from:Steve Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, this is a case of 'fixing' the standard Java library.
String.indexOf(String str) will throw a NPE if str is null. [That's where
indexOfAny will throw] It also can't be called on a null string.
IMO StringUtils is a different proposition to a
Hi Kurt
From: Kurt Rush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey,
Sorry about the double post :( I forgot to put Jelly in the subject...
I cannot seem to get this right... In my custom tag I would like to have
the value of an attribute be an expression like this:
ejb:create var=bean
ejb:param
My summary of the discussion that I started:
1 Many thanks to everybody, who responds;
2 I didn't know about 'pluggable' ORO possibilty,
I'll take a look at this (puting something in commons
only to have 'commons' in package name is not a good idea);
3 I agree that totally 'bootstraping'
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-09-27/commons-httpclient.html
Buildfile: build.xml
init:
[echo] HttpClient Library
Hey James,
Thanks for the feedback. I found the problem elsewhere. I was creating a
context for the tag before I executed it and I did not set the old
context to be the parent of the new context. So the attribute 'value'
could not find a variable called 'name'. Hence no value in 'value'.
You are volunteering to be the Release Manager? If so, I am +1, and
willing the help with publishing if you don't have access.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE]
On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 11:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Ola and Robert and Henri are all correct.. I think I was just
looking for a bit of a push in the right direction! Should I submit my
test
case for BeanComparator now (with my test on booleans removed), or wait
release plan
release manager: scott sanders
version number: 1.5
features:localization support and bug fixes
to do: fix bug #12458 (since no one's volunteered) i'll take a
look at this
fix bug #12728 scott - you're handling this.
good work richard.
- robert
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 05:08 PM, Richard Sitze wrote:
The Commons team is proud to announce a release of Commons Logging 1.0.2.
This release introduces bug fixes for various NullPointerExceptions, and
Security Exceptions in J2EE environments.
At 12:34 PM 9/27/2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
You are volunteering to be the Release Manager? If so, I am +1, and
willing the help with publishing if you don't have access.
I am in fact volunteering to RM the release. So thanks for the vote, and
the offer of help.
James
--
To unsubscribe,
+1
I think it would be great if we could get a DTD into the first release, as
Taras Tielkes suggested. It'd be nice to see his other comments addressed
also, but I wouldn't hold up the first release for them.
I can help with the release process if needed.
--
Martin Cooper
-Original
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Attached is a small patch for MethodUtils.java. It simply changes the
visibility of getMatchingAccessibleMethod() from private to public.
This is needed for a patch I submitted for digester, so I'm hoping to
get it into the 1.5 release.
I have twice previously submitted this patch using the
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 06:54 PM, Gregory M. Messner wrote:
Attached is a small patch for MethodUtils.java. It simply changes the
visibility of getMatchingAccessibleMethod() from private to public. This
is needed for a patch I submitted for digester, so I'm hoping to get it
I'd like to add the following methods to StringUtils:
String defaultString(Object obj) - behaves the same as
defaultString(String), invoking toString() on the obj to return the
string, or blank if obj is null
String defaultString(Object obj, String defaultString) - same as
defaultString(String,
rdonkin 2002/09/27 11:39:12
Modified:logging STATUS.html
Log:
Updated STATUS document with release information.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +22 -3 jakarta-commons/logging/STATUS.html
Index: STATUS.html
I'd like to hold it off til after the release.
Just add to the TODO and let it lie. Else we'll be doing this all over the
place :)
Mainly I just want to get the null/NPE/IAE thing agreed upon and then
the main release pushed out.
While we're an API project, so not quite like many other
(i've been ill and other people have been tied up with tomcat and structs
releases. i'm slowing getting round to reviewing all the emails i've
flagged but it will take time.)
i'm actually a little reluctant to apply this patch since MethodUtil API
is (unofficially) frozen since it will
I was actually hoping that would be the response, because I am +1 on
getting out the release as soon as possible. I'll add to TODO and be
ready when the release is out :)
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them...
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 06:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be acceptable to get my testcase for the existing BeanComparator
in
in time for the release? Of, if not, should I wait till after Monday, or
put it in via bugzilla?
it's probably easiest to leave them until
Btw...
can you not just use:
StringUtils.defaultString(+obj) for now?
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Steven Caswell wrote:
I'd like to add the following methods to StringUtils:
String defaultString(Object obj) - behaves the same as
defaultString(String), invoking toString() on the obj to return the
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 07:39 PM, Gregory M. Messner wrote:
(i've been ill and other people have been tied up with tomcat and structs
releases. i'm slowing getting round to reviewing all the emails i've
flagged but it will take time.)
i'm actually a little reluctant to apply
husted 2002/09/27 12:11:01
Modified:scaffold STATUS.txt build.xml
Log:
+ ConvertUtils: Add blankValue to test Strings for 0, empty, or null. (For
beanutil behavior when converting numerics).
+ Tokens: Add ERRORS_REQUIRED;
+ StorageBeanBase: change marked default to 1
husted 2002/09/27 12:11:20
Modified:scaffold/src/java/org/apache/commons/scaffold/text
ConvertUtils.java
Log:
+ ConvertUtils: Add blankValue to test Strings for 0, empty, or null. (For
beanutil behavior when converting numerics).
+ Tokens: Add
The Commons team is proud to announce a release of Commons Logging 1.0.2.
This release introduces bug fixes for various NullPointerExceptions, and
Security Exceptions in J2EE environments.
Binary/Source:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-logging/v1.0.2
stevencaswell2002/09/27 12:24:11
Modified:lang STATUS.html
Log:
Added StringUtils defaultString variation TODO
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +3 -1 jakarta-commons/lang/STATUS.html
Index: STATUS.html
Somebody want to patch the release HOWTO to reflect the need to update
this type of thing?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/logging
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am attaching a
FileTag that is able to move/copy/delete/rename files and create directories. I
am also attaching a jelly script to demonstrate how the FileTag is used. The
package this file is currently in is:
org.apache.commons.jelly.tags.io
It may make sense
to try and mirror the jdk
On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 08:50 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:
Somebody want to patch the release HOWTO to reflect the need to update
this type of thing?
committed
- robert
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
might i suggestion that the validator component considers asking martin
and scott to be committers?
they've both volunteered to help with the release and are commons
committers of good repute but (at the moment) their votes are non-binding.
this means that you're still 2 votes short of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9226.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This public constant isn't used anywhere in [lang], and doesn't seem to
be used anywhere in Jakarta. It looks like a leftover from earlier
refactoring.
This patch cuts it out.
Alternatively, if someone likes it, could they explain it's intended
use, and I'll post a doc patch for it.
I didn't see that before I checked in your patch. In general it is a bad idea to use
the com.sun packages directly. Can you do this more
genericly?
I don't believe so though I'm not an expert on JCE so I'd love to hear corrections if
I'm wrong about that. The best option that I can see is
CharRange uses an unassigned static character, UNSET, as a flag value
for testing if the range is a range or a single value.
This looks a little odd to me. I had the distinct impression that
accessing an unassigned value was an error. However, the comparison
works. I'm just not sure it's working
+1
Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was actually hoping that would be the response, because I am +1 on
getting out the release as soon as possible. I'll add to TODO and be
ready when the release is out :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Weird. I'd thought all values in Java were set to a defined value. Thought
we got rid of the unassigned stuff with C. But I don't delve into the JVM
and language spec enough so could be wrong very easily.
Hen
On 27 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
CharRange uses an unassigned static character,
The inherit tag for include doesn't seem to do anything, variables are
inherited either way.
include inherit=true uri=import.jelly/
-jason horman
This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I need to construct an object that requires an array of objects as a
parameter to its constructor.
For example:
mypackage.Foo (int i, ScoresClass[] soccerScores)
Does JOCLContextHandler support that? If so, could I have a sample JOCL and
DTD grammar for the JOCL?
Thanks
-Thyagu Poola
public class TestDefAssign {
public static char UNSET;
public static void main(String[] args) {
char c;
char d = 0;
//System.out.println(d == c);
//System.out.println(d != c);
//System.out.println(c);
System.out.println(d != UNSET);
System.out.println(d == UNSET);
Stefan,
I guess we could fix this by replacing the offending line with:
Security.addProvider(new org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider());
So that the BouncyCastle implementation is used instead, but that should not be forced
on us. At the moment Adrian is the only one using
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Untested code ahead:
String provider = System.getProperty(JCEProvider);
Class jceProvider = Class.forName(provider);
Security.addProvider(jceProvider.newInstance());
Although, really, I think the right answer is [discovery]
On Friday 27 September 2002 09:23 pm, Jeff Dever wrote:
Stefan,
I
How about something like the following:
String secProviderClass =
System.getProperty(httpclient.security.provider,org.bouncycastle.jce.prov
ider.BouncyCastleProvider);
java.security.Provider = (java.security.Provider)
Class.forName(secProviderClass).newInstance();
Security.addProvider(new
document throws in CharSet, and a bubbled up NPE in CharSetUtil
Index: CharSet.java
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/CharSet.java,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -w -r1.1
What's the advantage of these tags over Ant's existing copy delete etc?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
Jason Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/09/2002 06:28:15 AM:
I am attaching a
jsdever 2002/09/27 20:02:46
Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient NTLM.java
Log:
Fix for the GUMP compliation failure.
Allow for runtime determination of which security provider to use for NTLM
authentication. The provider is chosen through the
Yeah, method variables are that way.
I don't think instance/class variables are
public class Bob {
private String name = null;
..
is overkill.
For example, I commonly see standard bean code like:
public Person {
private int age;
public int getAge() {
return this.age;
Slight misordering in double comparison
--- NumberUtils.java15 Sep 2002 10:26:42 - 1.2
+++ NumberUtils.java28 Sep 2002 03:11:33 -
@@ -491,8 +491,8 @@
* liNormal positve numbers
* li+0.0
* li-0.0
- * liMinimum double (-Double.MAX_VALUE)
* liNormal
Yeah there are several issues with both the include and import tags. Please add
any new ones to issue tracker. For instance, declare a filterset in the first
script file and you can't reference it in a copy in the included script.
Some related bugs:
Does :
public static String random(int count, int start, int end, boolean letters,
boolean numbers, char[] set)
really need to be public? Odds of correct use seem to be pretty low. It's a
nice as a shared implementation, but it doesn't look like something that
someone would really use.
53 matches
Mail list logo
