'm going to need to think about that some more.
Not sure at all why my tests are showing old values being returned after an
update. Some volatile issue? I've got some cheats in my code that I
On Sunday, 19 July 2015 00:03:04 UTC+8, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
I don't think the tweets you link are the 'normal approach'. I would call
them pretty unusual in several aspects. For one, I think that for the vast
majority of Clojure tickets created, no on asks and gets Rich's comments on
Are tuples used for small maps as well?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
Your comments are one-sided.
When I modify code written by others, I follow their style.
I do not complain about their code formatting habits.
I wrote/modified enough code in 30 years written by hundreds of individuals to
find emphasis on code formatting and variable naming a waste of time and
I agree with you but changes like this need time to bloom and are motivated by
increased pressure to release.
We have been seeing more of that in the last year.
Linus did not find solid maintainers day one. You need to test drive
individuals before you can delegate significant chunks and not
The code for actor looks very different this morning. Obviously an
immutable queue is being used.
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 2:12:43 AM UTC-4, William la Forge wrote:
I've been working with agents and it looked like messages are often
processed in the reverse of the order received. I
I'm a Clojure beginner and wanted to compliment the authors on a very clear
yet concise text. Thank you.
Aria Media Sagl
Via Rompada 40
6987 Caslano
Switzerland
+41 (0)91 600 9601
+41 (0)76 303 4477 cell
skype: ariamedia
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Alejandro Gómez alejan...@dialelo.com
On 18 July 2015 at 19:54, Luc Préfontaine lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca
wrote:
My tone does not please you ? It could be worse and I reserve my right to
free speech. Have a look at some Linus rants. I am far from that level.
I think everyone in this community should aspire to more than I'm not
Seems like a bug to me.
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 3:10:37 AM UTC-5, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Hey Alex,
Looks terrific, thank you! Particularly excited about CLJ-703 and tuples.
Quick question: are tuples intended to implement :kv-reduce?
Currently (with 1.8.0-alpha2):
(reduce-kv (fn
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:02:43 AM UTC-5, Luc wrote:
I agree with you but changes like this need time to bloom and are
motivated by increased pressure to release.
We have been seeing more of that in the last year.
Linus did not find solid maintainers day one. You need to test drive
Matching socks and Herwig, thanks for your answers.
https://github.com/bendlas/data.xml works for roundtripping the data.
Currently using raw-parsing and raw-emit.
Great work, hope it will be accepted into master eventually.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:56 PM Herwig Hochleitner
We just released the second revision which includes a lot of
corrections, an Acknowledgments section and an almost finished
chapter about CSP core.async which covers all its API and
introduces the CSP concepts.
- Leanpub: https://leanpub.com/clojurescript-unraveled
- GitHub repository:
Hi everyone,
In a recent talk, David Nolen talks about a great idea for Om Next, where
components declaratively describe what data they’re interested in. [omnext] I’d
like to explore the optional server-side router part. The idea is that you
write your code on the front-end as if you have
(It looks like you're depending on Potemkin through clj-http, so upgrading
to clj-http 2.0.0 will also solve the problem)
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:53 PM Michael Blume blume.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like it has, pinning to Potemkin 0.4.1 should probably sort you out
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at
Is this a good candidate area for adding generative tests? It seems like
they may have been able to catch this regression.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:40 AM Alex Miller a...@puredanger.com wrote:
Seems like a bug to me.
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 3:10:37 AM UTC-5, Peter Taoussanis wrote:
Sean, I think that was identified as a bug in Potemkin. The pull was merged
but I'm not sure if there's been a release since. Zack?
https://github.com/ztellman/potemkin/pull/40
Bumping clj-http to 2.0.0 got me past that problem (and it uses Potemkin 0.4.1)
but then I hit the problem below, which I’ve run into several times trying to
use updated versions of clj-http over the last year.
Message java.lang.RuntimeException: No such var: clj-tuple/vector,
I just released version 0.1.0 of Afterglow so that other interested people
can start exploring it. I simply cannot believe I have been able to create
a system like this in a couple of months, after being inspired by the
example of Overtone. Thank you, Clojure community, for making software
On Jul 18, 2015, at 10:33 PM, Sean Corfield s...@corfield.org wrote:
Wow, that's a fast timeline. Thank you. We'll upgrade to Alpha 2 this week.
We may go to production with it fairly quickly.
Switched out 1.7.0 for 1.8.0-alpha2 and got the exception below. Posting here
in case anyone knows
Looks like it has, pinning to Potemkin 0.4.1 should probably sort you out
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:50 PM Michael Blume blume.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean, I think that was identified as a bug in Potemkin. The pull was
merged but I'm not sure if there's been a release since. Zack?
Prioritizing the 'good' form over the substance is the first step toward
political correctness and lobotomy. Civility is more about form than substance
and has
various meaning depending on the people involved. You can say horrendous things
using a civil tone. It's as unbearable as a crude
http://docs.paralleluniverse.co/pulsar/ is out there. I can't say I've used
it in anger, but I did enjoy experimenting with it.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:24 AM Colin Yates colin.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
I don’t have anything to add at that scale, but I wanted to echo Stuart’s
comment about the
Stuart and Alex, thank you for your replies and recommondations.
I take it then that the problem is the seq casting performed in apply and
in reduce1.
For now the only way to avoid applys seq casting seems to be a hackish
.doInvoke call.
Kind regards,
Leon.
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at
Hi Leon,
I think this is an edge case related to how varargs functions are
implemented in Clojure.
The varargs arity of `max` is implemented with `reduce1`: core.clj line 1088
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/36d665793b43f62cfd22354aced4c6892088abd6/src/clj/clojure/core.clj#L1088
Is there any need to speak with this tone and this arrogance? It's just an
attempt to improve things, and I think there is nothing negative about it.
I think the initial motivation of this email is change things to be better
and with good intentions. It make sense to attack good intentions without
This is an old thread, but it showed up in my Google Groups so I figured I
would give an answer.
I have worked on fairly large (10-50 machines) distributed systems written
entirely in Clojure.
The language itself doesn't provide an explicit mechanism for communication
between machines, so you
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 10:53:25 AM UTC-5, Stuart Sierra wrote:
Hi Leon,
I think this is an edge case related to how varargs functions are
implemented in Clojure.
The varargs arity of `max` is implemented with `reduce1`: core.clj line
1088
Thanks Stuart for your answer, it is very helpfull. Would you choose
Clojure again ?
2015-07-19 17:13 GMT+02:00 Stuart Sierra the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com:
This is an old thread, but it showed up in my Google Groups so I figured I
would give an answer.
I have worked on fairly large (10-50
Absolutely would use again. But I'm biased towards Clojure already. :)
–S
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 09goral wrote:
Thanks Stuart for your answer, it is very helpfull. Would you choose
Clojure again ?
2015-07-19 17:13 GMT+02:00 Stuart Sierra:
This is an old thread, but it showed up in my
I don’t have anything to add at that scale, but I wanted to echo Stuart’s
comment about the serialisability of EDN. Moving EDN between the front and back
tiers on our app has cut down a bunch of boilerplate. That principle can scale
across machines as well.
On 19 Jul 2015, at 16:54, Stuart
I'll also add that if you're interested in the Storm model (distributed
stream processing), you may want to check out Onyx
(https://github.com/onyx-platform/onyx). It's newer, but I have a feeling
that moving forward we're going to see it take a dominant position as far
as that flavor of
That's a really exciting project, as a lot of people are looking to get
started with ClojureScript and are finding it kind of hard because of the
lack of such resources.
My advise would be to put a bit heavier focus on the differences between
Clojure ClojureScript and add some section about
I followed the instructions to add the proper dependencies, plugins to the
project, but upon entering
lein cljsbuild once
as noted in every online doc/ tutorial related, I get the error
C:\Functional_Languages\Clojure\clojurescript_master\!work\modern-cljslein
cljsbuild once
'cljsbuild' is
You're also going to have to target [clj-tuple 0.2.2], since something
else seems to be shadowing that depedency. Sorry for all the fuss.
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 5:02:13 PM UTC-7, Sean Corfield wrote:
Bumping clj-http to 2.0.0 got me past that problem (and it uses Potemkin
0.4.1) but
38 matches
Mail list logo
