Re: [Coder-Com]

2002-10-23 Thread Alex Badea
begin quote from Kev on Oct 23, 2002: > It'd be nice to have a brainstorming session over how to calculate the > "recent" numerical size of a channel and what the proportionality should > be--should it be linear? Quadratic? Advantages? Disadvantages? I didn't study any details (yet), but perha

Re: [Coder-Com]

2002-10-23 Thread éL NìçoS
Hi, Maybe this isn't a coder-com discussion topic, but I encountered for what the banlist size matter counts kinda the same situation. Sorry for some non-coder-com related answers / solutions, but in a way it provides a short-term solution for his problem too. As I recall, #usa uses some eggdrops

Re: [Coder-Com]

2002-10-23 Thread Kev
[user-com snipped from the cc-list--I'm only covering the coder-com side of things here] > Quite a few users I know see the new host hiding option as a loss of > accountability, since no detailed information demarcating what > [EMAIL PROTECTED] can/will and can't/won't do. > > In my situation,

Re: [Coder-Com]

2002-10-23 Thread Isomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > In my situation, as one of the ops in #usa (which tends to have 200-350 users >during any part of the day), the host-hiding option further stresses what I consider >to be a far too small banlist size even further; just the simple addition of this

RE : [Coder-Com]

2002-10-23 Thread Mathieu René
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ircu12.10.11.03 has MAXBANS 40 by default Math [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-coder-com@;undernet.org] De la part de Christopher Robin Wilding Envoyé : 23 octobre, 2002 17:10 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Coder-Com]

2002-10-23 Thread Christopher Robin Wilding
At 14:03 2002-10-23 -0400, Kev wrote: >Undernet's AUP prohibits spamming, so you can email logs to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] It'll likely result in suspension of his account, and >hopefully also a complaint from abuse@ to the user's ISP. This is clearly >not as good as letting the user do this himself,

Re: [Coder-Com] Bans & mode +x

2002-10-23 Thread éL NìçoS
Thx :o) Good to know ;o) regards NicoS - Original Message - From: "Isomer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "éL NìçoS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Undernet Coder Committee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:19 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Bans & mode +x | -BEGIN PGP SIGNE

Re: [Coder-Com] Bans & mode +x

2002-10-23 Thread Isomer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Hi, > > This is just something I was wondering... If I would be abusing in a > channel with my real host matching the folowing mask > *!capricorne@*.kabel.telenet.be, I probably would get banned. I could > return with another host & still get banned

Re: [Coder-Com] Bans & mode +x

2002-10-23 Thread Kev
> Now there we have a problem... Even if we know who did that, he is able to > use his handlehost (?.users.undernet.org) as a mask so we can't figure out > his userip. We won't be able to track him down any more, and his ISP can't > be warned of his abuse. Undernet's AUP prohibits spamming, so you

[Coder-Com] Bans & mode +x

2002-10-23 Thread éL NìçoS
Hi, This is just something I was wondering... If I would be abusing in a channel with my real host matching the folowing mask *!capricorne@*.kabel.telenet.be, I probably would get banned. I could return with another host & still get banned. Logicly I could have a second connection open with host n

RE: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion

2002-10-23 Thread Ivan Degiorgio
Don`t think giving a user an @Guest*.users.undernet.org is so much complex. (without the removal after 60 seconds and all that) ... Users are given @Guest*.users.undernet.org and it will swap to @Username.users.undernet.org upon login and never showing their real ip. Regards, Ivan Degiorgio AiRMaF

Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion

2002-10-23 Thread net
That sounds like an aweful complex way of original host hiding. Why not just do the traditional "Undernet.sub.domain.com" or "127.0.0.xxx" instead of all this fancy stuff? Cheers, net - Original Message - From: "Larry Kaeto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ivan Degiorgio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc

Re: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion

2002-10-23 Thread Larry Kaeto
I think this is a good idea! HIGH^5 Ivan *smiles* They get Guest*.users.undernet.org on connect, this immediately hides the IP of the user, then Services messages the user to login, you log in (manually or via a nifty client script), then your host is changed to your username.users.undernet.org.

RE: [Coder-Com] Account Suggestion

2002-10-23 Thread Ivan Degiorgio
Was the +x done so that noone`s real host is visible ? If yes is it possible to give a user @Guest1.users.undernet.org @Guest2.users.undernet.org etc etc on connect. and when logged in it will change to the normal username.users.undernet.org ? If no is it possible to add