harishkrao commented on issue #20032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20032#issuecomment-988575520
@mik-laj I have made the change, I have a question on the unit tests. They
are failing because the connection sends the region name. Do you have a
suggestion on how to test
Bowrna commented on pull request #20066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20066#issuecomment-988574897
I face static check issues in shell check. But the shell files I have
committed is the autogenerated one by python click. How could this issue be
handled?
--
This is an
huxuan opened a new issue #20127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20127
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.2 (latest released)
### What happened
After configuring `AUTH_OAUTH`, everything looks good except that Role
`User` and `Viewer` can not access "Your
uranusjr commented on pull request #20112:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20112#issuecomment-988570543
Need to fix many errors in linters and tests
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20126#issuecomment-988569847
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18724:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18724#discussion_r764611325
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py
##
@@ -297,15 +296,34 @@ def post_set_task_instances_state(dag_id, session):
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #20126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20126#issuecomment-988568327
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
holadepo opened a new pull request #20126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20126
Replace a Poland specific link to Google Workplace with a more general link
in apache-airflow-providers-google documentation
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read
wsmolak commented on issue #20100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20100#issuecomment-988563395
Thanks @mik-laj!
What is the recommended way to build a cluster config? Usage of
ClusterGenerator simplifies running a DataProc pipelines form Composer.
--
This is an
uranusjr commented on issue #20110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20110#issuecomment-988562945
Looks like the logic does not handle wildcard expansion:
plockaby edited a comment on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988555042
Oh and I may add that the use case you put forth -- people using
impersonation without sudo configured or installed -- does not exist. The
current code uses a
uranusjr commented on issue #18967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18967#issuecomment-988558407
ORA-00923 is *FROM keyword not found where expected*. Currently we are
testing a database connection with `select 1`, but it seems like Oracle does
not support this. [From this
casra-developers commented on pull request #16110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#issuecomment-988555675
@potiuk any news on the failing tests? I see that there are some conflicts
again. I can resolve those but seeing how this would be about the 4th iteration
it would
plockaby commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988555042
Oh and I may add that the use case you put forth -- people using
impersonation without sudo configured or installed -- does not exist. The
current code uses a combination of
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20121#issuecomment-988554510
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20121#discussion_r764597161
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -2889,7 +2889,7 @@ def gantt(self, session=None):
task_dict['end_date'] = task_dict['end_date']
plockaby commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988550520
I mean the docs are very clear that when using impersonation you have to
configure sudo and even tell you how to configure sudo. I'm trying to touch as
little code as
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20096#discussion_r764593128
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ class AirflowBaseView(BaseView):
}
if not conf.getboolean('core',
yrj opened a new issue #20125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20125
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.2 (latest released)
### What happened
Airflow Task and Gantt view doesnt display the task names properly in
Airflow UI. Anything more than 30 characters
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #20125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20125#issuecomment-988548918
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988547402
The problem is that you’re prioritising your use case over others, and
potentially breaking other people’s environments to make your environment work
correctly.
uranusjr commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988547402
The problem with is that you’re prioritising your use case over others, and
potentially breaking other people’s environments to make your environment work
correctly. That’s
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20096#discussion_r764589818
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ class AirflowBaseView(BaseView):
}
if not conf.getboolean('core',
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20096#discussion_r764589818
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ class AirflowBaseView(BaseView):
}
if not conf.getboolean('core',
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new bb48bc3 Updating
plockaby commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988539843
One thing that I do notice when I run my patch on my own system is this
error:
```
[2021-12-08 06:31:05,703: ERROR/ForkPoolWorker-31] Failed to execute task
[Errno
plockaby edited a comment on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988534329
You're right, @uranusjr , that there are improvements that could be made to
this. My first priority is addressing the regression quickly by getting it back
to the
plockaby commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988534329
You're right, @uranusjr , that there are improvements that could be made to
this. My first priority is addressing the regression quickly by getting it back
to the previous
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20096#discussion_r764577876
##
File path: airflow/settings.py
##
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
DAGS_FOLDER: str = os.path.expanduser(conf.get('core', 'DAGS_FOLDER'))
engine:
uranusjr commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988532609
One downside to this change is it requires `sudo` to exist (it is not
guaranteed), which is unnecessary if the Airflow’s runtime user _does_ have
permission to chown. Maybe
alexott commented on issue #20097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20097#issuecomment-988531446
Thank you Jarek
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20120#discussion_r764571216
##
File path: airflow/www/extensions/init_appbuilder.py
##
@@ -560,7 +561,7 @@ def security_converge(self, dry=False) -> Dict:
:param dry: If
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20096#discussion_r764571983
##
File path: airflow/settings.py
##
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
DAGS_FOLDER: str = os.path.expanduser(conf.get('core', 'DAGS_FOLDER'))
engine:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20106#discussion_r764570799
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/hooks/snowflake.py
##
@@ -25,10 +25,22 @@
from snowflake import connector
from snowflake.connector import
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20106#discussion_r764570006
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/hooks/snowflake.py
##
@@ -25,10 +25,22 @@
from snowflake import connector
from snowflake.connector import
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20106#discussion_r764567672
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/hooks/snowflake.py
##
@@ -25,10 +25,22 @@
from snowflake import connector
from snowflake.connector import
uranusjr commented on pull request #17329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17329#issuecomment-988513575
@flolas Do you intend to pick this back up?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 7fb301b Remove unused code in SnowflakeHook (#20107)
add b0eecc3 Remove legacy hack for TaskInstance without
uranusjr merged pull request #20108:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20108
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on issue #20116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20116#issuecomment-988511457
> This is *meant* to be a backwards compatibility shim
Not really, the function has not been touched (except to apply Black) in
three years, and is not used at all in the
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20124#discussion_r764543794
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/athena.py
##
@@ -227,6 +227,29 @@ def poll_query_status(self, query_execution_id: str,
max_tries:
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20124#discussion_r764543412
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/athena.py
##
@@ -227,6 +227,29 @@ def poll_query_status(self, query_execution_id: str,
max_tries:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from bcacc51 Lift off upper bound for MarkupSafe (#20113)
add 7fb301b Remove unused code in SnowflakeHook
mik-laj merged pull request #20107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20107
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
PrincipalsOffice commented on issue #20116:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20116#issuecomment-988487760
@ashb I have updated the "How to reproduce" section with a reproducible
snippet.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20106#discussion_r764538586
##
File path: airflow/providers/snowflake/hooks/snowflake.py
##
@@ -25,10 +25,22 @@
from snowflake import connector
from snowflake.connector import
manuzhang commented on issue #14459:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14459#issuecomment-988476934
I don't thinks this is minor now when I'm trying to get DAGs from this tab
from the `/dags` endpoint with `only_active` parameter. Meanwhile, is there a
way to get all unpaused
subkanthi opened a new pull request #20124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20124
Added function in AWSAthenaHook to get s3 output query results file URI
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
EricGao888 commented on pull request #19471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19471#issuecomment-988457294
>
> > Did I miss any important information?
>
> I think you missed the information that Airlfow 1.10 (not even 1.10.12 but
any 1.10 version) reached
potiuk commented on pull request #19471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19471#issuecomment-988444636
> Did I miss any important information?
I think you missed the information that Airlfow 1.10 (not even 1.10.12 but
any 1.10 version) reached end of life in June 2021 and
EricGao888 commented on pull request #19471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19471#issuecomment-988441211
> Workers don’t need DAG information, only the scheduler does.
Thanks for the reply. Another question is will the python script `from
airflow.models.serialized_dag
potiuk commented on issue #19205:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19205#issuecomment-988433544
We have now Multi-tenancy effort in progress which I am leading. And while
the first two AIPs that are very draft (but will soon be updated) do not
address this final granularity
potiuk commented on issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226#issuecomment-988432370
Or actually let me re-open it and add multi-tenancy label to group similar
stuff together and refer to it when we will be implementing it.
--
This is an automated message from
mandicLuka opened a new issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226
### Description
Access Control feature where one can limit a DAG permissions (read, write,
etc.) for a group of DAGs, namely, the ones where owner is set or the tag is
set to the desired
potiuk commented on issue #9342:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9342#issuecomment-988431647
We have now Multi-tenancy effort in progress which I am leading. And while
the first two AIPs that are very draft (but will soon be updated) do not
address this final granularity
potiuk commented on issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226#issuecomment-988429690
Note that we have now Multi-tenancy effort in progress which I am leading.
And while the first two AIPs that are very draft (but will soon be updated) do
not address this final
potiuk edited a comment on issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226#issuecomment-988429690
Note that we have now Multi-tenancy effort in progress which I am leading.
And while the first two AIPs that are very draft (but will soon be updated) do
not address this
potiuk closed issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #19891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19891#issuecomment-988425025
cool. I will refresh the list from scratch tomorrow :).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20113#issuecomment-988424025
But if you want to start using it for your own builds, you will need to wait
for new release unfortunately as this is released airlfow package dependency
(`MarkupSafe <
potiuk commented on pull request #20113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20113#issuecomment-988424025
But if you want to start using it for your own builds, you will need to wait
for new release unfortunately as this is released airlfow package dependency
(`MarkupSafe <
smartnewsdingli opened a new issue #20123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20123
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.2 (latest released)
### What happened
We have multi schedulers setup with kubernetesExecutor. We find of all 14000
tasks run daily, there are
potiuk commented on pull request #20113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20113#issuecomment-988419189
Hey @tsingh2k15 - all looks good. In the "Build Images" job you can find
that this build actually used 2.0.1 version:
sunny760408 commented on issue #10026:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10026#issuecomment-988412621
>
Hi @gcristian ,
What is worker's heartbeats name? Do you mean `job_heartbeat_sec`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #19729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19729#discussion_r764477823
##
File path: airflow/executors/local_kubernetes_executor.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+#
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 139be53 Fix mypy tests providers part 2 (#20111)
add bcacc51 Lift off upper bound for MarkupSafe (#20113)
No
potiuk merged pull request #20113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20113
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk edited a comment on issue #12611:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12611#issuecomment-988403817
Yeah. I also think it's not really AIP-worthy.
But this is very good point with the multi-tenancy interaction
I am performing an inventory of stuff that will
potiuk edited a comment on issue #12611:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12611#issuecomment-988403817
Yeah. I also think it's not really AIP-worthy.
But this is very good point with the multi-tenancy interaction
I am performing an inventory of stuff that will
potiuk commented on issue #12611:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12611#issuecomment-988403817
Yeah. I also think it's not really AIP-worthy.
But this is very good point with the multi-tenancy interaction
I am performing an inventory of stuff that will be
jedcunningham commented on issue #19199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19199#issuecomment-988361250
Hmm, I couldn't even reproduce this in 2.1.3 路♂️
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19157:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19157#issuecomment-988360953
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #19039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19039
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #19051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19051
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #17329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17329
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #19665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19665#discussion_r764429805
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/operators/test_redshift.py
##
@@ -42,3 +47,69 @@ def test_redshift_operator(self, test_autocommit,
potiuk merged pull request #20111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20111
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on issue #19199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19199#issuecomment-988354751
@parisni, can you try with 2.2.2? I'm unable to reproduce this with 2.2.2 or
main.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19825:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19825#issuecomment-988353130
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk closed issue #17800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17800
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk merged pull request #20091:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20091
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19729#issuecomment-988351445
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
kaxil commented on pull request #19729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19729#issuecomment-988351165
cc @potiuk @dstandish for a second review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
euccas opened a new pull request #20122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20122
This PR is a change that allows users to input reasons on the UI when they
manually mark state (clear, success, failed) of a DAG run or task instances.
Recording users' comments associated with such
jedcunningham commented on issue #19613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19613#issuecomment-988345779
Ah! #19258 populated `execution_date` in 2.2.2. Mystery solved.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
hkjang commented on issue #18967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18967#issuecomment-988344799
first thanks. also i got that error message ORA-00923
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
jedcunningham commented on issue #19613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19613#issuecomment-988344210
I wasn't able to reproduce the original error, but the log link was broken
and should be fixed in #20121.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #20121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20121
The link to the log in the gantt view modal was a broken link as the
execution_date wasn't isoformatted.
Closes #19613
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20108:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20108#issuecomment-988335064
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
khalidmammadov opened a new pull request #20120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20120
Part of https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19891
Fixes various typing issues in airflow/www subfolder
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20118#issuecomment-988330008
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk edited a comment on issue #20097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20097#issuecomment-988327727
> P.S. #19443 is missing from the changelog
Ah yeah. Good point - I have mistakenly hidden it in the changelog - it is
in the hidden section among refactoring (my
potiuk commented on issue #20097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20097#issuecomment-988327727
> P.S. #19443 is missing from the changelog
Ah yeah. Good point - I have mistakenly hidden it in the changelog - it is
in the hidden section among refactoring (my bad) - see
isaac-florence edited a comment on issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226#issuecomment-988324455
Agreeing with @potiuk's comment on #9342, airflow can't do multi-tenancy at
the moment. However we have setup an instance which only uses the
kubernetesPodOperator,
isaac-florence commented on issue #19226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19226#issuecomment-988324455
Agreeing with @potiuk's comment on #9342, airflow can't do multi-tenancy at
the moment. However we have setup an instance which only uses the
kubernetesPodOperator, and so
kazanzhy commented on issue #10288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10288#issuecomment-988323907
Hi all.
I've tried to remove warnings during GCSToBigQueryOperator as in PR #20119
But as a result, I copied almost all code from
`bq_hook.create_external_table` and
kazanzhy opened a new pull request #20119:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20119
closes: #10288
I've tried to remove warnings during `GCSToBigQueryOperator` as in issue
#10288.
But as a result, I copied almost all code from
`bq_hook.create_external_table` and
kaxil opened a new pull request #20118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20118
The following feels like there were non-zero jobs that were zombies while
there weren't
```
[2021-12-07 20:54:35,502] {manager.py:1051} INFO - Finding 'running' jobs
without a recent heartbeat
dbarrundiag commented on a change in pull request #19665:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19665#discussion_r764419580
##
File path: tests/providers/amazon/aws/operators/test_redshift.py
##
@@ -42,3 +47,69 @@ def test_redshift_operator(self, test_autocommit,
plockaby commented on pull request #20114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20114#issuecomment-988316722
I answered your message and stepped out to a meeting and then you fixed my
whole PR.
Looks good to me! Thanks for your help!
--
This is an automated message from
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
