On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > You can look at patches people have previously submitted and see to what
> > extent there is interest in this issue.
>
> I see another software development challenge here.
>
> The discussed source code search pattern builds on a "general
> You can look at patches people have previously submitted and see to what
> extent there is interest in this issue.
I see another software development challenge here.
The discussed source code search pattern builds on a "general function"
like "seq_printf" as an update candidate from which each
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > But that should be fine for detecting eg if a string has only one character.
>
> Did you come along similar change possibilities at other places already?
>
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/seq_file.h?v=4.8#L114
>
>
On Friday 14 October 2016 02:21 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 07:01 PM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 13 October 2016 09:45 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>>>
Currently because of the left associativity of the
> * But I will also need a way to construct a source code change ("plus code" in
> the semantic patch) with OCaml or Python scripting, won't I?
If you need to do this, you can follow the examples in
demos/camltococci.cocci and demos/pythontococci.cocci
julia
> You can inherit and test properties of anything you like in python or
> ocaml code. If you inherit some kind of metavariable other than a
> position variable, the term will be represented as a string. But that
> should be fine for detecting eg if a string has only one character.
Your
On 10/13/2016 07:01 PM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 13 October 2016 09:45 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>>
>>> Currently because of the left associativity of the operators,
>>> pattern IRQF_ONESHOT | flags does not match with the
> > coccinelle/demos/first.cocci may be helpful.
>
> I have got the impression that this small SmPL script demonstrates the usage
> of the mentioned function from your software library only for a simple
> position variable.
> I do not see the way so far how desired data could be extracted from a
>> With which metavariables and corresponding programming interfaces can
>> strings that
>> are passed to such functions be checked in more detail by the Coccinelle
>> software?
>
> The simplest would be to use python or ocaml code to make the checks that
> are needed. You can use
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I came during my software development activities along a few Linux source
> files
> where I got an advice by the script "checkpatch.pl" like the following.
>
> WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
>
>
Hello,
I came during my software development activities along a few Linux source files
where I got an advice by the script "checkpatch.pl" like the following.
WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
11 matches
Mail list logo
