___
> From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Rochkind [rochk...@jhu.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:41 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2012 Seattle Update
>
> I doubt anyone is particularly wedd
te.edu
From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Rochkind [rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:41 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2012 Seattle Update
I doubt anyone is particularly wedded to the particularities
me know.
Ryan Wick
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary
Gordon
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:31 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2012 Seattle Update
That's me!
It is probably a good time to mov
aries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary
> Gordon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:31 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2012 Seattle Update
>
> That's me!
>
> It is probably a good time to move this to a newe
in on this, let me know.
Ryan Wick
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cary
Gordon
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:31 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib 2012 Seattle Update
That's me!
It is proba
That's me!
It is probably a good time to move this to a newer version, perhaps
Drupal 7, if for no other reason than security. The only downside is
that the theme would either need to be recreated or change. No biggy,
really.
If someone wants to send me the code and a DB dump, I will do it in my
i've got admin rights on the code4lib drupal, so i went ahead and set the alias:
http://code4lib.org/code4lib_2012_sponsorship
cary: i'll look into getting you the correct privileges. you're
highermath, correct?
cheers,
rob
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Cary Gordon wrote:
> In a moder
In a modern version of Drupal, you can set a path alias for any page.
Unfortunately, C4L does not appear to be in a modern version of
Drupal. It looks like 4.7 or earlier.
I would be happy to volunteer to help manage it.
Cary
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Anjanette Young
wrote:
> Hey Susan,
One form of recognition that I think is almost a no brainer is a "Sponsor
page" containing appropriately sized logos in sponsorship level order that
has the sole purpose of recognizing the sponsors. A link to the sponsor page
would be provided at the top of the conference page. This would be
unobtr
More tales from DrupalCon-land...
Before we professionalized our events, we had a competitive system
like C4L. That was fine as long as we had one solid proposal. In 2008,
the only proposal for out European event was from Szeged, Hungary,
near the borders with Romania and Serbia, and a long way fr
Just a heads up: I and about 5 other MLIS/MSIM students at the UW iSchool
are very interested in helping. Looking forward to the event!
Tod Robbins
MLIS '12
Information School
University of Washington
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
> What is the problem we're trying to solve again? Do we think that the
> recent conferences have cost too much for the attendees? That this
> year's will cost too much? Are we worried about not finding places to
> host in the future? Are
Hey Susan,
Sweet! Language. Information. Social niceties.
Here is the link to the 2012 sponsor page.
http://code4lib.org/node/417
(Anyone know how to make that a nicer url on drupal?)
There seems to be discussion on expanding options for sponsorship, but the
options on the page are standard.
T
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Sean Hannan wrote:
> Honestly, I'm the most concerned that there was only one proposal last year.
> Let's try to solve that problem.
>
+1
-Ross.
On 6/15/2011 1:46 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
What is the problem we're trying to solve again? Do we think that the
recent conferences have cost too much for the attendees? That this
year's will cost too much? Are we worried about not finding places to
host in the future? Are we worried about
Honestly, I'm the most concerned that there was only one proposal last year.
Let's try to solve that problem.
-Sean
On 6/15/11 1:46 PM, "Kevin S. Clarke" wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
>
>> Heresy I know, but I wonder if we should change conf host/site sel
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Heresy I know, but I wonder if we should change conf host/site selection
> from an open vote, to a conf selection committee that chooses. Then the
> committee could say to themselves "you know, even though the hosts say no
> problem kee
On 6/15/2011 12:51 PM, Susan Kane wrote:
great
visibility with influential folks for a fraction of the cost of ALA!
That's an interesting point too -- you pay for a booth at ALA ($),
you DO reach a whole lot of people, but it's a lot more expensive than
even our 'platinum' sponsorship, n
So maybe part of the problem is our venue voting system -- people vote
for flashy locations, which are also expensive locations. The people
voting (which is anyone who wants to) don't neccesarily consider all the
ramifications (don't neccesarily have the experience/background to do so
even if t
In Providence we had little carrot cake whoopie pies at lunch one day, with
a fluffy cream cheese filling.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Cary Gordon wrote:
> In my experience accross countless conferences, not remembering the
> food is usually a good thing.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:06 A
Hi Anj,
Nice to see your name again after meeting briefly at UW when you were coming
and I was leaving for Boston!
I doubt I'll be able to attend the conference this year but I've put the
word out to the group of Ex Libris and Endeavor alumni that I manage on
LinkedIn. Many people now work for o
I honestly don't think it's a disaster if registration fee approaches
$200 either. (I realize you said $200 in _addition_ to the usual $125,
I'm saying $200, heh).
I think $200 is about the max that seems okay to me, but $200 does.
That's still a good price for the conf, and still fairly affor
In my experience accross countless conferences, not remembering the
food is usually a good thing.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Ross Singer wrote:
> Although I sat in the room and nodded a lot in Athens when we picked
> and chose our conference options and signed the contract, I remember
> ver
Although I sat in the room and nodded a lot in Athens when we picked
and chose our conference options and signed the contract, I remember
very few details of it anymore.
I do remember when the UGA Conference Center representative left the
room for a minute that we all thought that the prices we we
> The third code4lib conference was hosted in Portland, and the venue was a
> hotel. Costs were **much** higher in Portland, due mainly to the type of
> venue (hotel) and Portland being a larger city. To keep the registration
> fee at $125 (which I think it was, if memory serves me correctly), we
>
Just some clarification on the 1st and 3rd c4l conferences:
The first code4lib conference had about 85 attendees, and was situated on
the Oregon State campus. We still paid for the conference space, food,
conference support, shuttle buses to / from downtown, and signed a
contract with a nearby hot
I was the events manager for the Drupal Association, for the past few
years, and our conferences have gone from mid 30s to over 3,000 in the
US and 1,200 in Europe. We are expecting over 1,500 for our London
conference in August.
Having outgrown the hotel rooms and free venues that we had through
On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
>> So what I'm curious about, is how did the first 3-4 Code4Lib's manage to
>> happen in a way that satisfied us, had low conf registration, and had lower
>> sponsorship contributions and lower sponsor privileges than it is suggested
>> is now requ
On 6/14/2011 5:34 PM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
C4l was much smaller then. The smaller the event, the less complicated
things are and the more options you have. There are quite a few
regional c4l events. We held one for a capacity crowd in Portland
yesterday. It was about the same size as the firs
> So what I'm curious about, is how did the first 3-4 Code4Lib's manage to
> happen in a way that satisfied us, had low conf registration, and had lower
> sponsorship contributions and lower sponsor privileges than it is suggested
> is now required?
>
I can't speak with authority as I wasn't invol
While I agree with the idea of keeping costs down so as to not rely on sponsors
as much I am not sure how realistic this is without looking at the numbers.
Comparing the first one or two conferences with lower attendance at university
facilities to what we had the last few years is probably not
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> So what I'm curious about, is how did the first 3-4 Code4Lib's manage to
> happen in a way that satisfied us, had low conf registration, and had lower
> sponsorship contributions and lower sponsor privileges than it is suggested
> is now
On 6/14/2011 4:00 PM, Kyle Banerjee wrote:
Or maybe the conf has gotten more expensive such that we need more
money and thus more incentive to sponsor. (First priority -- try to keep the
conf from getting more expensive so this doesn't happen)
Costs can be kept down by securing sponso
> Or maybe the conf has gotten more expensive such that we need more
> money and thus more incentive to sponsor. (First priority -- try to keep the
> conf from getting more expensive so this doesn't happen)
Costs can be kept down by securing sponsorships, reducing what is provided,
and/
On 6/14/2011 12:14 PM, Mark Jordan wrote:
-before negotiating with sponsors, have a policy on whether sponsorship gets
them a slot on the program. IIRC there was a long discussion about this on the
c4l planning list.
That is the thing the community has really not liked the idea of in the
pas
When sponsors have sponsored pre-conf activities, that 'sponsoring' of
pre-confs was just that their staff were the
presenters/facilitators/instructors at those pre-confs. So that is more
exposure, but it was formally unconnected with their sponsorship
donation -- in the sense that _anyone_ ca
Hi Anjanette,
We're just wrapping up the sponsorship drive for Access 2011, and can say we
learned:
-you can't start soliciting sponsorships too soon; a lot of organizations
allocate their conference and sponsorship money very early
-before negotiating with sponsors, have a policy on whether sp
This might be better for the planning list, but I think we do need a broader
discussion about our normal approach to working with sponsors. We typically
have not had sponsored events, and this has been purposeful in intent (last
year was an exception; I don't believe the topic was brought up wit
Excellent!
I've been kicking around ideas with Kyle about sponsorship. I noticed in the
past that OCLC and DLF had sponsored pre-conference activities. I'd
appreciate more thoughts on walking the line between maximum exposure for
sponsors and intrusiveness on conference attendees.
--Anj
On Fri,
Thanks for setting this up, Anj! Once the committees have some more names
attached to them, you may want to identify a lead for each.
I'm excited about #c4l12 already.
-Mike
On Jun 7, 2011 12:16 PM, "Anjanette Young" wrote:
Hi Anj - I just wanted to let you know that Serials Solutions is working out
a plan to better support the conference. We'd possibly like to sponsor an
evening event, we will have more information for you later in the summer.
Cheers
Andrew
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Anjanette Young wrote:
Thanks for the reminder. Dates: Feb 6 - 9, 2012.
--Anjanette
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jay Luker wrote:
> Hi Anjanette,
>
> Does this mean you've settled on dates?
>
> --jay
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Anjanette Young
> wrote:
> > Code4Lib Seattle 2012 update. Thanks to Eliza
Hi Anjanette,
Does this mean you've settled on dates?
--jay
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Anjanette Young
wrote:
> Code4Lib Seattle 2012 update. Thanks to Elizabeth Duell of Orbis Cascade
> Alliance and Cary Gordon of chillco.com, we finally have a venue with
> adequate (hopefully) bandwidth
Anj,
I justed finished my first year as a MLIS student at the iSchool (UW). I'd
love to help coordinate the meetup. Contact me personally to sort out a
meeting.
Thanks,
Tod Robbins
Code4Lib Seattle 2012 update. Thanks to Elizabeth Duell of Orbis Cascade
Alliance and Cary Gordon of chillco.com, we finally have a venue with
adequate (hopefully) bandwidth and wireless access points, a reasonable food
& beverage minimum, and chairs! The Renaissance Hotel (515 Madison St.,
Seatt
45 matches
Mail list logo
