Beautiful.
Note:
I didn't see the new Expire attribute mentioned in the Performance
guide. It is a very important feature for large scale projects.
Ivelin
Diana Shannon wrote:
> I just updated (with the help of Vadim on xml.apache.org) the live site.
> It is now synced with the release
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:43 PM, John Morrison wrote:
> How did you build the files?
I built from the release branch, once I synced docs from head.
Diana
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 01:41 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
>
>> I'm adding notices at the top of any doc related to 2.1. It's the same
>> notice that appears in the WARNING note in the 2.1 branch.
>
> Ah, that makes a lot of sense, and should help keep track of new
> features
> etc for peopl
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Diana Shannon wrote:
> I'm adding notices at the top of any doc related to 2.1. It's the same
> notice that appears in the WARNING note in the 2.1 branch.
Ah, that makes a lot of sense, and should help keep track of new features
etc for people upgrading from older versions.
> From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:54 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
> >> isn't correct. This should have been replaced by the file
> >> generated by check-jars...
> >
> > How is this generated?
>
> It's not a build target for the release branch. Is
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:49 PM, Andrew Savory wrote:
> Question: should the documentation on the site reflect HEAD, the stable
> development branch (2.0.3-dev), or the latest stable release? I'd
> suggest
> either of the latter two, as most people I assume will be using the
> stable
>
> From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:43 PM, John Morrison wrote:
>
> > Diana,
> >
> > How did you build the files?
> >
> > http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/installing/jars.html
>
> To clarify, I sync all docs in head and release branches below
> sr
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, at 12:54 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
>>
>> isn't correct. This should have been replaced by the file
>> generated by check-jars...
>
> How is this generated?
It's not a build target for the release branch. Is it ok to include the
result generated for HEAD on the liv
TED]]
>> Sent: Saturday, 8 June 2002 5:32 pm
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [doc] live site update report
>>
>>
>> I just updated (with the help of Vadim on xml.apache.org) the live
>> site.
>> It is now synced with the release and HEAD bra
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Diana Shannon wrote:
> It is now synced with the release and HEAD branch docs with the
> exception of a few docs in src/documentation/xdoc/developing/.
Great stuff -- the site is coming on in leaps and bounds. I have a
question though ;-)
Question: should the documenta
e 2002 5:32 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [doc] live site update report
>
>
> I just updated (with the help of Vadim on xml.apache.org) the live site.
> It is now synced with the release and HEAD branch docs with the
> exception of a few docs in src/documentation/xdoc/
I just updated (with the help of Vadim on xml.apache.org) the live site.
It is now synced with the release and HEAD branch docs with the
exception of a few docs in src/documentation/xdoc/developing/. Carsten
(or someone else) will have to inform me about a few issues there.
One way to get some
12 matches
Mail list logo
