On Friday 10 December 2010, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2010-12-10 17:01+0100 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
I have a third idea that we have not yet tried:
What do people think of automatically closing bugs if they
On Friday 10 December 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote:
There are a few things we have already started to do that should help
with the bug tracker issue.
1. We hare having 4 releases of CMake each year. After each release we
post to the list and ask people to vote for bugs they would like fixed
in
There are a few things we have already started to do that should help
with the bug tracker issue.
1. We hare having 4 releases of CMake each year. After each release we
post to the list and ask people to vote for bugs they would like fixed
in the next release.
2. We are now sending all
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
I have a third idea that we have not yet tried:
What do people think of automatically closing bugs if they are not modified
for some period of time (say 6 months). They can always be reopened if the
closed. By
On 12/10/2010 11:01 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
I have a third idea that we have not yet tried:
What do people think of automatically closing bugs if they are not modified
for some period of time (say 6 months).
...@kitware.com]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 09:31
To: Pau Garcia i Quiles
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake bug tracker discussion
On 12/10/2010 11:01 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
I have a third idea
On 12/10/2010 12:48 PM, Thompson, David C wrote:
Mantis lets you customize bug resolution. Maybe a new category of
resolution could be created. Instead of Won't Fix it could be
Lack of Activity?
It would have to be something that made it clear, that unless someone
cares enough to re-open it,
On 2010-12-10 17:01+0100 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
I have a third idea that we have not yet tried:
What do people think of automatically closing bugs if they are not modified
for some period of time (say 6 months).
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On the other hand, on KDE, when we moved to KDE4, we closed almost all
KDE3-related bugs without checking if they had been fixed. It did not
made too much sense to keep bug reports around unless they were
feature
2010/12/10 Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com:
There are a few things we have already started to do that should help with
the bug tracker issue.
1. We hare having 4 releases of CMake each year. After each release we
post to the list and ask people to vote for bugs they would like fixed
Bug trackers make people accountable and make it easy for tasks to be
delegated and tracked. BUT, someone has to take on the responsibility of
assigning bugs as the come in and/or closing bugs/feature requests that
aren't going to be developed on any time soon, thus keeping the number of
bugs in
I'll start the ball rolling by saying that, personally, I like the bug
tracker. I find it much easier to keep a list of issues organized and
accessible than I can with email filters and folders. But I still see
a need for both tools.
What do you say?
I like the current system. Especially
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:06 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Hello CMake users and devs,
(And now for something completely different...)
Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate the bug tracker entirely and just do all
discussion and patches on the mailing list? (Why
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:06 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Hello CMake users and devs,
(And now for something completely different...)
Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate the bug tracker entirely and just do all
discussion and patches on the mailing list? (Why
On 2010-12-09 17:06-0500 David Cole wrote:
Hello CMake users and devs,
(And now for something completely different...)
Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate the bug tracker entirely and just do all
discussion and patches on the mailing list? (Why have two sources of
information...?)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On 2010-12-09 17:06-0500 David Cole wrote:
Hello CMake users and devs,
(And now for something completely different...)
Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate the bug tracker entirely and just do all
...Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate the bug tracker entirely and just do all
discussion and patches on the mailing list? ...
- Or, alternatively, should we eliminate the bulk of mailing list
traffic, and insist on issues in the bug tracker being the main
conversational forum for
On 2010-12-09 19:23-0500 David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On 2010-12-09 17:06-0500 David Cole wrote:
Hello CMake users and devs,
(And now for something completely different...)
Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate
18 matches
Mail list logo
