potiuk commented on pull request #17400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17400#issuecomment-892378601
some docs and test failures
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17400#issuecomment-892378608
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
josh-fell commented on pull request #17399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17399#issuecomment-892325412
@eladkal FYI if you'd like to review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
unixfree opened a new issue #17401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17401
**Apache Airflow version**:
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17401#issuecomment-892325011
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
er1shivam commented on issue #27:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/airflow-client-python/issues/27#issuecomment-892322524
I will share it in few hours when I log back in.
But as you said regarding dag_run_timeout, I haven't defined this in my dag
as it is not a REQUIRED parameter. So I
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #15042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15042#issuecomment-892248347
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
mariotaddeucci edited a comment on pull request #16915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16915#issuecomment-892245415
@eladkal @potiuk the unit tests have run successfully now ✅
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
mariotaddeucci commented on pull request #16915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16915#issuecomment-892245415
@eladkal @potiuk the unit tests have run successfully now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
subkanthi opened a new pull request #17400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17400
closes: #17368
- Fixed bug with SlackAPIFileOperator with uploading file.
- Added example dag to demonstrate support for uploading file and file
content.
--
This is an automated message
fmv1992 commented on issue #13637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13637#issuecomment-892225483
In our case we get n processes determined by `parsing_processes`. `top`
gives:
```
airflow scheduler - DagFileProcessor /mydags/dag1.py
```
All of them with a
jedcunningham commented on issue #17398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17398#issuecomment-892200174
Thanks @smythie86. Unfortunately the naive approach of just adding
annotations where necessary isn't enough to fix this (it would cause worker
restarts on any `helm
smythie86 commented on issue #17398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17398#issuecomment-892176505
Yes, I confirmed that I am running 1.1.0, and that the
AIRFLOW__WEBSERVER__SECRET_KEY env variable is set.
After more digging, I discovered that this bug doesn't happen on
raphaelauv commented on issue #17035:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17035#issuecomment-892159335
check this
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-892153152
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
raphaelauv edited a comment on issue #16922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-892153152
@louison @ericdevries
```python
class MyKubernetesPodOperator(KubernetesPodOperator):
template_fields = tuple(x for x in
raphaelauv edited a comment on issue #16922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-892153152
@louison @ericdevries
```python
class MyKubernetesPodOperator(KubernetesPodOperator):
template_fields = tuple(x for x in
raphaelauv edited a comment on issue #16922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-892153152
@louison @ericdevries
```python
class MyKubernetesPodOperator(KubernetesPodOperator):
template_fields = tuple(x for x in
raphaelauv commented on issue #16922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-892153152
@louison @ericdevries
```python
class MyKubernetesPodOperator(KubernetesPodOperator):
a = tuple(x for x in KubernetesPodOperator.template_fields if x !=
jedcunningham commented on issue #17398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17398#issuecomment-892152186
#17142 should have fixed this. Silly question, but are you sure you are on
1.1.0, not 1.0.0? Do you see the `valueFrom` `AIRFLOW__WEBSERVER__SECRET_KEY`
env var in your
potiuk commented on pull request #16904:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16904#issuecomment-892149704
The problem is that we can't do it differently until we have better support
from GitHub for cross-workflow communication.
All details are described in CI.rst but here
kurtqq commented on a change in pull request #17399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17399#discussion_r68202
##
File path: airflow/providers/salesforce/hooks/salesforce.py
##
@@ -74,6 +91,29 @@ def get_connection_form_widgets() -> Dict[str, Any]:
natanweinberger commented on a change in pull request #15013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15013#discussion_r682064811
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/secrets/vault.py
##
@@ -188,12 +204,28 @@ def get_conn_uri(self, conn_id: str) -> Optional[str]:
josh-fell opened a new pull request #17399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17399
Closes: #17192
- Adding login and authentication support when using the `SalesforceHook`:
- JWT bearer authentication
- IP filtering (allow-listing)
- Direct session/instance
sreenath-kamath commented on pull request #17339:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17339#issuecomment-892121981
@potiuk Have made the recommended changes, Can you take another pass at it ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
smythie86 opened a new issue #17398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17398
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.1.2
**Airflow Helm Chart version: 1.1.0
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
Client Version:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17398#issuecomment-892113279
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
jedcunningham commented on issue #17394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17394#issuecomment-892065842
Likely related to `run_as_user`:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/4dae4ec9a4148db6c32f15ccc122d42c93a2c58a/airflow/jobs/local_task_job.py#L198-L199
Do you
flolas commented on pull request #17329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17329#issuecomment-892050301
@uranusjr @potiuk Okay, I think that defaulting True for split_statement
sounds good, bc if someone has some edge-cases (sqlparse is not perfect) can be
easily fixed changing
dimon222 commented on a change in pull request #16980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16980#discussion_r681979565
##
File path: airflow/kubernetes/pod_generator.py
##
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def make_unique_pod_id(pod_id: str) -> str:
# Strip trailing '-' and
dimon222 commented on a change in pull request #16980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16980#discussion_r681979565
##
File path: airflow/kubernetes/pod_generator.py
##
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def make_unique_pod_id(pod_id: str) -> str:
# Strip trailing '-' and
denimalpaca commented on a change in pull request #17382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17382#discussion_r681970662
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/example_dags/example_local_to_s3.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
potiuk commented on pull request #17329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17329#issuecomment-892032420
My thoughts exactly @uranusjr. I was a bit on a side of backwards
compatibility and our SemVer approach (which would make such change wait for
3.* Release).
But we
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #17397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17397
Celery 4 is no longer supported as of 2021-08-01:
https://docs.celeryproject.org/en/stable/history/whatsnew-5.0.html#long-term-support-policy
Closes: #11301
--
This is an
potiuk commented on pull request #17386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17386#issuecomment-892028776
And congrats Astronomer :).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on pull request #17386:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17386#issuecomment-892028180
Congrats @BasPH
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk commented on pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462#issuecomment-892024467
I started discussion
https://lists.apache.org/x/thread.html/rb567279f7ea1611ef2145c61c0c726bce540bbf06e21e0447bd7be6c@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
--
This is an automated
josh-fell closed pull request #17396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17396
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
fmv1992 commented on issue #13637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13637#issuecomment-892019154
We upgraded from `airflow` `1.10.15` to `2.0.2` and are experiencing this.
@kaxil, configs:
* `[scheduler] parsing_processes`: `2`.
* `[scheduler]
potiuk commented on pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462#issuecomment-892019012
Let me start discussion
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462#issuecomment-892018433
I am not sure if we have any policy around that ? Do we want to have bigger
number of small use cases or smaller number of bigger ones. I think we might
want to discuss it at
potiuk commented on pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462#issuecomment-892017506
Ah sorry , no - it is in use-case rather than blog. I think we have not
discussed what can go here.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
potiuk commented on pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462#issuecomment-892016362
I think blogs on airflow site are mostly for serious announcements and some
big improvements from the community. We recently added an Airflow Medium
publication and it's much
Raju-basava commented on issue #8208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8208#issuecomment-892003826
hi, I'm new to airflow and interested in contributing to this task, let me
know.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
andrewgodwin commented on a change in pull request #15389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15389#discussion_r681933392
##
File path: airflow/jobs/local_task_job.py
##
@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ def _run_mini_scheduler_on_child_tasks(self, session=None)
-> None:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from e8e3b06 More touches on dag_maker fixture to create DagModel
automatically (#17391)
add 4dae4ec refactor:
potiuk merged pull request #17388:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17388
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #17186:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17186#issuecomment-891973397
I have changed the name to correctly reflect the discussion results.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk commented on issue #16922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-891972732
See discussion in #17186 - it turned out really to be a bug in the
implementation of recursive rendering of parameters in Kubernetes Pod Operator,
You can (and Kubernetes
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch gh-pages
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/gh-pages by this push:
new 83521ef Deploying to gh-pages
potiuk merged pull request #461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/461
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
subkanthi commented on a change in pull request #17382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17382#discussion_r681881085
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/example_dags/example_local_to_s3.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-site.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 6427952 Fixes messed-up changelog for some
davlum commented on a change in pull request #15013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15013#discussion_r681881872
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/secrets/vault.py
##
@@ -188,12 +204,28 @@ def get_conn_uri(self, conn_id: str) -> Optional[str]:
potiuk commented on pull request #16858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16858#issuecomment-891950891
Not really - there is one intermittent error with scheduler job, but SSH
tests are still failing:
potiuk commented on issue #16728:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16728#issuecomment-891945673
Assigned you @goodhamgupta !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ephraimbuddy merged pull request #17391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17391
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from ed99eaa Regression on pid reset to allow task start after heartbeat
(#17333)
add e8e3b06 More
josh-fell opened a new pull request #17396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17396
Closes: #17192
Adding login and authentication support when using the `SalesforceHook`:
- JWT bearer authentication
- IP filtering (allow-listing)
- Direct session/instance access
davlum commented on a change in pull request #17387:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17387#discussion_r681851621
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/_internal_client/vault_client.py
##
@@ -191,8 +191,21 @@ def __init__(
self.radius_secret =
christopherpetrino commented on pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462#issuecomment-891924768
@potiuk @kaxil @jhtimmins who are the appropriate people to tag on these
types of PRs?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
christopherpetrino opened a new pull request #462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/462
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe,
santosh-d3vpl3x closed pull request #17341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17341
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
cpdean commented on pull request #15599:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15599#issuecomment-891921076
I am trying to get my installation of airflow to mask passwords in the
rendered template UI of a given task. It seems this pull request was merged and
made available somewhere
wyattshapiro commented on a change in pull request #16980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16980#discussion_r681837507
##
File path: airflow/kubernetes/pod_generator.py
##
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ def make_unique_pod_id(pod_id: str) -> str:
# Strip trailing '-'
yevsh opened a new issue #17395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17395
Airflow 2.1.2
runs as pod in kubernetes cluster.
python DAG is placed in airflow_dags location, airflow executes it twice!
From log:
```
[2021-08-02 14:48:07,900]
SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #17347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17347#discussion_r681810429
##
File path: tests/models/test_taskinstance.py
##
@@ -1743,6 +1743,32 @@ def on_execute_callable(context):
ti.refresh_from_db()
wojsamjan commented on pull request #17285:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17285#issuecomment-891880603
> The labels should already be unique:
>
terryfugit opened a new issue #17394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17394
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.1.2
**What happened**:
Receive warning message "WARNING - Recorded pid 4969 does not match the
current pid 4969", then the "INFO - Sending
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17394:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17394#issuecomment-891878172
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
dash-stefan-petrescu commented on pull request #16858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16858#issuecomment-891874964
@potiuk All looks good now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
rodrigoechaide commented on issue #11379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11379#issuecomment-891865334
Thanks, @uranusjr. I will check that entry.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17391#issuecomment-891860163
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-891859321
Note: I’ve changed `schedule_date` in this PR to `logical_date` as I
mentioned on the dev mailing list:
uranusjr commented on pull request #16352:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16352#issuecomment-891859321
Note: I’ve changed `schedule_date` in this PR to `logical_date` as I
mentioned on the dev mailing list:
uranusjr commented on issue #11379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11379#issuecomment-891853538
You may find this StackOverflow entry interesting:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56188537
From what I can gather, this tends to happen when you send a ton of things
sreenath-kamath commented on issue #17340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17340#issuecomment-891851776
Have raised a PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17393 for the same.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
rodrigoechaide edited a comment on issue #11379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11379#issuecomment-891850328
Hi, @Siddharthk are you still facing the same issue? Because I am facing the
same issue when running a DAG that has 500 parallel tasks because I am running
some
sreenath-kamath opened a new pull request #17393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17393
Fetching and logging Livy session logs for LivyOperator
closes: #17340
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
rodrigoechaide commented on issue #11379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11379#issuecomment-891850328
Hi, @Siddharthk are you still facing the same issue? Because I am facing the
same issue when running a DAG that has 500 parallel tasks because I am running
some stress
ashb commented on a change in pull request #15389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15389#discussion_r681735890
##
File path: airflow/jobs/local_task_job.py
##
@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ def _run_mini_scheduler_on_child_tasks(self, session=None)
-> None:
ashb commented on issue #16618:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16618#issuecomment-891827633
> It would also be great if there was a way of NOT creating the dependencies
between tasks automatically.
> For cluster or job IDs (EMR, Databricks, etc) is very common, and having
potiuk commented on pull request #17356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17356#issuecomment-891808959
Yeah. I also run all the scenarios in my own repos 1) 'main' from my own
repo 2) "main' from a completely new repo (to test builds in forks of our
users) 3) PR from another
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-891799985
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
cansjt edited a comment on issue #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17022#issuecomment-891787393
With Airflow 2.1.2 we are something similar but not identical:
```
Task failed with exception", "exc_info": "Traceback (most recent call last):
File
cansjt commented on issue #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17022#issuecomment-891787393
With Airflow 2.1.2 we are something similar but not identical:
```
Task failed with exception", "exc_info": "Traceback (most recent call last):
File
goodhamgupta commented on issue #16728:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16728#issuecomment-891784787
Incase this has not yet been picked up, I would like to work on this issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #16227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16227#issuecomment-891783610
You can create an issue with a simple dag to reproduce the issue. That way
we will figure it out
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
rafraph commented on issue #8907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8907#issuecomment-891782320
I think in my case it also was DNS issue since when I use the IP instead of
the URL the UI become very fast
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
mwaaas commented on issue #16227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16227#issuecomment-891781711
Yes from the scheduler logs, I was seeing logs saying cannot find the task.
Why would the task go missing but its still processing.
--
This is an automated message from
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #16227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16227#issuecomment-891779597
You can check the scheduler log when this happens, probably the task went
missing and was removed somewhere. That happened externally and I think it
might not be related to
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #17347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17347#issuecomment-891770159
Can you rebase @SamWheating
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
ephraimbuddy closed pull request #17347:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17347
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rounakdatta commented on a change in pull request #17349:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17349#discussion_r681669098
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -333,20 +337,31 @@ def __init__(
templates_exts=templates_exts,
**kwargs,
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17391#discussion_r681669038
##
File path: tests/conftest.py
##
@@ -436,25 +436,27 @@ def dag_maker(request):
DEFAULT_DATE = timezone.datetime(2016, 1, 1)
class
mwaaas commented on issue #16227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16227#issuecomment-891765746
> Yeah, checking the image it has the change. In your dag, how does the task
state change to removed?
Not sure how the task change to removed.
I have added this
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #16227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16227#issuecomment-891761998
I will also simulate this: ```the publish task ( this task takes time to run
up to 30min)```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #16227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16227#issuecomment-891761170
Yeah, checking the image it has the change. In your dag, how does the task
state change to removed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17391#discussion_r681664002
##
File path: tests/conftest.py
##
@@ -436,25 +436,27 @@ def dag_maker(request):
DEFAULT_DATE = timezone.datetime(2016, 1, 1)
class
ephraimbuddy opened a new pull request #17391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17391
This change improves the dag_maker fixture to create DagModel on exit
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
alittlesliceoftom edited a comment on issue #13888:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13888#issuecomment-891757648
Hey @kdunee a very crude one for #14259, I just replace the command I use
with one that runs an echo every 30 secs in addition to the main task.
So I
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
