[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-18514) Remove the legacy Ozone website

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-18514: -- Summary: Remove the legacy Ozone website Key: HADOOP-18514 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18514 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate hadoop from log4j1 to log4j2

Hi Duo, Thank you for starting this discussion. Log4j1.2 bridge seems like a practical short-term solution. However the bridge will silently affect applications that add appenders or filters. NameNode audit logger and metrics come to mind. There may be others. Thanks, Arpit > On Jan 20,

Re: [DISCUSS] which release lines should we still consider actively maintained?

+1 to EOL 3.1.x at least. > On May 23, 2021, at 9:51 PM, Wei-Chiu Chuang > wrote: > > Sean, > > For reasons I don't understand, I never received emails from your new > address in the mailing list. Only Akira's response. > > I was just able to start a thread like this. > > I am +1 to EOL

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16992) Update download links

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-16992: -- Summary: Update download links Key: HADOOP-16992 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16992 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement

Hadoop 3.1.2 missing from download site?

The Hadoop 3.1.2 download links seem to be broken on https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html Was it removed on purpose? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.5.0-beta RC2

+1 binding. - Verified hashes and signatures - Built from source - Deployed to 5 node cluster - Tried ozone shell and filesystem operations - Ran freon stress test for a while with write validation I couldn’t find the RC2 tag in the gitbox repo, although

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.0 Release include ARM binary

ote: > > Sure, we can't make mandatory while voting and we can upload to downloads > once release vote is passed. > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 11:24 PM, Arpit Agarwal > wrote: > >>> Sorry,didn't get you...do you mean, once release voting is >>> processed and upload

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.0 Release include ARM binary

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:59 PM Arpit Agarwal > wrote: > >> Can ARM binaries be provided after the fact? We cannot increase the RM’s >> burden by asking them to generate an extra set of binaries. >> >> >>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Brahma Reddy

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3.3.0 Release include ARM binary

Can ARM binaries be provided after the fact? We cannot increase the RM’s burden by asking them to generate an extra set of binaries. > On Mar 17, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Brahma Reddy Battula wrote: > > + Dev mailing list. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Brahma Reddy Battula >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.5.0-beta RC1

mpiled sources >> * Ran ozone smoke test against both binary and locally compiled versions >> >> Thanks Dinesh for RC1. >> >> -Attila >> >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 2:34 AM Arpit Agarwal >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.5.0-beta RC1

+1 (binding) Verified mds, sha512 Verified signatures Built from source Deployed to 3 node cluster Tried a few ozone shell and filesystem commands Ran freon load generator Thanks Dinesh for putting the RC1 together. > On Mar 6, 2020, at 4:46 PM, Dinesh Chitlangia wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > We

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.5.0-beta RC0

Hi Dinesh, Thanks for spinning up this RC! Looks like we still had ~15 issues that were tagged as Blockers for 0.5.0 in jira. I’ve moved out most of them, however the remaining 4 look like must fixes.

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature branch for HDFS-14978 In-place Erasure Coding Conversion

+1 > On Jan 23, 2020, at 2:51 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: > > +1 for the feature branch. > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 1:34 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang > wrote: > Hi we are working on a feature to improve Erasure Coding, and I would like > to seek your opinion on creating a feature branch for it.

Re: Needs support to add more entropy to improve cryptographic randomness on Linux VMs

Thanks for flagging this Ahmed. urandom is a perfectly acceptable option. I am not sure who maintains the pre-commit machines these days. > On Jan 14, 2020, at 10:42 AM, Ahmed Hussein wrote: > > Hi, > > I was investigating a JUnit test > (MAPREDUCE-7079:TestMRIntermediateDataEncryption >

Re: [DISCUSS] Ozone 0.4.2 release

+1 > On Dec 6, 2019, at 5:25 PM, Dinesh Chitlangia wrote: > > All, > Since the Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.4.1 release, we have had significant > bug fixes towards performance & stability. > > With that in mind, 0.4.2 release would be good to consolidate all those fixes. > > Pls share your

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16688) Update Hadoop website to mention Ozone mailing lists

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-16688: -- Summary: Update Hadoop website to mention Ozone mailing lists Key: HADOOP-16688 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16688 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [VOTE] create ozone-dev and ozone-issues mailing lists

Thanks for kicking this off Marton. Submitted INFRA requests to create the following. The lists should be live soon. - ozone-dev@h.a.o - ozone-issues@h.a.o - ozone-commits@h.a.o > On Oct 31, 2019, at 3:32 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > Thanks for all the votes and

Re: [VOTE] create ozone-dev and ozone-issues mailing lists

+1 > On Oct 27, 2019, at 1:25 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > As discussed earlier in the thread of "Hadoop-Ozone repository mailing list > configurations" [1] I suggested to solve the current misconfiguration problem > with creating separated mailing lists (dev/issues) for Hadoop Ozone. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Separate Hadoop Core trunk and Hadoop Ozone trunk source tree

+1 > On Sep 17, 2019, at 2:49 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > > TLDR; I propose to move Ozone related code out from Hadoop trunk and store it > in a separated *Hadoop* git repository apache/hadoop-ozone.git > > > > > When Ozone was adopted as a new Hadoop subproject it was proposed[1] to

Re: [VOTE] Move Submarine source code, documentation, etc. to a separate Apache Git repo

+1 > On Aug 23, 2019, at 7:05 PM, Wangda Tan wrote: > > Hi devs, > > This is a voting thread to move Submarine source code, documentation from > Hadoop repo to a separate Apache Git repo. Which is based on discussions of >

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HDFS-13891(RBF) to trunk

Utility method which is moved to > hadoop-hdfs-client module. Ideally it could have been seperate jira. But this > changes will not induce any issues, will take necessary action for this. > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:40 PM Arpit Agarwal <mailto:aagar...@cloudera.com>> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge HDFS-13891(RBF) to trunk

I scanned the merge payload for changes to non-RBF code. The changes are minimal, which is good. The only commit that I didn’t understand was: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14268 The jira description doesn’t make it clear why

Re: [VOTE] Unprotect HDFS-13891 (HDFS RBF Branch)

The request is specific to HDFS-13891, correct? We should not allow force push on trunk. > On May 14, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Anu Engineer > wrote: > > Is it possible to unprotect the branches and not the trunk? Generally, a > force push to trunk indicates a mistake and we have had that in the

Re: VOTE: Hadoop Ozone 0.4.0-alpha RC2

Thanks for building this RC Ajay. +1 binding. - verified signatures and checksums - built from source - deployed to 3 node cluster, tried out basic operations - ran smoke tests - ran unit tests - LICENSE/NOTICE files look ok There is an extra file in the source root named JenkinsFile. > On

Re: VOTE: Hadoop Ozone 0.4.0-alpha RC1

Thanks Ajay for putting together this RC. Unfortunately HDDS-1425 looks like a blocker. We should make the docker experience smooth for anyone trying out 0.4.0. I’ve just committed Marton’s patch for HDDS-1425 this morning. Let’s roll a new

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-13386) Upgrade Avro to 1.8.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal reopened HADOOP-13386: Reopening since HADOOP-14992 upgraded Avro to 1.7.7. This jira requested an upgrade to 1.8

Re: [DISCUSS] Docker build process

Hi Eric, > Dockerfile is most likely to change to apply the security fix. I am not sure this is always. Marton’s point about revising docker images independent of Hadoop versions is valid. > When maven release is automated through Jenkins, this is a breeze > of clicking a button. Jenkins

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.1.2 - RC1

+1 (binding) - Verified signatures - Verified checksums - Built from source - Verified Maven artifacts on staging repo - Deployed 3 node cluster - Tried out HDFS commands, MapReduce jobs. Confirmed the issues Billie pointed out. Not sure if you need to spin up a new RC or you can update the

Re: proposed new repository for hadoop/ozone docker images (+update on docker works)

I’ve requested a new repo hadoop-docker-ozone.git in gitbox. > On Jan 22, 2019, at 4:59 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > > TLDR; > > I proposed to create a separated git repository for ozone docker images > in HDDS-851 (hadoop-docker-ozone.git) > > If there is no objections in the next 3 days

Re: [VOTE] - HDDS-4 Branch merge

+1 It's great to see Ozone security being merged. On 2019/01/11, 7:40 AM, "Anu Engineer" wrote: Since I have not heard any concerns, I will start a VOTE thread now. This vote will run for 7 days and will end on Jan/18/2019 @ 8:00 AM PST. I will start with my vote, +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.3.0-alpha (RC1)

+1 binding. - Verified signatures - Verified checksums - Checked LICENSE/NOTICE files - Built from source - Deployed to three node cluster and ran smoke tests. Thanks Marton for putting up the RC. On 2018/11/14, 9:14 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Hi all, I've created the

Re: Jenkins build machines are down

sk upgrade and will be back when complete. Thank You @Marton Elek for providing this information. Thanks, Bharat On 10/31/18, 11:58 AM, "Arpit Agarwal" wrote: A number of the Jenkins build machines appear to be down with different error messages.

Jenkins build machines are down

A number of the Jenkins build machines appear to be down with different error messages. https://builds.apache.org/label/Hadoop/ Does anyone know what is the process to restore them? I assume INFRA cannot help as they don’t own these machines.

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15867) Allow registering MBeans without additional jmx properties

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15867: -- Summary: Allow registering MBeans without additional jmx properties Key: HADOOP-15867 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15867 Project: Hadoop

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop Ozone 0.2.1-alpha (RC0)

Thanks for putting together this release Marton. +1 (binding) - Verified signatures and checksums - LICENSE and NOTICE files exist in source and binary tarballs - Built from source code - Deployed to three node cluster - Tried out Ozone shell commands via 'ozone sh' - Tried out

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15727) Missing dependency errors from dist-tools-hooks-maker

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15727: -- Summary: Missing dependency errors from dist-tools-hooks-maker Key: HADOOP-15727 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15727 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-12558) distcp documentation is woefully out of date

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal reopened HADOOP-12558: Reopening to evaluate if this needs a fix and bumping priority. > distcp documentat

Re: HADOOP-14163 proposal for new hadoop.apache.org

Requested a new git repo for the site: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop-site.git On 9/4/18, 1:33 PM, "Mingliang Liu" wrote: It might be late but I'm +1 on the new site and transition proposal. Thanks Marton. On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:07 AM Elek, Marton wrote:

Re: HADOOP-14163 proposal for new hadoop.apache.org

+1 Thanks for initiating this Marton. On 8/31/18, 1:07 AM, "Elek, Marton" wrote: Bumping this thread at last time. I have the following proposal: 1. I will request a new git repository hadoop-site.git and import the new site to there (which has exactly the same

Re: [VOTE] Merge ContainerIO branch (HDDS-48) in to trunk

Late +1 for the merge. Thanks for driving this improvement Hanisha and Bharat. On 6/29/18, 3:10 PM, "Bharat Viswanadham" wrote: Hi All, Given the positive response to the discussion thread [1], here is the formal vote thread to merge HDDS-48 in to trunk. Summary of

Re: [VOTE] reset/force push to clean up inadvertent merge commit pushed to trunk

Things are good. > > I can push this now which will restore trunk to its original. > I can do this if there are no objection. > > - Sunil > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:10 AM Arpit Agarwal > wrote: > > afaict YARN-8435 is s

Re: [VOTE] reset/force push to clean up inadvertent merge commit pushed to trunk

s original. I can do this if there are no objection. - Sunil On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:10 AM Arpit Agarwal wrote: > afaict YARN-8435 is still in trunk. YARN-7556 and YARN-7451 are not. > > > From: Giovanni Matteo Fumarola > Date: F

Re: [VOTE] reset/force push to clean up inadvertent merge commit pushed to trunk

afaict YARN-8435 is still in trunk. YARN-7556 and YARN-7451 are not. From: Giovanni Matteo Fumarola Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 10:59 AM To: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Cc: Anu Engineer , Arpit Agarwal , "su...@apache.org" , "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" , "h

Re: [VOTE] reset/force push to clean up inadvertent merge commit pushed to trunk

-1 for the force push. Nothing is broken in trunk. The history looks ugly for two commits and we can live with it. The revert restored the branch to Giovanni's intent. i.e. only YARN-8435 is applied. Verified there is no delta between hashes 0d9804d and 39ad989 (HEAD). 39ad989 2018-07-05

Re: [DISCUSS]Merge ContainerIO branch (HDDS-48) in to trunk

will clean up the unused classes, fix old integration tests and continue testing the changes. Thanks to Hanisha Koneru, Arpit Agarwal, Anu Engineer, Jitendra Pandey, Xiaoyu Yao, Ajay Kumar, Mukul Kumar Singh, Marton Elek and Shashikant Banerjee for their contributions in design, d

Re: HADOOP-15124 review

Hi Igor, it is perfectly fine to request a code review on the dev mailing list. From: Igor Dvorzhak Date: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 at 9:27 PM To: Cc: , Subject: Re: HADOOP-15124 review Hi Yiqun, Thank you for the explanation. I didn't know that this is not appropriate and will not do so in

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15493) DiskChecker should handle disk full situation

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15493: -- Summary: DiskChecker should handle disk full situation Key: HADOOP-15493 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15493 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15451) Avoid fsync storm triggered by DiskChecker and handle disk full situation

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15451: -- Summary: Avoid fsync storm triggered by DiskChecker and handle disk full situation Key: HADOOP-15451 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15451

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15450) Avoid fsync storm triggered by DiskChecker and handle disk full situation

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15450: -- Summary: Avoid fsync storm triggered by DiskChecker and handle disk full situation Key: HADOOP-15450 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15450

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.1.0 (RC1)

com> Date: Monday, April 2, 2018 at 9:25 PM To: Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com> Cc: Gera Shegalov <ger...@gmail.com>, Sunil G <sun...@apache.org>, "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>, Hdfs-dev <hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.1 (RC1)

Hi Lei, It looks like the release artefacts have dummy shaded jars. E.g. Repository Path: /org/apache/hadoop/hadoop-client-runtime/3.0.1/hadoop-client-runtime-3.0.1.jar Uploaded by: lei Size: 44.47 KB Uploaded Date:Fri Mar 16 2018 15:50:42 GMT-0700 (PDT) Last Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.1.0 (RC1)

Thanks for putting together this RC, Wangda. The guidance from Apache is to omit MD5s, specifically: > SHOULD NOT supply a MD5 checksum file (because MD5 is too broken). https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums On Apr 2, 2018, at 7:03 AM, Wangda Tan

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15334) Upgrade Maven surefire plugin

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15334: -- Summary: Upgrade Maven surefire plugin Key: HADOOP-15334 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15334 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

Re: About reset branch-3.1 to trunk before release.

Thanks Wangda. On 3/19/18, 11:38 AM, "Wangda Tan" wrote: Done JIRA fix version update: Moved all JIRAs with fixVersion = 3.2.0 to 3.1.0 except following few fixes (which committed after 49c747ab187d0650143205ba57ca19607ec4c6bd) YARN-8002.

Re: Apache Hadoop 3.0.1 Release plan

Hi Aaron/Lei, Do you plan to roll an RC with an uncommitted fix? That isn't the right approach. This issue has good visibility and enough discussion. If there is a binding veto in effect then the change must be abandoned. Else you should be able to proceed with committing. However, 3.0.0 must

Re: Access to wiki

Granted Ajay write access to the confluence wiki. On 1/9/18, 10:38 AM, "Steve Loughran" wrote: Is this for the confluence wiki at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+Home On 4 Jan 2018, at 20:25, Ajay Kumar

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-15128) TestViewFileSystem tests are broken in trunk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-15128. Resolution: Not A Problem Reverted HADOOP-10054, let's make the right fix

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 GA is released

:36 AM To: Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com> Cc: general <gene...@hadoop.apache.org>, "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <common-dev@hadoop.apache.org>, "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>, "mapreduce-...@hadoo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 GA is released

Hi Andrew, Thank you for all the hard work on this release. I was out the last few days and didn’t get a chance to evaluate RC1 earlier. The changelog looks incorrect. E.g. This gives an impression that there are just 5 incompatible changes in 3.0.0.

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-15066) Spurious error stopping secure datanode

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-15066: -- Summary: Spurious error stopping secure datanode Key: HADOOP-15066 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15066 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

of voting? Best, Andrew On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for your hard work in getting us to this step. This is our first > major GA release in many years.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.0.0 RC0

Hi Andrew, Thank you for your hard work in getting us to this step. This is our first major GA release in many years. I feel a 5-day vote window ending over the weekend before thanksgiving may not provide sufficient time to evaluate this RC especially for downstream components. Would you

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-14287) Compiling trunk with -DskipShade fails

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-14287: -- Summary: Compiling trunk with -DskipShade fails Key: HADOOP-14287 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14287 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-7880) The Single Node and Cluster Setup docs don't cover HDFS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-7880. --- Resolution: Not A Problem This is covered by our docs now, resolving. https

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-14121) Fix occasional BindException in TestNameNodeMetricsLogger

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-14121: -- Summary: Fix occasional BindException in TestNameNodeMetricsLogger Key: HADOOP-14121 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14121 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-14002) Document -DskipShade property in BUILDING.txt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-14002. Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0-alpha2

Re: [VOTE] Release cadence and EOL

The ASF release policy says releases may not be vetoed [1] so the EOL policy sounds unenforceable. Not sure a release cadence is enforceable either since Release Managers are volunteers. 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release On 1/18/17, 7:06 PM, "Junping Du"

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-6751) hadoop daemonlog does not work from command line with security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-6751. --- Resolution: Duplicate > hadoop daemonlog does not work from command line with secur

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-6751) hadoop daemonlog does not work from command line with security enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal reopened HADOOP-6751: --- > hadoop daemonlog does not work from command line with security enab

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-13737) Cleanup DiskChecker interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal reopened HADOOP-13737: Assignee: Arpit Agarwal Resolved the wrong issue! > Cleanup DiskChecker interf

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13737) Cleanup DiskChecker interface

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-13737: -- Summary: Cleanup DiskChecker interface Key: HADOOP-13737 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13737 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13668) Make InstrumentedLock require ReentrantLock

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-13668: -- Summary: Make InstrumentedLock require ReentrantLock Key: HADOOP-13668 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13668 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-13434) Add quoting to Shell class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal reopened HADOOP-13434: Reopening to attach branch-2.7 patch. > Add quoting to Shell cl

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13457) Remove hardcoded absolute path for shell executable

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-13457: -- Summary: Remove hardcoded absolute path for shell executable Key: HADOOP-13457 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13457 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-13424) namenode connect time out in cluster with 65 machiones

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-13424. Resolution: Invalid [~wanglaichao] Jira is not a support channel. Please use u

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12903) Add IPC Server support for suppressing exceptions by type, suppress 'server too busy' messages

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12903: -- Summary: Add IPC Server support for suppressing exceptions by type, suppress 'server too busy' messages Key: HADOOP-12903 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP

'Target Version' field missing in Jira

Is it just me or has the Target Version/s field gone missing from Apache Hadoop Jira? I don't recall any recent discussion about it.

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12746) ReconfigurableBase should update the cached configuration consistently

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12746: -- Summary: ReconfigurableBase should update the cached configuration consistently Key: HADOOP-12746 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12746 Project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC2

+1 (binding) - verified signatures - Installed pseudo-cluster from binary distribution and ran example MapReduce jobs - Built from sources and reran tests on pseudo-cluster On 1/14/16, 8:57 PM, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli" wrote: >Hi all, > >I've created an updated release

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12664) UGI auto-renewer does not verify kinit availability during initialization

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12664: -- Summary: UGI auto-renewer does not verify kinit availability during initialization Key: HADOOP-12664 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12664

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.2 RC1

Thanks for putting together this release Vinod. +1 (binding) - Verified signatures - Started pseudo-cluster with binary distribution, verified git commit ID - Built sources, deployed pseudo-cluster and ran example map reduce jobs, DistributedShell, HDFS commands. PS: Extra file

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12665) Document hadoop.security.token.service.use_ip

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12665: -- Summary: Document hadoop.security.token.service.use_ip Key: HADOOP-12665 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12665 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.3 RC0

+1 (binding) - Verified signatures for source and binary distributions - Built jars from source with java 1.7.0_79 - Deployed single-node pseudo-cluster - Ran example map reduce jobs - Ran hdfs admin commands, verified NN web UI shows expected usages On 12/11/15, 4:16 PM, "Junping Du"

Re: Github integration for Hadoop

+1, thanks for proposing it. On 10/29/15, 10:47 AM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote: >All, > For code & patch review, many of the newer projects are using the Github >pull request integration. You can read about it here: >

Re: Github integration for Hadoop

On 10/29/15, 3:48 PM, "Andrew Wang" wrote: > If we pushed for it, I think it could happen. Gerrit support is a complete unknown. The community response to date supports Github integration. Github will appeal to new contributors as their Github profiles will reflect

Re: Github integration for Hadoop

On 10/29/15, 5:14 PM, "Andrew Wang" <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> wrote: >On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com> >wrote: > >> On 10/29/15, 3:48 PM, "Andrew Wang" <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> wrote: &g

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12522) Simplify adding NN service RPC port to an existing HA cluster with ZKFCs

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12522: -- Summary: Simplify adding NN service RPC port to an existing HA cluster with ZKFCs Key: HADOOP-12522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12522

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-10571) Use Log.*(Object, Throwable) overload to log exceptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal reopened HADOOP-10571: Assignee: (was: Arpit Agarwal) Thanks Steve. The original patch is quite out

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10571) Use Log.*(Object, Throwable) overload to log exceptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-10571. Resolution: Won't Fix Use Log.*(Object, Throwable) overload to log exceptions

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12272) Refactor ipc.Server and implementations to reduce constructor bloat

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12272: -- Summary: Refactor ipc.Server and implementations to reduce constructor bloat Key: HADOOP-12272 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12272 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12250) Enable RPC Congestion control by default

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12250: -- Summary: Enable RPC Congestion control by default Key: HADOOP-12250 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12250 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-12212) Hi, I am trying to start the namenode but it keeps showing: Failed to start namenode. java.net.BindException: Address already in use

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-12212. Resolution: Auto Closed Target Version/s: (was: 2.7.0) Hi Joel, I am closing

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-12179) Test Jira, please ignore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-12179. Resolution: Pending Closed Test Jira, please ignore

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12179) Test Jira, please ignore

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12179: -- Summary: Test Jira, please ignore Key: HADOOP-12179 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12179 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.1 RC0

Vinod, thanks for putting together this release. +1 (binding) - Verified signatures - Installed binary release on Centos 6 pseudo cluster * Copied files in and out of HDFS using the shell * Mounted HDFS via NFS and copied a 10GB file in and out over NFS * Ran example MapReduce

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12160) Document snapshot APIs exposed by the FileSystem interface

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12160: -- Summary: Document snapshot APIs exposed by the FileSystem interface Key: HADOOP-12160 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12160 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12162) Add ACL APIs to the FileSystem specification

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12162: -- Summary: Add ACL APIs to the FileSystem specification Key: HADOOP-12162 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12162 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12161) Add getStoragePolicy API to the FileSystem interface

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12161: -- Summary: Add getStoragePolicy API to the FileSystem interface Key: HADOOP-12161 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12161 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12163) Add xattr APIs to the FileSystem specification

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12163: -- Summary: Add xattr APIs to the FileSystem specification Key: HADOOP-12163 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12163 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-12075) Document that DN max locked memory must be configured to use RAM disk

Arpit Agarwal created HADOOP-12075: -- Summary: Document that DN max locked memory must be configured to use RAM disk Key: HADOOP-12075 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12075 Project

  1   2   >