Re: [CMake] How to add additional informations to cdash?

ces of information, but it may help. It does have the benefit of putting this information in a very visible spot on the dashboard. You can also set CTEST_BUILD_NAME to hold a couple other pieces of data. I use that to specify which build flags were used and which subset of tests was run. Ceej aka

Re: [CMake] Execution order

ouldn't have to, unless you're using in-source builds which is very strongly deprecated. Once you've gotten used to out-of-source builds you'll never want to go back. Read section 3 of the FAQ about out-of-source builds. Good luck, Ceej aka Chris Hillery

Re: [CMake] Execution order

here? Your add_custom_command() and list(APPEND SRCS) steps below will do this if you just change the OUTPUT to "${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/SourceFileInfo.cpp". This would have the added benefit of not forcing a rebuild of SourceFileInfo.o every time you run "make". Ceej aka Chris H

Re: [CMake] Bootstrapping a compiler with cmake - ideas?

ed out if this is a flaw with our scheme, with VS2010, or with CMake's VS2010 generator, although our current bet is on CMake - certainly there have been other reports of difficulties with custom commands in VS2010. If you're coming from a strictly Makefile-based project, this probably won't ma

[CMake] CPU identification

well. Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Re: [CMake] cmake -E compare_files - end of line character

e the same is true of Perforce and probably other systems. Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Olivier Pierard wrote: > Dear all, > > For several testcases validations, I use 'cmake -E compare_files' > command on a result file against a reference file. Pr

Re: [CMake] Setting environment variables

CUTE_PROCESS (COMMAND /my/custom/envprogram) and expecting envprogram to be able to modify your environment, however, that won't work for the reasons Gerhard and I said - the command is executing in a subshell, and by definition a subshell cannot affect the enviro

Re: [CMake] Setting environment variables

irmed that the variable was set in the environment for both the ctest_configure and ctest_build steps. Can you reduce this to a small example, maybe? Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at h

Re: [CMake] Getting a list of all targets?

nse as a read-only directory property ? > As long as you can iterate over directories too! :) Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please ke

Re: [CMake] Getting a list of all targets?

t you wouldn't have to modify any sub-project build files. Just function (add_library name ) # do stuff to remember this target _add_library (name ) endfunction (add_library) Not 100% ideal, but a relatively small amount of work should get you what y

Re: [CMake] Getting a list of all targets?

way from within my overwritten forms to call the original, so it's not very useful.) Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote: > Is there any way within a CMakeLists.txt file to get a list of all the > currently defined targets? I'm interested in

Re: [CMake] Why CMake can't run as make ? (was: Re: makefile to CMakeLists.txt, possible?)

which attempted to be a "better Make" which is effectively what you're describing. There's nothing wrong with that, but that isn't what CMake does. If that's what you want in a tool, then I think you'll be happier finding a tool with that goal - always pick the right

Re: [CMake] makefile to CMakeLists.txt, possible?

n't what CMake does. If that's what you want in a tool, then I think you'll be happier finding a tool with that goal - always pick the right tool for the job at hand! Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitwa

Re: [CMake] makefile to CMakeLists.txt, possible?

bly code for several major platforms, and then you could store the generated assembly files in version control..." Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/open

Re: [CMake] Categorizing test results displayed via CDash

Check out this article: http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/11 and read the article in the Kitware Quarterly that is linked to from there on "CDash subprojects". It's not nearly as clean and straightforward as it should be, IMHO, but it does work. Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Tu

Re: [CMake] CMake and CTest for Google tests

OURCE_DIR} ) You'll need to tweak the invocation of addtestscript to successfully generate testlist.cmake in the build directory, and then I think it'll all work. Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-sou

Re: [CMake] CTest examples

ty ctest and cdash offer. (To be fair, even if this were fixed in ctest, CxxTest would also need some modifications as it currently doesn't let you run subsets of tests either.) Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Bo Thorsen wrote: > Hi people, > > I have converte

Re: [CMake] option bug ?

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Michael Hertling wrote: > IMO, things aren't sooo bad. ;-) > > [100 lines of explanation of how SET() behaves in 6 different ways elided] > I think you've just proven my point. Thanks! :)

Re: [CMake] option bug ?

. Maybe it would be possible to change it such that a cache variable declaration (option() or set(...CACHE...) ) would allow a current non-cache variable of the same name to override the declaration's default value, in the same way that -D on the command-line does. Ceej aka Chris Hillery On F

Re: [CMake] Howto unset cache variable without UNSET()

7;if(VAR)'. That will be true as long as VAR is not undefined, 0, "", N, NO, OFF, FALSE, NOTFOUND, or -NOTFOUND. If you really need to only match empty string, then probably 'if(VAR STREQUAL "")' would be a little easier to read and type. Ceej aka Chris Hillery __

Re: [CMake] CTest results to XML file

Try this: ctest -T Test This will generate the same Test.xml logfile as running ctest -D, but it won't do all the other dashboard steps (update, configure, build...). Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:46 AM, David Cole wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:22 AM, David Co

Re: [CMake] An observation about CTest

d changing away from global variables or at least having a massive rename-fest would be difficult to achieve with anything like compatibility. Perhaps CMake 3.0 could have a clean break... Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT < christian.con...

Re: [CMake] CMake VS OTB

I don't think the CMake list is the place to ask this question, as it sounds like a problem with OTB. At the very least I would ask for help first with the developers of OTB. Also, I would suggest when asking them, that you include the actual error messages that you saw. Ceej aka Chris Hi

Re: [CMake] How specify revision for ctest_update(...) do check out?

e, clearly it is meant to support a "Nightly" dashboard. However, experimentally, I've determined that it takes effect if it is set no matter what type of dashboard you're running. Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Convey, Christian J CIV NUWC NWPT < christi

Re: [CMake] ctest meant to be re-entrant?

do what the URL lists, though, you might get what you want. > I'd like to continue specifying my tests by having "ADD_TEST(...)" calls > sprinkled throughout my project's CMakeLists.txt files. > Yes, please; don't ever stop doing that. It's just

Re: [CMake] ctest meant to be re-entrant?

covers thus unfortunately grows ever taller. But, back to the original subject, if you can re-state what your goal is a little bit, hopefully we can figure out a way to get you there. Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitw

Re: [CMake] ctest meant to be re-entrant?

script" is that it uses the functions ctest_start(), ctest_configure(), etc. Anyway, that was probably a lot more than you wanted to know at this time, but hopefully it will serve some value in future. Meanwhile, I suspect there's probably a straightforward way to do what you actually wa

Re: [CMake] 0009835: ctest --help-property CTEST_BUILD_TARGET

...), it's set (CTEST_BUILD_TARGET ...) and then ctest_build() will build that. Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:58 AM, wrote: > Hi there, > > I reported a bug a couple of month back, which apparently was fixed with > "Closing this since the new TARGET option fo

Re: [CMake] How to see the generated compiler commands?

t; > FYI: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Question 2.1. There's a lot of other good stuff in there too! :) Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensour

Re: [CMake] CTest: Any way around the "one test == one program invocation" assumption?

er of tests had been run, and let it populate and submit the XML report based on that information. But, if there's any way to do that, it's highly undocumented... Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-s

[CMake] CTest: Any way around the "one test == one program invocation" assumption?

rate CDash-compatible XML output from my testdriver? And how would I go about uploading those results? Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Ple

Re: [CMake] Using Valgrind on all tests

Would it be possible to use ctest -D without actually submitting to CDash? Something like ctest -D ExperimentalCoverage seems like it would do the same thing that nightlies do, just for a single local build without submitting the results. Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:36 PM

[CMake] Policy CMP0009 doesn't work (2.6.4)

x27;m afraid I have not yet been able to test this out with CMake 2.8. I don't know if Kitware does maintenance releases for previous revisions. Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://

Re: [CMake] CTest: regular expression not matched

;m not sure if ctest will look at stderr at all.) Also, might something else in your CMakeLists.txt be overriding the tests_properties for test4? Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:59 AM, AlannY wrote: > Hi there. I'm trying to write some tests for my library with CTest.

Re: [CMake] File permissions on CONFIGURE_FILE output

thing! So, tell me - are there any other features for generically modifying file permissions without copying the file? Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/openso

Re: [CMake] File permissions on CONFIGURE_FILE output

Whoops - I take it back. I see that it IS there in the 2.8 online docs, as a separate file( entry as you said. Not terribly clear IMHO, but anyway. So I guess this is a new 2.8 feature (it really truly isn't there in 2.6.4). Ceej aka Chris Hillery On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Chris Hi

Re: [CMake] File permissions on CONFIGURE_FILE output

n't want to muck with a configured file after configuring it. However, I expect there are some non-ideal situations which might require that, so the above work-around should get you going. Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit o

Re: [CMake] using cmake on windows - query on existing targets

e same is true for the free Visual Studio Express (which somewhat confusingly is NOT identified as "the free VC compiler" by CMake, but it all works fine). Ceej aka Chris Hillery ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware o