potiuk closed issue #37460: ArgoCD reverting the app to Missing, OutOfSync even
when successfully deployed
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37460
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #23453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23453#issuecomment-1947855033
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 365 days without any activity. There has been several Airflow releases
since last
potiuk commented on issue #37460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37460#issuecomment-1947846025
Yep I think discussion is better.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
potiuk commented on issue #37131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37131#issuecomment-1947843819
It's just another way to achieve isolation (heavy handed, so maybe
side-edlffects will be too big and it's a bad idea).
Basically the reason we are doing deep copy here is
Lee-W commented on code in PR #37176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37176#discussion_r1492014740
##
airflow/providers/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/override.py:
##
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ class
FabAirflowSecurityManagerOverride(AirflowSecurityManagerV2):
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #37468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37468#discussion_r1492012822
##
airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/import_error_endpoint.py:
##
@@ -16,39 +16,59 @@
# under the License.
from __future__ import annotations
-from typing
uranusjr commented on code in PR #37176:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37176#discussion_r1492007495
##
airflow/providers/fab/auth_manager/security_manager/override.py:
##
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ class
FabAirflowSecurityManagerOverride(AirflowSecurityManagerV2):
rawwar commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491968585
##
airflow/security/utils.py:
##
Review Comment:
So, is it safe to remove from the modules? If so, I can check for all the
modules where E402 is ignored and
harshith-bolar-rapido commented on issue #20047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20047#issuecomment-1947761572
Seeing this in airflow 2.5.3
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
jaruji commented on issue #37460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37460#issuecomment-1947700115
I'm mainly opening the issue to see whether somebody else encountered
something similar and managed to fix it. I do not have any expectations
regarding you doing the necessary
dirrao commented on issue #37131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37131#issuecomment-1947695416
Copy on write is intuitive and makes sense. I would look into the options.
However, I believe the Kubernetes executor utils calls coming from either
the scheduler (pod launch) or
drajguru closed pull request #37467: Core tests fail when run separately
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37467
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
drajguru closed issue #37466: Core tests fail when run separately
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37466
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
drajguru closed issue #37466: Core tests fail when run separately
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37466
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
drajguru commented on issue #37466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37466#issuecomment-1947691550
Oh I see... I just retested on the latest main and the issue is indeed now
fixed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
Taragolis commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491874137
##
airflow/security/utils.py:
##
Review Comment:
And also think it listed in 3rd-party-licenses:
Taragolis commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491867626
##
airflow/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -14,13 +14,9 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing
Satoshi-Sh commented on issue #37423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37423#issuecomment-1947589825
I can take on this task.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
rawwar commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491840368
##
airflow/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -14,13 +14,9 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing
SatishChGit commented on PR #36953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36953#issuecomment-1947589696
Thank you every one for your support!.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
rawwar commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491840368
##
airflow/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -14,13 +14,9 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing
Taragolis commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491844488
##
pyproject.toml:
##
@@ -1381,83 +1387,1472 @@ combine-as-imports = true
"tests/providers/qdrant/hooks/test_qdrant.py" = ["E402"]
rawwar commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491840368
##
airflow/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -14,13 +14,9 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing
Taragolis commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947582702
And personally not sure about D107
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
rawwar commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947582616
> I don’t think it is even possible not to combine them if we want to enable
all of them. Only problem to create issues with all of them
I just raised this PR -
rawwar commented on code in PR #37469:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37469#discussion_r1491840368
##
airflow/api/auth/backend/kerberos_auth.py:
##
@@ -14,13 +14,9 @@
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
# specific language governing
Taragolis commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947578178
> We could combine several `D*`s if we want in one row. I don't think there
is a particular reason why we want to keep them in separate sections.
@Taragolis ?
I don’t
sudiptob2 commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947569963
@ketozhang Thank you so much. There were problem in RBAC, I updated it and
now I can get Pod events
```
[2024-02-15, 23:26:26 UTC] {pod.py:980} ERROR - (403)
vincbeck commented on code in PR #37468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37468#discussion_r1491830495
##
airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/import_error_endpoint.py:
##
@@ -65,10 +85,42 @@ def get_import_errors(
"""Get all import errors."""
to_replace =
vincbeck commented on code in PR #37468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37468#discussion_r1491829265
##
airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/import_error_endpoint.py:
##
@@ -16,39 +16,59 @@
# under the License.
from __future__ import annotations
-from typing import
potiuk commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947559270
> Issue is that same module have D*s and also E*s.
We could combine `D*`'s and `E*s` together as well.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
rawwar commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947557987
> We could combine several `D*`s if we want in one row. I don't think there
is a particular reason why we want to keep them in separate sections.
@Taragolis ?
Issue is that
potiuk commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947556694
We could `D*` if we want. I don't think there is a particular reason why we
want to keep them in separate sections. @Taragolis ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
rawwar commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947555396
And, list of all issues that we can add to `pyproject.toml`. I did some
basic pre-processing.
```
"airflow/__main__.py" = ["D103"]
"airflow/api/auth/__init__.py" =
potiuk commented on PR #37465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37465#issuecomment-1947554480
LGTM. But I would prefer Others to also take a look - maybe there is a good
reason for not having it hashable :). And thanks for the thorough research on
the past !
BTW. Static
rawwar commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947553871
> Oh absolutley. Moving it out is just theorethically possible, but we do
not want to do it (or at least we have not decided about it yet. I personally
think there is a value in
potiuk commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947550688
> Can we just update it in the current pyproject.toml? I would like to
contribute and I'll finish them off one by one
Oh absolutley. Moving it out is just theorethically
sudiptob2 commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947549730
Thanks for the hint ✅
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ketozhang commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947548134
It looks like you're not getting any event failures because of some
Kubernetes permission issue. In your logs, you're getting a 403 error:
> HTTP response body:
potiuk commented on issue #37466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37466#issuecomment-1947544510
BTW. You Absolutely should not open issue for such things - just opening PR
is more than enough, we hate beauraucracy (even the word is ugly) and in
Airlfow, when you plan to open
jedcunningham opened a new pull request, #37468:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37468
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
potiuk commented on issue #37466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37466#issuecomment-1947542936
Are you ABSOLUTELY sure you tested in on the latest main ?
Becauase I believe I fixed this very problem few days ago here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37320 -
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #26203:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26203#issuecomment-1947539465
This issue has been closed because it has not received response from the
issue author.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] closed issue #35630: Not able to view the DAG page but jump
straight to an error page when testing customized timetable
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35630
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #35630:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35630#issuecomment-1947539386
This issue has been closed because it has not received response from the
issue author.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] closed issue #26203: Continuously logging and Batch logging
mode for the aws Glue job's execution logs
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26203
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #35190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/35190#issuecomment-1947539409
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 14 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
rawwar commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947534083
> In theory we could enable all rules [#10742
(comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947242983)
but place exclusions into the separate file, e.g.
rawwar commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947530957
> In theory we could enable all rules [#10742
(comment)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947242983)
but place exclusions into the separate file, e.g.
potiuk commented on issue #37460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37460#issuecomment-1947527524
> Specifically, the run-airflow-migrations and create-user jobs are
executing every couple of minutes in this case. If the automated selfHeal is
turned off, the app just shifts to
drajguru opened a new pull request, #37467:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37467
Add orm mocking to settings test
Prevent putting the session into a state that prevents subsequent test
modules from passing.
closes: #37466
--
This is an automated message from the
sudiptob2 commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947510738
Hi @ketozhang
I ran 2 dags according to your suggestion. But could not get the Pod Event
log.
1.
drajguru opened a new issue, #37466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37466
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
_No response_
### What happened?
test_sqlite_relative_path() in
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #37418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37418#issuecomment-1947489220
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request! You are invited to
check our [Issue Tracker](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues) for
additional
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jscheffl pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 9f4f8b3553 Add environment var example to
jscheffl merged PR #37418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37418
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
taragolis pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 42f8d048d2 Replace usage of `datetime.utcnow`
Taragolis merged PR #37138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37138
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mpeteuil opened a new pull request, #37465:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37465
Currently DAGs accept a
[`Collection["Dataset"]`](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/0c02ead4d8a527cbf0a916b6344f255c520e637f/airflow/models/dag.py#L171)
as an option for the `schedule`, but
sudiptob2 commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947442082
Yes sure, Just to mention, I already did try
[this](https://github.com/sudiptob2/airflow-kpo-test/blob/main/dev/dags/test_fail_dag_2.py)
Dag which is similar to the one you
jaruji commented on issue #37460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37460#issuecomment-1947441852
I can open an issue there tomorrow. I did some more research, and enabled
automated prune and selfHeal in the argoCD app like so:
```
syncPolicy:
automated:
ketozhang commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947438237
If you wouldn't mind. Can you do one run with and another without
`container_resources` set?
I forgot the original issue I outlined here was we are getting Pod Event
ninowalker commented on issue #37463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37463#issuecomment-1947437366
For additional context, with the python debugger inside `execute_callable`
of the PythonOperator (which wraps the function in question):
1. It's calling
sudiptob2 commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947433926
@ketozhang Thanks! will try this shortly
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
ketozhang commented on issue #36077:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36077#issuecomment-1947432083
You seem to be getting a different error more so about Kubernetes API
permission issue which isn't related to the Pod.
Let's try to use reduce your DAG file into minimal
bbovenzi opened a new pull request, #37464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37464
Read in all the dag_ids from the dataset dependencies endpoint and allow
filtering the datasets graph by dag_id
A use rcan filter via the multi-select or from a tooltip when clicking on a
Dag
potiuk commented on issue #37460:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37460#issuecomment-1947407531
Have you opened the issue to ArgoCD? What do they say ? It could be caused
by some issues that we already know and plan to fix
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37399 or
Taragolis commented on issue #37442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37442#issuecomment-1947401299
Maybe you rights, attached link to core modules.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
potiuk commented on issue #37442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37442#issuecomment-1947393912
Ah. Maybe I misunderstood :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Taragolis commented on issue #37442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37442#issuecomment-1947391262
Just wondering is it issue about EmailOperator from core or from [SFTP
Provider](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow-providers-smtp/stable/index.html)?
--
This is
ninowalker opened a new issue, #37463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37463
### Apache Airflow version
Other Airflow 2 version (please specify below)
### If "Other Airflow 2 version" selected, which one?
2.8.0
### What happened?
A task with
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #37463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37463#issuecomment-1947378746
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template! If you are willing to raise PR to address this issue please do so, no
need to wait for
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 2ad99b909f Updating
Taragolis commented on code in PR #37444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37444#discussion_r1491687286
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/release_management_commands.py:
##
@@ -711,8 +804,8 @@ def prepare_provider_packages(
sys.exit(0)
jaruji commented on issue #37459:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37459#issuecomment-1947350151
Okay that fixed it. The docs for this should get updated, as the information
written there regarding the azure blob remote logging setup is not up to date.
It took me a fair bit of
potiuk commented on code in PR #37444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37444#discussion_r1491675071
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/release_management_commands.py:
##
@@ -711,8 +804,8 @@ def prepare_provider_packages(
sys.exit(0)
potiuk commented on issue #37443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37443#issuecomment-1947343754
> Sorry, I don't mean to say that its not possible. I think, the current log
tab is just a window showing text and I was talking about it.
Well it's a javascript-controlled
potiuk commented on issue #37442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37442#issuecomment-1947335380
So far that has been deliberate choice - see
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/howto/email-config.html.
SMTP for the emails that are sent by Airflow have -
Taragolis commented on issue #37459:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37459#issuecomment-1947316985
It is separate section, something like that.
```yaml
config:
logging:
remote_logging: 'True'
remote_base_log_folder: wasb-airflow/logs
Taragolis commented on PR #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462#issuecomment-1947310104
Anyway, I will create appropriate task tomorrow
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
potiuk commented on PR #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462#issuecomment-1947309064
like it we have in pyproject.toml (and have mechanism to see the
"important" changes there :).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
potiuk commented on PR #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462#issuecomment-1947305106
https://github.com/apache/airflow/assets/595491/e6255807-312b-45a3-a783-2889bdf8e5b7;>
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
Taragolis commented on PR #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462#issuecomment-1947304958
We could move this changes in the separate file
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947303063 but it
just an idea, because if we enable all rules we have to
Taragolis commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947303063
In theory we could enable all rules
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947242983 but
place exclusions into the separate file, e.g. in ruff.toml
potiuk commented on PR #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462#issuecomment-1947302356
I really like how those kinds of pyproject.toml changes now do not generate
full build :D . YAY... Achievement unlocked.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 3c1d05140e Partially enable D105 rule (#37462)
potiuk merged PR #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Taragolis opened a new pull request, #37462:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37462
related: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Taragolis commented on issue #10742:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10742#issuecomment-1947242983
Just finish calculation other violations of D100-D107
| **Rule** | **Total Errors** | **Uniq Core Modules** | **Uniq Providers
Modules** | **Uniq Other Modules** |
potiuk commented on PR #36935:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36935#issuecomment-1947220665
This time I rebased it, but you can usually do it yourself without calling
maintainers -> generally I recommend to rebase eaarly, often, and especially
when you see you are behind and
potiuk commented on PR #36935:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36935#issuecomment-1947217035
> The Test failures look like are coming from other changes cc. @eladkal
@potiuk
Yes. Usually rebasing helps. Those errors were found and fixed earlier today
--
This is an
romsharon98 closed pull request #37447: add override option for app with the
same name
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37447
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
hussein-awala commented on code in PR #37447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37447#discussion_r1491561796
##
airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/spark_kubernetes.py:
##
@@ -255,6 +258,8 @@ def custom_obj_api(self) -> CustomObjectsApi:
def
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
husseinawala pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new ef0ab856e4 Support type checking for
hussein-awala merged PR #37457:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37457
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Taragolis commented on PR #37458:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37458#issuecomment-1947076850
And static checks and mypy should be fixed:
-
https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/7919541474/job/21623012828?pr=37458
-
potiuk commented on PR #37446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37446#issuecomment-1946977154
Thanks for super-quick diagnosis and fix @pankajastro BTW !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
potiuk commented on PR #37446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37446#issuecomment-1946967719
Merged!
That explains it indeed, It did not fail in your PR, because it would
**generally** work without mocking (and worked for me as well locally) if run
in isolation / on not
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new c84efe77a5 KPO Maintain backward compatibility for
potiuk merged PR #37454:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37454
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
