I'm sorry I was wrong. Thanks Allen for the detailed information.
-Akira
On 10/7/16 15:04, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:39 PM, Akira Ajisaka wrote:
It wasn't 'renamed' to jenkins, prior releases were actually built by and on
the Jenkins infrastructure. Which was a very ver
Thanks everyone for checking out this release! The vote passes with 15
+1's, 7 of which are binding, and no -1's.
I'll go ahead and wrap up the release, and will send an announcement in the
next day or two.
Regards,
Sangjin
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Jason Lowe wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
+1 (binding)
- Verified signatures and digests- Built native from source- Deployed to a
single-node cluster and ran some sample jobs
Jason
On Sunday, October 2, 2016 7:13 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
Hi folks,
I have pushed a new release candidate (R1) for the Apache Hadoop 2.6.5
release (t
ccay
> Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2016 3:43 AM
> To: Karthik Kambatla
> Cc: Yongjun Zhang; Sangjin Lee; Andrew Wang; Wangda Tan; Zhihai Xu;
> Masatake Iwasaki; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.o
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums and signatures of the tarballs
- Built source with Java 1.7.0_111 on Centos 6.6 with native
- Verified licenses and notices using verify-license-notice.sh
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran basic dfs, distcp, ACL commands
- Ran MapReduce wordcount example
- Ra
: Saturday, October 08, 2016 3:43 AM
To: Karthik Kambatla
Cc: Yongjun Zhang; Sangjin Lee; Andrew Wang; Wangda Tan; Zhihai Xu; Masatake
Iwasaki; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop
+1 (non-binding)
* Downloaded and verified signatures
* Built from source
* Deployed a standalone cluster
* Tested HDFS commands and job submit
* Tested webhdfs through Apache Knox
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> Thanks for putting the RC together, Sangjin.
>
> +
Thanks for putting the RC together, Sangjin.
+1 (binding)
Built from source, deployed pseudo distributed cluster and ran some example
MR jobs.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Yongjun Zhang wrote:
> Hi Sangjin,
>
> Thanks a lot for your work here.
>
> My +1 (binding).
>
> - Downloaded both bina
Hi Sangjin,
Thanks a lot for your work here.
My +1 (binding).
- Downloaded both binary and src tarballs
- Verified md5 checksum and signature for both
- Build from source tarball
- Deployed 2 pseudo clusters, one with the released tarball and the other
with what I built from source, and did the
I'm casting my vote: +1 (binding)
Regards,
Sangjin
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Thanks to Chris and Sangjin for working on this release.
>
> +1 binding
>
> * Verified signatures
> * Built from source tarball
> * Started HDFS and did some basic ops
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
Thanks to Chris and Sangjin for working on this release.
+1 binding
* Verified signatures
* Built from source tarball
* Started HDFS and did some basic ops
Thanks,
Andrew
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Wangda Tan wrote:
> Thanks Sangjin for cutting this release!
>
> +1 (Binding)
>
> - Downlo
Thanks Sangjin for cutting this release!
+1 (Binding)
- Downloaded binary tar ball and setup a single node cluster.
- Submit a few applications and which can successfully run.
Thanks,
Wangda
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Zhihai Xu wrote:
> Thanks Sangjin for creating release 2.6.5 RC1.
>
Thanks Sangjin for creating release 2.6.5 RC1.
+1 (non-binding)
* Downloaded and built from source
* Verified md5 checksums and signature
* Deployed a pseudo cluster
* verified basic HDFS operations and Pi job.
* Did a sanity check for RM and NM UI.
Thanks
zhihai
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:16 AM,
Thanks Masatake!
Today's the last day for this vote, and I'd like to ask you to try out the
RC and vote on this today. So far there has been no binding vote. Thanks
again.
Regards,
Sangjin
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Masatake Iwasaki <
iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
+1(non-binding)
* verified signature and md5.
* built with -Pnative on CentOS6 and OpenJDK7.
* built documentation and skimmed the contents.
* built rpms by bigtop and ran smoke-tests of hdfs, yarn and mapreduce
on 3-node cluster.
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 10/3/16 09:12, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:39 PM, Akira Ajisaka wrote:
>
> > It wasn't 'renamed' to jenkins, prior releases were actually built by and
> > on the Jenkins infrastructure. Which was a very very bad idea: it's
> > insecure and pretty much against ASF policy.
>
> Sorry for the confusion. I should no
I think it's a good idea. We can still have the underlying data (in
*-version.properties) but we can consider removing the date and the build
person from the web UI. I'll file a JIRA to consider the idea.
I would greatly appreciate it if you folks can take a little time to take
the RC1 for a spin
I don't think it's a blocker, though I wonder what the point of that date
and attribution are on the WebUI.
Maybe file a follow-on JIRA to remove it for the future?
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> I looked into building it on jenkins earlier, but it appears that this
> jenk
I looked into building it on jenkins earlier, but it appears that this
jenkins job is busted (at least for 2.6.x):
https://builds.apache.org/job/HADOOP2_Release_Artifacts_Builder/
I don't have access to the job configuration, so I'm unable to fix it atm.
That said, I do think Allen has a point. I
> It wasn't 'renamed' to jenkins, prior releases were actually built by
and on the Jenkins infrastructure. Which was a very very bad idea: it's
insecure and pretty much against ASF policy.
Sorry for the confusion. I should not have used the word 'rename'.
What I meant is that "would you change
+1 ( non- binding)
--Downloaded source and built from it.
--Installed 3 node cluster with HA deployed.
—Ran sample MR jobs and tested with basics operations.
— Integrated JCarder tool to find any potential deadlock cycles. And did not
observe any potential cycles.
Thanks & Regards
Rohith Sharm
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Akira Ajisaka wrote:
> Can we rename it?
>
> AFAIK, hadoop releases were built by hortonmu in 2014 and was renamed to
> jenkins.
That's not how that works.
It's literally storing the id of the person who built the classes. It
wasn't 'renamed' t
Hi Sangjin,
When using binary tarball, I'm seeing
"2016-09-27T18:26Z by sjlee from branch-2.6.5" in Web UI.
Can we rename it?
AFAIK, hadoop releases were built by hortonmu in 2014 and was renamed to
jenkins.
*
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-common-dev/201401.mbox/%3CCAJs-t7N
Thanks Sangjin!
+1 ( non- binding)
--Downloaded the source and complied
--Installed HA cluster
--Verified basic fsshell commands
--Ran pi,terasort Slive jobs, all works fine.
--Brahma Reddy Battula
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have pushed a new r
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for cutting another release candidate Sangjin!
1. Diff'ed the CHANGES-*.txt files against the branch-2.6.5 git log and
verified the set of listed issues matches.
2. Verified md5 checksums and signature on src and binary tar.gz.
3. Built from source.
4. Started up a pseudo
25 matches
Mail list logo