Re: [CM] Cmdist Digest, Vol 104, Issue 12

2016-12-14 Thread Daniel Hensel
Hello, I can offer to test it on macOS, I beta-test OSX and port from brew and macports anyway. All the best, Daniel > > Thank you for your reply Bill. > > ?Is anyone else is interested in collaborating on achieving a quicklisp > loadable cl-clm? > All that is required is separating the

Re: [CM] quicklisp clm

2016-12-14 Thread bil
Any chance of changing the asd? The ccrma-ftp clm-5 tarball now has Tito's asdf code. The original clm.asd was apparently written by Rick 10 years ago. ___ Cmdist mailing list Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu

Re: [CM] quicklisp clm

2016-12-14 Thread Juan Cristóbal Cerrillo
> > If a minimalist approach is good for you, it is quicklispable :) > > (asdf:defsystem "clm" > :description "Common Lisp Music" > :version "3" > :author "William Schottstaedt " > :licence "LLGPL" > :perform (compile-op (o c) > (load (system-relative-pathname "clm"

Re: [CM] quicklisp clm

2016-12-14 Thread Juan Cristobal Cerrillo
> If a minimalist approach is good for you, it is quicklispable :) > > (asdf:defsystem "clm" > :description "Common Lisp Music" > :version "3" > :author "William Schottstaedt " > :licence "LLGPL" > :perform (compile-op (o c) > (load (system-relative-pathname "clm" "all.lisp"

Re: [CM] quicklisp clm

2016-12-14 Thread Tito Latini
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:40:06PM -0600, Juan Cristobal Cerrillo wrote: > > > On Dec 10, 2016, at 7:22 AM, b...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: > > > > ok -- that's fine by me, but I am no longer interested > > in the CL part of that package. I haven't worked on it > > in about 20 years, and no

Re: [CM] quicklisp clm

2016-12-14 Thread Orm Finnendahl
Hi Juan, if you need help, I can offer to test on linux, although Ralf Mattes would obviously be a better choice than me. For quite some time I have been very interested in getting all these great tools quicklisp-loadable and make them cooperate in a more up-to-date environment. -- Orm Am