On 09/18/2012 02:23 AM, Patrick Gansterer wrote:
> If we store everything in one variable (via string concatenation) I
> don't see much value in an extra -GP switch. We need to split the
> ${CMAKE_GENERATOR} variable into generator+platform then all the time
> anyway.
> Maybe we can only change
On Monday 17 September 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Monday 17 September 2012, Brad King wrote:
> > > On 09/15/2012 04:45 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > > There is now a branch export-sets-2 on cmake stage.
> > > > It cherry-pic
On 09/18/2012 04:12 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> How about defining a variable which can be set by Config-files which holds an
> error message for the case that the Config-file has set _FOUND to
> FALSE
> ?
> Like e.g. _FIND_FAILURE_MESSAGE ?
> This could then be printed by cmFindPackage and/
On 09/12/2012 11:23 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 12/09/2012 22:39, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
I'd be content with just interpreting a return value of 77 as a "Not
Run" status; this is a fairly trivial change that should work well in
any existing setups.
I don't think it is really needed to make th
I don't like it. Existing tests that run and return, for example, a number
of errors that occurred, will magically appear as "not run" when that
number just so happens to be 77.
If there are enough people who think this is "simple and works" and are not
concerned about the accidental matching of a
On 09/18/2012 11:37 PM, David Cole wrote:
I don't like it. Existing tests that run and return, for example, a
number of errors that occurred, will magically appear as "not run" when
that number just so happens to be 77.
If there are enough people who think this is "simple and works" and are
not
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13548
==
Reported By:tschutter
Assigned To:
David Cole wrote:
> I don't like it. Existing tests that run and return, for example, a number
> of errors that occurred, will magically appear as "not run" when that
> number just so happens to be 77.
>
> If there are enough people who think this is "simple and works" and are not
> concerned abou
On 19/09/12 08:18, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
David Cole wrote:
I don't like it. Existing tests that run and return, for example, a number
of errors that occurred, will magically appear as "not run" when that
number just so happens to be 77.
If there are enough people who think this is "simple and w
