lgov opened a new issue #17129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17129
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.1.0
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl
version`): v1.19.7
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware
chenjiahui closed pull request #17128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17128
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #17054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17054#issuecomment-883987047
> hmm, I tried with 2.1.0 too couldn't reproduce.
>
> cc @ephraimbuddy can you reproduce with 2.1.0?
I was not able to reproduce in 2.1.0 as well.
@AvniM ,
uranusjr commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884011294
Not directly related to the issue, but `distutils.util.strtobool` is going
to be deprecated in Python 3.10, so this is probably a good time as any to
remove that function
ciancolo commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884023597
Oh really?! I didn't know. Thank you for the hint.
I was thinking, what if we removed completely the conversion? I mean the
admissible value for that `Verify` field
ciancolo commented on issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037#issuecomment-883961376
there is a problem with #16365. In the case of `Extra` parameter in format
`{'verify': true}` the conversion str to bool is not necessary.
With `Extra` parameters as
ciancolo opened a new pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125
Hello all,
During the RC tests, I founded this bug (generated from my PR #16365). The
bug is present when the user set in `Extra` parameter field in a `Tableau
Connection` the parameter
uranusjr commented on issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124#issuecomment-884005562
The task still seems to work though? It’s marked as success and that’s
what’s important to Airflow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
ciancolo edited a comment on issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037#issuecomment-883961376
there is a problem with #16365. In the case of `Extra` parameter in format
`{'verify': true}` the conversion str to bool is not necessary.
With `Extra` parameters
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17127#issuecomment-884008943
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
sorabhgit opened a new issue #17127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17127
### Discussed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/17126
Originally posted by **sorabhgit** July 21, 2021
Hello Guys , I am also struggling with issue while setting up
oyarushe commented on pull request #17117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17117#issuecomment-884016463
> Could you also rename the variable since it’s no longer a truncate
statement?
thanks, I did it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124#issuecomment-884005562
The task still seems to work though? It’s marked as success and that’s
what’s important to Airflow. The `on_success_callback()` does not check the
return code, only the
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17128#issuecomment-884017325
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
chenjiahui opened a new pull request #17128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17128
In some cases, the task_instancetask_instance gets a state of scheduled, so
we need to provide a style for this state. Otherwise, we can't to know which
node is currently in progress.
uranusjr commented on issue #17123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17123#issuecomment-883938505
Hi, you did not provide any information about your error!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
potiuk closed issue #17123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17123
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124#issuecomment-883972671
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
kushagra391 opened a new issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124
**Apache Airflow version**:
2.1.1
**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`):
1.19
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware
Lyalpha commented on issue #8494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8494#issuecomment-884022861
There has been no fix of this, so I expect it is the same in 2.x, although I
don't have a MWE to check.
* The CLI does not expose a way to trigger the same dag >1/second
* Even
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17117#issuecomment-884045975
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
kushagra391 commented on issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124#issuecomment-884052102
thanks @uranusjr !
yea, the job does get marked success.
And i just tested callbacks on a test dag. It seems to be working fine.
Closing the issue, I'll debug my
kushagra391 closed issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884094993
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r673891843
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -618,6 +619,8 @@ def process_file(
Stats.incr('dag_file_refresh_error', 1, 1)
potiuk closed issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037#issuecomment-884119589
There were quite a bit too many problems with this wave, I am going to
release a second rc2 wave with all the providers with fixes soon (plus few more
changes). Closing this one
kaxil merged pull request #17041:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17041
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884095718
I am ok we do this in follow up PR too but we should definitely do it i.e
replace strtobool
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17122#discussion_r673885918
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##
@@ -242,24 +242,34 @@ def post_dag_run(dag_id, session):
except
ciancolo commented on issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037#issuecomment-884037636
Tested #16350 on my local Sqoop env and it works as expected
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
fjetter commented on a change in pull request #16829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16829#discussion_r673811608
##
File path: airflow/executors/dask_executor.py
##
@@ -81,7 +81,22 @@ def airflow_run():
if not self.client:
raise
uranusjr commented on issue #17129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17129#issuecomment-884044784
I mentioned in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16110#discussion_r640487904 we should
just replace the `:` with `_`. Would you be interested in creating a pull
request for
aa1371 commented on a change in pull request #16829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16829#discussion_r673831944
##
File path: airflow/executors/dask_executor.py
##
@@ -81,7 +81,22 @@ def airflow_run():
if not self.client:
raise
kushagra391 commented on issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124#issuecomment-884070878
found the issue, for some reason, this does not call callbacks on v2.x (but
worked fine v1.x)
```
class RWBatchOperator(AwsBatchOperator, AATBaseOperator):
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from eb3d685 Correct the :mod: documentation for s3_to_redshift_operator
(#17115)
add 96fd413 Chart: Update
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ef3c75d Fix bool conversion Verify parameter in
potiuk merged pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884121330
Random failures. Merging.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
uranusjr commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884042661
We can’t just remove functionality due to backward compatibility policy—we
could deprecate it, but still need to keep the logic. So something like this is
probably good
eladkal commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884107478
> We can’t just remove functionality due to backward compatibility policy—we
could deprecate it, but still need to keep the logic
Do we need deprecation? it was added
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #17118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17118#discussion_r673890194
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_backfill_job.py
##
@@ -290,13 +306,13 @@ def test_backfill_conf(self):
dr =
potiuk commented on issue #8494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8494#issuecomment-884118023
There has been a bit overhaul of DAG triggering in Airflow 2 and there is a
different primary index on DagRun and we are also preparing for making
"out-of-band" triggering a DagRun
potiuk commented on issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037#issuecomment-884119793
> Check #17125 for the bug fix.
Cool. Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884120669
> > We can’t just remove functionality due to backward compatibility
policy—we could deprecate it, but still need to keep the logic
>
> Do we need deprecation? it was
potiuk commented on pull request #17125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17125#issuecomment-884120867
I am going to release an rc2 wave of July Providers shortly.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
Lyalpha commented on issue #8494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8494#issuecomment-884126197
OK thanks, I am already on 2.x but indeed I don't know if any DB changes may
have alleviated this as the fix I posted has meant I never saw it again for the
remainder of 1.x (or
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r673904932
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -647,3 +650,17 @@ def process_file(
self.log.exception("Error logging import
GBAAM opened a new issue #17132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17132
The Docker Image for 2.1.2 (default Python 3.6
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/2.1.2/docker-compose.yaml) is
missing a few python packages:
- `celery`
- `redis`
-
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17132#issuecomment-884131226
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
pmalafosse commented on issue #17037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17037#issuecomment-884130862
There is a bug with https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16685 I will
create a fix by tomorrow
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r673904932
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -647,3 +650,17 @@ def process_file(
self.log.exception("Error logging import
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r673904932
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -647,3 +650,17 @@ def process_file(
self.log.exception("Error logging import
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17122#discussion_r673915763
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/dag_run_endpoint.py
##
@@ -242,24 +242,34 @@ def post_dag_run(dag_id, session):
except
fjetter commented on a change in pull request #16829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16829#discussion_r673923845
##
File path: airflow/executors/dask_executor.py
##
@@ -81,7 +81,22 @@ def airflow_run():
if not self.client:
raise
wavewater opened a new issue #17135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17135
When calling the exasol hooks get_pandas_df function
(https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/airflow/providers/exasol/hooks/exasol.py)
I noticed that it does not return a pandas dataframe. It
kaxil commented on pull request #17133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17133#issuecomment-884175587
> Is there a way to disable these and maybe set it in breeze? It’d be a bit
annoying to see it show up when I’m absolutely just testing things…
I can make it so that you
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17135#issuecomment-884175515
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ryanahamilton commented on a change in pull request #17128:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17128#discussion_r673961455
##
File path: airflow/www/static/css/graph.css
##
@@ -136,6 +136,10 @@ g.node.queued rect {
stroke: grey;
}
+g.node.scheduled rect{
+
GBAAM commented on issue #17132:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17132#issuecomment-884188597
Addition: in the 3.8 image, the dependency `libpq-dev` is also missing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r673974267
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -647,3 +650,17 @@ def process_file(
self.log.exception("Error logging import
kaxil opened a new pull request #17136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17136
This change was missing from changelog, potentially because of bad commit
message "yarn audit"
(https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/9b0b0c68f6db940b16037be8dd7c1884ce6f1a87)
---
kaxil edited a comment on issue #15364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15364#issuecomment-884197549
@HardikVijayPatel This is available in 2.1.2 -- looks like because of the
bad commit message it wasn't captured in Changelog --
wavewater commented on issue #17135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17135#issuecomment-884200313
sure - it will be my first pull request. Can you guide me?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17034#issuecomment-884139528
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17118#issuecomment-884140176
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
hx-markterry commented on a change in pull request #16338:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16338#discussion_r673915248
##
File path: airflow/providers/sftp/hooks/sftp.py
##
@@ -135,8 +135,13 @@ def get_conn(self) -> pysftp.Connection:
}
if
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from ef3c75d Fix bool conversion Verify parameter in Tableau Hook (#17125)
add 29b6be8 Refactored waiting function
eladkal merged pull request #17034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17034
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
namjals commented on issue #17127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17127#issuecomment-884149426
It looks like you are not getting the lock.
How about accessing the installed mysql server by referring to the site
below and checking if queries such as select and insert are
kaxil opened a new pull request #17133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17133
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the
uranusjr commented on pull request #17133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17133#issuecomment-884159915
Is there a way to disable these and maybe set it in breeze? It’d be a bit
annoying to see it show up when I’m absolutely just testing things…
--
This is an automated
uranusjr commented on issue #17124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17124#issuecomment-884164870
Oh that makes sense, this is related to how multi-inheritance works in
Python (method resolution order, aka MRO). Airflow 2 uses a different kind of
inheritance magic (metaclass)
rv-irosario commented on issue #17111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17111#issuecomment-884177034
looks like the tag of 12.0.0 is the last compatible tag for 3.6
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
uranusjr commented on pull request #17133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17133#issuecomment-884178339
Sounds good to me
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r673959161
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -647,3 +650,17 @@ def process_file(
self.log.exception("Error logging import
kaxil edited a comment on issue #15364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15364#issuecomment-884197549
@HardikVijayPatel This is available in 2.1.2 -- looks like because of the
bad commit message it wasn't captured in Changelog --
kaxil commented on issue #15364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15364#issuecomment-884197549
@HardikVijayPatel This is available in 2.1.2 -- looks like because of the
bad commit message it wasn't captured in Changelog --
Lyalpha edited a comment on issue #8494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8494#issuecomment-884126197
OK thanks, I am already on 2.x but indeed I don't know if any DB changes may
have alleviated this as the ~~fix~~ workaround I posted has meant I never saw
it again for the
uranusjr commented on issue #8494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8494#issuecomment-884129669
Also iirc the metadatabase is currently running on sub-millisecond
precision, so even if this is still an issue (and I am not sure about that),
it’s probably significantly more
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17118#discussion_r673911401
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_backfill_job.py
##
@@ -290,13 +306,13 @@ def test_backfill_conf(self):
dr =
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17118#discussion_r673914099
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_backfill_job.py
##
@@ -919,9 +895,9 @@ def test_backfill_max_limit_check_within_limit(self):
assert 2 ==
pateash commented on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-884180567
> The problem is we can’t store the timetable object in db (at least not
easily; it’s technically doable but should be avoided). Maybe we can pre-render
the description and
uranusjr commented on issue #17135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17135#issuecomment-884180729
Hi, would you be interested in putting together a pull request for this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
lwyszomi opened a new pull request #17137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17137
Related: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13779
Give a possibility to run `wait_for_pipeline_state` with default or provided
parameters, remove unnecessary call inside
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17137#issuecomment-884206185
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
m1racoli edited a comment on issue #16243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16243#issuecomment-884202100
@iostreamdoth @potiuk Using `grpcio<=1.30` certainly helps, but I am not
sure if the topic can be considered closed.
Version 1.30.0 of grpc is over a year old and
m1racoli edited a comment on issue #16243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16243#issuecomment-884202100
@iostreamdoth @potiuk Using `grpcio<=1.30` certainly helps, but I am not
sure if the topic can be considered closed.
Version 1.30.0 of grpc is over a year old and
kaxil commented on pull request #16915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16915#issuecomment-884212370
There are some conflicts, can you please resolve that
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 29b6be8 Refactored waiting function for Tableau Jobs (#17034)
add 038b87e Add missing changelog entry for
AvniM commented on issue #17054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17054#issuecomment-884234504
@ephraimbuddy: The output is
`airflow@airflow-webserver-78dd8ff445-zdm62:/$ echo $AIRFLOW_HOME`
`/opt/airflow`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
m1racoli commented on issue #16243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16243#issuecomment-884202100
@potiuk Using `grpcio<=1.30` certainly helps, but I am not sure if the topic
can be considered closed.
Version 1.30.0 of grpc is over a year old and currently there's no
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17136#issuecomment-884202974
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
m1racoli edited a comment on issue #16243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16243#issuecomment-884202100
@iostreamdoth @potiuk Using `grpcio<=1.30` certainly helps, but I am not
sure if the topic can be considered closed.
Version 1.30.0 of grpc is over a year old and
kaxil merged pull request #17136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17136
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil commented on pull request #16754:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16754#issuecomment-884217602
> I also faced the same issue and was not able to solve it, I downgraded to
2.1.1 in the chart for now.
> Can we create a Issue and track it for 2.1.3
Yup, we will
SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #17121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17121#discussion_r674009622
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -618,6 +619,8 @@ def process_file(
Stats.incr('dag_file_refresh_error', 1, 1)
uranusjr commented on issue #17135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17135#issuecomment-884260770
Sure, let's see what we can do.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17138#issuecomment-884261651
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
scrawfor opened a new issue #17138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17138
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.1.2
**Environment**:
- **Cloud provider or hardware configuration**: Docker Image:
apache/airflow:2.1.2-python3.8
- **OS** (e.g. from /etc/os-release):
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
