PR: Cleaning up Fedora Docker image kickstart file

Please review the changes: https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/pull-request/119 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #186 `switch to overlay2`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks for the heads up, and sorry for the double comments if it happens again! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/186 ___

[atomic-wg] Issue #186 `switch to overlay2`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Thanks for the heads up, and sorry for the double comments if it happens again! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/186 ___

[atomic-wg] Issue #186 `switch to overlay2`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > vgoyal > This script will only set up the thin pool when you are using devicemapper > right? So the script would only make a thin pool LV when running for dm and > only make a regular LV when running for overlay. So one type of

[atomic-wg] Issue #186 `switch to overlay2`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > vgoyal > This script will only set up the thin pool when you are using devicemapper > right? So the script would only make a thin pool LV when running for dm and > only make a regular LV when running for overlay. So one type of

Re: [atomic-devel] Moving towards containerized Kube/layered packages

Adding fedora cloud list. On 08/22/2016 10:13 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > Hi, I'd like to propose a fairly fundamental rework of Atomic Host. TL;DR: > > - Move towards "system containers" (or layered packages) for flannel/etcd > - Move towards containers (system, or Docker) for

Re: [atomic-devel] Add mdadm to Fedora Atomic Host

On 08/18/2016 01:47 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > > On 08/18/2016 12:00 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> We need to add mdadm to Fedora Atomic Host so that we can support software >> raid disk setups. >> >> https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/8 >>

2wk atomic release candidate: 20170228

We are going to attempt to release the 20170228 images that contain the fix for CVE-2017-6074. We'll try to release today (2/28) unless we get any negative feedback. Here is the new candidate: The atomic images are here:

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20170227.n.0 compose check report

On 02/27/2017 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 17:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> Missing expected images: >> >> Atomic qcow2 x86_64 > > There seems to be some sort of problem in pungi-make-ostree: >

Re: [atomic-devel] 2wk atomic release candidate: 20170228

On 02/28/2017 08:56 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 01:37 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> The atomic images are here: > ^ Host =) > >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-25-20170228.0/compose/C

Re: Fedora Cloud AMIs are not readable

On 03/01/2017 12:08 PM, Sayan Chowdhury wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Sayan Chowdhury > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Stephen John Smoogen >> wrote: >>> We are still working on this. >>> >>> On 27 February 2017 at

Re: Ansible woes for FAO

On 02/28/2017 08:11 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 02/28/2017 05:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 02/28/2017 07:33 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> Folks, >>> >>> Apparently Ansible-2.2.1 breaks OpenShift-Ansible. The only other >>>

Re: Ansible woes for FAO

On 02/28/2017 07:33 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > Apparently Ansible-2.2.1 breaks OpenShift-Ansible. The only other > version available, 2.1.2 is too old for Openshift-Ansible. And attempts > to downgrade via pip result in dependency hell and fails. Haven't tried with 2.2.1 yet. Been

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 03/01/2017 09:25 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree commit: > > Commit: ba95a4665776b58d342ad9cc36779f9b8fcf19c6606f8964a8ec1622cadc > Version: 25.67 > > > Existing systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. `atomic host

[atomic-wg] Issue #162 `Milestones, components need updating`

The status of the issue: `Milestones, components need updating` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/162 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

[atomic-wg] Issue #127 `Working with the Server WG`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Leaving the cloud base image with the cloud sig for now: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ITOEHIH2LJGUB6ZIOUYGOEX4T66JJKSX/#PEEAQVTK5TNDKFHXBRVMW7ZA5NKKYKT6 `` To reply, visit the

[atomic-wg] Issue #127 `Working with the Server WG`

The status of the issue: `Working with the Server WG` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/127 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[atomic-wg] Issue #121 `Migrate Dockerfiles to systemd, update for Fedora:latest, clean up READMEs`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` closing this Dockerfiles ticket as we are now using the Fedora build system to build containers and they are going through review. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/121

[atomic-wg] Issue #121 `Migrate Dockerfiles to systemd, update for Fedora:latest, clean up READMEs`

The status of the issue: `Migrate Dockerfiles to systemd, update for Fedora:latest, clean up READMEs` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/121 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #236 `container scratch build without a dist-git`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @maxamillion can you answer this? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/236 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #198 `move ostree ref to be "container-host"`

The issue: `move ostree ref to be "container-host"` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `dustymabe` by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/198 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[atomic-wg] Issue #186 `switch to overlay2`

The issue: `switch to overlay2` of project: `atomic-wg` has been assigned to `dustymabe` by dustymabe. https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/186 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 08/23/2016 11:30 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic compose? compose?

On 09/05/2016 02:06 PM, Kushal Das wrote: > On 05/09/16, Kushal Das wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host. >> >> Deployments: >> ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host >>Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02) >> Commit: >>

Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic compose? compose?

On 09/06/2016 10:27 AM, Micah Abbott wrote: > > It looks like the ostree composes had the version numbering reset on > July 20. > > # ostree pull --commit-metadata-only --depth=-1 > fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > > 68 metadata, 0 content objects fetched; 7 KiB

overlayfs for AFTER Fedora 25

In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26. I think this will work well because it will give us some time to allow people to "try" overlayfs in F25 (we

Re: growpart not working in Fedora 25 cloud base

On 09/10/2016 12:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> >> Should I open a bug for this? Can we get someone to look at it/work on it? > > Yes, and I think it needs a dmesg in case partprobe was

Re: growpart not working in Fedora 25 cloud base

On 09/11/2016 12:22 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 09/10/2016 12:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Should I open a bug for this? Can we get someone to look at it/wor

Re: overlayfs for AFTER Fedora 25

On 09/15/2016 04:25 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > On 14/09/16, Adam Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >>> >>> In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After >>> discussing w

growpart not working in Fedora 25 cloud base

From https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5352/1352/Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-20160909.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 Sep 10 03:13:17 cloudhost.localdomain cloud-init[645]: 2016-09-10 03:13:17,078 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed: growpart /dev/sda 1 Sep 10 03:13:17 cloudhost.localdomain

Fedora Cloud/Atomic Test Day

Hey Jason, Did you ever make any progress on planning a test day for us for this cycle? Dusty ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-09-21

On 09/21/2016 03:38 PM, Vinny Valdez wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sayan Chowdhury > > wrote: > > * vagrant boxes fixups https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136 >

Add mdadm to Fedora Atomic Host

We need to add mdadm to Fedora Atomic Host so that we can support software raid disk setups. https://pagure.io/fedora-atomic/pull-request/8 ___ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

lease?) Dusty [1] https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Atomic/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-dvd-x86_64-24-20160820.0.iso > >> On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >>> The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on >>> 8/23 [1

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

On 08/25/2016 12:05 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 08/25/2016 04:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic. >> >> Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is >>

Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install: -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAMEREFSPEC * 2016-06-15

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

Adding atomic-devel On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on > 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install: > > -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status > TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID

Re: Don't overwrite Two Week Atomic (Ticket #147)

On 08/25/2016 06:43 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance > to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next > Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the >

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

On 08/24/2016 11:27 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > Hi all, > > During Flock PRD discussion, a proposal was put up about changing the > name of the WG to Atomic. We have few open questions from last week's > meeting. I > will try to put those down here, if anyone wants to add to that list, or >

Re: Discussion on changing the name of Working Group

On 08/25/2016 02:51 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: >> >> Others have made some good comments in this thread. I'm really not as >> concerned with these specific questions. >> >> I think

Need signups to host future Fedora cloud meetings

I just added new dates to the page. Can people sign up to host the meetings? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud#Upcoming_Meetings.2C_Agendas.2C_and_Chairs If you are new, don't worry! We will all help you through it. Dusty ___ cloud mailing list

Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-08-24

summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-08-24/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-08-24-17.07.html full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-08-24/fedora_cloud_wg.2016-08-24-17.07.log.html == #fedora-meeting-1: fedora cloud WG

Re: Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree

Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic. Dusty On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on > 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install: > > -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status &

Re: Fedora Cloud/Atomic Test Day

On 09/28/2016 02:56 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > That'd be fine, or would Fri be better? Friday works too. Dusty ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Cloud/Atomic Test Day

On 09/28/2016 02:13 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > I was supposed to send out an ML msg about that but I haven't done it yet. > How does Oct 11 sound? > > Jason That week sounds good but I would suggest that Monday or Fridays tend to be a little lighter on meetings than other days so we might get

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 09/21/2016 12:45 PM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

Re: Current Fedora 25 Atomic images are failing to boot

On 10/03/2016 02:47 AM, Trishna Guha wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The current F25 Atomic images are failing to boot[1], I never managed to >> reach >> dracut emergency shell in my local box. >> >> Can anyone else also please

Re: Current Fedora 25 Atomic images are failing to boot

On 10/03/2016 03:06 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, at 02:57 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> There is a kernel panic happening early in boot. Here is the serial >> console log from one of those boots: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: Current Fedora 25 Atomic images are failing to boot

On 10/03/2016 02:57 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 10/03/2016 02:47 AM, Trishna Guha wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Kushal Das <m...@kushaldas.in> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The current F25 Atomic images are failing to boot[1], I

Re: Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging

On 09/29/2016 06:03 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > I was recently discussing some items around docker layered image > release process in the future with Randy (bowlofeggs) and Patrick > (puiterwijk). As a side effect of our discussion there were two > questions I wanted to ask of the

Re: Fedora Cloud/Atomic Test Day

On 10/03/2016 01:45 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:38 PM, wrote: >> Hey Jason >> >> Did you guys file a ticket for the test day? >> If not , here's is where you can [ >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/report/11 ] >> > > I'm going to file this

Need karma on new docker package in F25

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0ed0314ad7 We need karma on this package so we can get new docker-storage-setup to take care of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387934. Dusty ___ cloud mailing list --

FYI: F25 image builds - none for the past few days

On thursday night the image builds didn't run because pagure was intermittently down. For the past 2 nights they have failed to build. I'm not sure why exactly but there is some libvirt error [1] in the logs. Dennis has been looking into this for us. I'm hoping we can an image built to look

Re: Proposal: su-exec in Fedora Base Image

On 11/08/2016 03:57 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> Someone's written a tiny C implementation of gosu: >> >> https://github.com/ncopa/su-exec > > This is seems close to `runuser` from util-linux, > which would just need to be taught an

Fedora Atomic 2016-11-09 RC Testing == Nightly Testing

Hey all, In Fedora Atomic the release process is disjoint from the rest of Fedora in that our images aren't produced as part of the normal "production" composes and RCs. I will make it a point to send out an email like this on the same day that every RC is created in Fedora so that we can

[atomic-wg] Issue #158 `Proposed website changes for Cloud Base → Atomic Host switch`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > The dark text on purple around "atomic cli" is a little tough to read. Yeah, on this page: https://stg.getfedora.org/en/cloud/ - the Atomic CLI section does not look good. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this

Blogs for F25 release

I believe we need to communicate a few things for F25: 1 - overlayfs - what it is, how to enable it in the various f25 images we release 2 - containerized k8s - no longer in atomic host so we have to show people how to use it I am already planning to write the first blog post. Any volunteers

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > There's a kube 1.4.5 in koji for fc26 > (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=816481), and I've asked > Jan about making it available for fedora 25. Can you keep us in the loop here on the progress of this one?

Re: Blogs for F25 release

On 11/10/2016 05:09 AM, Jason Brooks wrote: > I summed up the state of kube on f25 in this issue: > https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/176 Wow! That is an excellent, very detailed, issue. Thanks Jason! ___ cloud mailing list --

Re: Blogs for F25 release

On 11/09/2016 05:45 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 11/09/2016 09:43 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> I believe we need to communicate a few things for F25: >> >> 1 - overlayfs - what it is, how to enable it in the various f25 images we >> release >> 2 - containerized k8s

Re: [Marketing] Feedback needed on Fedora 25 announcements

I reviewed the announcement and would like to suggest some changes: https://gist.github.com/dustymabe/e308d1f549e4df55d3a902d271b4cf48/revisions?short_path=7002345#diff-700234571b092630ce68dcd5a3da6529 Also, the press release seems to still reference 24. Are we updating that? On 11/02/2016

Re: [Marketing] Feedback needed on Fedora 25 announcements

On 11/10/2016 12:01 PM, Brian Proffitt wrote: > Dusty: > > Added your changes. in them, you mentioned a "yum/rpm environment". Should > that be "dnf/rpm"? > Yep! Thanks ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: weird error with docker-storage-setup

On 10/21/2016 04:02 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, at 03:42 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > >>> Oct 21 18:40:37 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: >>> docker-storage-setup.service: Job docker-storage-setup.service/start >>> deleted to break ordering cycle starting with

Re: weird error with docker-storage-setup

On 10/23/2016 06:55 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 10/21/2016 04:02 PM, Colin Walters wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016, at 03:42 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: >> >>>> Oct 21 18:40:37 localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: >>>> docker-stor

[atomic-wg] Issue #175 `Fedora 24 atomic image Fedora-Atomic-24-20161025.0.x86_64.qcow is not allowing ssh`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Looks like the instance is shutting itself down: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/460804/14774076 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/175

[atomic-wg] Issue #175 `Fedora 24 atomic image Fedora-Atomic-24-20161025.0.x86_64.qcow is not allowing ssh`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` actually I don't think it shut itself down now. looks like the gssproxy service fails to come up and has to time out before other things can continue during boot: ``` -bash-4.3# systemctl status gssproxy.service ●

weird error with docker-storage-setup

I haven't had time to really investigate but figured I would pass this along: qcow: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-25-20161021.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/Fedora-Atomic-25-20161021.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 test results from last night's test run:

should we release new fedora cloud image for f24

As part of the next release of Fedora 24 atomic host should we also release the Fedora 24 base image so that the released version doesn't have the latest huge kernel bug in it by default? Dusty ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: should we release new fedora cloud image for f24

On 10/24/2016 03:22 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > As part of the next release of Fedora 24 atomic host should we also > release the Fedora 24 base image so that the released version doesn't > have the latest huge kernel bug in it by default? It looks like the image builds we are doi

Can't make the meeting today

Hey WG, I can't make the meeting today because of a conflict. Some updates: - We have a working Atomic qcow so we are go for test day: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2016_10_24_Cloud - The tests for Autocloud for f25 failed last night due to a typo. We believe that they really

[atomic-wg] Issue #177 `Disable interactive "cp" in fedora base image`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` agreed. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/177 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

[atomic-wg] Issue #158 `Proposed website changes for Cloud Base → Atomic Host switch`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I gave review and feedback in the original ticket that was opened for this: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/406#comment:1 Please make any further comments/review there. `` To reply, visit the link below or just

[atomic-wg] Issue #177 `Disable interactive "cp" in fedora base image`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus - can you explain what situation you were in when you hit this problem? I'm not seeing it: ``` $ sudo docker run -it --rm fedora-docker-base-25-1.2.x86_64 bash [root@0dcea1cb767e /]# [root@0dcea1cb767e /]# cp

[atomic-wg] Issue #181 `Vagrant cannot create synced folder`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This is an actual problem with the way the images are built right now. Can you workaround this issue by adding a line like this to your Vagrantfile: config.vm.synced_folder "/tmp", "/vagrant", disabled: 'true' `` To reply, visit

[atomic-wg] Issue #174 `network not coming up in fah25 qcow2`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @walters. what exactly do you want to revert? We added the [patch](http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/cloud-init.git/commit/?id=b48cb59de23027b5b647baaf7d7dbe8eb52c95ad) to cloud-init to make it so that networkmanager can read

[atomic-wg] Issue #174 `network not coming up in fah25 qcow2`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > One should be able to configure static IPs via nmcli in bootcmd hooks in > cloud-init, so I'd like to back out the change to enable network.service. hmm. I don't think we enabled network.service ``` -bash-4.3# systemctl status

[atomic-wg] Issue #154 `make Fedora Atomic download page clearer`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I would say update the wiki page, but whatever works. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/154 ___ cloud mailing list --

[atomic-wg] Issue #154 `make Fedora Atomic download page clearer`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus - now we can propose new changes to the F25 page. please schedule some time for interested parties to get together and go over your proposed changes. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

Fedora 25 Cloud Base Images

We currently don't have a download page for the Fedora 25 cloud base image. This is because we did a poor job of communicating with the websites team (our fault, not theirs) before Fedora 25 release. There will be a new site for the cloud base image at https://cloud.fedoraproject.org/ This is

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

On 11/22/2016 12:17 AM, nore...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > A new update of Fedora Cloud Atomic Host has been released and can be > downloaded at: > > Images can be found here: > > https://getfedora.org/en/cloud/download/atomic.html > > Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found

[atomic-wg] Issue #181 `Vagrant cannot create synced folder`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > What's the problem? It seems it cannot write to / That is right. With Atomic only some directories are writable. The problem is that the images used to get generated with the default sync to go to `/home/vagrant/sync` and that

Re: Move F25 Atomic to "Production" composes

On 11/16/2016 11:49 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 11/14/2016 04:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> Hi releng, >> >> It is a week before Fedora 25 will be released and the Atomic images >> are still using the "nightly" composes. When can we expect the >

[atomic-wg] Issue #154 `make Fedora Atomic download page clearer`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This is going to need to be reworked for F25. After next week let's sit down and apply your sketch to the new pages. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/154

[atomic-wg] Issue #158 `Proposed website changes for Cloud Base → Atomic Host switch`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` mattdm and I are meeting with robyduck today to try to get a formal request in for cloud.fp.o `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/158

[atomic-wg] Issue #178 `Fix locale support in base image.`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @jberkus ^^ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/178 ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[atomic-wg] Issue #176 `status of kubernetes on fedora atomic 25`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` as an alternative for now I have been working on getting the openshift-ansible installer to work against F25 atomic host. I have opened up several issuses: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/issues/2808

Testing the RC1.3 images

I think RC1.3 is what we are going with on Tuesday. Please take some time to test out the RC1.3 images so we can find/document any issues that we need to. You can find them on this page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_RC_1.3_Cloud Also, the EC2 images are:

Discussion about overlay vs devicemapper for docker-storage-setup in Fedora

dwalsh sent a message to the devel list about this. Follow along/respond here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JBUEITVRLFHHOPQXSSFVYL5WQA3754ZZ/ ___ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

[atomic-wg] Issue #177 `Disable interactive "cp" in fedora base image`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` so this is the same behavior as the F24 docker base image so I vote that we don't make this change until after F25 release. - Also someone needs to step up and "own" the issue and be responsible for making the change. `` To

[atomic-wg] Issue #178 `Fix locale support in base image.`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @dwalsh - can you comment on this? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/178 ___ cloud mailing list --

Fedora 25 Compose for Release Day

Looks like we have a candidate for release for F25 Atomic this week. This is the Fedora-Atomic-25-20161120.0 production compose and all links to ISOs and cloud images are below. The autocloud tests all passed https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/491. Please take some time and see if

Move F25 Atomic to "Production" composes

Hi releng, It is a week before Fedora 25 will be released and the Atomic images are still using the "nightly" composes. When can we expect the production composes that run daily (i.e. RC-20161114.0) to start producing F25 images rather than F24 images? We really need this so that we can test

Re: FYI: F25 image builds - none for the past few days

We now have successful image builds! Please try them out! https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-25-20161101.n.0/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/ On 10/30/2016 09:17 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On thursday night the image builds didn't run because

Re: FYI: F25 image builds - none for the past few days

On 10/30/2016 09:45 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 10/30/2016 09:17 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> On thursday night the image builds didn't run because pagure was >> intermittently down. >> For the past 2 nights they have failed to build. I'm not sure why

Re: FYI: F25 image builds - none for the past few days

On 10/30/2016 09:17 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > On thursday night the image builds didn't run because pagure was > intermittently down. > For the past 2 nights they have failed to build. I'm not sure why exactly but > there is > some libvirt error [1] in the logs. > >

Re: Connection Refused on SSH to Fedora Atomic 24 QCOW2 Image

On 11/02/2016 02:04 AM, Trishna Guha wrote: > Hi all, > > There is Connection refused issue when I am trying to ssh to the current > Fedora Atomic 24 Qcow2 image [1]. > Here is the connection refused failure for it on Autocloud [2]. > > [1] >

network not coming up on 20161011 FAH

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3677/16053677/Fedora-Cloud-Base-25-20161011.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 seen on local kvm as well as on openstack newton: Cloud-init v. 0.7.7 running 'init' at Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:45:39 +. Up 7.01 s ci-info: +++Net device

Re: Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement

The Vagrant Atlas page with the new atomic host: https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/ https://atlas.hashicorp.com/fedora/boxes/25-atomic-host/versions/20161207 vagrant init fedora/25-atomic-host; vagrant up or, if you already have the box, to get the new one: vagrant box update --box

[atomic-wg] Issue #184 `ISO file is missing`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > Well, we shouldn't remove the prior ISO until the new one is populated. We > had at least 24 hours with no ISO. We actually don't "remove" the iso, but the link does get updated (which is effectively removing it from the

[atomic-wg] Issue #185 `November 21 ISO is not bootable`

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` thanks @miabbott, I also just tried out the latest ISO and it works for me. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/185 ___ cloud

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >