ephraimbuddy commented on issue #18041:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18041#issuecomment-916691668
@laserpedro It will be very helpful if you can provide a simple dag to
reproduce this behaviour.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
potiuk commented on issue #18133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18133#issuecomment-916787541
Just started to answer when @uranusjr did :) ,. so to repeat - as a
solution for now you need to set the encoding properly via LANG* variables in
your environment (for all
potiuk commented on issue #18136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18136#issuecomment-916799112
Good Idea. While the Airflow Official Image supports Open-Shift arbitrary
user, the Charts might indeed need some modifications to be able to support it
out-of-the-box cc:
potiuk commented on issue #18136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18136#issuecomment-916799362
Happy to help with review @nwalens !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
lvjg commented on issue #18133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18133#issuecomment-916845288
thanks!!!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17100#discussion_r706136935
##
File path: airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py
##
@@ -106,21 +106,25 @@ def dag_backfill(args, dag=None):
dag_run_state=State.NONE,
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17100#discussion_r706137492
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -878,6 +920,34 @@ def from_dict(cls, serialized_obj: dict) ->
'SerializedDAG':
eladkal commented on issue #18031:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18031#issuecomment-916727949
I find no value with the current SLA feature. I don't know many people who
are using it due to it's limitations.
I would say that a better approch is to deprecate the current
Taragolis commented on issue #18125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18125#issuecomment-916741336
Most probably my explanation not clear.
I shouldn't have created it in midnight, I even wasn't use my main account
:-)
Let me explain wit some sample, probably after
cablespaghetti commented on pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211#issuecomment-916773094
Ok it is quite rightly erroring since I changed the default for Ingress path
from "" to "/". I'll change that in the schema and update the UPDATING.rst
file. The other
uranusjr commented on pull request #18042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18042#issuecomment-916724995
It seems like the CI failed since it ran out of resource. I think you can
disregard those failures.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
eladkal commented on issue #17336:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17336#issuecomment-916768827
Correct me if i'm wrong but if `json_format=True` and `asctime` isn't in
`json_fields` then you can't reference `asctime`
in `log_format`
--
This is an automated message
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-1-test by this push:
new c11d368 Sane detection of the host/port
laserpedro edited a comment on issue #17507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17507#issuecomment-915407555
cf https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18041#issuecomment-915383493
For me for the moment the pb is on backfill mode. tonight my processes will
run on this
uranusjr commented on issue #18133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18133#issuecomment-916786534
You probably need this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/27931669/1376863
Although explicitly using UTF-8 is probably a correct thing to do anyway.
IIRC the source code read
raefezzeldin opened a new issue #18135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18135
### Apache Airflow version
2.1.3 (latest released)
### Operating System
Official image os
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
###
potiuk commented on pull request #17576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17576#issuecomment-916792442
> I'd like to get 2.2 release train started, and in order to not delay that
unnecessarily how about we mark this feature as experimental -- that way if we
decide we _don't_
nathadfield commented on a change in pull request #18064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18064#discussion_r706113088
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/hooks/vault.py
##
@@ -148,7 +149,21 @@ def __init__(
except ValueError:
nathadfield commented on a change in pull request #18064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18064#discussion_r706118393
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/hooks/vault.py
##
@@ -148,7 +149,21 @@ def __init__(
except ValueError:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18141#issuecomment-916860597
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-916868864
Fix here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18142 (there were quite a
few missing ``__init__.py` files. Stil do not what triggered the error though
(and did not trigger
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18139#issuecomment-916833483
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from e6cb2f7 ECSOperator returns last logs when ECS task fails (#17209)
add b8926ee Add a note about no back-compat
ashb merged pull request #18139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18139
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
lvjg commented on issue #18133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18133#issuecomment-916845161
thanks~
> You probably need this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/27931669/1376863
>
> Although explicitly using UTF-8 is probably a correct thing to do anyway.
IIRC the
ephraimbuddy edited a comment on issue #18131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18131#issuecomment-916862728
> I believe this is same as #17786 and fix will come in 2.1.4 (shortly).
@ephraimbuddy - can you confirm?
The fix is https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17945
ashb merged pull request #18140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18140
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 0e3b06b Mark passing pre/post execute callbacks to
ashb commented on issue #18069:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18069#issuecomment-916864057
Yeah, absolutely no problem with your PR, I was just a bit surprised by the
effects!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
potiuk commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-916869739
Sorry for that @subkanthi ... That was somewhat unexpected :(
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
laserpedro edited a comment on issue #17507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17507#issuecomment-915407555
cf https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18041#issuecomment-915383493
For me for the moment the pb is on backfill mode. tonight my processes will
run on this
potiuk commented on issue #18031:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18031#issuecomment-916796799
Yeah. I think we should have a more comprehensive/better/complete/usable SLA
implementation replacing the current one.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
potiuk commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-916849947
Found the problem. Fix is coming. I am not sure how it was triggered now but
was not triggered before. Tableau test package misses ``_init_.py` simply ... I
will add it
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18141#discussion_r706131668
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ def _schedule_dag_run(
unfinished_task_instances = (
mobuchowski commented on issue #17984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17984#issuecomment-916862802
Hey @potiuk, maybe you had time to look at this :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #18131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18131#issuecomment-916862728
> I believe this is same as #17786 and fix will come in 2.1.4 (shortly).
@ephraimbuddy - can you confirm?
The fix is https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18061,
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from c11d368 Sane detection of the host/port in entrypoint prod (#17847)
new 59bf5b5 Do not delete running
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 59bf5b5167192ebc60e2c9235d0dc1e999bf228a
Author: Ephraim Anierobi
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 16 09:20:35 2021 +0100
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 6866a7c2e131b5e8fcbef5473abd4835cad1c972
Author: Ephraim Anierobi
AuthorDate: Tue Aug 17 09:37:56 2021 +0100
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 34fbe0ddebefa35cd46498c21cdeb1377334f68a
Author: Brent Bovenzi
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 16 18:00:02 2021 +0200
potiuk opened a new pull request #18142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18142
Lacl of the __init__.py caused failures in some specific
cases - especially when new providers have been added.
This PR adds missing ``__init__.py`` files and modifies pre-commit
check
malthe commented on pull request #17576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17576#issuecomment-916790800
@ashb yes that sounds very reasonable – to me, `pre_execute` is really just
a workaround. In a perfect world, the scheduling system is able to support
these use-cases out of
potiuk closed issue #18135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18135
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #18135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18135#issuecomment-916790317
You need to share the disks between the node. Airflow does not support
separate volumes per schedule. Your persistent volume claim has to be one of
the distributed fllesystems that
potiuk edited a comment on issue #18135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18135#issuecomment-916790317
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
ashb opened a new pull request #18140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18140
My primary concern here is that by being able to arbitrarily "change"
what an operator does will greatly increase the "accidental complexity"
of both Airflow (for us as developers) and of the DAG
potiuk commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-916840245
There is indeed something fishy going on here with test collection. I am
taking a look,
BTW (for the future @eladkal @subkanthi ) - if you look at the logs, it is
ashb commented on pull request #18140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18140#issuecomment-916840480
/cc @malthe
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
eladkal commented on issue #18089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18089#issuecomment-916758390
@theagilehacker feel free to submit PR with a fix
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
potiuk commented on pull request #17576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17576#issuecomment-916793392
We can even print warning when it is used, that it is experimental.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #18064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18064#discussion_r706089404
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/hooks/vault.py
##
@@ -148,7 +149,21 @@ def __init__(
except ValueError:
raise
ashb opened a new pull request #18139:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18139
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
potiuk commented on issue #18131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18131#issuecomment-916837455
I believe this is duplicate of #17786 and fix will come in 2.1.4 (shortly).
@ephraimbuddy - can you confirm?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
potiuk commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-916841729
also @uranusjr -> for the future ^^ - for similar investigations, you might
not be aware of it but we have full reproducibility of the images used during
tests locally (the
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-916849947
Found the problem. Fix is coming. I am not sure how it was triggered now but
was not triggered before. Tableau test package misses `_init_.py` simply ... I
will add it
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18140:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18140#issuecomment-916860998
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
lvjg opened a new issue #18133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18133
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### Operating System
centos7
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
### Deployment
Other
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #18133:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18133#issuecomment-916761145
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ashb commented on pull request #17576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17576#issuecomment-916788361
I'd like to get 2.2 release train started, and in order to not delay that
unnecessarily how about we mark this feature as experimental -- that way if we
decide we _don't_ want
potiuk edited a comment on issue #18131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18131#issuecomment-916837455
I believe this is same as #17786 and fix will come in 2.1.4 (shortly).
@ephraimbuddy - can you confirm?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #18071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18071#issuecomment-916860013
I have tried to experiment with what you said @collinmcnulty but
unfortunately, I can't wrap my head around it.
For example, this dag when parsed today:
```
potiuk commented on issue #18131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18131#issuecomment-916871892
Closing then and marking as 2.1.4
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk closed issue #18131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18131
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
nwalens opened a new issue #18136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18136
### Description
Airflow helm chart is very powerful and configurable, however in order to
run it in a on-premises openshift 4 environment, one must manually create
security context constraints or
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #18136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18136#issuecomment-916797458
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr opened a new pull request #18141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18141
When we did `TaskInstance`’s migration from `execution_date` to `run_id`, we
forgot to check the quarentined tests. This fixes them.
Note that this does _not_ make the quarentined tests to
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17100#discussion_r706138480
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -878,6 +920,34 @@ def from_dict(cls, serialized_obj: dict) ->
'SerializedDAG':
potiuk commented on issue #17984:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17984#issuecomment-916871219
Not yet. Life took over. But I will
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
mik-laj edited a comment on pull request #18143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18143#issuecomment-916896880
Should we add notes in CHANGELOG like in google provider?
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-1-test by this push:
new 203b455 Limit the number of queued
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #18071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18071#issuecomment-916923176
> > would have execution_date stored as "2021-09-12 00:00:00+00". This is
when it should run.
> > On the execution day, the start_date will still be in the past:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 3d4bfdc Add missing __init__.py files for some
potiuk merged pull request #18142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18142
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch constraints-2-1
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-2-1 by this push:
new f65e2a5 Updated to latest
potiuk commented on pull request #17068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17068#issuecomment-917046569
One more missing ``__init__.py`` - now I think I know where it could come
from. Lack of __init__.py creates an implicit namespace and the problem was
that from influxdb tests
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18143#issuecomment-916885911
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-1-test by this push:
new 19f32fd Improve dag/task concurrency
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #18130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18130#discussion_r706214672
##
File path: dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md
##
@@ -745,3 +746,15 @@ EOF
## Update Announcements page
Update "Announcements" page at the [Official
nathadfield commented on a change in pull request #18064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18064#discussion_r706236888
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/hooks/vault.py
##
@@ -148,7 +149,21 @@ def __init__(
except ValueError:
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #18147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18147#discussion_r706312705
##
File path: chart/values.yaml
##
@@ -1251,7 +1252,7 @@ dags:
# Volume size for dags
size: 1Gi
# If using a custom storageClass, pass
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #18147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18147#discussion_r706291745
##
File path: chart/templates/rbac/security-context-constraint-rolebinding.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #18068:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18068#discussion_r706325427
##
File path: Dockerfile
##
@@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ LABEL org.apache.airflow.distro="debian" \
org.opencontainers.image.title="Production Airflow Image"
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 9f98a7d4319f2b1c7cf88f026f7f8442ff7d6560
Author: Malthe Borch
AuthorDate: Thu Sep 9 00:05:34 2021 +0200
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 6866a7c Fix wrong query on running tis (#17631)
new 8ecc710 Increase width for Run column (#17817)
msumit opened a new pull request #18143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18143
These 2 operators - `FacebookAdsReportToGcsOperator` &
`GoogleDisplayVideo360RunReportOperator` were (mis)using the `params` keyword &
causing a lot of pain in
potiuk commented on pull request #18104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18104#issuecomment-916901437
Cool. I think you will need to fix some tests. I run the workflow for you,
let's see.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
yavuzmester commented on issue #17507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17507#issuecomment-916909875
I also got the same error and I am using `run_as_user`.
I tried changing the BashOperator to PythonOperator and it worked for me.
In detail:
- Create a function
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch v2-1-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v2-1-test by this push:
new 54f3a77 Fix deprecation error
collinmcnulty edited a comment on pull request #18071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18071#issuecomment-916908995
> would have execution_date stored as "2021-09-12 00:00:00+00". This is when
it should run.
On the execution day, the start_date will still be in the past:
ephraimbuddy merged pull request #18071:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18071
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 68d99bc [Airflow 16364] Add conn_timeout and cmd_timeout params to
SSHOperator; add conn_timeout param to
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18142#issuecomment-916931855
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
jedcunningham opened a new issue #18146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18146
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### Operating System
macOS 11.5.2
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
### Deployment
jedcunningham commented on issue #18136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18136#issuecomment-916987782
@nwalens, I'm also happy to help! Ping us on slack in #helm-chart-official
if you get stuck or want/need to chat about this .
--
This is an automated message from the
jedcunningham closed pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211#issuecomment-917000456
> I don't understand the test failure we've currently got.
Most likely a flaky failure, let's try it again.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
cablespaghetti opened a new pull request #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17211
Fixes #17188
Uses stable versions of Ingress, PodDisruptionBudget and CronJob APIs where
available. There is no change for users of Kubernetes versions older than 1.19.
Also tidies
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18130#discussion_r706307729
##
File path: dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md
##
@@ -745,3 +746,15 @@ EOF
## Update Announcements page
Update "Announcements" page at the [Official
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18130#discussion_r706329683
##
File path: dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md
##
@@ -745,3 +746,15 @@ EOF
## Update Announcements page
Update "Announcements" page at the [Official
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo