Re: dbxml

2003-06-03 Thread John Merrells
Steven, On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Steven Noels wrote: Looking at your enquiries, I believe we should be better informed about what exactly you want us to add to Cocoon CVS. I've been asked be a few dbxml users about integration with Cocoon. I've never actually used it

Re: dbxml

2003-06-03 Thread Steven Noels
On 2/06/2003 18:57 John Merrells wrote: Good. Who has the final word on this though? Is it the Cocoon PMC? Or is there an Apache PMC...? We (the Cocoon PMC) make sure to properly check copyright and licensing issues before committing anything to our code base. Looking at your enquiries, I believ

Re: dbxml

2003-06-03 Thread John Merrells
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 06:07 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: It's called XML:DB API, by http://xmldb.org/ Ah, OK. Yes I know about XML:DB. I looked at it but it wasn't suitable for dbxml. You could easily implement XML:DB on top of the dbxml API. Huh? As I read this (http://sle

Re: dbxml

2003-05-31 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
John Merrells wrote: On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: ... The Cocoon xmldb block uses the org.xmldb API, but IIUC it is limited to querying databases. Create / Delete / Update / Query. All is there. See for example XMLDBTransformer. I don't know anything abo

Re: dbxml

2003-05-31 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Samedi, 31 mai 2003, à 00:31 Europe/Zurich, John Merrells a écrit : ...There is a kind-of a standard API for XML databases, but it's not a very good one, and doesn't have the backing of an established standards organisation. So the interface code would have to be written to our

Re: dbxml

2003-05-31 Thread John Merrells
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 03:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Personally I'd very much like to see dbxml integrated with Cocoon in some way - as Cocoon processes XML natively it would make a lot of sense to be able to store it in an industrial-strength native XML database, which I a

Re: dbxml

2003-05-31 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi John, Personally I'd very much like to see dbxml integrated with Cocoon in some way - as Cocoon processes XML natively it would make a lot of sense to be able to store it in an industrial-strength native XML database, which I assume dbxml is or is going to be. Does dbxml impleme

dbxml

2003-05-31 Thread John Merrells
Hi, I'm working on an open-source embedded native XML database project called Berkeley DB XML. I think there would be a lot of value for end users if Cocoon were able to run on top of dbxml. We offer reliability and recoverability through transactions, and provide high performance indexin

RE: (dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Steven Noels
> -Original Message- > From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: donderdag 18 april 2002 17:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (dbxml) Generator vs Source > > > Rogier Peters [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > - What are the diff

RE: (dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Rogier Peters
1 (0)20 6345173 Fax +31 (0)20 6345179 Rogier(at)hippo(dot)nl / www.hippo.nl > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Per Kreipke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:55 PM > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: (dbxml) Generator vs Source > >

RE: (dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Per Kreipke
Rogier, Could you give a few more details about the performance problems you encountered? Xindice was looking like an interesting solution until you mentioned your problems :-) Per - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

Re: (dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Rogier Peters wrote: > Hi Gianugo, > > thanks for explaining, one more question: see below > > >>>- What are the reasons behind deprecating xmldb-generator? >> >>There was no reason for it anymore, given that FileGenerator >>was able to >>handle the XML:DB pseudo protocol directly. A Source i

RE: (dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Rogier Peters
Hi Gianugo, thanks for explaining, one more question: see below > > - What are the reasons behind deprecating xmldb-generator? > > There was no reason for it anymore, given that FileGenerator > was able to > handle the XML:DB pseudo protocol directly. A Source is much more > flexible and the

Re: (dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
Rogier Peters wrote: > - What are the differences between a generator and a source, other than the >different structural locations and different ways of calling them in the pipeline Basically a source is a URL and can be used wherever a URL can be used, as a quick example with the XML:DB sourc

(dbxml) Generator vs Source

2002-04-18 Thread Rogier Peters
Hi, As I understood the xmldb-generator is to be deprecated in favor of the xmldb-source. I extended the xmldb-generator to be able to pass a depth parameter, as happens in the directory-generator. Although this worked reasonably well, we had a lot of performance issues and therefore are curre

I've done a sort of authenticator for DbXML ...and I want to contribute it

2002-02-27 Thread Christian Zoffoli
I've done a sort of authenticator for DbXML ...and If someone is interested in I want to contribute it. Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DB/dbXML logic sheet, actions and sample

2001-10-22 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> -Original Message- > From: Michael Homeijer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: XML:DB/dbXML logic sheet, actions and sample > > Hi, > > I am developing a logic sheet to access XML:DB

XML:DB/dbXML logic sheet, actions and sample

2001-10-22 Thread Michael Homeijer
Hi, I am developing a logic sheet to access XML:DB / dbXML functionality from Cocoon. To get a working sample I am working an some xsp pages and actions to demonstrate functionality of dbXML and Cocoon within my company. Would there be any interest to add the logic sheet and/or the sample and