eladkal commented on issue #18921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18921#issuecomment-941947902
We probably need also to add support for timeout in the hook itself (for
users who build custom operators on top of the hook)?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
zkan opened a new pull request #18931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18931
Related: #16986
Changes proposed in this PR:
* Add a clear task menu on task instance view to save a few clicks
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #18930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18930#issuecomment-941921101
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
sharon2719 opened a new pull request #18930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18930
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
dstandish opened a new pull request #18929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18929
This is a small fixup for the salesforce hook.
Previously, code used `extras["blah"] or None` instead of simply
`extras.get("blah")`, which forces users to add each of these optional params
jameslamb opened a new pull request #18928:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18928
This PR proposes adding additional type hints on arguments and return values
for methods in `airflow.providers.cncf.kubernetes.utils.PodLauncher` which
currently don't have them.
I hope
asaf400 edited a comment on issue #18874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18874#issuecomment-941906832
I have confirmed the fix I suggested works in airflow 2.0.2,
For my own use, I just overrode the 'DockerOperator' class, and it's
'_run_image' function
I'll now
asaf400 edited a comment on issue #18874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18874#issuecomment-941906832
I have confirmed the fix I suggested works in airflow 2.0.2,
For my own use, I just overrode the 'DockerOperator' class, and it's
'_run_image' function
I'll now
asaf400 edited a comment on issue #18874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18874#issuecomment-941906832
I have confirmed the fix I suggested works in airflow 2.0.2,
For my own use, I just overrode the 'DockerOperator' class, and it's
'_run_image' function
I'll now
asaf400 edited a comment on issue #18874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18874#issuecomment-941906832
I have confirmed the fix I suggested works in airflow 2.0.2,
For my own use, I just overrode the 'DockerOperator' class, and it's
'_run_image' function
I'll now
asaf400 edited a comment on issue #18874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18874#issuecomment-941906832
I have confirmed the fix I suggested works in airflow 2.0.2,
For my own use, I just overrode the 'DockerOperator' class, and it's
'_run_image' function
I'll now
asaf400 commented on issue #18874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18874#issuecomment-941906832
I have confirmed the fix I suggested works in airflow 2.0.2,
For my own use, I just overrode the 'DockerOperator' class, and it's
'_run_image' function
I'll now start to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c4f5233 Bump chart version to `1.3.0-dev`
jedcunningham merged pull request #18919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18919
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #18926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18926#discussion_r727685785
##
File path: airflow/cli/cli_parser.py
##
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ def _check_value(self, action, value):
"To do it, run: pip
josh-fell commented on pull request #18562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18562#issuecomment-941845645
Rebasing. Looks like #18853 fixes the failing
`tests/sensors/test_external_task_sensor.py` test for Postgres13, Py3.8.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
edwardwang888 commented on pull request #18866:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18866#issuecomment-941797477
Thanks for the feedback. On further thought, I think the timestamp is based
on local computer time, so having the seconds isn't all that accurate anyways.
I would
xuan616 commented on pull request #18927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18927#issuecomment-941793980
thanks for the review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
xuan616 commented on a change in pull request #18927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18927#discussion_r727608247
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/transfers/cassandra_to_gcs.py
##
@@ -84,6 +87,10 @@ class CassandraToGCSOperator(BaseOperator):
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18927#discussion_r727590968
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/transfers/cassandra_to_gcs.py
##
@@ -110,6 +117,7 @@ def __init__(
google_cloud_storage_conn_id:
xuan616 opened a new pull request #18927:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18927
Related issue: #18921
- Add query_timeout as an argument in CassandraToGCSOperator constructor
- Support query execution with a timeout parameter
---
**^ Add meaningful
mik-laj commented on issue #18925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18925#issuecomment-941739050
> If you create pull-request, you don't have to create an issue first, but
if you want, you can do it. Creating an issue will allow you to collect
feedback or share plans with
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18926#discussion_r727578230
##
File path: airflow/cli/cli_parser.py
##
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ def _check_value(self, action, value):
"To do it, run: pip install
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18926#discussion_r727578230
##
File path: airflow/cli/cli_parser.py
##
@@ -73,6 +73,12 @@ def _check_value(self, action, value):
"To do it, run: pip install
andrewgodwin commented on pull request #18926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18926#issuecomment-941736300
I thought our import error in `utils.asyncio` errored out early enough, but
this *is* nicer :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
uranusjr commented on pull request #18875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18875#issuecomment-941732893
If you're just curious, try changing the expected query count in the test
against main and see what `assert_queries_count` reports But less query is
always good so that
SamWheating commented on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-941718102
Since the search term is passed directly into `ilike()` it can use
wildcards, so maybe we should call it something like `dag_id_pattern` or
`search_pattern`?
--
This
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #18926:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18926
The triggerer requires Python 3.7+.
cc: @andrewgodwin
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
uranusjr commented on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-941710663
My Django root tells me to choose `dag_id__contains` but I understand it's
not a universally loved approash :p
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
SamWheating edited a comment on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-941706608
> what's wrong with fetching the entire list and filter yourself
This is totally possible (and what we're doing currently), but it feels
pretty inefficient
SamWheating edited a comment on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-941706608
> what's wrong with fetching the entire list and filter yourself
This is totally possible (and what we're doing currently), but it feels
pretty inefficient
SamWheating commented on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-941706608
> what's wrong with fetching the entire list and filter yourself
This is totally possible (and what we're doing currently), but it feels
pretty inefficient when we
uranusjr commented on issue #18925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18925#issuecomment-941703559
Go ahead
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
celoibarros opened a new issue #18925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18925
### Description
Add template_ext = ('.json') in databricks operators. I will improve the
debug and the way to organize parameters.
### Use case/motivation
Bigger parameters on
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #18925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18925#issuecomment-941695216
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr commented on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-941688196
Not objecting to the idea (although what's wrong with fetching the entire
list and filter yourself?) but I feel `search` is not a particularly good name
for this.
--
This
josh-fell opened a new pull request #18562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18562
Related: #9415
This PR aims to replace the use of `PythonOperator` and
`PythonVirtualEnvOperator` tasks for the TaskFlow API in several core example
DAGs.
Additionally, there are
uranusjr closed pull request #18562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18562
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#discussion_r727556838
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_endpoint.py
##
@@ -60,13 +60,16 @@ def get_dag_details(dag_id):
SamWheating opened a new pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924
One of the issues we run into when developing tools on top of the Airflow
API is wanting to get just a subset of DAGs (typically all of the jobs relating
to a particular service or data
coinzerge commented on pull request #18622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18622#issuecomment-941660710
what's not right? total_seconds returns a float.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #17689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17689#issuecomment-940908158
The cookies are natively separated by domain, so this is the natural
behaviour for sites configured like this. It is theoratically possible to
manually prefix all the
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #17689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17689#issuecomment-940908158
The cookies are natively separated by domain, so this is the natural
behaviour for sites configured like this. It is theoratically possible to
manually prefix all the
uranusjr commented on issue #17413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17413#issuecomment-941641096
I wonder why that's the case. `get_latest_execution_date` simply fetches the
`execution_date` from the database, which *should* match the value in the
dropdown... Do we do
uranusjr commented on pull request #18755:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18755#issuecomment-941635373
You can import it from `typing_extensions` instead. Try searching the code
base, I think there are a couple of examples in other providers available.
--
This is an
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941632056
Also I'd be interested if you have ever deleted any DAG runs from the web UI
(or if you can identify any of the `execution_date` values in `task_instance`
and `task_fail`
uranusjr commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941632056
Also I'd be interested if you have ever deleted any DAG runs from the web UI
(or if you can identify any of the `execution_date` values in `task_instance`
correspond to those DAG
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18675#discussion_r727534778
##
File path: airflow/www/static/js/tree/useTreeData.js
##
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*!
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18675#discussion_r727529032
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -219,6 +219,82 @@ def get_date_time_num_runs_dag_runs_form_data(www_request,
session, dag):
}
+def
potiuk closed pull request #18922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18922
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from c8b86e6 Add more information to PodLauncher timeout error (#17953)
add a59775b Revert "Fix --github-image-id
potiuk closed pull request #18914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18914
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk merged pull request #18923:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18923
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk opened a new pull request #18923:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18923
This reverts commit ce0b64e895a247fde9d177a044ba16b1b99a9596.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
potiuk commented on pull request #18920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18920#issuecomment-941593301
Counterpart here : https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18922
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk opened a new pull request #18922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18922
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18915#discussion_r727516599
##
File path: docs/docker-stack/entrypoint.rst
##
@@ -194,6 +194,27 @@ If there are any other arguments - they are simply passed
to the "airflow"
uranusjr commented on issue #18921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18921#issuecomment-941589700
Assigned. Feel free to submit the PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
xuan616 opened a new issue #18921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18921
### Description
In the current
[CassandraToGCSOperator](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/google/cloud/transfers/cassandra_to_gcs.py#L40),
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18916:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18916#discussion_r727511440
##
File path: airflow/cli/commands/role_command.py
##
@@ -42,3 +44,43 @@ def roles_create(args):
for role_name in args.role:
jedcunningham commented on pull request #17953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17953#issuecomment-941582292
Thanks @jameslamb, congrats on your second commit
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c8b86e6 Add more information to
jedcunningham merged pull request #17953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17953
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18920#issuecomment-941572093
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #18920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18920
The triggerer is only supported in Python 3.7, so use that as the
default image. For users who do not want to update Python versions,
allow the triggerer component to be disabled.
--
Acehaidrey closed pull request #18916:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18916
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new f22c834 Add information about keepalives for
potiuk merged pull request #18850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18850
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed pull request #18916:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18916
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18850#issuecomment-941531993
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
potiuk closed pull request #18635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18635
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #18850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18850#issuecomment-941499940
Shall we merge :) ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk closed pull request #18915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18915
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
leonsmith edited a comment on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941325572
SQL we used from our deployment playbook to clean up these tables
Obviously a disclaimer on running this blindly. Validate its rows you can
safely remove first by
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #18915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18915#discussion_r727480731
##
File path: docs/docker-stack/entrypoint.rst
##
@@ -194,6 +194,27 @@ If there are any other arguments - they are simply passed
to the "airflow" comma
avkirilishin commented on pull request #18875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18875#issuecomment-941491678
I reduced the number of queries in the test. Why are two excluded instead of
one?
First - implicit COMMIT (expected).
Second - SELECT in new session (`SELECT ...
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18915#discussion_r727476558
##
File path: docs/docker-stack/entrypoint.rst
##
@@ -194,6 +194,27 @@ If there are any other arguments - they are simply passed
to the "airflow"
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18915#discussion_r727475627
##
File path: docs/docker-stack/entrypoint.rst
##
@@ -194,6 +194,27 @@ If there are any other arguments - they are simply passed
to the "airflow"
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18919#issuecomment-941470907
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #18919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18919
Now that `1.2.0` has been released, time to bump the chart version.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
jedcunningham commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941446073
@sbialkowski-pixel @RenGeng, thanks! Would either of you happen to have an
example `execution_date` from one of those task_instance rows (or better yet a
couple)? Mostly
gigatexal closed pull request #18800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18800
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
RenGeng commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941387303
We've started using airflow one year ago with 1.10 and then updated to every
new version when there is a release
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
sbialkowski-pixel commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941369344
I've started from 2.1.2
Then upgrade to 2.1.4 and now
2.2.0
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
potiuk commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941360717
How old your databases were @RenGeng @sbialkowski-pixel ? Did you upgrade to
Airflow 2 from 1.10 before ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
leonsmith edited a comment on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941325572
SQL we used from our deployment playbook to clean up these tables
Obviously a disclaimer on running this blindly. Validate its rows you can
safely remove first by
leonsmith edited a comment on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941325572
SQL we used from our deployment playbook to clean up these tables
Obviously a disclaimer on running this blindly. Validate its rows you can
safely remove first by
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941336577
Might also want to remove DAG runs with NULL execution date, I think 2.2
also started enforcing those (and I think their existence might mess up some
clauses in the SQL
uranusjr commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941336577
Might also want to remove DAG runs with NULL and execution date, I think 2.2
also started enforcing those (and I think their existence might mess up some
clauses in the SQL
MatrixManAtYrService opened a new issue #18918:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18918
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.0 (latest released)
### Operating System
Debian Buster (in docker)
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
n/a
###
leonsmith edited a comment on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941325572
SQL we used from our deployment playbook to clean up these tables
Obviously a disclaimer on running this blindly. Validate its rows you can
safely remove first by
leonsmith commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-941325572
SQL we used from our deployment playbook to clean up these tables
```sql
BEGIN;
-- Remove dag runs without a valid run_id
DELETE FROM dag_run WHERE run_id is
dimon222 edited a comment on issue #8212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8212#issuecomment-914353201
If anyone pops on this issue, I wanted to mention that as of 2.1.3 the issue
is still present, and solution that still works is prepending this:
```python
from gevent
mik-laj commented on issue #18913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18913#issuecomment-941317784
We can still delete a few unnecessary files.
```
&& rm -rf "/root/.config/gcloud/logs/" \
&& find "$(python -c 'import sys; print(sys.prefix);')" -regex
potiuk commented on issue #18917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18917#issuecomment-941316313
> I'm going to re-open this as a "we should document the behaviour".
Yep. Completely right!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ashb commented on issue #18917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18917#issuecomment-941306984
I have memories of another issue about this (making it an option or
something like that) but I can't find it right now.
I'm going to re-open this as a "we should document the
potiuk edited a comment on issue #18917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18917#issuecomment-941304995
This is expected behaviour. When task is retried, XCom is cleaned (just
before retry is executed) in order to maintain "idempotent" behaviour. If you
want to keep "state"
potiuk commented on issue #18917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18917#issuecomment-941304995
This is expected behaviour. When task is retried, XCom is cleaned in order
to maintain "idempotent" behaviour. If you want to keep "state" from the first
try you need to keep it
potiuk closed issue #18917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18917
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
MatrixManAtYrService opened a new issue #18917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18917
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.0 (latest released)
### Operating System
Debian Buster (in Docker)
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
n/a
###
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
