On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:26:05AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 09:12 +0100, Bastian Winkler wrote:
using floating point values for sub-pixel precision is IMHO a very good
thing, thank you.
thanks. I would have preferred to get this kind of feedback during 0.7,
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:38 +0100, Bastian Winkler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:26:05AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 09:12 +0100, Bastian Winkler wrote:
using floating point values for sub-pixel precision is IMHO a very good
thing, thank you.
thanks. I
I have clutter compiled and running on Vista (using Tor Lillqvist's GTK+
bundle), but I've run into a couple of problems:
First, in clutter-stage-win32.c, clutter_stage_win32_realize was failing
because clutter_stage_win32_choose_pixel_format couldn't negotiate a
usable format. After a bit of
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:30 -0600, Keath Milligan wrote:
I have clutter compiled and running on Vista (using Tor Lillqvist's GTK+
bundle), but I've run into a couple of problems:
My guess is the pixel format you've ended up with is one of the
'Microsoft Generic GDI' implementations which means
