Hi All,
Just wondering if we should work around [1] in our cloud/atomic
kickstart scripts for building images by copying the bits in
/usr/share/syslinux/mbr.bin to the mbr of the disk.
I've been doing some 'manual' virt-install builds of the cloud/atomic
images using the same kickstart/tree
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:03:06AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:15:36PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Just wondering if we should work around [1] in our cloud/atomic
kickstart scripts for building images by copying the bits in
/usr/share/syslinux/mbr.bin to the mbr
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:04:10PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:59:01AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I am not super familiar with the build process for these images but I
assume that they are building up disk images (qcow2 or raw) that are
probably backed by files
Hi All,
Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21.
I know of at least a few cases where there has been confusion regarding
what deliverable has been the subject of a conversation on IRC
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:29:12AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, at 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
In a nutshell, it would be great if we added Container to references we
make to the container image (in conversation and docs).
I tend to say Docker Base Image - that's
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:28:20AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 09/07/2014 11:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hi All,
Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21.
I know of at least a few
Hi all,
I wrote a post[1] about finding the debug output of cloud-init on systemd
based systems.
TL;DR.. If you find yourself trying to debug cloud-init and you find that
/var/log/cloud-init.log and /var/log/messages are lacking then run:
journalctl /usr/bin/cloud-init
This is probably
Hey all,
I won't be able to make it to the meeting today as I'll be tour guide for
some folks who are in from out of town (let me know if you ever make it to
NYC).
I did get in touch with cole about virt-manager support for userdata /
cloud config data. They have thought about it and there is an
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:16:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
So, proposed new slate:
* Andy Grimm (agrimm)
* Dusty Mabe (dustymabe)
* Ian McLeod (imcleod)
* Jared Smith (jsmith)
* Joe Brockmeier (jzb)
* Haïkel Guémar (number80)
* David Gay (oddshocks)
* Mike Ruckmman (roshi
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:09:36AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147998
This may be related to the automatic partition resizing, but I'm not sure.
PVM-based booting, as in EC2 (uh, except for HVM in EC2, obviously) is
unaffected.
We
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:01:14PM -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
Hey fellow fedorans!
I've made some slight edits to the existing Test Overview [0] on the wiki
and would like some feedback. It's meant as a high-level overview of all the
things we think we need to test for the Fedora 21 cloud
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:00:02PM +, hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2014-10-10 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
Wasn't there an action item to find a new day/time for the meeting?
Do you guys want to fill in some times
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:26:02AM +0530, Neependra Khare wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Neependra,
I work with Red Hat in performance engineering team from Bangalore, India.
I am also one of the co-organizer of Banglaore Docker meetup group.
http://www.meetup.com/Docker-Bangalore/
I met few of you
Hey All,
Sorry this took so long. I was trying to get Dennis to vote so that we could
accommodate his schedule if we ever needed him in any meetings. I never heard
back
from him so I'm moving forward.
The results are here: http://whenisgood.net/recw7mb/results/wx5ep2c
It looks like the
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 05:51:32PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hey All,
Sorry this took so long. I was trying to get Dennis to vote so that we could
accommodate his schedule if we ever needed him in any meetings. I never heard
back
from him so I'm moving forward.
The results are here
Per discussion on the New Meeting Time thread we have decided to
cancel the meeting for today. The next meeting will be next week at
the new time.
Dusty
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have updated fedlocal [1] to reflect the new meeting time.
One slight problem I just realized is that Daylight Savings ends on
November 2nd so this may change some member's availability.
I guess we will cross that bridge when we get there.
Dusty
[1] -
Last night I created some AMIs for roshi to test using the procedure at [1].
I then booted the x86_64 AMI (ami-145fdd7c) and it seemed fine. The i386 AMI
(ami-de6be9b6) had issues booting (see [2] for full log). Has anyone else
seen this before?
[[32m OK [0m] Started System Logging Service.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:34:32AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As Joe noted the other day, Fedora Atomic is intended to come with this
service, which will create storage space for Docker images. As
mentioned in the IRC meeting, at this point, the plan is to get this to
stable after the beta
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 05:51:29PM +0100, milanisko k wrote:
looking at [2], lines 605--612, there's just the loop-back device therefore
cloud-init fails to fetch instance metadata.
Not sure why there's no other NIC device, though...
Thanks. I didn't notice that to begin with. I think the
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:09:41AM -0400, Andy Grimm wrote:
Thank you for testing. You basically tested in the same way that I
developed and demoed it. :-) Unfortunately, you gave it karma while
it was still pending, and when the push to testing happened, it reset
the karma to 0. So
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0500, Andy Grimm wrote:
yep, and this backs up the idea that it really is a 32-bit kernel
issue, rather than something in your process.
Based on a couple of conversations I found about the Xen hypervisor
and this error message, I believe the issue may be
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:53:21PM -0500, David Gay wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joe Brockmeier j...@redhat.com
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 2:47:00 PM
Subject: Re: 32 bit AMI registration boot problem: explaination and
possible
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:31:17AM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:36:30PM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
So - the good news is that we are tantalizingly close[1] to a good build
for the Atomic image. (We're missing the docker-storage-setup package,
and I
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:44:52PM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I finally got around to making some notes (very basic) for some people
to follow to test atomic. For now they live at [1] but I am planning
to add them to the Wiki and also put out a blog post with them in it.
Dusty
[1] - https
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:32:30PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014, at 08:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Colin, what's the easiest way to test this? (Or ostree updates in
general?)
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/2014-October/004497.html
It'd be
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:38:09AM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
We don't do much with the formalized test plans but we do need to take those
steps and put them into test cases for Atomic. I'll work on that today so we
have what we need for the testday, which is tomorrow :)
s/tomorrow/Thursday/
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:55:41AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:59:45PM +0100, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
IIRC somebody sent the list of AMIs but I have not been able to dig it
up -- do we have a list of AMIs for current Atomic builds to use for
tomorrow's Test Day?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 04:47:40PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Right now the Cloud flavor page on the new website has a single
testimonial:
“Fedora Atomic Host is the most up-to-date way to deploy Docker
containers.” – Joe Brockmeier, Cloud Dude
AIUI there were one or more Cloud WG
The other day during the Atomic Test Day jzb and I noticed that we
were losing bash history (seemingly randomly). Today I dug into it a
bit more. If you reboot a machine from a bash session then you will
lose all of your history for that session. Note the following is from
the F21 Cloud image:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:02:09PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:52:57PM -0600, Major Hayden wrote:
On 11/24/14 10:59 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Here's the first testimonial - big thanks to Dusty for running this down
and Major for being massively responsive!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:23:03PM +, Keith Sharp wrote:
I've been trying to get to grips with Docker over the last few days, and as
learning exercise I've been trying to build a chain of images from scratch,
however I've run into some problems and I hope someone can put me on the
right
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:48:33AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hey all,
Past experience suggests that a lot of people fade out for vacation in
the U.S. early in the week. Wondering if we'll have a quorum (or
anybody) around for a meeting tomorrow?
(I've pinged a few folks on IRC and
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 07:02:04PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpm-ostree-2014.111-1.fc21
Will allow Atomic to be smaller, and also fixes the wheel bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164058
Please karma.
Is it a bit odd that
Hi all,
I can't make the meeting today. Summary for this past week is: DigitalOcean
now has Fedora 21.. woohoo.
If there was anything else I was supposed to do let me know about it.
I'll read the meeting notes.
Dusty
___
cloud mailing list
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:27:13PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015, at 12:56 PM, Matt Micene wrote:
I'd be in favor of pulling NetworkManager.? It still seems that network is
the way for server class systems to handle networking
It's not that simple, at least for
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:47:22PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Both NetworkManager and network systemd services are enabled in F21
and F22 Atomic and this could be causing some issues we are seeing.
We should probably open a BZ for this. If no one objects I will make
one.
Opened this BZ
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:00:02PM +, du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-03-11 from 19:00:00 to 20:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
For those of us that just got hit with Daylight Savings Time the
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:38:14AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Garrett Holmstrom
gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do we still need dhclient in our cloud images? I am looking at
The new sfdisk that was rewritten (see [1]) doesn't support an option that
is used by growpart (which is used by cloud-init). Below is the error that
occurs
in the TC7 compose at [2]:
[root@t7 ~]# growpart --dry-run /dev/vda 1
Do we still need dhclient in our cloud images? I am looking at the
candidate for F22 [1] and am having issues with my network coming up
on boot in an openstack environment. I suspect the fact that dhclient
isn't in the image is to blame. It is in the F21 image. Was it
intentionally removed?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:43:51PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we still need dhclient in our cloud images? I am looking at the
candidate for F22 [1] and am having issues with my network coming up
on boot in
Both NetworkManager and network systemd services are enabled in F21
and F22 Atomic and this could be causing some issues we are seeing.
We should probably open a BZ for this. If no one objects I will make
one.
I would suggest that we adopt the approach that Fedora Cloud Base
takes by just
A few people can't make the meeting today so we have decided to
cancel. Will resume next week.
Dusty
___
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:55:00AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hey guys,
Here is a link to a draft post I have created for the cloud test day.
Check it out and let me know if there is anything wrong. It's simple
but fits I
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 06:40:31PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 06:38:59PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I think we really need to get a new Docker rpm in to F22 atomic before
we ship. One thing that I found this weekend is that /run/ is mounted
Uh oh
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 07:43:38PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 07:18:05PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
So. Some new information. Looks like there is a new docker in testing [1]
that does not have this problem. We need to add karma to this. Please test
and upvote
I think we really need to get a new Docker rpm in to F22 atomic before
we ship. One thing that I found this weekend is that /run/ is mounted
on top of /tmpfs inside running containers. This means that directories
that are needed don't exist and cause some applications to fail on
startup. A great
Hi All,
I have a booth to man at a conference here in NYC so I won't be able to make
the
meeting tomorrow. I added some comments to some tickets [1] [2] that I hope
will be
discussed tomorrow.
Also, I know we had talked a while about systemd-networkd/NM/legacy network.
See [3]
and [4].
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:35:15PM -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
Hey fellow cloudies!
I've updated the PRD [0] with the discussion points from the Talk
[1] page. I think I got everything in there where people had it in mind.
Please take a look at the PRD and edit it or leave more feedback on
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:10:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 08:06:04AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Well, and linux-firmware, which isn't needed at runtime but is pulled
in for kernel
Hey all,
Have we considered running fstrim against our cloud image filesystems
before we package it up? I wrote a small script to do it (inside a
container) at [1]. Looks like we can save ~28M:
[root@f22 xzimg]# ls -lh ./
total 1.3G
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 3.0G May 22 00:13 orig.raw
-rw-r--r--.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:54:56PM +0200, Ha??kel wrote:
Hi,
I request that we change the meeting time to 5PM UTC.
It should be fine for most of us, and we can't keep that current
schedule.
Please vote in that thread (-1/+0/+1)
+1
- Dusty
___
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 07:46:51PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 08:54:56PM +0200, Ha??kel wrote:
Hi,
I request that we change the meeting time to 5PM UTC.
It should be fine for most of us, and we can't keep that current
schedule.
Please vote in that thread (-1/+0
Hi All,
We are evaluating adding systemd-networkd [1] or NetworkManager to the cloud
Base image.
In discussions we have identified a need for us to identify requirements of the
network
management tool. We'd like to get these requirements down so we can start to
compare
networkd vs NM and see
docker-storage-setup fails on our cloud image because there is no storage for it
to configure. In my case I am just testing on openstack with no ephemeral disks
attached to the instance.
All you need to do to show this is install and start docker and then
you will see:
[root@f22 ~]# systemctl
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 04:50:12PM -0400, Ron Wagner wrote:
Greetings,
If this is the wrong list, kindly point me to the correct one.
I am trying to get ecryptfs running on a Fedora 21 EC2 instance on Amazon’s
AWS service. Not having any luck whatsoever, I brought up a virtual F21 on my
html version:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-21/cloud_wg.2015-10-21-17.02.html
full log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-21/cloud_wg.2015-10-21-17.02.log.html
=
#fedora-meeting-1 Meeting
=
On 10/28/2015 06:45 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
We found out today that all RC images for Atomic are broken. They are
building against a much older yum repo (the beta repos) and thus have
a very old systemd, which has some breakages with ostree. dgilmore and
maxamillion have done some investigation
docker 1.7 is what is in the stable f23 repo. with that we can't run a
container with root bind mounted into it:
```
-bash-4.3# docker run -it --rm -v /:/host busybox
Error response from daemon: Relabeling of / is not allowed
-bash-4.3# rpm -q docker
docker-1.7.0-22.gitdcff4e1.fc23.x86_64
```
Hi all,
We will be indexing our vagrant images in Atlas for the F23 release.
We'd like to invite people to try it out with the RC6 vagrant images
that I just recently indexed in atlas. Right now these images are in
my own repository, but on release they will be under the fedora name
so just
html version:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-28/cloud_wg.2015-10-28-17.02.html
full log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-28/cloud_wg.2015-10-28-17.02.log.html
===
#fedora-meeting-1: Cloud WG
On 11/13/2015 10:41 AM, Amanda Carter wrote:
Hey folks, creating a separate thread for this longer term discussion. We're
getting ready to release our first 2 week atomic update on Tuesday and Dusty
Mabe has raised 2 potential release blockers that were not part of automated
testing. It's
On 10/30/2015 05:28 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 10/30/2015 05:21 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 08:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:45:09PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Right now the last booting atomic image is TC11. If we don't do
another compose
This is just a reminder that Daylight savings time has hit many of us.
In the past few cycles we have decided to stick with the same UTC time.
We'll be doing that again this time so the meeting will stay at 17:00
UTC. Click the link below to see what that means for you:
On 10/30/2015 05:53 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote:
docker 1.7 is what is in the stable f23 repo. with that we can't run a
container with root bind mounted into it:
```
-bash-4.3# docker run -it --rm -v /:/host busybox
On 10/30/2015 08:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote:
docker 1.7 is what is in the stable f23 repo. with that we can't run a
container with root bind mounted into it:
```
-bash-4.3# docker run -it --rm -v /:/host busybox
html version:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-04/fedora-meeting-1.2015-11-04-17.03.html
full log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-04/fedora-meeting-1.2015-11-04-17.03.log.html
===
#fedora-meeting-1: cloud_wg
Sending this to marketing and the cloud list..
I have written a post promoting our vagrant images (now indexed in
atlas). Can I get some feedback on this and possibly out to the magazine?
https://gist.github.com/dustymabe/f4db1ef857260d216ab2
Dusty
On 10/28/2015 03:33 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hi all,
We will be indexing our vagrant images in Atlas for the F23 release.
We'd like to invite people to try it out with the RC6 vagrant images
that I just recently indexed in atlas. Right now these images are in
my own repository, but on release
Is there a reason the ostree remote for f23 (
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/atomic/23/) hasn't been
updated since "Wed 28 Oct 2015 10:50:12 AM UTC" ?
-bash-4.3# rpm-ostree upgrade
Updating from: fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/f23/x86_64/docker-host
22 metadata, 29 content objects
Hey guys anybody seen these when starting
docker-1.8.2-5.gitcb216be.fc23.x86_64:
```
Oct 08 18:55:47 cloudhost.localdomain audit[1513]: AVC avc: denied {
read } for pid=1513 comm="iptables" path="net:[4026531957]" dev="nsfs"
ino=4026531957 scontext=system_u:system_r:iptables_t:s0
On 10/08/2015 03:06 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hey guys anybody seen these when starting
docker-1.8.2-5.gitcb216be.fc23.x86_64:
```
Oct 08 18:55:47 cloudhost.localdomain audit[1513]: AVC avc: denied {
read } for pid=1513 comm="iptables" path="net:[4026531957]"
dev="nsfs
On 10/06/2015 10:13 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:01:51AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Heh, it seems that my career as Fedora-Dockerfiles comaintainer may
be rather short :) I think having a web frontend with pull requests
for the new dist-git is an awesome idea. I'm
On 10/16/2015 01:40 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are
now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing!
Hey Adam/Cloud list,
Does anyone know what
On 10/17/2015 12:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/16/2015 01:40 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are
now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing
On 10/17/2015 12:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/17/2015 12:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/16/2015 01:40 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/16/2015 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 10 (TC10) and TC11 are
now available for testing. Please
On 10/09/2015 11:46 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/09/2015 06:12 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
This looks like docker is running with the wrong context. Make sure
docker-selinux is installed. and /usr/bin/docker has the right label.
restorecon -v /usr/bin/docker
If docker is still labeled
On 10/12/2015 06:09 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
On 10/11/2015 01:41 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 10/10/2015 09:09 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On 10/10/2015 08:02 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 10/09/2015 01:07 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:43:52 -0400,
Dusty Mabe <
html version:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-07/cloud_wg.2015-10-07-17.02.html
text version:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-07/cloud_wg.2015-10-07-17.02.txt
=
#fedora-meeting-1 Meeting
=
On 10/13/2015 08:38 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:23:00PM +0530, Kushal Das wrote:
the network section in the kickstart, and did a local build. But it still
failed with the same issue. So, the only *easy* solution I can think of
is actually deleting the file
On 10/09/2015 05:56 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:06:09PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hey guys anybody seen these when starting
docker-1.8.2-5.gitcb216be.fc23.x86_64:
```
Oct 08 18:55:47 cloudhost.localdomain audit[1513]: AVC avc: denied { read }
for pid=1513 comm
On 10/08/2015 03:06 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
and this is in the journal:
```
Oct 08 19:04:31 cloudhost.localdomain audit[1]: USER_AVC pid=1 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
msg='Unknown permission stop for class system
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd&q
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:10:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 08:06:04AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Well, and linux-firmware
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:16:49AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:44:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 07:44:25AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:10:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
In this case kernel-core could
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:42:29AM +0530, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone has a set of reproducible steps to setup
file sync using NFS and 9pfs in a Vagrant/libvirt box.
Related issues with NFS setup on Vagrant:
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/110
If
We have had several people report issues with the F23 beta vagrant box
[1]. I see this in the log file under /var/log/libvirt/qemu/:
KVM internal error. Suberror: 1
emulation failure
Can some more people try this and report if it is successful and if not
let us know if you get the same errors
On 09/08/2015 06:14 PM, Jason Brooks wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dusty Mabe" <du...@dustymabe.com>
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 2:54:06 PM
Subject: F23 beta vagrant box issues
We have had several people report issues w
On 08/31/2015 01:48 PM, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ratnadeep Debnath <rtn...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:13:10PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
I say put t
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:13:10PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:42:29AM +0530, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone has a set of reproducible steps to setup
file sync using NFS and 9pfs in a Vagrant/libvirt box.
Related issues with NFS
On 08/31/2015 03:40 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
Hi All,
There has been some discussion of doing a joint test day with Fedora
and CentOS atomic folks. Fedora is having a test day for Fedora Cloud
base on 9/8 (all are welcome to join us). We were thinking about
having the joint Fedora/CentOS test day
On 09/14/2015 11:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:15:41PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello!
Any progress on this? I need to inform the marketing and design teams
soon so that we can begin working on the material. This is now quite
urgent.
Trac ticket here:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 01:44:43PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 11:59 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Since VirtualBox is the format the vast majority of Vagrant users will
> > want, that's... kind of a big deal. *sigh* Options I can see here are:
> >
> > A) Scramble to find some
On 09/15/2015 02:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
https://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/misc/newfedoratomiclogomockup.png
With Fedora Atomic Host as primary, the current Fedora Cloud logo would
be still used for the Cloud Base image, but would probably be
de-colored (see the non-Edition logos on
Hey all,
Sorry for the wide distribution.. We'd like to promote the joint test
day we are doing next week for Atomic. Please see Jason's blog post for
more details and join us on the test day:
http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/09/combined-fedora-centos-atomic-test-day-next-week/
- Dusty
html version:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-09-16/fedora-meeting-1.2015-09-16-17.01.html
full log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-09-16/fedora-meeting-1.2015-09-16-17.01.log.html
===
#fedora-meeting-1:
From what I can tell the the atomic builds are still broken [1]. The
cloud base builds are working [2]. I was able to perform a localbuild
by changing the "Install Tree" from [3] to match what is set for the cloud
base build [4].
Is that the problem that is breaking the builds? How do we get
On 09/15/2015 09:18 AM, Ryan Brown wrote:
On 09/14/2015 03:22 PM, Aditya Patawari wrote:
Hello,
During the last meeting we talked about the text for gofedora.org. The
current text is good but I suggest something on more positive note.
Current text:
Fedora Cloud provides a minimal image of
On 12/04/2015 02:16 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> Right, this would affect them all. As you mention below we
were >> intending for this ("eth0") to be the case for a long time so I
>>
1 - 100 of 875 matches
Mail list logo
