Hi David,
I've got one more, one that I just entered in Mantis.
#11410 - Result of IF(LIST) is inconsistent
Regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake
regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
Hi David,
I've got one more, one that I just entered in Mantis.
#11410 - Result of IF(LIST) is inconsistent
Regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
Hi Alex,
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 10:20 +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 28 October 2010, Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
What is the best way to work around a broken Find module?
A technique I've used up till now is to wrap the broken module in a
module with the same name
?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:46 +0200, Marcel Loose wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:30 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 17:14 , Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 16:45 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Wouldn't
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 11:00 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 27. Oct, 2010, at 9:54 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:46 +0200, Marcel Loose wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:30 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 17:14 , Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010
to grow
extensively. And, worse, that file will share implementation details
of some lower-level directory, requiring package XYZ. So, for larger
projects, I would choose the seconds option.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 16:54 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 16:45 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that 'ctest -DExperimentalBuild' returns with an exit
status
0, even if compiler errors occur. I think that is caused by the fact
that 'make -i' is used. The -i
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:30 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 17:14 , Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 16:45 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to use 'make -k' instead?
Some weeks ago
' instead?
The -k|--keep-going option tries to build as much as possible, but
won't try to build targets that depend on sources that failed to
compile. Furthermore, and more importantly, 'make -k' will return with
an exit status unequal to 0, if compiler errors occurred.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose
? The keep going
option tries to build as much as possible, but won't try to build
targets that depend on sources that failed to compile. Furthermore, and
more importantly, 'make -k' will return with an exit status unequal to
0, if compiler errors occurred.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 08:24 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 10/19/2010 4:21 AM, Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I stumbled upon IMHO weird behaviour of CTest.
It seems that compilation errors are not picked up, somehow. Look at
the
output of a run of ctest -V -D ExperimentalBuild below
/Makefile.cmake
Or do you use keyword expansion in your CMakeLists.txt file. Keywords,
like $Id$, $Author$, etc. are a relict from CVS, but still supported by
Subversion, though you have to explicitly activate it using properties.
An updated keyword could trigger a complete rebuild.
Regards,
Marcel
to pay
if you want to have just one static library.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
been talking about static libraries
only.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:45 +0200, pellegrini wrote:
in fact the makefile we would like to generate should be able to:
- build the console version of library (-DBUILD_WINDOW=False)
- build the console AND the window
sources twice.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:17 +0200, pellegrini wrote:
Hi Marcel,
I want a single library for respectively console and window modes
because I was asked to not disrupt too much the current architecture
of the library that is created in its console
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:40 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Zitat von Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl:
Even if you opt for the one static library option, you already
gain in
build speed. Suppose you've modified foo.c, then CMake will only
rebuild
foo.o. Of course, it will rebuild foo.o twice
afraid there's no silver
bullet :-(
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
suggested.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 17:10 +0200, pellegrini wrote:
Hi Ryan,
Yes, that might be the solution if I wanted to change the compiler flags
for the whole library but in my case, that is not on the whole
library that I want to apply a new set of compiler flags but only
into the LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES option
of target_link_libraries to avoid over-linking.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:12 +0100, Paul McEnery wrote:
Hi.
I'm a cmake newbie, and have only been exposed to cmake in the form of
maintaining a Debian package. I'm working on packaging galinette
(http
,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
thoughts on the use of
-whole-archive/--no-whole-archive here please?
BR
David
See this yesterday's mail:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cmake@cmake.org/msg31781.html
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
configure_file().
That's the way I do it, and it works great.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
TARGET_SUPPORTS_SHARED_LIBS FALSE)
else(BUILD_STATIC_EXECUTABLES)
# Set RPATH to use for installed targets; append linker search path
set(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH ${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/${LOFAR_LIBDIR})
set(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH_USE_LINK_PATH TRUE)
endif(BUILD_STATIC_EXECUTABLES)
HTH,
Marcel Loose
that, none of the changes
you make to these *_INIT variables will be picked up.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
sources with -fPIC -DPIC which
is not the default when building static libraries.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link
On 28. Sep, 2010, at 9:33 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering how I could generate a list of user-definable CMake
variables. This list, with a brief help per variable, would be
*very*
useful for the end-user. It's a bit like the well-known configure
--help which gives you
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:43 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 28. Sep, 2010, at 10:12 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On 28. Sep, 2010, at 9:33 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering how I could generate a list of user-definable
CMake
variables. This list, with a brief help per
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:42 +0200, Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/9/28 Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl:
On 28. Sep, 2010, at 9:33 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering how I could generate a list of user-definable
CMake
variables. This list, with a brief help per variable, would
83c31ae
Author: Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
AuthorDate: Mon Sep 20 10:35:30 2010 +0200
Commit: Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
CommitDate: Mon Sep 20 10:35:30 2010 +0200
Merge branch 'issue_10201' into next
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h
, below.
- Log -
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=24ecd4cfde77b2fa600022b3bdad0f41a1ba6bd5
commit 24ecd4cfde77b2fa600022b3bdad0f41a1ba6bd5
Merge: c134483 80bad29
Author: Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
AuthorDate: Mon
Hi all,
I would like to inform you that I'm volunteering to become the
maintainer of FindSubversion.cmake.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 03:09 +0200, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 07/21/2010 10:26 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jul, 2010, at 9:56 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 09:18 -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2010-07-20 17:12+0200 Michael Hertling wrote:
On 07/20/2010 03:26 AM
a policy to switch between old and new behaviour.
However, I can see that not everyone is convinced that that would be the
way to go. So yes, NAMES_FIRST and PATHS_FIRST sound OK.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 13:30 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
Thanks for reminding me of my old
problems with some people's
builds I would suggest to add a policy for this, which defaults to the
proposed IMHO preferred behaviour: put the paths in the outer loop and
the names in the inner loop.
Just my 2cts,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered
compiling, I would discourage using my solution, because
it will trigger too many complete rebuilds.
Anyway, if you're interested, let me know. The code is GPL.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
Op donderdag 08-07-2010 om 16:01 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Daniel
Blezek:
Sounds good. Incidentally
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:49 -0400, Brad King wrote:
On 7/7/2010 7:45 AM, Marcel Loose wrote:
My pragmatic question is: is there a different way to check whether
a
target has already been defined, or not.
Try this:
get_target_property(mytarget_exists mytarget TYPE
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 11:12 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
On 7 July 2010 23:38, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 17:05 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 7. Jul, 2010, at 16:01 , Paul Harris wrote:
Hi all
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 11:12 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
On 7 July 2010 23:38, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 17:05 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
On 7. Jul, 2010, at 16:01 , Paul Harris wrote:
Hi all
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:30 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
On 8 July 2010 16:27, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 11:12 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
On 7 July 2010 23:38, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl wrote
is good or bad practice.
My pragmatic question is: is there a different way to check whether a
target has already been defined, or not. If not, should I change my
cmake_minimum_required() line to read VERSION 2.6.2?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered
' and invoke 'make' there.
You could also define a 'check' target that will build and run all your
test programs. See http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMakeEmulateMakeCheck
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
-29 03:45
0010198 FindSubversion does not always handle REQUIRED option correctly
- Modules - 2010-01-29 03:40
0008466 Provide finer control than pass/fail for a test program - CTest
- 2009-09-15 03:57
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 14:31 -0400, David Cole wrote:
Hi all
Hi Andreas,
Use 'set(variable value PARENT_SCOPE])'. This will set the variable
in the scope directly above the current scope. Remember that each
add_subdirectory() will create a new scope.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:06 +0200, Diablo 666 wrote:
Hi,
say I create a list
, I wanted to resort to 'IF DEFINED(FOO)'.
Best regards,
Marcel.
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:43 -0700, Tyler Roscoe wrote:
Marcel,
Maybe I missed it earlier ITT, but I don't understand why you can't
just
use if(FOO) instead?
tyler
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:53:33AM +0200, Marcel Loose wrote
Hi Fraser,
It doesn't. Well, partly it does, but unfortunately setting FOO to an
empty string doesn't make it undefined; i.e. if(DEFINED FOO) will be
TRUE. I've decided to use 'if(${FOO} MATCHES ^$)' instead.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 10:57 +0100, Fraser Hutchison wrote
use it.
The problem is that, though 'set(FOO)' will make FOO undefined, this
doesn't seem to work for 'set(FOO CACHE INTERNAL Foo)'.
Any ideas how to accomplish this?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 17:51 +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 30 June 2010, Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to unset a cache variable, i.e. make it undefined,
*without* using unset().
My reason for asking is that my CMake scripts need to be backward
compatible
Hi Alex,
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 22:52 +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 24 June 2010, Marcel Loose wrote:
Oops! Forgot to CC to the list.
Hi Tod,
I'll try to answer some of your questions below inline (I've snipped
off
parts of your mail). We're also using a BlueGeneP
Best regards.
--
Marcel Loose
Senior Software Engineer, Computing Group, RD, Astron, the Netherlands
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
this?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki
, compared to using
mpicxx. So, preferably the C/C++ compiler should be set to mpicc/mpicxx.
However, that cannot be done after the project() statement has been run.
So, I feel this is kind of a chicken-and-egg problem.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 20:10 +0200, Michael Wild wrote
to the
value of MPI_COMPILER?
I vaguely remember that setting CMAKE_LANG_COMPILER after the
project() statement was a definite no-no, because all kinds of tests,
executed by the project() command, are done with the default C/C++
compilers.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose
Yeah, I know that works.
But if that's the proper solution, then what's the use of FindMPI
anyways?
Regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:53 -0400, Dave Partyka wrote:
The way I have accomplished this is to:
export CC=mpicc
export CXX=mpicxx
blow away your build tree
the loop in the different
cmFind*.cxx files inside out: i.e. loop over the paths in the outer loop
and over the names in the inner loop. If it turns out this breaks any
CMake build environments, a policy could be added, though I doubt that
will be necessary.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Sat, 2010
default.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki
from Kitware can comment on this?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 12:58 -0400, Luke Dalessandro wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
wrote:
Hi Luke,
Remember that the definitions you do with add_definitions() are
scoped;
i.e. you can only
(see
below).
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
$ pwd
/tmp/loose/cmake/#/build
$ cat ../CMakeLists.txt
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
project(Hash)
$ cmake --debug-trycompile -DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH=/tmp/loose/cmake/# ..
debug trycompile on
-- The C compiler identification is GNU
-- The CXX compiler
,
Marcel Loose.
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 11:44 -0400, Luke Dalessandro wrote:
I meant add_definitions not dependencies. Sorry.
Luke
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Luke Dalessandro
ldalessan...@gmail.com wrote:
We sometimes use add_dependencies to add compile flags that aren't
defines, e.g
and link flags.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 10:56 +0200, Tom Vercauteren wrote:
Hi all,
As a side note on this topic: It's not really necessary to use the
mex executables to build mex files. As far as I understand it, mex
files are just shared libraries. It should thus
'. The proper way to write this in a one-liner would
be:
make -j2 make -j2 install
You might consider to set MAKEFLAGS=-j2.
HTH,
Marcel Loose.
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 07:50 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
Hi all
While creating a formula for Homebrew on Mac OS X 10.6.2 I happened
across a problem
: Is there a reason why I cannot specify options like
NO_CMAKE_ENVIRONMENT_PATH, NO_SYSTEM_ENVIRONMENT_PATH, etc. with
FIND_PACKAGE(), except when using config mode?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 10:22 -0400, Chuck Atkins wrote:
With multiple versions installed, setting
this is (also) a CMake issue. IMHO it would make
sense to turn the loop in cmFindLibraryCommand::FindNormalLibrary()
inside out. What's your opinion?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:05 -0400, Michael Jackson wrote:
I thought there was now an option the boost build system
)
paths, but I guess these might be erratic as well, when multiple
versions of a package exists with libraries named slightly different.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 06:50 -0400, Philip Lowman wrote:
Someone could add an option to FindBoost that will simply exclude
in
cmFindLibraryCommand::FindNormalLibrary() inside out: i.e.
for(path in paths)
{
for(name in names)
{
find name in path;
if found return name;
}
}
Any thoughts on this?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
Hi all,
Can you rely on the value of CMAKE_BINARY_DIR (and CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR for
that matter) before the PROJECT() statement has been seen by CMake?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
that CMake is being run from (CMAKE_BINARY_DIR).
Wouldn't it be more logical to start in the binary directory and then
look in the source directory? Or, probably even better, completely
ignore the source directory when searching for the cache file.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 14:27 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 5. Mar, 2010, at 14:19 , Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I just spent an hour debugging a very strange phenomenon running
CMake
on Mac OS-X, which in the end turned out to be trivial, but
completely
unexpected for me
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 16:37 +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Friday 19 February 2010, Marcel Loose wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed a problematic behaviour with the FIND_XXX macros when
using
ENV in either PATHS or HINTS: symbolic links get converted to the
real
paths. This happens
/include
Replacing 'ENV HDF5_ROOT' in find_path() with the literal string
'/opt/hdf5' gives me:
$ grep HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR CMakeCache.txt
HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=/opt/hdf5/include
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
Ahh,
I thought CMake, CPack, CTest, CDash. Should all go on the same
mailing list. Never realized there could be something like a CDash
mailing list. I'll repost it there.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 09:10 -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Wrong mailing list, use the cdash
the DartConfiguration.tcl file.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
### Start of output of ctest -V -D MemoryCheck ###
UpdateCTestConfiguration
from
:/export/home/loose/work/LOFAR_trunk/build/gnu_debug/LCS/Common/DartConfiguration.tcl
Cannot find
file:
/export/home/loose/work/LOFAR_trunk/build/gnu_debug/LCS/Common
here is to make it possible to
memory-check my test programs, ideally using 'ctest -D MemoryCheck'.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
]=
string(11) objectclass [gecos]= array(2) { [count]= int(1)
[0]= string(12) Marcel Loose } [1]= string(5) gecos [uid]=
array(2) { [count]= int(1) [0]= string(5) loose } [2]=
string(3) uid [sn]= array(2) { [count]= int(1) [0]=
string(5) Loose } [3]= string(2) sn [givenname]= array(2)
{ [count
Hi Brian,
You ask a lot of questions in one mail ;-)
I'll answer some inline (see below).
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:15:11 Brian Davis wrote:
So I have various CMakeLists.txt files in my directory structure. Some
with the PROJECT( name ) specified at the top
the equivalent of 'hostname -s', i.e. return the short hostname,
but the ChangeLog.txt appears to suggest that it should do the
equivalent of 'hostname -f', i.e. return the fully qualified domain
name. Which is correct?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose
regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
), a broken out line from /etc/hosts, and the Network Information
Service (NIS or YP), depending upon the contents of the order line
in /etc/host.conf. The default action is to query named(8), followed
by /etc/hosts.
Yippie!
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:08 -0500, David Cole wrote
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 09:05 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl wrote:
Hi all,
For my project, I'm working on automatic 'svn update' of (parts of)
my
source tree, prior to building. I was wondering whether someone else
might
. This script
prepares the run-time environment for the test program (a.o. it copies
some input files to the run-time directory). Problem is that when doing
a 'ctest -D MemoryCheck' that 'bash' is memory-checked, instead of my
test program. Is there an easy way to solve this?
Best regards,
Marcel
. This puts the burden on the user to check Subversion_FOUND
first, before calling, e.g., Subversion_WC_INFO. I'd prefer to do this
inside the macro Subversion_WC_INFO.
Just my 2 cents.
Marcel Loose.
Index: FindSubversion.cmake
===
RCS
this. Flaming
doesn't help you much.
Marcel Loose.
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:30 +0900, jojelino wrote:
I DONT WANT 'CMAKE' DO DEPENDENCY STUFF. because it sucks very much.
instead of letting cmake do MORON stuff to piss me off, i want to give
it wise and toleable solution by giving LDFLAGS stuff
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 10:53 -0600, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
On 1/26/10 10:33 AM, Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:23:03AM +0100, Marcel Loose wrote:
Is that portable? I don't do development on Windows, but I vaguely
remember that on Windows the .svn directories had a different
Hi all,
Here's a small patch that fixes two errors in the current
FindSubversion.cmake file.
1) The variable var-prefix_WC_ROOT was documented, but not set. This
has been fixed.
2) The documentation doesn't mention the existence of a second macro
Subversion_WC_LOG, and erroneously mentions that
it to STATUS (or WARNING, but that's not supported for CMake 2.8)
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 13:47 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 12:07 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 10:14 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 9:56 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 06:52 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:33 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:24:30 +0100, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
wrote:
Partly true.
If the preprocessor symbol provides a generic name for a function,
which
may have different names on different platforms, it will still work
completely missing the point here?
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 10:14 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 9:56 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 06:52 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 24:55 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to perform the following checks
what's going on here??
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 11:55 -0500, David Cole wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to somehow do a double @-substitution when
using, e.g.,
configure_file, similar to a double
...@hello@
-- Hello=Hello World
Apparently this doesn't produce the same results.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
of add_custom_command() and
add_custom_target().
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
', only during 'cmake'.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 15:04 +0100, Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit
Group) wrote:
I do a similar thing with an XSD file from which I generate c++
wrapper classes for accessing the corresponding XML
Note the DEPENDS line !
MACRO(XSD FILE
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 16:35 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 15. Jan, 2010, at 16:25 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:07 -0500, David Cole wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Marcel Loose lo...@astron.nl
wrote:
Hi Jack,
The difference with your and my
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 16:45 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
On 15. Jan, 2010, at 16:38 , David Cole wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 15. Jan, 2010, at 16:25 , Marcel Loose wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:07 -0500, David Cole wrote
Too bad. I was hoping I could do this without having to use a list
variable to collect all my sources. In my case, the use of conditionals
is somewhat awkward.
Best regards,
Marcel Loose.
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 18:38 -0500, Philip Lowman wrote:
I highly doubt it. Best practice is to just use
101 - 200 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
