sowhatim commented on issue #18989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18989#issuecomment-1012974092
Facing the similar issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
uranusjr commented on issue #19902:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19902#issuecomment-1012992340
Oh the cause is simpler than I though; fixing.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
uranusjr opened a new pull request #20870:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20870
When appending `__{n}` for task ID deduplication, we are currently using
`dag.task_ids`, which prepends the surrounding task group ID. This means that
we must also use the group-prefixed *current*
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20871#issuecomment-1013030185
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20871#discussion_r784776186
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py
##
@@ -326,7 +326,13 @@ def post_set_task_instances_state(*, dag_id: str,
ephraimbuddy opened a new pull request #20871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20871
When I merged #18724 the jobs ran successfully but it's now failing in main.
This PR fixes it
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Bowrna commented on pull request #20848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20848#issuecomment-1013026737
@potiuk I resolved the above issue and it works :) I could generate the
python file during pre-commit process. I have added the python file generation
part in the
Bowrna edited a comment on pull request #20848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20848#issuecomment-1013026737
@potiuk I resolved the above issue and it works :) I could generate the
python file during pre-commit process. I have added the python file generation
part in the
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r784788806
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1741,6 +1788,28 @@ def leaves(self) -> List["MappedOperator"]:
def has_dag(self):
eladkal commented on issue #20780:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20780#issuecomment-1012989236
@CelastrinaLadon assigned to you. Feel free to open PR
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
eladkal commented on issue #20396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20396#issuecomment-1012995249
Since this is AIP-36 related. i suggest to take it to the AIP comment page /
relevant thread in the mailing list... We usualy dont discuss AIPs in github
issues
--
This is an
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20870:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20870#discussion_r784746579
##
File path: airflow/decorators/base.py
##
@@ -86,15 +89,18 @@ def get_unique_task_id(
if tg_task_id not in dag.task_ids:
return
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r784758697
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1672,20 +1677,52 @@ def _validate_kwarg_names_for_mapping(cls:
Type[BaseOperator], func_name: str, v
kaxil opened a new pull request #20872:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20872
This was pinned because of issue mentioned in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16172 . However this was fixed in
1.8.0 of cattrs by https://github.com/python-attrs/cattrs/issues/151
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20871#discussion_r784778808
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py
##
@@ -326,7 +326,13 @@ def post_set_task_instances_state(*, dag_id: str,
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20872:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20872#issuecomment-1013050672
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
ephraimbuddy closed issue #18672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18672
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ephraimbuddy merged pull request #18724:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18724
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 2b4bf7f Use `DagRun.run_id` instead of `execution_date` when updating
state of TIs(UI & REST API) (#18724)
val2k edited a comment on issue #10790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10790#issuecomment-1012934214
We face the same issue with tasks that stay indefinitely in a queued status,
except that we don't see tasks as `up_for_retry`. It happens randomly within
our DAGs. The task
val2k commented on issue #10790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10790#issuecomment-1012934214
We face the same issue with tasks that stay indefinitely in a queued status,
except that we don't see tasks as `up_for_retry`. It happens randomly within
our DAGs. The task will
ephraimbuddy merged pull request #19769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19769
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ephraimbuddy closed issue #19699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19699
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17476036#comment-17476036
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-5071:
-
val2k edited a comment on issue #10790:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17476035#comment-17476035
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-5071:
-
val2k commented on issue #10790:
URL:
mgorsk1 commented on issue #20849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20849#issuecomment-1012899889
Thanks @potiuk! Let me know if I can be of any help with this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from a20d577 Fixing flaky task that fails in first check ocasionally
(#19132)
add 2b4bf7f Use
kaxil opened a new issue #20880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20880
### Body
We are using jsonschema 3.2.0 which is a 2 years old version.
Based on https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst there
might be the following change that might
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878#discussion_r784971014
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -81,14 +81,14 @@ setup_requires =
kaxil closed issue #19641:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19641
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil merged pull request #20819:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20819
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #20798:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20798#issuecomment-1013328482
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
bbovenzi merged pull request #20798:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20798
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 03b08aa Fix Vault Hook default connection name (#20792)
add e5c2384 Add "Greater/Smaller than or Equal" to
kaxil merged pull request #20879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20879
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil merged pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #20391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20391#discussion_r785071599
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -289,8 +290,21 @@ def _executable_task_instances_to_queued(self, max_tis:
int, session:
SasanAhmadi commented on issue #16919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16919#issuecomment-1013424780
Hi Elad, just got a confirmation from my manager at Skillz to wrap this up
in the next week. got a dedicated time from my job to finish this contribution.
I am sorry it is
khalidmammadov opened a new pull request #20881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20881
This fixes `test_sync_perm_for_dag` test case inside `test_dagbag.py` that
leaves a record for a test DAG permission in the DB.
It causes failure on another test case
o-nikolas commented on a change in pull request #19022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19022#discussion_r785081536
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/airflow_local_settings.py
##
@@ -194,13 +193,17 @@
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 7039cb8 Updating
saisujithkp removed a comment on pull request #6799:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6799#issuecomment-1013489871
We are facing a similar issue with Airflow Version 2.1.2
The program has a very large JSON object that should be inserted as an XCOM.
But `cat
kaxil edited a comment on issue #20876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20876#issuecomment-1013263547
Map Index hasn't been introduced in Airflow 2.2.3 and nor intended to, it is
currently available in the main branch and will be released in Airflow 2.3. So
it is very likely
kaxil edited a comment on issue #20876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20876#issuecomment-1013263547
Map Index hasn't been introduced in Airflow 2.2.3 and nor intended to, it is
currently available in the main branch and will be released in Airflow 2.3. So
it is very likely
kaxil commented on pull request #20879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20879#issuecomment-1013278085
> Duplicate of #20549
I changed this PR to include `dataclass` only which isn't covered in that PR
and we don't have any code conditionals for it.
--
This is an
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878#discussion_r784984948
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -81,14 +81,14 @@ setup_requires =
o-nikolas commented on a change in pull request #20858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20858#discussion_r785076651
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/base_aws.py
##
@@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ def _read_credentials_from_connection(self) ->
mik-laj commented on issue #20867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20867#issuecomment-1013459400
We already have defined annotations on service, so preometheus should detect
stated service:
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20794#discussion_r785013493
##
File path: chart/values.yaml
##
@@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ workers:
# Select certain nodes for airflow worker pods.
nodeSelector: {}
+
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 9157734 Unpin ``argcomplete`` and ``colorlog`` (#20878)
add bbe1eff Remove redundant ``dataclass``
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #20794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20794#discussion_r785063195
##
File path: chart/templates/flower/flower-deployment.yaml
##
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ spec:
tolerations:
{{ toYaml $tolerations | indent 8 }}
mik-laj commented on issue #20867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20867#issuecomment-1013460161
Here is section in Prometheus docs:
https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/configuration/configuration/#service
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
ssatia commented on issue #20615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20615#issuecomment-1013467246
#20264 works as expected. We had the unexpected occur again and it was
handled correctly this time around
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
kaxil edited a comment on issue #20876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20876#issuecomment-1013263547
Map Index hasn't been introduced in Airflow 2.2.3 and nor intended to, it is
currently available in the main branch and will be released in Airflow 2.3. So
it is very likely
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878#discussion_r784984948
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -81,14 +81,14 @@ setup_requires =
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 8881458 Unpin ``cattrs`` (#20872)
add 307d356 AWS: Adds support for optional kwargs in the EKS Operators
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from e5c2384 Add "Greater/Smaller than or Equal" to filters in the browse
views (#20602) (#20798)
add 9157734
saisujithkp commented on pull request #6799:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6799#issuecomment-1013489871
We are facing a similar issue with Airflow Version 2.1.2
The program has a very large JSON object that should be inserted as an XCOM.
But `cat
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878#discussion_r784984948
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -81,14 +81,14 @@ setup_requires =
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #20802:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20802#discussion_r784989929
##
File path: airflow/models/dagbag.py
##
@@ -398,6 +400,9 @@ def _process_modules(self, filepath, mods,
file_last_changed_on_disk):
jedcunningham merged pull request #20787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20787
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from bbe1eff Remove redundant ``dataclass`` dependency (#20879)
add 5ca5693 Chart: fix extra containers docs
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20787:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20787#issuecomment-1013486363
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878#discussion_r784971210
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -81,14 +81,14 @@ setup_requires =
kaxil commented on issue #20862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20862#issuecomment-1013269706
> We should do that in our setup.py as well. Or, since the error came from
the _vendor_ connexion, it may be possible to fix this in the Airflow code
base. What’s our policy about
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20879#issuecomment-1013276042
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
fjmacagno commented on issue #20862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20862#issuecomment-1013320235
Adding a constraints file fixed the issue, but it sounds like this may still
be something that needs to be handled? I will leave it open, feel free to close
if it isn't.
--
bbovenzi closed issue #20602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20602
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #20882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20882#issuecomment-1013350915
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
alekseiloginov opened a new pull request #20882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20882
WIP: Add Looker PDTs operator
This PR adds new Airflow operators that make use of the upcoming Looker PDT
Start/Stop API that will be released soon. These operators allow to manage
mike-mcdonald opened a new pull request #20883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20883
Fixes issue where custom connection fields are not updated because `extra`
field is in form and has previous values, overriding custom field values.
Adds portion of connection form tests to
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #20883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20883#issuecomment-1013373302
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #20814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20814#discussion_r785094194
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/logs.py
##
@@ -99,7 +97,7 @@ def get_log_events(
yield from events
-if
SamWheating commented on issue #19289:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19289#issuecomment-1013392308
We just got caught by exactly this issue when upgrading from 2.1.2 to 2.2.2.
Can I take this issue on? I would love to have this check in place for my
future self
dacort commented on issue #20215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20215#issuecomment-1013392808
@yeshbash @ferruzzi If you haven't already, please sign up for the preview
here: https://pages.awscloud.com/EMR-Serverless-Preview.html
We've started to let folks in and you
kaxil closed issue #20876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20876
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil commented on issue #20876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20876#issuecomment-1013263547
Map Index hasn't been introduced in Airflow 2.2.3 and nor intended to, it is
currently available in the main branch and will be released in Airflow 2.3. So
it is very likely you
kaxil commented on issue #20877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20877#issuecomment-1013262404
Assigned the issue to you :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20802:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20802#issuecomment-1013285414
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #20792:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20792#issuecomment-1013304635
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
kaxil merged pull request #20792:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20792
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20878#issuecomment-1013314696
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #20881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20881#discussion_r785161712
##
File path: tests/models/test_dagbag.py
##
@@ -837,6 +837,7 @@ def _sync_perms():
mock_sync_perm_for_dag.assert_called_once_with(
SamWheating commented on issue #18939:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18939#issuecomment-1013463456
If anyone else is having this issue - we got into this state despite using
the correct collation and encoding, here's what we found.
In our case, the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 03b08aa Fix Vault Hook default connection name
saisujithkp opened a new issue #20884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20884
### Apache Airflow Provider(s)
cncf-kubernetes
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
### Apache Airflow version
2.1.2
### Operating System
jedcunningham edited a comment on issue #20873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20873#issuecomment-1013500431
What is your `doc_md`?
I can only reproduce this with:
```
doc_md="Test `code block` and a [`link`](https://airflow.apache.org).",
But
SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #20733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20733#discussion_r785235303
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -3127,6 +3127,50 @@ def robots(self):
"""
return
jedcunningham commented on issue #20873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20873#issuecomment-1013500431
What is your `doc_md`?
I can only reproduce this with:
```
doc_md="Test `code block` and a [`link`](https://airflow.apache.org).",
But if I
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 426780f Updating
cploonker commented on pull request #18675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18675#issuecomment-1013594704
Is it possible to include dependency lines into this view using something
like https://observablehq.com/@erikbrinkman/d3-dag-topological
SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #20733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20733#discussion_r785235303
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -3127,6 +3127,50 @@ def robots(self):
"""
return
subkanthi commented on a change in pull request #20860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20860#discussion_r785250871
##
File path: airflow/decorators/branch_python.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
subkanthi commented on a change in pull request #20860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20860#discussion_r785250956
##
File path: tests/decorators/test_branch_python.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
edithturn commented on pull request #20701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20701#issuecomment-1013526470
@potiuk they are working: airflow-freespace in **test** and **build
images** workflows are working on my repo (main branch). These workflows failed
in another step.
subkanthi commented on a change in pull request #20860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20860#discussion_r785252124
##
File path: tests/decorators/test_branch_python.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #14672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14672#issuecomment-1013622147
@stroykova can you create a separate issue for the behaviour you
experienced. It looks different from other issues here because you're using
multiprocessing in your code
SamWheating commented on a change in pull request #20733:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20733#discussion_r785236325
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/default_airflow.cfg
##
@@ -658,6 +658,16 @@ auto_refresh_interval = 3
# Boolean for displaying warning for
sandeepsaimone edited a comment on issue #14672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14672#issuecomment-1013568265
Hi Guys,
I am running Mwaa version 2.0.2 and the dag run more than 5hrs, but in the
end the task are marked has failed and there is no error in the logs.
sandeepsaimone commented on issue #14672:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14672#issuecomment-1013568265
Hi Guys,
I am running Mwaa version 2.0.2 and the dag run more than 5hrs, but in the
end the task are marked has failed and there is no error in the logs. Below are
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
