scollier added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
note was added to the main Fedora-Dockerfiles github repo README to notify
contributors that the repo is no longer maintained.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/180
scollier added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Per the Fedora Cloud meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-11-23/fedora_atomic_working_group.2016-11-23-17.03.log.html
We agreed that I will post on the Fedora-Dockerfiles repo that we are going to
stop
scollier added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> dist-git won't allow for pull requests, will it?
Not sure, @maxamillion ?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/180
___
cloud
scollier added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> So, I have added my own auth there. For now, i suspect I have been a bit too
> optimist with haproxy and the roundrobin setup is not working as I hope (I am
> just forwarding the port 8443 to the 3 master nodes, so maybe I should
scollier reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are
following:
``
We need to decide what is going to happen with the Fedora-Dockerfiles repo
located here:
https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles
Right now I don't have enough time to maintain these properly.
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-08-10/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-08-10-17.00.html
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
Meeting started by scollier at 17:00:56 UTC (full logs).
Meeting summary
Roll Call (scollier, 17:01:02)
Ticket
On 06/15/2016 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Previously (at last year's Flock and after), we've talked about
replacing the Fedora Cloud Edition with Fedora Atomic Edition. (See
previous discussion on this list if you're unfamiliar with this
decision and its rationale.)
We hadn't actually had
Minutes are here:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-25/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-05-25-17.02.log.html
And text below:
==
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
==
Meeting started by scollier at 17:02:36 UTC. The
==
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
==
Meeting started by scollier at 17:02:24 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-04/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-05-04-17.02.log.html
.
On 04/13/2016 03:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
While we're discussing meeting times, I'd also like to discuss rotating
chair duties so that 1) nobody is saddled with it all the time, and 2)
the Chair 'o the Week (TM) shows up prepared to run the meeting.
That means:
- Has the action
On 02/17/2016 02:47 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
Hi all,
There was talk some time in the path of Kubernetes, Flannel, and etcd being
made available as container images for deployment on top of the Atomic image
rather than baked into it. Is this still the plan and if so when might this
work
On 10/01/2015 09:50 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:36:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
One of the things that I forgot to talk about with Scott was the
relation of Fedora-Dockerfiles to Layered Image Build System proposal
[3]. The proposal suggests that dist-git should
On 07/02/2015 09:42 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
At Summit, I talked briefly to Karanbir Singh from CentOS. CentOS has a
Jenkins system with a lot of hardware behind it (https://ci.centos.org/),
and they run all of their layered image builds* through that. KB
offered to run their tests on any
On 07/02/2015 01:39 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 12:22:54PM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
AIUI, this all goes through the Fedora-Dockerfiles repo. I don't
know what this would look like, but I'm envisioning the CentOS
Jenkins system pulling in this repo, and then running x
On 06/18/2015 03:22 PM, Michael P. McGrath wrote:
Hey all, a 2 week build of Atomic was done and I've put it up on the
mirror for testing. Even has an install iso:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/fedora-atomic/images/testing/
Kernel: 4.0.4-303
kubernetes: 0.17.1
docker: 1.6.0-3
On 06/10/2015 01:54 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Hi,
I request that we change the meeting time to 5PM UTC.
It should be fine for most of us, and we can't keep that current
schedule.
Please vote in that thread (-1/+0/+1)
+1
---
+1
Regards,
H.
___
cloud
root:qemu /dev/kvm
ack. I will go in and make the changes.
I think this would break on other machines that do not have libvirt
installed on the host.
On 03/19/2015 10:20 AM, Scott Collier wrote:
On 03/11/2015 09:40 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
On 03/11/2015 09:23 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote
On 03/11/2015 09:40 AM, Major Hayden wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2015 09:23 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
I'm CC'ing Scott b/c, if I'm not mistaken, he's done quite a lot of
the work so far on the Dockerfiles - but also, I think he's looking
for assistance there
On 03/03/2015 03:04 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Plan to post tomorrow. Anything to add/change here? Sorry for the delay!
Good article. Since you mention yum, you might want to add that each
line in a dockerfile creates a layer, we have to yum clean every
layer to remove the cache. That can
On 01/01/2015 11:00 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
Colin,
First off, Nice job on Fedora Atomic - I'm liking what I see :) A
fairly complete uOS for container launching.
I'm not sure if your aware, but there is no etcdctl in Fedora Atomic
Cloud 21 images. This wouldn't be such a big deal, but I
Hey Dusty
I'll check today.
On Oct 22, 2014 5:51 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
Hey All,
Sorry this took so long. I was trying to get Dennis to vote so that we
could
accommodate his schedule if we ever needed him in any meetings. I never
heard back
from him so I'm moving
On 09/09/2014 02:21 PM, Tim St Clair wrote:
Greetings folks -
I was wondering what the process is for trying to add Mesos
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ApacheMesos) to the base Atomic image?
If anyone has ideas or could point me in the right direction it would be
appreciated.
On Mar 24, 2014 6:54 AM, Aditya Patawari adima...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Scott Collier
emailscottcoll...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes please. That's the preferred workflow.
I have written the python file. Please check out the pull request [1].
Got it. Thanks. I'll
On 03/22/2014 07:23 AM, Aditya Patawari wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Scott Collier
emailscottcoll...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for looping me in here Matt. I just signed up for the Cloud SIG
mailing list.
I'm excited to see interest in expanding the fedora-dockerfiles project.
It's
24 matches
Mail list logo
