for library folder
and library names.
[1] http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-December/052909.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
also implementation-specific form, e.g. __restrict, etc.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrict
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
On 4 January 2013 14:46, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 1/4/2013 9:24 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
It tests if C compiler supports C99 restrict keyword,
perhaps also implementation-specific form, e.g. __restrict, etc.
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrict
Should be able
seems to be recurring,
some users even suggest to uninstall/reinstall Visual Studio...
Note, both VS versions work well with projects I already have.
I'm confused, what is the correct solution?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
when you are starting from a
clean build tree?
Yes, it does.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake
On 5 March 2013 15:58, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 3/5/2013 10:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Here is my environment:
- Windows 7 (64-bit).
- CMake 2.8.10.2
- Visual Studio 2010 Professional
- Visual Studio 2012 Professional (Update 1)
All VS installations work well
On 5 March 2013 17:09, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 3/5/2013 11:40 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Nice tip with the solution in the CMakeTmp, I had no idea about it.
I figured out that the VS2010 project there,
cmTryCompileExec3417082516.vcxproj,
specifies for linker
On 6 March 2013 11:52, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 5 March 2013 17:09, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
Taking off incremental seemed to fix the problem for them as well. If you
read that
thread close, there seems to be ways to fix the problem...
Installing
this list too, so if any fixes or improvements for SOCI
come up, I'd like to pick them up and apply to SOCI.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
[2]
http://sourceforge.net/p/e57-3d-imgfmt/code/331/tree/trunk/cmake/Modules/FindXerces.cmake#l44
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
On 22 March 2013 18:01, Sergei Nikulov sergey.niku...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/22 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
I'm trying to build software which uses libE57 library which has
Xerces as dependency.
I build Xerces too as part of my project and I deploy it in custom
locations
and Xerces
On 22 March 2013 21:25, Andreas Stahl andreas.st...@tu-dresden.de wrote:
Am 22.03.2013 um 16:59 schrieb Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net:
I'm trying to build software which uses libE57 library which has
Xerces as dependency.
I build Xerces too as part of my project and I deploy it in custom
On 23 March 2013 14:29, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Friday 22 March 2013, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 22 March 2013 18:01, Sergei Nikulov sergey.niku...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/22 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
I'm trying to build software which uses libE57 library
of fragmentation
and distribution, and it's time to apply Stop Rolling Your Own [1]
approach, and perhaps stream all those precious efforts into one sink.
[1] http://ithaca.arpinum.org/2013/01/02/git-prompt.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit
to hear what others think. But
you'll be hard-pressed to convince me that a find module inside CMake itself
is better than a config file installed with a project's install tree.
I prefer to adopt what CMake recommends myself.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
that repo
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/autoconf-archive/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ
another find module into CMake.
Great, I'm all for that, but let's set up no new find modules added
to CMake repo
once for all, and force this approach.
Otherwise, reality will continue to diverge from the plans.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
On 29 March 2013 18:31, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 3/29/2013 11:27 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Great, I'm all for that, but let's set up no new find modules added
to CMake repo
once for all, and force this approach.
Otherwise, reality will continue to diverge from
On 29 March 2013 21:00, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 3/29/2013 3:53 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
What if there are multiple CMake modules for the same project, all
different
and none offering complete coverage of features?
Then they don't sounds ready for use to me
On 4 April 2013 17:44, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2013, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
To CMake maintainers,
what do you think about creating new repository at
https://github.com/Kitware/CMakeModules
as incubator for contributed CMake modules?
we
On 4 April 2013 20:14, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 04 April 2013, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 4 April 2013 17:44, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2013, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
To CMake maintainers,
what do you think about
changed in recent CMake versoins,
so it is no longer necessary.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake
/cmake.html#command:if
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various
with set_directory_properties (or set_property),
like here:
set_directory_properties(PROPERTIES MY_PROP foo)
You don't mean the CMake, cache or environment variable
set with the command set by any chance?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole
regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process is a form of torture ~~ Szalony
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support
for non-existent binary library.
Perhaps, all headers-only libraries could be handled by the FindBoost module
and then reported by CMake:
Spirit is headers-only, shall not be specified with COMPONENTS
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Participation in this whole process
Hi,
The latest version linked in the documentation [1] is 2.8.11.
Where can I find docs for the latest release?
[1] http://cmake.org/cmake/help/documentation.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic
On 11 October 2013 15:23, Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com wrote:
I am currently in the process of getting the 2.8.12 documentation
generated and uploaded.
Sweet, thanks!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages
dllexport and dllimport.
IMO, OP should split the threads for sake of the list usability.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various
name to
create project files for a specific target platform. E.g. Visual
Studio 10 Win64 will create project files for the x64 processor;
Visual Studio 10 IA64 for Itanium.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic
On 4 November 2013 15:16, dravion.sm...@gmx.net dravion.sm...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 04.11.2013 16:09, schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
On 4 November 2013 14:45, dravion.sm...@gmx.net dravion.sm...@gmx.net
wrote:
Hi,
Is there an Way to choose diffrent Windows Compilers Versions for (Win64
and Win32
On 4 November 2013 15:38, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/4/2013 10:21 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I don't care about MinGW/Cygwin myself, but AFAIR, there is no
detection mechanism
for those, only -m64 flag juggling.
You could look at the compiler id and related variables
and
projectName_SOURCE_DIR to the respective values.
And they are the same as CMAKE_BINARY_DIR , or CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR.
So why one would use the ${PROJECT}_BINARY_DIR variables?
i.e. when writing general purpose macros/functions, more generic scripts, etc.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
to the installation
destination).
Jeet,
Have you managed to solve this task of combining use of git submodule
and exported targets without installation?
Anyone, is it even possible?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Łoskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
-
--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
View
Hi,
I've started adding the config mode support to my CMake-based
projects and with quite a success.
So far, I have basic understanding of what it takes in practice to enable
config mode and there is still more to learn for me.
TL;TR: How to make use of CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE in config mode?
Could
On 17 December 2013 02:29, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote:
build with multiple passes... 1 time release, and 1 time debug. Don't
think about building both at once
I'm more concerned about using both (linking against) at once,
FooBarUser built in Release links against FooBar build in
On 17 December 2013 14:27, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote:
which is... build seperately into seperate directories even with makefile.
[...]
Yes, and that is a good feature of CMake.
What is still unclear to me is how the package registry works in such case.
Here is the basic example to
On 23 April 2015 at 18:04, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.04.2015 18:00, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
It's better, indeed, but what about
This is set to the size of a pointer on the target machine for which
the (machine) code is generated.
Hm that is in my opinion too redundant
Hi,
Surprisingly, I'm having trouble to figure out how to determine,
that in Linux 64-bit OS, I'm building a project with -m32 specified.
IOW, any CMake variable or macro to tell me target architecture
of a build that is being configured is 32 or 64 bit?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
On 23 April 2015 at 17:20, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.04.2015 17:08, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I know this trick, but this is not what I'm looking for, unless I
misread the documentation.
The doc says:
This is set to the size of a pointer on the machine
but not size
On 23 April 2015 at 16:57, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/23/2015 04:54 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
Surprisingly, I'm having trouble to figure out how to determine,
that in Linux 64-bit OS, I'm building a project with -m32 specified.
IOW, any CMake variable or macro
On 23 April 2015 at 17:50, Nils Gladitz nilsglad...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.04.2015 17:32, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
So, the documentation is imprecise in this regard, isn't it?
Best regards,
Is this better?
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/git-next/variable/CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P.html
It's
what's the issue.
I'm surprised it hasn't been addressed yet, seems folks apply some
workarounds external to FindBoost, but what they are...
Thanks for the pointers too, somehow I missed that issue
was discussed in those Boost threads.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
expect it to do,
by design or by a bug?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community
On 24 April 2015 at 21:00, Gregor Jasny gja...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 23/04/15 16:54, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Surprisingly, I'm having trouble to figure out how to determine,
that in Linux 64-bit OS, I'm building a project with -m32 specified.
IOW, any CMake variable or macro to tell me target
results.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each
o cut number of custom options and I'm never certain
how I can actually re/ab-use the standard CMake settings.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMa
ersManual.html#clang-cl
[2] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.9/variable/MSVC.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various
On 11 September 2017 at 17:04, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 11.09.2017, 17:59, "Mateusz Loskot" <mate...@loskot.net>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm building a project with CMake 3.9 using clang-cl.exe driver [1]
>> from LLVM/clang 4.0 enabled
tion\build>cmake ..
-- Building for: Visual Studio 15 2017
CMake Error at foo/CMakeLists.txt:1 (add_executable):
add_executable called with incorrect number of arguments
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "D:/tmp/cmake-location/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
Best
On 12 September 2017 at 14:53, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 11.09.2017, 18:12, "Mateusz Loskot" <mate...@loskot.net>:
>> On 11 September 2017 at 17:04, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>> 11.09.2017, 17:59, "M
posted related question earlier in
https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2018-May/067504.html
I'd be interested to know if the technique used in the module is sound
or if there is a better one recommended.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please
variables?
Or something else?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
s shared as the similar to 32 vs 64 bit?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
info
On 19 May 2018 at 22:16, Ray Donnelly <mingw.andr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018, 8:50 PM Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote:
>> On 19 May 2018 at 15:00, Elvis Stansvik <elvis.stans...@orexplore.com> wrote:
>> > I know this has been asked
I understand your
Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net
(Sent from mobile)
On Sat, 19 May 2018, 22:54 Ray Donnelly, <mingw.andr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018, 9:38 PM Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2018 at 22:16, Ray Donnelly <min
Sorry for garbage in previous response.
I top posted partial response and bottom-posted more completed one.
Not easy to edit longish emails on mobile :)
Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net
(Sent from mobile)
On Sun, 20 May 2018, 00:03 Mateusz Loskot, <mate...@loskot.net> wrote:
> I u
qually - thus presence of such find-modules archive deployed should
not affect the health of CMake installation and its pursue fo
rFind-modules ignorance.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake
On 24 May 2018 at 08:45, Elvis Stansvik <elvis.stans...@orexplore.com> wrote:
> Den ons 23 maj 2018 17:18Mateusz Loskot <mate...@loskot.net> skrev:
>> On 23 May 2018 at 16:37, David Demelier <mark...@malikania.fr> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2018-05-21
On 22 May 2018 at 13:36, <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote:
> On 2018-05-21 18:39, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I've been recently trying to update/add Find-modules to CMake:
>> updated FindJPEG, proposed FindODBC and most recently FindLZ4.
> […]
>>
>&
On 22 May 2018 at 12:27, Johannes Zarl-Zierl <johannes.zarl-zi...@jku.at> wrote:
> On Montag, 21. Mai 2018 19:39:16 CEST Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> The FindLZ4 discussion basically ended with suggestion from Brad that,
>> instead of adding Find-module to CMake, I should
On 23 May 2018 at 16:37, David Demelier <mark...@malikania.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 19:39 +0200, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>
>> I've been recently trying to update/add Find-modules to CMake:
>> updated FindJPEG, proposed FindODBC and most recently FindLZ4.
>
kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/17701
Remember, FindBoost.cmake is *always* a step or two behind CMake release.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
I recommend vcpkg and Conan.
You may check Boost.GIL configuration for CMake that uses both as
alternatives.
Conan can automatically pulls libpng etc.
https://github.com/boostorg/gil
Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net
(Sent from mobile)
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, 09:44 Dvir Yitzchaki,
wrote:
>
ons of ->IssueMessage
and uses of cmake::MessageType and its members eg. cmake::FATAL_ERROR
may help to collect a picture on how messages are composed.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMa
al
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Professional
[1]
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/commit/9ffb35386fb923a5959eec482bfa131aa3feaa18
[2] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.11/generator/Visual Studio 15 2017.html
[3] https://github.com/Microsoft/vswhere
Best regards,
--
M
1]
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/10/05/cmake-support-in-visual-studio/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various
tor for "Visual Studio Code".
VSCode is generator-agnostic.
For current list of generators, refer to the CMake docs.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.or
API
as OOP, that is OOP like in C in GTK+ :), of course.
[1] https://twitter.com/mloskot/status/973914895287713793
[2] https://github.com/vector-of-bool/vscode-cmake-tools
[3] https://cpplang.slack.com/archives/C5Y2GDECX/p152122705490
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.
On 20 March 2018 at 21:52, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org> wrote:
> On 2018 M03 20, Tue 21:14:30 CET Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> ...
>> Why I can not write:
>>
>> target_use(app Boost::system Boost::filesystem)
>>
>> or
>>
>>
On 20 March 2018 at 21:52, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org> wrote:
> On 2018 M03 20, Tue 21:14:30 CET Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> ...
>> Why I can not write:
>>
>> target_use(app Boost::system Boost::filesystem)
>>
>> or
>>
>>
On 22 March 2018 at 16:51, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 10:17 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> It seems folks generally agree there is need for porcelain API.
>> It's a pity it's been 5+ years and it is still waiting for implementation.
>
> [...
ps://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/module/FindXercesC.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake c
.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 22:17, Brad King wrote:
> On 10/24/2018 01:22 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > So, I had to bend CMake this way to find Boost for me:
> >
> > cmake -DBoost_COMPILER=-gcc5 -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ARCHITECTURE_ID=x64 ..
>
> See these issues:
>
>
to pin point
where may possible problem be.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For mo
u will have to dig the issue deep and the digging may be difficult
and frustrating.
That is why I would work things on Linux locally (VM) first - Docker
just adds up to the overall complexity.
I see no way to solve your problem for you.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.losko
e standard prefix /usr/local
with cmake executable deployed in /usr/local/bin/cmake
and having /usr/local/bin typically in PATH
you would get cmake in your PATH out of the box.
Just forget about using apt-get with the downloaded .tar.gz, forget it!
Or, learn about Debian packages, apt, etc. just not her
les/v3.12/cmake-3.12.3-Linux-x86_64.sh
sh cmake-linux.sh -- --skip-license --prefix=$HOME/usr
export PATH=$HOME/usr/bin:$PATH
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 18:10, Osman Zakir wrote:
>
> So I have to do "ENV export PATH=$HOME/usr/bin:$PATH"? Is that what you mean?
Your question is off-topic here. Try Docker forums, StackOverflow, ...
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by
y!
ML
>
> From: CMake on behalf of Mateusz Loskot
>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 2:55 PM
> To: cmake@cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [CMake] About FindBoost.cmake
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 10:54, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > [...]
> > D:
form name if supported by generator.
For this paricular VS use case, I could have used
cmake -G "Visual Studio 15 2017 Win64" -DBOOST_ROOT:PATH=D:\boost.win ..
which should be equivalent to
cmake -A x64 -DBOOST_ROOT:PATH=D:\boost.win
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Pow
the option 2. works perfectly
I use it daily to juggle CMake on number of Linux environments
https://github.com/mloskot/wsl-config/blob/master/wsl/scripts/install-cmake-latest.sh
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 10:54, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> [...]
> D:\_\workshop\test_boost\_build.vs2017 cmake -A x64
> -DBOOST_ROOT:PATH=D:\boost.win ..
> -- Building for: Visual Studio 15 2017
> -- The C compiler identification is MSVC 19.15.26730.0
> -- The CXX compiler iden
AG = -gd
FindBoost is a complex animal, it deals with tons of cases, it
frequently stops working.
So, crystal sphere -based investigation does not quite apply :)
BTW, pease respond to the mailing list, not privately.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kit
em-vc141-mt-x64-1_69.lib
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information
-O cmake-linux.sh
https://cmake.org/files/v3.12/cmake-3.12.3-Linux-x86_64.sh
sudo sh cmake-linux.sh -- --skip-license --prefix=/usr/local
cmake --version
I guess, it may be a good idea to update https://cmake.org/install/
Best regards,,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 10:24, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 10:17, Osman Zakir wrote:
> >
> > Yes, but this might also be why it can't find more than "some" of the Boost
> > libraries. It looks for "-d" even though I'm using the "
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 17:06, Robert Maynard wrote:
>
> CMake 3.13 Release Notes
>
> [...]
>
> Modules
> ---
> [...]
FindBoost.cmake changes seem to be missing from this section
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 17:12, Brad King wrote:
> On 10/25/2018 11:10 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > FindBoost.cmake changes seem to be missing from this section
>
> We don't record every version update or implementation change
> in release notes. The interface of the module has
Hi,
FYI, I proposed changes to FindBoost that may be of interest of users
relying on the upcoming Boost 1.69 ie. current master or develop branches
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/2579
Feedback is welcome.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 21:45, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
> The library has number of dependencies on third-party libraries,
> namely database access client libraries. I've reached the point
> where I need to 'list' those dependencies in soci-config.cmake [3]
> Namely, I need
://github.com/mloskot/soci/blob/ml/modern-cmake/cmake/soci-config.cmake
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support
LSET.html
Best regards
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offerin
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 18:31, Bill Hoffman via CMake wrote:
> On 12/8/2018 7:47 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> >
> > Am I correct clang-tidy run via CXX_CLANG_TIDY
> > ignores .clang-tidy configuration file?
> >
> > I've tried number of ways to help it find t
CTORIES.html#prop_tgt:INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES>
property
of .
Yea, but are missing the actual from your call.
Mateusz Loskot, mate...@loskot.net
(Sent from mobile)
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers v
p me to understand if this is actually a bug
or am I misunderstanding anything?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services t
what's the correct way to do this?
Modify C/C++ flags. For example, something along these lines
string(REGEX REPLACE "/MD" "" CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS})
string(REGEX REPLACE "-MT" "" CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS})
target_compile_options(m
ould typically be cache entries such as FOO_LIBRARY
and not output variables like FOO_LIBRARIES.
"""
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_F
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit
101 - 200 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
