Re: cmake

2012-05-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 May 2012 11:33, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: i have better experience with scons instead of cmake mmm, may be better to jump beyond make altogether to the higher levels of nativeish build tools. What would be good is that the output can be parsed by jenkins have that set up to

Re: Getting address bind Exception when starting single node hadoop cluster

2012-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
1. This is a user question, so please use the common-user or mapreduce-user mailing lists. There are more people on it and it is the better place. 2. Before panicing and asking others for help, always try and do a bit of research. The stack trace says the cause is BindException and Address

Re: plz help! HDFS to S3 copy issues

2012-07-11 Thread Steve Loughran
This is a hadoop-user q, not a development one -please use the right as user questions get ignored on the dev ones. also: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ConnectionRefused On 11 July 2012 19:23, Momina Khan momina.a...@gmail.com wrote: i use the following command to try to copy data from hdfs to

adding bin and net categories to JIRA/HADOOP

2012-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
There aren't bin and net categories in JIRA, yet often bugs go against the code there? Should I add them?

Re: adding bin and net categories to JIRA/HADOOP

2012-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
done. On 6 August 2012 13:45, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote: Works for me. I've been adding missing ones that make sense (eg webhdfs). On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: There aren't bin and net categories in JIRA, yet often bugs go against

Re: serializable writables - HADOOP-8619

2012-08-09 Thread Steve Loughran
correction: i'd like a junit test that pushes some of the std writables to an ObjectOutputStream and back, verifies round-tripping of data. It may seem extra work -but it stops serialization breaking in future. -steve On 9 August 2012 09:11, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: I've

Re: Adding hadoop usage

2012-08-11 Thread Steve Loughran
-- Steve Loughran Hortonworks Inc ste...@hortonworks.com skype: steve_loughran tel: +1 408 400 3721 http://hortonworks.com/download/

Re: Does anyone do related work on the log of hadoop?

2012-08-26 Thread Steve Loughran
What are you trying to log/analyse? I self-assigned to me do better logging for machine analysis, a long time ago, but never sat down to do any of it -yet- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7466 On 23 August 2012 20:44, Li Shengmei lisheng...@ict.ac.cn wrote: Hi, all I

Re: 答复: Does anyone do related work on the log of hadoop?

2012-08-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 29 August 2012 10:36, Li Shengmei lisheng...@ict.ac.cn wrote: Hi, Steven, Thank you very much. I just start to study the log analysis of HADOOP. I will review your work carefully. Btw, which part of hadoop source codes should be read carefully if I want to get know the log record?

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-09 Thread Steve Loughran
On 5 October 2012 18:27, Thilee Subramaniam thi...@quantcast.com wrote: We at Quantcast have released QFS 1.0 (Quantcast File System) to open source. This is based on the KFS 0.5 (Kosmos Distributed File System), a C++ distributed filesystem implementation. KFS plugs into Apache Hadoop via

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On 10 October 2012 16:03, Thilee Subramaniam thi...@quantcast.com wrote: Hi Steve, Like Harsh said, HADOOP-8886 addresses removing KFS from apache tree. But I interpret your suggestion as 'moving qfs.jar out of apache tree, and keeping the jar in possibly a maven repo externally. The new fs

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-11 Thread Steve Loughran
Good point Steve. This touches on the larger issue of whether it makes sense to host FS clients for other file systems in Hadoop itself. I agree with what I think you're getting which is - if we can handle the testing and integration via external dependencies it would probably be better to

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-11 Thread Steve Loughran
On 11 October 2012 00:34, Thilee Subramaniam thi...@quantcast.com wrote: My initial goal was to make Hadoop use QFS the same way it used KFS. Since Hadoop branch-1 had lib/kfs.xx.jar, I was expecting to include a qfs.x.x.jar in the Hadoop release; my first patch was to use such jar. But now

Re: [DISCUSS] remove packaging

2012-10-15 Thread Steve Loughran
+1, only creates confusion On 15 October 2012 19:00, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote: Hey Bobby, That's correct, I mean the packages directories in common, hdfs, and MR top-level directories, which contain the debs and RPMs. I'm not opposed to someone re-working/contributing new code

Re: Need to add fs shim to use QFS

2012-10-26 Thread Steve Loughran
On 26 October 2012 01:24, Thilee Subramaniam thi...@quantcast.com wrote: We have made the changes recommended here, and made available a 'Hadoop QFS jar' with QFS. This plugin and the QFS libraries will be maintained released by the QFS open-source project. Please see the download and

Re: [PROPOSAL] 1.1.1 and 1.2.0 scheduling

2012-11-09 Thread Steve Loughran
negative exit code on bad arguments. (Steve Loughran via suresh) MAPREDUCE-4782. NLineInputFormat skips first line of last InputSplit (Mark Fuhs via bobby)

Re: need help submitting patches

2012-11-14 Thread Steve Loughran
don't worry about the patch fail message on jenkins as it currently only patches against trunk The standard development process for is -use Git, with git.apache.org the read-only repository -branch for each JIRA issue, trunk branch-1 for the asf versions e.g

Re: [PROPOSAL] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 November 2012 02:40, Chris Nauroth cnaur...@hortonworks.com wrote: It seems like the trickiest issue is preservation of permissions and symlinks in tar files. I suspect that any JVM-based solution like custom Maven plugins, Groovy, or jtar would be limited in this respect. According

Re: [PROPOSAL] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 November 2012 19:15, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote: This discussion started in Those of us involved in the branch-1-win port of Hadoop to Windows without use of Cygwin, have faced the issue of frequent use of shell scripts throughout the system, both in build time (eg, the utility

Re: commit access to hadoop

2012-11-24 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 November 2012 15:03, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: what it takes to gain commit access to hadoop? good question. I've put some of my thoughts on the topic into a presentation I gave last month: http://www.slideshare.net/steve_l/inside-hadoopdev That isn't so much about

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-25 Thread Steve Loughran
On 24 November 2012 20:13, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote: For discussion, please see previous thread [PROPOSAL] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack. This vote consists of three separate items: 1. Contributors shall be allowed to

Re: commit access to hadoop

2012-11-28 Thread Steve Loughran
On 26 November 2012 21:25, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: The main feature is that when you get the +1 vote you yourself get to deal with the grunge work of apply patches to one or more svn branches, resyncing that with the git branches you inevitably do your own work on. no, main

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 November 2012 00:29, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: * What else in the current build, besides saveVersion.sh, you see as candidate to be migrated to Phyton? inline ant scripts =0. Ant's versioning is stricter; you can pull down the exact Jar versions, and some of us in the Ant

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-11-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 November 2012 12:57, Luke Lu l...@apache.org wrote: I'd like to change my binding vote to -1, -0, -1. Considering the hadoop stack/ecosystem as a whole, I think the best cross platform scripting language to adopt is jruby for following reasons: 1. HBase already adopted jruby for HBase

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-12-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 1 December 2012 01:08, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote: -1, 0, -1 IIUC the only platform we plan to add support for that we can't easily support today (w/o an emulation layer like cygwin) is Windows, and it seems like making the bash scripts simpler and having parallel bat files is

Re: [VOTE] introduce Python as build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack

2012-12-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 November 2012 13:40, Radim Kolar h...@filez.com wrote: inline ant scripts =0. Ant's versioning is stricter; you can pull down the exact Jar versions, and some of us in the Ant team worked very hard to get it going everywhere. You don't gain anything by going to .py there are sh

Re: SPEC files?

2012-12-04 Thread Steve Loughran
The RPMs are being built with bigtop; grab it from here https://github.com/apache/bigtop/tree/master/bigtop-packages/src/rpm/hadoop I'm not sure which branch to use for hadoop-1.1.1; let me check that On 4 December 2012 17:24, Michael Johnson m...@michaelpjohnson.com wrote: Hello All, I've

Re: SPEC files?

2012-12-04 Thread Steve Loughran
On 4 December 2012 18:51, Michael Johnson m...@michaelpjohnson.com wrote: On 12/04/2012 12:54 PM, Harsh J wrote: The right branch is branch-0.3 for Bigtop. You can get more information upstream at Apache Bigtop itself (http://bigtop.apache.org). Branch 0.3 of the same URL Steve posted:

making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-14 Thread Steve Loughran
The swiftfs tests need only to run if there's a target filesystem; copying the s3/s3n tests, something like property nametest.fs.swift.name/name valueswift://your-object-store-herel//value /property How does one actually go about making junit tests optional in mvn-land? Should the

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-17 Thread Steve Loughran
14, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: The swiftfs tests need only to run if there's a target filesystem; copying the s3/s3n tests, something like property nametest.fs.swift.name/name valueswift://your-object-store-herel//value /property How

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-17 Thread Steve Loughran
it easier to turn those and the rackspace ones without sticking my secrets into an XML file under SCM Tom On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: thanks, I'l; have a look. I've always wanted to add the notion of skipped to test runs -all the way through

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 December 2012 09:11, Colin McCabe cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Colin McCabe cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu wrote: another tactic could be to have specific test projects: test-s3, test-openstack, test-... which contain nothing but test cases. You'd set

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 December 2012 09:05, Colin McCabe cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu wrote: I think the way to go is to have one XML file include another. ?xml version=1.0? ?xml-stylesheet type=text/xsl href=configuration.xsl? configuration xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude; property

Re: wiki write permissions

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 December 2012 15:00, Simone Leo simone@crs4.it wrote: it looks like I don't have write permissions on the Hadoop wiki anymore (account: SimoneLeo). I've given you access, ping me if it doesn't work -steve

Re: making a hadoop-common test run if a property is set

2012-12-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 17 December 2012 16:06, Tom White t...@cloudera.com wrote: There are some tests like the S3 tests that end with Test (e.g. Jets3tNativeS3FileSystemContractTest) - unlike normal tests which start with Test. Only those that start with Test are run automatically (see the surefire

Re: development environment for hadoop core

2013-01-16 Thread Steve Loughran
My setup ( I work from home) # OS/X laptop w/ 30 monitor # FTTC broadband, 55Mbit/s down, 15+ up -it's the upload bandwidth that really helps development: http://www.flickr.com/photos/steve_l/8050751551/ # IntelliJ IDEA IDE, settings edited for a 2GB Heap # Maven on the command line for builds #

Re: timeout is now requested to be on all tests

2013-02-21 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks, just seen and commented on this. IF we're going to have test timeouts, we need a good recommended default value for all tests except the extra slow ones. Or 1. we just use our own JUnit fork that sets up a better default value than 0. I don't know how Ken would react to that. 2. we get

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
On 2 March 2013 03:33, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Windows is so different from _any_ Unix or pseudo-Unix flavors, including Windows with Cygwin - that even multi-platform Java has hard hard time dealing with it. This is enough, IMO, to warrant a separate checkpoint. Cygwin is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop branch-1.2

2013-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
On 6 March 2013 23:17, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I got stuck in other work and did not make the Hadoop 1.2 branch in February. Now that release 1.1.2 is out, I'm ready to make the 1.2 branch. I intend to branch for 1.2 in the next night or two, and at that point will make the

Re: [VOTE] Plan to create release candidate Monday 3/18

2013-03-11 Thread Steve Loughran
On 11 March 2013 03:38, Matt Foley ma...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, I have created branch-1.2 from branch-1, and propose to cut the first release candidate for 1.2.0 on Monday 3/18 (a week from tomorrow), or as soon thereafter as I can achieve a stable build. Between 1.1.2 and the current

Re: [VOTE] Plan to create release candidate for 0.23.7

2013-03-14 Thread Steve Loughran
On 13 March 2013 16:31, Thomas Graves tgra...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hello all, I think enough critical bug fixes have went in to branch-0.23 that warrant another release. I plan on creating a 0.23.7 release by the end March. Please vote '+1' to approve this plan. Voting will close on

Re: How to build hadoop code using ANT offline

2013-03-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 14 March 2013 17:06, Vikas Jadhav vikascjadha...@gmail.com wrote: for first job ANT download jar from internet how to build offline using ANT -- ant needs all the dependencies. Once that first build is done, it will not need to do it again, as the stuff is cached in your disk somewhere

Re: how to define new InputFormat with streaming?

2013-03-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 March 2013 09:18, springring springr...@126.com wrote: Hi, my hadoop version is Hadoop 0.20.2-cdh3u3 and I want to define new InputFormat in hadoop book , but there is error class org.apache.hadoop.streaming.WholeFileInputFormat not org.apache.hadoop.mapred.InputFormat Hadoop

Re: Reading partition for reducer

2013-04-01 Thread Steve Loughran
have you considered joining the u...@hadoop.apache.org and asking the question there? On 1 April 2013 17:38, Vikas Jadhav vikascjadha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want process/store all data pertaining to one reducer. i want store it in some data structure depending on key for example

Re: Error in first build : Cannot run program protoc: CreateProcess error=2

2013-04-03 Thread Steve Loughran
On 3 April 2013 15:46, Chandrashekhar Kotekar shekhar.kote...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks a lot for your help. You were right. Problem was with Protoc version 1.5 only. I downloaded and added protoc 1.4 version and now that error is gone. However now I am stuck at this new error. Now maven is not

Re: Building Hadoop from source code

2013-04-08 Thread Steve Loughran
On 8 April 2013 16:08, Mohammad Mustaqeem 3m.mustaq...@gmail.com wrote: Please, tell what I am doing wrong?? Whats the problem?? a lot of these seem to be network-related tests. You can turn off all the tests; look in BUILDING.TXT at the root of the source tree for the various operations,

Re: How to understand Hadoop source code ?

2013-04-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 April 2013 18:32, Noelle Jakusz (c) njak...@vmware.com wrote: +1 There are quite a few new people, so maybe start a collaborative group where you can collect notes and steps (videos and articles). I know I would have some for you that I have created as I have gotten started... it would

Re: How to understand Hadoop source code ?

2013-04-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 19 April 2013 23:08, Noelle Jakusz (c) njak...@vmware.com wrote: I have created an account (noellejakusz) and would like write access to help with this... OK, you have write access

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 April 2013 14:00, Karthik Kambatla ka...@cloudera.com wrote: Hadoop devs, This doc does not intend to propose new policies. The idea is to have one document that outlines the various compatibility concerns (lots of areas beyond API compatibility), captures the respective policies that

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22 April 2013 18:32, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: There's a separate issue that says we make some guarantee that the behaviour of a interface remains consistent over versions, which is hard to do

Re: Hadoop Scheduling Algorithm

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 09:13, Chris Smith csmi...@gmail.com wrote: And there is another scheduler, Dynamic Priority Scheduling, lurking in the backwater of 0.21.0 that allows users to 'bid' for additional time. Getting this back into current 1.x may be a great way to understand about scheduling:

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 09:00, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: On 22 April 2013 18:32, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote: However if a change made FileSystem#close three times slower, this perhaps a smaller semantic change (eg doesn't change what exceptions get thrown

Re: Compatibility in Apache Hadoop

2013-04-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 11:32, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: At the risk of hijacking this conversation a bit, what do you think of the notion of moving interfaces like Seekable and PositionedReadable into a new foundational Maven module, perhaps just for such interfaces that define and

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting to Hadoop 2.X beta

2013-04-24 Thread Steve Loughran
On 23 April 2013 17:25, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! Now that Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha is released I'd like to open up a discussion on what practical steps would it take for us as a community to get Hadoop 2.X from alpha to beta? There's quite a few preconditions to be met for

Re: Heads up - 2.0.5-beta

2013-04-29 Thread Steve Loughran
you need those patches to remove sun-specific bits in, don't you? On 25 April 2013 19:23, Amir Sanjar v1san...@us.ibm.com wrote: Arun, thanks for the update. This is indeed the news we (IBM) have been waiting for. Please let us know if there is anyway we can help. Best Regards Amir Sanjar

Re: How to test patch

2013-04-30 Thread Steve Loughran
On 29 April 2013 14:20, Amit Sela am...@infolinks.com wrote: Thanks for the reply Chris! I'm actually running on Fedora 17... I went ahead and changed to the forrest findbugs versions you recommended (the log file had an issue with apache-forrest-0.8), and now when I look at the log and see

Re: Heads up - 2.0.5-beta

2013-04-30 Thread Steve Loughran
Phone# 512-286-8393 Fax# 512-838-8858 [image: Inactive hide details for Steve Loughran ---04/29/2013 05:40:33 PM---you need those patches to remove sun-specific bits in, don]Steve Loughran ---04/29/2013 05:40:33 PM---you need those patches to remove sun-specific bits in, don't you

Re: After Creating a patch what I need to do

2013-05-01 Thread Steve Loughran
On 1 May 2013 06:33, Thoihen Maibam thoihen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Can somebody help me after creating patch what I need to I do. I have seen one subject 'How to test the patch' but that isn't really helping me. I am stuck in the below areas. dev-support/test-patch can test your patch

Re: Issue HADOOP-8905

2013-05-09 Thread Steve Loughran
On 8 May 2013 21:20, st...@stevendyates.com wrote: Hi Harsh, Thanks for responding, I would be interested in what the dev group had in mind for this and I also have a couple of additional queries ; I can see that a quick win for this would be to expose the existing Jetty statistics

Re: Issue HADOOP-8905

2013-05-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On 9 May 2013 20:39, sya...@stevendyates.com wrote: Unless there are existing bits of this stuff lurking somewhere in the Hadoop codebase that I haven't noticed, these could be copied into hadoop core. Reviewing the code as it is would be welcome

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

2013-05-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 May 2013 10:57, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, A considerable number of people have expressed confusion regarding the recent vote on 2.0.5, beta status etc. given lack of specifics, the voting itself (validity of the vote itself, whose votes are binding) etc. IMHO

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

2013-05-15 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 May 2013 15:02, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Roman, Furthermore, before we rush into finding flaws and scaring kids at night it would be useful to remember one thing: Software has *bugs*. We can't block any release till the entire universe validates it, in fact they won't

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

2013-05-16 Thread Steve Loughran
On 15 May 2013 23:19, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: Guys, I guess what you're missing is that Bigtop isn't a testing framework for Hadoop. It is stack framework that verifies that components are dealing with each other nicely. which to me means Some form of integration test

Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote

2013-05-22 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 May 2013 23:47, Jagane Sundar jag...@sundar.org wrote: I see one significant benefit to having Release Plan votes: Fewer releases with more members of the community working on any given release. In turn, fewer Hadoop releases implies less confusion for end users attempting to download

Re: [DISCUSS] - Committing client code to 3rd Party FileSystems within Hadoop Common

2013-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
-effecting operations, such as a recursive delete of a v. large directory. That remote testing, therefore, helps me find such pains before it hits the fueld. You might also try asking Steve Loughran, since he did some great work recently to try to nail down the exact semantics of FileSystem

Re: [DISCUSS] Ensuring Consistent Behavior for Alternative Hadoop FileSystems + Workshop

2013-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
are a little ambiguous. With that said, we've joined Steve Loughran in attempting to clarify these for both the Hadoop 1.0 and the Hadoop 2.0 FileSystem class over at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9371 It seems to me that once we had these semantics defined, it would be good

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Hadoop Committers

2013-05-29 Thread Steve Loughran
congratulations! I propose you should celebrate your new rights by reviewing some of my outstanding patches, such as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545 On 28 May 2013 23:07, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote: On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I'd like to announce the

Re: Error in protobuf definitions

2013-05-30 Thread Steve Loughran
It's up as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4866 On 29 May 2013 21:53, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com wrote: Ralph, could you please file a Jira? We'll fix it. -Arpit On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Ralph Castain r...@open-mpi.org wrote: Hi folks On line 228 of

Re: Cannot update PoweredBy wiki page

2013-05-31 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 May 2013 22:14, Adam Kawa kawa.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When uploading new content (and information about my company), I got the exception Sorry, can not save page because rubbelloselotto.de is not allowed in this wiki. How could I solve it? Kind regards, Adam the word lotto

Re: Backwards compatibility of FileSystem interface.

2013-05-31 Thread Steve Loughran
API calls are made older FileSystem implementations dont work anymore. For context, here is a closely related JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Steve Loughran ste

HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

2013-06-03 Thread Steve Loughran
. If anyone does want to run the test themselves, try the docs and then escalate to us if there are any problems. Steve Loughran, Dmitry Mezhenskiy (Mirantis) David Dobbins (Rackspace)

Re: HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

2013-06-03 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks On 3 June 2013 17:20, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.com wrote: Steve, I will review this. Might need a couple of days though. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: Hi, We've got the HADOOP-8545 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: Heads up: branch-2.1-beta

2013-06-19 Thread Steve Loughran
Arun, What do I do if I have I minor patch that I'd like to get out into 2.1, but where I don't want to introduce instability into that 2.1 branch if you are trying to make a beta release? For example, HADOOP-9651https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9651 changes the exception that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta

2013-06-26 Thread Steve Loughran
On 26 June 2013 09:17, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, The RC tag in svn is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.1.0-beta-rc0 The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. did all the poms go up? [INFO]

Re: write access to hbase wiki

2013-07-02 Thread Steve Loughran
done On 1 July 2013 19:47, erman pattuk ermanpat...@su.sabanciuniv.edu wrote: Hi, I was planning to add our current project, BigSecret, to the powered-by list of HBase. https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PoweredBy I believe I need to get write permissions to do so. My username is ermanpattuk.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Hadoop Karaf support

2013-07-08 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks -I've commented on it briefly. Could you print the blog post to PDF and attach it too -it ensures that it will stay with the JIRA forever On 8 July 2013 06:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi folks, Maybe some of you remember the discussion about OSGi support some

HADOOP-8545 swift reviewers needed

2013-07-09 Thread Steve Loughran
Hi, I've been through suresh's review of the HADOOP-8545 patch and pulled in the changes -that patch is now ready for review by anyone, testing even better. I'd like to get this in not just because we've been working on it for a long time, but because I'm trying to specify more rigorously what

Re: HADOOP-8545 swift reviewers needed

2013-07-09 Thread Steve Loughran
the Hadoop on Swift work. I have a single-node Swift setup and will first try running the unit tests against the setup. I'm guessing the most up-to-date documentation is the hadoop-openstack/src/site/apt/index.apt.vm added in HADOOP-8545? Thanks, Stephen On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Steve

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

2013-07-10 Thread Steve Loughran
create a wiki account then ask for write access we'll set you up On 10 July 2013 01:56, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Hi, I've installed ProtocolBuffer 2.5.0 according to [[wiki: HowToContribute]]. And that's why I failed to build hadoop and I had to downgrade protobuf to

Re: Bringing Hadoop to Fedora

2013-07-10 Thread Steve Loughran
On 8 July 2013 19:28, Tim St Clair tstcl...@redhat.com wrote: Arun, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9680 / 9623 fixing S3 is something that is niggling me as something I want to sit down and do once the Swift stuff is in -and once we've clarified some quirks w/ the FS API, and

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

2013-07-11 Thread Steve Loughran
On 10 July 2013 18:54, Akira AJISAKA ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp wrote: Thank you for your comments. create a wiki account then ask for write access we'll set you up I created a wiki account. (https://wiki.apache.org/**hadoop/AkiraAjisakahttps://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AkiraAjisaka )

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta

2013-08-02 Thread Steve Loughran
On 30 July 2013 14:29, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.1.0-beta that I would like to get released. This RC fixes a number of issues reported on the previous candidate. This release represents a *huge* amount of work

Re: Java 7 and Hadoop

2013-08-03 Thread Steve Loughran
would be nice for JDK7 builds to work on OSX -gave up the last time I tried, though we should see if the mvn plugins have been updated for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9350 http://steveloughran.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/hadoop-java7-and-osx-or-what-is-it.html It looks like there

Re: [UPDATE] Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

2013-08-13 Thread Steve Loughran
all this sorted out, we had some miscommunication on how to install protoc in the jenkins boxes and instead having 2.4.1 and 2.5.0 side to side we got only 2.5.0. By tomorrow we should have things mostly sorted out. Thanks On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com

Re: What's the status of IPv6 support?

2013-08-16 Thread Steve Loughran
On 16 August 2013 10:05, Andrew Pennebaker apenneba...@42six.com wrote: Thanks for the link! I understand a lack of support *for* IPv6, what I don't understand is why IPv6 must be disabled in order for Hadoop to work. On systems with both IPv4 and IPv6, I thought IPv4 apps could ignore IPv6

Re: [ACTION NEEDED]: protoc 2.5.0 in trunk/branch-2/branch-2.1-beta/branch-2.1.0-beta

2013-08-16 Thread Steve Loughran
On 16 August 2013 02:50, Jun Ping Du j...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Tsuyoshi, I just checked Hadoop wiki on HowToContribute and it points ProtocolBuffer things to YARN Readme which is already updated to 2.5.0 now. Thanks, Junping I remember spending time on that page trying to document

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.0-beta

2013-08-22 Thread Steve Loughran
+1, binding Review process # symlink /usr/local/bin/protoc to the homebrew installed 2.5.0 version # delete all 2.1.0-beta artifacts in the mvn repo: find ~/.m2 -name 2.1.0-beta -print | xargs rm -rf # checkout hbase apache/branch-0.95 (commit # b58d596 ) # switch to ASF repo (arun's

moving JIRA releases

2013-08-27 Thread Steve Loughran
Should we go through the JIRA workflow of releasing 2.1-beta, and move all open targeted-at-2.1-beta issues to something else -2.1.0? Currently JIRA still views 2.1-beta as unreleased -steve -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to

Re: hadoop wiki page

2013-08-30 Thread Steve Loughran
sure, create a wiki account, email the login name here and we'll give you write access On 30 August 2013 02:34, Pere Ferrera ferrerabert...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Datasalt (http://www.datasalt.com/) is a Hadoop consulting company which released two open-source products on top of Hadoop

Re: hadoop wiki page

2013-09-05 Thread Steve Loughran
commercial support, public / private training and custom Hadoop development. I get: Sorry, can not save page because t.co is not allowed in this wiki. There's actually t.co within datasalt.com but I don't see how to avoid this. Any suggestion? On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Loughran ste

help needed to test a patch for Java7 on OSX

2013-09-11 Thread Steve Loughran
There's now a patch (and instructions of a manual stage) to get hadoop to build on java7 on OSX before I commit it, I need to make sure it doesn't break on any other platforms. Can anyone with Linux, Windows, PowerPC, Arm, whatever (and free time, obviously) and an openjdk7 or closed-jdk7, apply

Re: help needed to test a patch for Java7 on OSX

2013-09-12 Thread Steve Loughran
11, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: There's now a patch (and instructions of a manual stage) to get hadoop to build on java7 on OSX before I commit it, I need to make sure it doesn't break on any other platforms. Can anyone with Linux, Windows, PowerPC

Re: unit testing and execution guide

2013-09-16 Thread Steve Loughran
Have a look at https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToDevelopUnitTests , which (now) explains the miniclusters​ -which you can use for testing against in-VM HDFS and YARN cluster simulations. Passing unit tests doesn't mean your code works in a real cluster, but failing them does mean that it won't

Re: symlink support in Hadoop 2 GA

2013-09-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 17 September 2013 23:05, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote: (Looping in Arun since this impacts 2.x releases) I updated the versions on HADOOP-8040 and sub-tasks to reflect where the changes have landed. All of these changes (modulo HADOOP-9417) were merged to branch-2.1 and are in the

Re: symlink support in Hadoop 2 GA

2013-09-18 Thread Steve Loughran
On 18 September 2013 12:53, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: I'm reluctant for this as while delaying the release, because we are going to find problems all the way up the stack -which will require

Re: Newbie:Need guidance

2013-09-24 Thread Steve Loughran
Hi. You need to know that we don't really consider Hadoop a good place to learn about Java or distributed system programming: it is simply too complex. It's like learning C by writing linux kernel device drivers -so we explicitly warn against trying to do this

Re: question about when do resource matching in YARN

2013-09-24 Thread Steve Loughran
On 21 September 2013 09:19, Sandy Ryza sandy.r...@cloudera.com wrote: I don't believe there is any reason scheduling decisions need to be coupled with NodeManager heartbeats. It doesn't sidestep any race conditions because a NodeManager could die immediately after heartbeating. historically

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

2013-10-07 Thread Steve Loughran
+1 pointed my mvn repository (and plugin repository) at the staging site, added 2.2.0 as the version, ran all my local tests bringing up hbase and accumulo dynamically. On 7 October 2013 08:00, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, I've created a release candidate (rc0) for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

2013-10-09 Thread Steve Loughran
forgot to mention my vote is binding. to repeat my previous. +1 binding I've also now tested it in secure mode -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,

Re: how to compile with OpenIndiana or Solaris

2013-10-10 Thread Steve Loughran
for hadoop 2.x, the log4j. properties file for each project should be in src/test/resources but there's a risk that tests in sub projects that include hadoop-commons-test.jar (or other -test JARs, like hadoop-hdfs) may pick up the version in the test jar ahead of any one that they have locally

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >