henryzhangsta commented on issue #17014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17014#issuecomment-880418148
@uranusjr Yes, I'll get that going
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
uranusjr commented on issue #16986:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16986#issuecomment-880418133
If you already know some Flask, what you need to do is to add a form in the
UI that POST to a new view. That view should take the current task instance’s
id, select it out, set
potiuk commented on issue #15303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15303#issuecomment-880414696
Duplicate of #13470 indeed
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
uranusjr closed issue #16836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16836
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on issue #17014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17014#issuecomment-880412245
Hi! Would you be interested in submitting a pull request for the fix? (And a
test to prevent future regression.)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new cc33d7e Drop support for Airflow 1.10 in
potiuk merged pull request #17011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17011
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #17011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17011#issuecomment-880410452
Ah yeah! Let's rip 1.10 out completely :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17011#issuecomment-880409897
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #16954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16954#discussion_r670146636
##
File path: airflow/utils/python_virtualenv.py
##
@@ -35,12 +38,44 @@ def _generate_virtualenv_cmd(tmp_dir: str, python_bin: str,
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from c164c5c Chart: Update the default Airflow version to ``2.1.2``
(#17013)
add 469d1cf Update Airflow version
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #16954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16954#discussion_r670145902
##
File path: airflow/utils/python_virtualenv.py
##
@@ -88,12 +124,15 @@ def prepare_virtualenv(
:type system_site_packages: bool
:param
kaxil merged pull request #17009:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17009
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #16954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16954#discussion_r670145370
##
File path: airflow/utils/python_virtualenv.py
##
@@ -88,12 +124,15 @@ def prepare_virtualenv(
:type system_site_packages: bool
:param
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #16508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16508#discussion_r670144247
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -1847,7 +1847,10 @@ def bulk_write_to_db(cls, dags: Collection["DAG"],
session=None):
for
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17014#issuecomment-880406773
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
henryzhangsta opened a new issue #17014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17014
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.1.2
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl
version`): 1.19.8
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r670141477
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/eks.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,452 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r670140497
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/utils/eks_test_constants.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r670140426
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/utils/eks_test_constants.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
potiuk commented on pull request #16311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16311#issuecomment-880396282
Example failure here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/3072403518?check_suite_focus=true
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on pull request #16311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16311#issuecomment-880395808
Happy to take a look as well but the Summit has taken quite a lot of my time
this week.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on pull request #16311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16311#issuecomment-880395529
Hmm. Somehow, I think (even if it succeeded), it causes failure in mssql in
main @aneesh-joseph @anitakar -> maybe you can join the forces and fix it :)
--
This is an
potiuk commented on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880393717
> I prefer to keep the operator KISS, so it should not retry in case of bad
configuration.
I thought about it, and I think I prefer to have this retry mechanism for at
potiuk closed pull request #17002:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17002
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #17002:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17002#issuecomment-880389530
Closing (unless there will be some good argument to re-open it :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk commented on pull request #17002:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17002#issuecomment-880389374
Agree with @uranusjr - this is backwards-incompatible change. If anything we
might want to make it an optional feature that you can enable if you want, but
if we would like to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c164c5c Chart: Update the default Airflow version
potiuk merged pull request #17013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17013
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #17008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17008#issuecomment-880384940
This will be implemented as bugfix in 2.1.0 that willl follow. The
description is also wrong. It will only fail when you have Docker-in-Docker or
Remote engine, So it does not
potiuk closed pull request #17008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17008
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from fc0250f Allow attaching to previously launched task in ECSOperator
(#16685)
add bc00415 Adds option to
potiuk merged pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #16803:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16803
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #16806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16806
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880384155
> The cause to the failure is that old `binds` thing _automatically create
an empty directory_ if the host path does not exist; the new `mounts` thing
does not do that, but
mariotaddeucci commented on a change in pull request #16915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16915#discussion_r670125675
##
File path: airflow/providers/tableau/operators/tableau.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r670125459
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/operators/test_eks.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r670125356
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/operators/test_eks.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
potiuk commented on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880382561
> Change is good as-is, the changelog addition can be done either here or in
another PR.
Yep. I will add the changelog when preparing provider's release.
--
This is
uranusjr commented on pull request #16956:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16956#issuecomment-880380845
This can be seen with `BashOperator`’s `bash_command` argument. If you
search [this documentation
edwardwang888 commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670115567
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
edwardwang888 commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670115567
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
edwardwang888 commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670115567
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670116981
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
if
edwardwang888 commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670115567
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
edwardwang888 commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670115567
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
edwardwang888 commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670115567
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
uranusjr commented on pull request #17002:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17002#issuecomment-880371855
> Some operators handle it, but I think it will be good to make this
behavior by default
But some operators *want* the un-parsed JSON string, so this will only
create
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670107222
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
if
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17003#discussion_r670107222
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -939,9 +939,9 @@ def next_retry_datetime(self):
delay = self.task.retry_delay
if
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880361861
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880360742
The cause to the failure is that old `binds` thing *automatically create an
empty directory* if the host path does not exist; the new `mounts` thing does
not do that,
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880360742
The cause to the failure is that old `binds` thing *automatically create an
empty directory* if the host path does not exist; the new `mounts` thing does
not do that,
uranusjr commented on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880360742
The cause to the failure is that old `binds` thing *automatically create an
empty directory* if the host path does not exist; the new `mounts` thing does
not do that. So the
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#discussion_r670099878
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -227,66 +240,66 @@ def get_hook(self) -> DockerHook:
def _run_image(self) ->
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17009:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17009#issuecomment-880349192
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
uranusjr commented on issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983#issuecomment-880348627
@trucnguyenlam Callback execution is disabled here, but that disabled
callback is returned as the second value here (`callback_to_run`). That
callback is then passed on for
raphaelauv commented on issue #15303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15303#issuecomment-880323051
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/13470
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
houqp commented on pull request #16636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16636#issuecomment-880313628
@SimonOsipov i think you need to write code to check and remove trailing `-`
after the truncation so when we concat them with `.`, it won't result in
invalid pod name in k8s.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 16c55f1 Move docs about masking to a new page (#17007)
add fc0250f Allow attaching to previously launched
kaxil merged pull request #16685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #16685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685#issuecomment-880312980
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17011#discussion_r670053767
##
File path: scripts/in_container/prod/entrypoint_prod.sh
##
@@ -193,30 +186,13 @@ function set_pythonpath_for_root_user() {
}
function
vikramkoka commented on issue #14906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14906#issuecomment-880306538
> No worries, I'll pick this one up then!
Great, assigned it to you @Naraujo13
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
kaxil opened a new pull request #17013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17013
Updates default Airflow version to 2.1.2 as it has been released.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15793#issuecomment-880288906
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 30 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #16313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16313#issuecomment-880288890
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 30 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
pmalafosse commented on a change in pull request #16685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685#discussion_r670031677
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/operators/test_ecs.py
##
@@ -349,6 +349,111 @@ def test_reattach_successful(self, launch_type, tags,
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #16404:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16404#discussion_r670028958
##
File path: airflow/models/variable.py
##
@@ -201,7 +201,13 @@ def get_variable_from_secrets(key: str) -> Optional[str]:
:return: Variable
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #16404:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16404#discussion_r670028958
##
File path: airflow/models/variable.py
##
@@ -201,7 +201,13 @@ def get_variable_from_secrets(key: str) -> Optional[str]:
:return: Variable
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #16685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685#discussion_r670027434
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/operators/test_ecs.py
##
@@ -349,6 +349,111 @@ def test_reattach_successful(self, launch_type, tags,
kaxil edited a comment on issue #16952:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16952#issuecomment-880281931
I think the priority is correct and will cause confusion if changed later
on. And with customer Secrets Backend, you can mix and match however you like.
We intentionally did
kaxil commented on issue #16952:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16952#issuecomment-880281931
I think the priority is correct and will cause confusion if changed later
on. And with customer Secrets Backend, you can mix and match however you like.
We intentionally did this
SangwanP commented on issue #17010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17010#issuecomment-880274651
Having the ability to define a custom trigger rule would be nice.
The difference between triggering with 2+ successes compared to 1+
success(es) is that the latter is more
raphaelauv edited a comment on issue #17010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17010#issuecomment-880267979
Problem what to do about the person that need
all_done_and_X_success where X could be 2 and not one
Look like airflow is missing an expressive pattern to let
raphaelauv commented on issue #17010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17010#issuecomment-880267979
Problem what to do about the person that need
all_done_and_X_success where X could be 2 and not one
Look like airflow is missing an expressive pattern to let the
gh4n removed a comment on issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983#issuecomment-880263158
@ephraimbuddy Is your PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15172
released with 2.1.2 related to this issue?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
raphaelauv opened a new issue #17012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17012
**Apache Airflow version**:
2.1.2
**What happened**:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/16c55f100374df8cb17a85d06396aa42785fed0e/airflow/ti_deps/deps/trigger_rule_dep.py#L206
gh4n edited a comment on issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983#issuecomment-880263158
@ephraimbuddy Is your PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15172
released with 2.1.2 related to this issue?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
gh4n commented on issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983#issuecomment-880263158
@ephraimbuddy Will your PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15172
released with 2.1.2 fix this issue?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from a5d7f9b Fix static checks after pre-commit upgrades (#17006)
add 16c55f1 Move docs about masking to a
mik-laj merged pull request #17007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17007
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mik-laj commented on pull request #17011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17011#issuecomment-880261527
CC: @aneesh-joseph
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
mik-laj opened a new pull request #17011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17011
The 1.10 series reached end of life, so the Dockerfile on main can drop
support it.
Additionally, this solves one problem that the user reported. We used CLI
check for Airflow 1.10 to check
magler commented on issue #16952:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16952#issuecomment-880259029
>
>
> @kaxil WDYT? II like this idea, but I wonder if there was any assumption
on the basis of which you chose the current order.
The Secrets backend docs mention a
pmalafosse commented on pull request #16937:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16937#issuecomment-880255509
Nice new operator!
There is this issue about TableauRefreshWorkbookOperator operator FYI
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16669 @ciancolo
--
This is an
SangwanP opened a new issue #17010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17010
**Description**
I would like to have a trigger rule that triggers a task if all the upstream
tasks have executed (_all_done_) and there is atleast one successful upstream
task. This would be like
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17010#issuecomment-880254564
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
kaxil opened a new pull request #17009:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17009
This commit/PR also updates the release date in CHANGELOG.txt
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
raphaelauv edited a comment on pull request #17008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17008#issuecomment-880252375
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
raphaelauv commented on pull request #17008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17008#issuecomment-880252375
Should I change the base branch to make this commit appear on
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-docker/2.0.0/index.htmll
--
This is an automated
raphaelauv opened a new pull request #17008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17008
Since there is a regression in version 2.0.0 , the changelog that is
directly show by the documentation ( and so the airflow website ) should let
know people about.
--
This is an automated
mik-laj commented on issue #16952:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16952#issuecomment-880246050
@kaxil WDYT? II like this idea, but I wonder if there was any assumption on
the basis of which you chose the current order.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mik-laj commented on issue #16996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16996#issuecomment-880245073
Duplicate: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10605
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
mik-laj closed issue #16996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16996
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685#issuecomment-880242336
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
raphaelauv edited a comment on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880238711
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
raphaelauv commented on pull request #16932:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16932#issuecomment-880238711
Since it's from 2.0.0 let's consider the mount of the tmp folder the default
pattern and simply add an option to disable it in case of docker in docker
I prefer to
pmalafosse commented on pull request #16685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685#issuecomment-880238325
Sorry there were some conflicts after the rebase that I hadn't fixed
completely, fixed now (I ran pytest locally and it passed) @kaxil .
--
This is an automated message
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo