> A bug in rc1 or is there something else wrong with the way I did this?
crypted passwords are known to work correctly on rc1--I'm able to /oper
on my testnet server, which is using crypted passwords.
I tend to use perl's crypt function to generate crypted password text.
Pick two letters out of
Ok thanks to R33D33R - Encrypted passwords were the problem.
F:CRYPT_OPER_PASSWORD:FALSE
This fixed the problem.
I had left the original set of F:lines as default (all commented, so all
were set at their defaults).
I presume encrypted passwords is the default setting.
I generated my encrypted
As you yourself note, this discussion is off-topic. It will cease
immediately.
> A few minutes ago I received this statement through someone at coder-com:
>
> [23:37:34] <@notnet> i suppose thats what you should expect from someone
> that us an uber eleet hacker that hangs in #warezhq
> [23:37:
sorry dewd ..
but i dont think this thread belongs to that list.
I know you know regarding your subject but writing this should mean
"not send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]" imho.
regards,
-- nighty
passes b around ;)
At 23:58 23/07/2002, you wrote:
>A few minutes ago I received this statement thro
I just finished setting up a new server.. compiled and loaded first time! :)
However Im having issues with the O:lines. Those of you currently in
#coder-com might have seen me mention this.
[11:26] O:*@*:test:blakjak::10
[11:26] so thats my oline
[11:26] i go /oper blakjak test
[11:26] and
outsider,
you always end up on the coder-com mailing list as a topic of discussion. Notably you
always
bring this stuff up. It has NO place in the coder-com mailing list. Stuff that is
here should
actually relate to the IRCD. Crap emails like this waste precious inbox space.
Regards,
Brade
A few minutes ago I received this statement through someone at coder-com:
[23:37:34] <@notnet> i suppose thats what you should expect from someone
that us an uber eleet hacker that hangs in #warezhq
[23:37:43] <@notnet> us/is
[23:37:59] lol
[23:38:09] * @notnet disappears
Just for the info: The
Ahhh right...I see what you mean...it should appear to come from the users
server because the source of the message is sptr->user->server->name. Very
odd indeed!
Oh well doesn't really matter now as it would appear that u2.10.11 won't do
that if as you said you change the sptr to an &me.
David
-
> I'm probably way off base here but I think it might be to do with the fact
> that jbuf->jb_source in joinbuf_init (channel.c) gets filled with the
> contents of sptr from m_join (joinbuf_init(&create, sptr, cptr,
> JOINBUF_TYPE_CREATE, 0, TStime());) which I think is the senders name and as
> t
I'm probably way off base here but I think it might be to do with the fact
that jbuf->jb_source in joinbuf_init (channel.c) gets filled with the
contents of sptr from m_join (joinbuf_init(&create, sptr, cptr,
JOINBUF_TYPE_CREATE, 0, TStime());) which I think is the senders name and as
the sender w
> * Now talking in #lamerville
> * Ad-Rock has joined #lamerville
> * Ad-Rock sets mode: +o Ad-Rock
> Snatcher sets mode: +o Snatcher WTF?!
>
> Does this happen when two users joins a channel at the *exact* same time?
Yes, but what you're supposed to see is the user's *server* opping them.
Thi
* Now talking in #lamerville
* Ad-Rock has joined #lamerville
* Ad-Rock sets mode: +o Ad-Rock
Snatcher sets mode: +o Snatcher WTF?!
Does this happen when two users joins a channel at the *exact* same time?
CashIC.com Ýnternetten para kazandiran, en onemlisi Turkiye ye de odeme yapan bir
sponsor. Uye olmak icin internetsitenizin olmasý da gerekmiyor, herkes uye olup para
kazanabilir.
Uye olduktan sonra 6 degisik sekýlde para kazanmaya basliyor ve her ay basinda ne
kadar kazandiysaniz odemezi 10 gu
13 matches
Mail list logo
