Actually, putting Clojurescript and any Clojurescript libraries into :dev
dependencies doesn't quite work in a trouble-free way because it still
breaks the Clojurescript compilation step in some circumstances. If I do
the following:
lein clean
lein uberjar (or lein ring uberwar)
.. then the
I don't think leiningen will ever do this, it might be a cleaner hack if
you move the cljsbuild plugin into the dev profile too.
On Monday, June 9, 2014, Chris Jenkins cdpjenk...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, putting Clojurescript and any Clojurescript libraries into :dev
dependencies doesn't
Thanks Gary. Yeah, moving :cljsbuild to the :dev profile works. I still
have to manually run cljsbuild though, which is annoying on my local
machine and I suspect it would break things like deploying to Heroku or
Cloud Foundry. So this will do for now but I'm still looking for a better
solution in
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Colin Fleming
colin.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on CLJS symbol resolution for Cursive. There are a lot of corners
where it's hard to figure out from the doc how they should work - I've looked
through the code but I'm not sure I've got it
goog.typeOf should probably be goog/typeOf.
David
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Colin Fleming
colin.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Another one - I've seen some forms like (goog.typeOf x), which implies that
JS root objects can be used directly? This is something I haven't seen
documented
Thanks David. I think I'll implement this the way it should work then, and
users will see an unresolved symbol warning if they use the incorrect
forms. As things get fancier I can provide some explanation and an
intention to migrate the incorrect forms to the correct ones.
Hopefully this should
Oh, one other question - does :refer-clojure in CLJS refer both macros and
functions in the same declaration? i.e. I could do something like:
(ns foo
(:refer-clojure :only [defn reduce]))
On 10 June 2014 01:27, Colin Fleming colin.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks David. I think I'll
That is correct.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Colin Fleming
colin.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, one other question - does :refer-clojure in CLJS refer both macros and
functions in the same declaration? i.e. I could do something like:
(ns foo
(:refer-clojure :only [defn reduce]))
Great, thanks.
On 10 June 2014 01:33, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
That is correct.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Colin Fleming
colin.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, one other question - does :refer-clojure in CLJS refer both macros
and
functions in the same
Hi David, this is great! I've switched to this branch, updated all hashing
impls of deftypes in my library and it works without a hitch and see much
less hash collisions in large 3d meshes as a result. Awesome!
K.
On 8 Jun 2014 18:07, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
1.6.0 branch is
Why clix is a workaround and not considered as the best solution?
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
ClojureScript group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
I have compilation warnings related to core.async. Here is the log:
Compiling resources/public/js/main.js from [src/cljs]...
Jun 10, 2014 7:49:49 AM com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager println
WARNING:
/Users/viebel/libs/klozzer/target/cljsbuild-compiler-0/cljs/core/async.js:127:
12 matches
Mail list logo
