DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi,
I've been reviewing the code of the commons FileUpload package and
would like to contribute a patch. This is no big thing, but some cleanup.
First of all, is this the right list for contributing patches?
Thanks in advance,
Sven
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Hi,
in the TODO list are these two points
# Examine the need for all dependencies. Validator has many dependencies
that are very lightly used and could be removed. Two likely candidates for
removal are commons-collections and ORO. The first because Validator only
uses one class in a very large
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
On 3/27/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Isn't the PoolableObjectFactory orthogonal to the four enum types you
mention? Those tune the FactoryConfig?
Yes, hence the smiley.
snap/
Aha ;-)
The implication for a
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 02:29 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/26/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-0
Could be a problem with setup or test itself, but with the 1.3-rc4
jar, I am getting failures in [dbcp] test
org.apache.commons.dbcp.TestJOCLed. These tests pass with 1.2. The
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon Mar 27 14:18:24 2006
New Revision: 389310
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389310view=rev
Log:
Fixed 18 instances of the misspelled word eligible (was eligable) in
Javadocs.
Modified:
Hello:
I've fixed 18 instances of the misspelled word eligible (was
eligable) in Javadocs in the trunk files:
src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericKeyedObjectPool.java
src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java
Not sure this is worth another RC. It all depends on how
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39109.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Couple of thoughts on files we should be making sure we're putting in
a rc-x release candidate:
The KEYS file that contains the key against which the pgp stuff needs
to be checked.
The .jar file that is going to go into the Maven repository
.md5 and .asc for said .jar file
Any thoughts?
Hen
Anyone mind if I split the Things To Look For When Inspecting A
Release Candidate section of
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html into its own
page?
And add in some bits about Phil's tools (I've been making
modifications to them, hope you've been noticing Phil :) ).
Hen
*ping*
In case this one has dropped off of the TODO lists.
Hen
On 3/14/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Demote [latka] to dormant status
+1
Simon Kitching
Henri Yandell
Robert Burrell Donkin
Dion Gillard
Niall Pemberton
Torsten Curdt
Stephen
2.1 because we'd rather get 2.0 out first, instead of waiting to try
out the ideas? If you guys think its appropriate, you might even move
that conversation here? Maybe others are interested as well; I am :-)
Plus it will give us better background while reading the commit
messages.
Thanks Sven,
This is the right list. As you might have noticed, there's a lot of
different things going on - so we use a convention of [fileupload] in
the subject name to help things stand out.
The best way to submit a patch is to create a new item in Bugzilla
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla)
Noticed today that Discovery 0.3 has an SVN tag, but we didn't do a
release. This was 6 months ago or so.
Did it get held up, or just lack of time/energy?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Some suggestions for the checklist:
* 3rd party jars and licences
* do the MD5 and PGPs work OK?
* do the archives contain everything that is needed? For example, if
there are source and binary jars, then the union of the two should
produce a set of files that includes everything in the
snip/
Who did it? How did it happen? Lets look at the clues.
First while we are running TestJOCLed, it subclasses
TestConnectionPool and that is where the failures are really
happening.
Yep.
* testPooling: This test method passes when you run it by itself. It
fails because while it looks
On 3/28/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone mind if I split the Things To Look For When Inspecting A
Release Candidate section of
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html into its own
page?
And add in some bits about Phil's tools (I've been making
modifications
On 3/27/06, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some suggestions for the checklist:
* 3rd party jars and licences
* do the MD5 and PGPs work OK?
* do the archives contain everything that is needed? For example, if
there are source and binary jars, then the union of the two should
produce a set
Author: sandymac
Date: Mon Mar 27 19:46:23 2006
New Revision: 389381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389381view=rev
Log:
Unit tests for the composite Lender implementations.
Bug fix in EvictorLender where two EvictorLender instances
chained would delay getNumIdle from detecting idle
Author: sandymac
Date: Mon Mar 27 21:04:36 2006
New Revision: 389394
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389394view=rev
Log:
Unit tests for the composite Tracker implementations.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/composite/TestDebugTracker.java
Author: sandymac
Date: Mon Mar 27 21:33:46 2006
New Revision: 389401
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389401view=rev
Log:
Added releases.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/doap_pool.rdf
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/pool/trunk/doap_pool.rdf
URL:
On 3/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
P.S.- [pool] code is quite hard to read with all that horizontal
scrolling. Irrespective of the code already in place, maybe we should
stick to a reasonable (80?) character line
On 3/27/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*ping*
In case this one has dropped off of the TODO lists.
snip/
Still on the list, and within the next 24 hours.
-Rahul
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
35 matches
Mail list logo
