On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Christopher Oliver wrote, On 28/06/2003 19.19:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
I'm really confused about this SWT thing. On my computer Eclipse feels
slower than JBuilder. And I still have to understand what makes SWT so
compelling and
snip
I have used Swing quite a lot, and as you know I even gave a shot at
making a WYSIWYG editor for XML. I had to debug the Editor.
Which xml namespaces were you trying to do this for? xhtml, svg, mathml?
I've tried numerous times to extend the javax.swing.text.*.* packages and
had
Roger I Martin PhD wrote, On 30/06/2003 14.57:
snip
I have used Swing quite a lot, and as you know I even gave a shot at
making a WYSIWYG editor for XML. I had to debug the Editor.
Which xml namespaces were you trying to do this for? xhtml, svg, mathml?
DocumentDTD, basically like xhtml
I've
on 6/28/03 4:43 PM Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The fact is that SWT is crap. Total crap.
Pff, SWT is a thin layer on top of the operating system, everything else
is native, therefore optimized and normally hardware accelerated
(today's GPUs are gigaflop machines with gigabyte/sec video mem2mem
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 29/06/2003 19.09:
on 6/28/03 4:43 PM Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The fact is that SWT is crap. Total crap.
This is a bit too much taken out of context I reckon ;-)
It was made to try and show that saying that something is crap or not,
things don't go far.
Pff, SWT is
Christopher Oliver wrote, On 28/06/2003 19.19:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
I'm really confused about this SWT thing. On my computer Eclipse feels
slower than JBuilder. And I still have to understand what makes SWT so
compelling and AWT so dreaded.
Check out JGoodies' fake eclipse LF using
copying the cocoon folks since we are getting pretty serious with
continuations overthere (we implement them using a modified version of
Mozilla Rhino, a javascript engine written in java)
on 6/26/03 3:15 PM Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Santiago Gala wrote:
[...]
I still
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Question: do you think it would be possible to compile java source code
into parrot bytecode? how would the limited Perl typing capabilities
would impact that?
http://www.astray.com/java/
--
!-- Matt --
:-get a SMart net/:-
Spam trap - do not
Stefano Mazzocchi escribió:
(...)
Wow, a VM with native continuations, very interesting.
Question: do you think it would be possible to compile java source code
into parrot bytecode? how would the limited Perl typing capabilities
would impact that?
The key piece is the validator. The Java VM uses
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
on 6/26/03 12:01 PM Christopher Oliver wrote:
Another aspect not always noticed is the speed of the compiler. Because
Java compilers don't perform any compile-time optimizations, they are
significantly faster than C++ compilers. This is very important when
dealing
on 6/24/03 6:55 AM Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Then perhaps my observation means absolutely nothing - and I should really
try to get my mind around a fundamentally different development model (and
some aspect you call WORA).
Oh, sorry, WORA := Write Once Run Anywhere. It's java's first
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Ted Leung wrote:
..cut..
- Organisationally xml and java are still lagging behind;
but have been catching up (though the catch up has slowed down
somewhat due to a much larger influx from the old school
side; and that influx is by average younger than
On 22/06/2003 3:43 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I personally believe in keeping the bar low for committership and
keeping the bar high for membership.
I believe that this helps us getting more people inside the foundation
(potential members) but keeps the real powers of the foundation heavily
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
Stefano's insightful post got me carried away to run some stats on
members projects: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/archives/001008.html
I've always stopped short of doing just this; and more kept things limited
to a pie diagram and postings/#of
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Steven Noels wrote:
Stefano's insightful post got me carried away to run some stats on
members projects: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/archives/001008.html
I've always stopped short of doing just this; and more kept things limited
On 23/06/2003 21:30 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Dirk is right pointing out how a specific frame in time tells you the
'position' but not the 'speed'. Luckily, social dynamics don't exhibit
the Heinsenberg principle.
To amuse the easily bored, here's 2002, 2001 and 2000:
Steven Noels wrote:
BTW: does anyone know some good Python charting library for this kind
of charts? I've looked at PIL but it seems pretty low-level.
Why not use python to generate xml files suitable for FINS, using cocoon
to generate theese graphs?
http://cocoondev.org/projects/fins.html
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
NOTE: copying members@ and community@ since this might be helpful to
many people.
WoW! - Excelent summary. Can we put this up somewhere on one of the
foundation pages please, if need be as 'Stefano's excelent and balanced
view' :-)
Dw.
NOTE: copying members@ and community@ since this might be helpful to
many people.
As many of you know, three cocoon committers were nominated then elected
members of the Apache Software Foundation yesterday. Since I've been
inquired by a few on how the system works, I'll spend some words on the
19 matches
Mail list logo
