Please do NOT send HTML messages to this list
Thanks
Mathieu René
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
De la part de éL NìçoS
Envoyé : 29 avril, 2002 16:50
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [Coder-Com] Banlist
Coders,
I also h
on 30/4/02 08:50, éL NìçoS at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Coders,
>
> I also have a suggestion. Large channels often deal with floods. Most off
> those large channels prefer to put two or three eggdrops online to protect
> themselves against the floodhosts. On most off these channels the banlis
Coders,
I also have a suggestion. Large
channels often deal with floods. Most off those large channels prefer to put two
or three eggdrops online to protect themselves against the floodhosts. On most
off these channels the banlist is quickly filled...
Many users asked to enlarge banlists
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:38:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> The P10 protocol as i know it,
> >> SENDERNUM B #channel TS +modes users :%bans
> >> doesn't have timestamps for the bans
> >>
> >
> > Like all channel modes, it uses the TS of the channel, there aren't
> > TS's on individual
> >> The P10 protocol as i know it,
> >> SENDERNUM B #channel TS +modes users :%bans
> >> doesn't have timestamps for the bans
> >>
> >
> > Like all channel modes, it uses the TS of the channel, there aren't
> > TS's on individual modes, they are just "merged".
> >
> i know the TS isn't the TS of
>> The P10 protocol as i know it,
>> SENDERNUM B #channel TS +modes users :%bans
>> doesn't have timestamps for the bans
>>
>
> Like all channel modes, it uses the TS of the channel, there aren't
> TS's on individual modes, they are just "merged".
>
i know the TS isn't the TS of the mode... but wh
> > i guess that those bans were actually *originally* set prior to any
> > other BUT ... when you *see* a server SET bans .. it doesn really
> > set them at the present moment like if a user did, it is just
> > resynchronizing with the list that server has on its side .. I
> > guess it just pass
> i guess that those bans were actually *originally* set prior to any
> other BUT ... when you *see* a server SET bans .. it doesn really
> set them at the present moment like if a user did, it is just
> resynchronizing with the list that server has on its side .. I
> guess it just pass around the
>Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:27:19 +0100
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: nighty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] banlist
>
>At 10:35 21/02/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> > the two most recent bans (e.g. number 30 and 31) ar
i sent a reply about banlists to nighty while i wanted to send it to
the list. i usually make the kind of errors. maybe nighty can reply it
to the list for me.
> Hi, i'm not sure if it is a bug or something.. but on one chan he have
> 31 bans set`:
This can typically happen during splits or lag. The server only limits
the number of bans local users can set--it doesn't limit bans set by a
remote server.
--
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
the two most recent bans (e.g. number 30 and 31) are at the end of your list,
you can notice they were not set by a user, but by the server ...
actually, as far as i know, if a server resets bans after a netsplit,
it doesnt bother about how much bans you already have thus being able to
over
X actually respects the 30 maxbans limit, as it is set the same on every
server, the following 2 were set by a server, this usually only happens at
net.join, where (as previously said by someone else) a server will not
adhere to the 30 maxbans.
>> :Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 367 KeK|PoSlA #char
It is possible to have more than MAXBANS in a channel. Usually this
occures from a server or a service initiating the ban; servers ignore the
MAXBAN value in this case.
-- notnet
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, denisegamache wrote:
> Hi, i'm not sure if it is a bug or something.. but on one chan he have
- Original Message -
From: "denisegamache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:08 PM
Subject: [Coder-Com] banlist
> Hi, i'm not sure if it is a bug or something.. but on one chan he have
> 31 bans set`:
> [
Hi, i'm not sure if it is a bug or something.. but on one chan he have
31 bans set`:
:Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 367 KeK|PoSlA #charlesbourg
*!*@80.78.66.10 Maj|Bouff 1013885357
:Stockholm.SE.eu.Undernet.org 367 KeK|PoSlA #charlesbourg
*!*@61.136.187.66 Maj|Bouff 1013885352
:Stockholm.SE.eu.U
16 matches
Mail list logo
