>>> Unfortunately, I stumble on the error message “replacement: already
>>> tagged token:
>>> C code context” then.
>
> This is what I would expect.
I came along different application imaginations.
> You could use one rule with an exists to put a position variable in the place
> where you
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I stumble on the error message “replacement: already
> > tagged token:
> > C code context” then.
This is what I would expect. You could use one rule with an exists to put
a position variable in the place where you want to put
> Unfortunately, I stumble on the error message “replacement: already tagged
> token:
> C code context” then.
It might be that the transformation approach was too generic for
the implementation of the function “megasas_mgmt_ioctl_fw”.
>> Where did the Coccinelle software get the impression that anything
>> would be added too often at the end of such a function implementation?
>
> Without the semantic patch and the C source code,
You have access to data from both files already.
> I can't answer the question.
Is it more
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> replacement: already tagged token:
> >
> > You try to add two things one one token, which is not allowed.
>
> How do you think about to clarify why a source file adjustment
> like the following can let my SmPL script succeed in a test
>> replacement: already tagged token:
>
> You try to add two things one one token, which is not allowed.
How do you think about to clarify why a source file adjustment
like the following can let my SmPL script succeed in a test configuration?
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> diff -u
>>> You can try with the option --debug.
>>> Or if that doesn't help with the option --verbose-ctl-engine.
>>
>> How can these parameters help to clarify undesirable run time
>> characteristics?
>
> How about actually looking at the results yourself?
I did that. - I do not find these extra data
> Maybe there are too many metavariable bindings.
Under which circumstances would such a situation really occur?
How do you think about my SmPL script example for the shown use case?
> You can try with the option --debug.
> Or if that doesn't help with the option --verbose-ctl-engine.
How can
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > * The complete source file seems to be very challenging for testing
> > the run time characteristics.
>
> How are the chances to clarify the different test results for this source code
> transformation approach with the software combination
> * The complete source file seems to be very challenging for testing
> the run time characteristics.
How are the chances to clarify the different test results for this source code
transformation approach with the software combination “Coccinelle
1.0.7-00211-geaa13d59-dirty
(OCaml 4.07.1)”?
Hello,
I became interested in another source code transformation again.
I would like to move a bit of common code to the end of a function
implementation
with the help of the following script for the semantic patch language.
@replacement@
expression info, result;
identifier target, work;
type
11 matches
Mail list logo
