Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-13 Thread Nate Hill
Eric, thanks- I was actually going to post something to the drupal4lib list later today. I intend to start developing this (I don't yet have permission from my library, but I expect it'll be ok) and would love to do the development simultaneously with folks at other libraries who are interested

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-12 Thread Eric Hellman
The challenge I like to present to libraries is this: imagine that your entire collection is digital. Does it include Shakespeare? Does it include Moby Dick? Yes! Just because you don't have to pay for these works, doesn't mean that they don't belong in your library. And what if many modern

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-11 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
On Apr 10, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: I'd love to see libraries creating online conversations around ebooks in much the same way. Take a title from project Gutenberg: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Why not host that book directly on my library website so that it can be

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-11 Thread Eric Lease Morgan
On Apr 10, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Nate Hill wrote: Karen and Peter, I completely agree with your feelings- But my point in throwing this idea out there was that despite all of the copyright issues, we don't really do a great job making a simple, intuitive, branded interface for the works that

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-11 Thread Shirley Lincicum
To a greater degree, I think libraries ought to be putting into practice the principles of our profession against public domain works. Collection. Preservation. Organization. Dissemination. Take EEBO (Early English Books Online), for example. Why couldn't the library community create

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-10 Thread Karen Coyle
I appreciate the spirit of this, but despair at the idea that libraries organize their services around public domain works, thus becoming early 20th century institutions. The gap between 1923 and 2011 is huge, and it makes no sense to users that a library provide services based on

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-10 Thread Peter Murray
I, too, have been struggling with this aspect of the discussion. (I'm on the DPLA list as well.) There seems to be this blind spot within the leadership of the group to ignore the copyright problem and any interaction with publishers of popular materials. One of the great hopes that I have for

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-10 Thread Nate Hill
Eric, thanks for finding enough merit in my post on the DPLA listserv to repost it here. Karen and Peter, I completely agree with your feelings- But my point in throwing this idea out there was that despite all of the copyright issues, we don't really do a great job making a simple, intuitive,

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-10 Thread Owen Stephens
I guess that people may already be familiar with the Candide 2.0 project at NYPL http://candide.nypl.org/text/ - this sounds not dissimilar to the type of approach being suggested This document is built using Wordpress with the Digress.it plugin (http://digress.it/) Owen Owen Stephens Owen

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-10 Thread Nate Hill
I'm familiar with it, and I love it. Love the Commentpresshttp://www.futureofthebook.org/commentpress/work as well. This project addresses participation and scholarly communication (nicely), not the interface by which you access it. If you think about the audience at a public library, it'd be

Re: [CODE4LIB] [dpla-discussion] Rethinking the library part of DPLA

2011-04-07 Thread Eric Hellman
The DPLA listserv is probably too impractical for most of Code4Lib, but Nate Hill (who's on this list as well) made this contribution there, which I think deserves attention from library coders here. On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Nate Hill wrote: It is awesome that the project Gutenberg stuff