Re: [httpclient] max response size

2002-09-17 Thread Ortwin Glück
Your app may want to get the data as an InputStream. Then you can decide yourself how many bytes you want to read. There might be some issues with closing the connection before the end of the stream has been reached. However this is another candidate for a configuration property. More about

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/support apfunctions.m4

2002-09-17 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/09/17 02:27:06 Modified:daemon/src/native/unix/support apfunctions.m4 Log: Remove the escapes... It crashes my BS2000 terminal. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/support/apfunctions.m4 Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12727] New: - [PATCH] fix NPE in RequestImpl.setVersion

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12727. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[lang] NestableDelegateTestCase.java

2002-09-17 Thread Henri Yandell
I get the following when I try to 'ant test' [javac] /Users/hen/jakarta/src/jakarta-commons/lang/src/test/org/apache/commons/lang/exception/NestableDelegateTestCase.java:1212: org.apache.commons.lang.exception.NonThrowableNestable should be declared abstract; it does not define

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12728] New: - Cache Bug in the PropertyUtils.java line 889

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12728. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [lang] NestableDelegateTestCase.java

2002-09-17 Thread Henri Yandell
Adding a /** * Prints the stack trace of this exception to the specified print * stream. Includes inforamation from the exception--if * any--which caused this exception. * * @param out codePrintStream/code to use for output. */ public void

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/sql/xdocs index.xml

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 03:19:07 Modified:sql/xdocs index.xml Log: fixed minor typeo Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/sql/xdocs/index.xml Index: index.xml === RCS file:

[lang][collections] ArrayUtils

2002-09-17 Thread scolebourne
So, which project gets ArrayUtils? [lang] or [collections]? Things on an ArrayUtils would be - a simple toString for arrays based on the ToStringBuilder. - Empty array constants for the different array types - ... Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang STATUS.html

2002-09-17 Thread bayard
bayard 2002/09/17 03:30:48 Modified:lang STATUS.html Log: Added some StringUtils todos. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +4 -1 jakarta-commons/lang/STATUS.html Index: STATUS.html === RCS

Re: [lang][collections] ArrayUtils

2002-09-17 Thread Henri Yandell
Other ones I'd expect an ArrayUtils to consider: converting long[] to Long[] etc. Or ListLong. reversing an array. I think CollectionUtils currently has that. some kind of 'map' method? So I would do: ArrayUtils.map(array, function); where function was defined as [one of your Pattern

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang STATUS.html

2002-09-17 Thread bayard
bayard 2002/09/17 03:58:37 Modified:lang STATUS.html Log: Need an unescape. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +2 -1 jakarta-commons/lang/STATUS.html Index: STATUS.html === RCS file:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12733] New: - [DBCP][PATCH]Statement.getResultSet() doesn't return null if like javadocs

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12733] - [DBCP][PATCH]Statement.getResultSet() doesn't return null if like javadocs

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [DBCP] DelegatingResultSet.close() - NullPointerException

2002-09-17 Thread Tim Funk
Yup - its a problem. The following classes have this problem because getResultSet() doesn't check for a null return. - DelegatingPreparedStatement - DelegatingCallableStatement - DelegatingPreparedStatement I just submitted a bug report and patch to fix this.

[Digester] XML Pull

2002-09-17 Thread Tal Lev-Ami
Anybody tried to adapt the Digester to work with XML Pull (http://www.xmlpull.org)? It should be fairly easy to do and there are pretty fast parsers out there. Tal Lev-Ami Trivnet Ltd. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/support apsupport.m4

2002-09-17 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/09/17 05:24:14 Modified:daemon/src/native/unix/support apsupport.m4 Log: Add detection of 2 of the FSC platforms: ReliantUNIX and BS2000. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +15 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/support/apsupport.m4

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/native arguments.c location.c replace.c

2002-09-17 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/09/17 05:25:50 Modified:daemon/src/native/unix/native arguments.c location.c replace.c Log: Arrange Java style comments - My compiler does like those - Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +15 -15

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly project.xml

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 05:36:26 Modified:jellyproject.xml Log: Added the common-user list Revision ChangesPath 1.68 +6 -0 jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly/project.xml Index: project.xml ===

Re: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Michael A. Smith
-1. I think there should be more initial committers before it gets moved to commons proper. One of the reasons for the sandbox is to allow a component to build a community, I don't think the component has a large enough development community yet. regards, michael Waldhoff, Rodney wrote:

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix Makedefs.in

2002-09-17 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/09/17 05:54:32 Modified:daemon/src/native/unix Makedefs.in Log: Remove the -Wall -Wstrict-prototype that are gnu specfic options. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -2 jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/Makedefs.in Index: Makedefs.in

Re: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Juozas Baliuka
It is true developer community is not very large, but I think user community is not so small, and I know they are waiting for release (I know two of them personaly). I can add myself to initial committers list, but I do not think it needs more committers at this time. -1. I think there should

RE: [lang] NestableDelegateTestCase.java

2002-09-17 Thread Steven Caswell
Henri, I am working on this. Thanks for the additional info. I should have something posted back later today. Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.k.a Mungo Knotwise of Michel Delving One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them... -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell

Re: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Michael A. Smith
It's not now that I'm worried about. It's 3 months from now when that active user community is submitting tons and tons of bugs/feature requests, and the development community cannot keep up because of external time pressures. That's better managed with more committers. In any case, I'm

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Scott Sanders
+1. The developer community issue is a concern, but as with BCEL, Lucene, PoolMan, the community as a whole is quite large, and not just developers make the community. Scott -Original Message- From: Juozas Baliuka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:48

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly XMLOutput.java

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 08:27:04 Modified:jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly XMLOutput.java Log: Added some extra helper methods to make it easier to output simple SAX events from inside a Tag Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +32 -7

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/junit RunTag.java

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 08:28:25 Modified:jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/junit RunTag.java Log: Allow the test name to be defaulted to the default TestSuite created by the test:suite tag Also allow a TestListener to be specified via the

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly maven.xml

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 08:31:04 Modified:jellymaven.xml Added: jelly/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly jellyunit.jelly Log: Added a sample test case to demonstrate the new test:run behaviour. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/jelly/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly jellyunit.jelly

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 08:52:12 Modified:jelly/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly jellyunit.jelly Log: patched the sample jellyunit script so that it runs all current JellyUnit scripts that can be found Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +24 -4

[latka] [PATCH] RequestImpl.setVersion () throws NPE

2002-09-17 Thread Janek Bogucki
Hi, I'm trying to build CVS latka with CVS httpclient and I encountered a NPE in RequestImpl.setVersion. My patch changes this method to match the meaning of the API comments by using HTTP/1.1 when the parameter is not 1.1, i.e. when it is null use HTTP/1.1. Maybe this is the wrong way to

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/unix/support apfunctions.m4 apsupport.m4

2002-09-17 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/09/17 09:21:15 Modified:daemon/src/native/unix Makedefs.in configure.in daemon/src/native/unix/native Makefile.in dso-dlfcn.c dso-dyld.c java.c jsvc-unix.c location.c daemon/src/native/unix/support apfunctions.m4

[Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Weber, Lance
Following some interesting discussions on the Maven list, I'd like to propose starting an SCM abstraction project, tentatively named Scamp. Proposed Goal: Scamp is a Source Control Manager abstraction layer. It provides a standard interface to SCM systems allowing common source control

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12746] New: - Easey Factory for ListUtils.lazyList() method

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12746. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Richard Sitze
Have you taken a look at how Eclipse handles this? http://eclipse.org *** Richard A. Sitze IBM WebSphere WebServices Development Following some interesting discussions on the Maven list, I'd like to propose starting an SCM abstraction project,

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 13:53, Weber, Lance wrote: Following some interesting discussions on the Maven list, I'd like to propose starting an SCM abstraction project, tentatively named Scamp. Proposed Goal: Scamp is a Source Control Manager abstraction layer. It provides a standard interface

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Martin Cooper
-0. It's just not ready. * There's no status file, which is required. * As far as I can tell, the unit tests cover only FTP, while the component covers a great deal more than that. * I have the same concern as Michael regarding number of committers. Witness the recent Plea for committal thread

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Michael A. Smith
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: I'm -0 because I'm not currently involved with [net]. If I was, I'd be -1. But I'd really hate to see us lower the barrier for Commons Proper components. Promotion to commons proper affects the entire commons, not just [net], so it shouldn't matter

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Scott Sanders
This is very true. -Original Message- From: Michael A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:34 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread James Strachan
+1. Great idea. James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ - Original Message - From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:18 PM Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction On Tue,

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/sql/src/test/org/apache/commons/sql/dynabean AbstractTestDynaSql.java

2002-09-17 Thread jstrachan
jstrachan2002/09/17 12:56:25 Modified:sql/src/java/org/apache/commons/sql/dynabean DynaSql.java sql/src/test/org/apache/commons/sql/dynabean AbstractTestDynaSql.java Log: Taken the ResultSetIterator class out of the DynaSql API (as its package

Promotion of NET issues ( was RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans )

2002-09-17 Thread Brekke, Jeff
Summarizing issues delaying promotion: *) No Status file. I skimmed the charter again, and it refers to a status file to list committers. Won't either the generated docs or the project.xml due for that information? There is a task/todo list also, but again it contains items to change after a

RE: [VOTE] Promote NET to commons proper was Release Plans

2002-09-17 Thread Brekke, Jeff
Actually, the whole committers issue was why I floated the idea of [httpclient], [net] and [webdav] getting together as a group. But that generated little enthusiam. This sounds like an interesting idea, but I think the driving force so far for the promotion of net was/is the current users of

Trying to try JellySwing

2002-09-17 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Hi list, Sorry to send a kind of user question... It runs out there is no other forum for the purpose. I wanted to give a try to JellySwing, being generally interested by Jelly but... had no chances... Downloading jelly-swing per se (the jar) doesn't seem to have executables. It's probably

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp TFTPClient.java

2002-09-17 Thread dfs
dfs 2002/09/17 14:48:07 Modified:net/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp TFTPClient.java Log: Applied my patch from May 2002 which addresses the situation whereby the IP address that answers a TFTP file transfer request is different from the one it was sent to. We handle

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Charles Burdick
This is indeed a great idea. An associated deliverable I'd love to see is a set of XML DTDs for describing log entries, etc. If the API could output to a standard XML format, then each app could avoid parsing all the text output of each SCM tool. --- Weber, Lance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder CompareToBuilder.java EqualsBuilder.java HashCodeBuilder.java

2002-09-17 Thread scolebourne
scolebourne2002/09/17 15:06:38 Modified:lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder CompareToBuilder.java EqualsBuilder.java HashCodeBuilder.java Log: Exclude static fields from reflection based builder Revision Changes

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder ToStringBuilder.java ToStringStyle.java StandardToStringStyle.java

2002-09-17 Thread scolebourne
scolebourne2002/09/17 15:07:20 Added: lang/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/builder ToStringBuilder.java ToStringStyle.java StandardToStringStyle.java Log: Initial checkin of ToStringBuilder and assistants Revision Changes

RE: [Digester] XML Pull

2002-09-17 Thread Scott Sanders
Would there be a good reason for it, other than because we can? Scott -Original Message- From: Tal Lev-Ami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:13 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List (E-mail) Subject: [Digester] XML Pull Anybody tried to adapt the

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Christopher Lenz
Hi Lance, I think this JSR is quite related to your proposal: http://www.webdav.org/deltav/wvcm/ Albeit inspired by WebDAV/DeltaV, I believe it is supposed to be generic. Also, AFAIK, it is initiated by an Eclipse team member, so its implementation is heading open-source. Weber, Lance

Re: [lang][collections] ArrayUtils

2002-09-17 Thread Daniel Rall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, which project gets ArrayUtils? [lang] or [collections]? Things on an ArrayUtils would be - a simple toString for arrays based on the ToStringBuilder. - Empty array constants for the different array types - ... I equate array operations more with [lang] than

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12752] New: - [PATCH] Remove use of deprecated o.a.c.httpclient.methods.PostMethod.setRequestBody ( String )

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12752. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Steve Downey
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 06:15 pm, Daniel Rall wrote: In what ways does this differ from DAV? A SCM system can sit on top of DAV, or DAV + deltaV. Subversion, for example, is using deltaV as the communication protocol between its client and server. But DAV, in and of itself, isn't a generic

Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

2002-09-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote: Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:13:59 -0400 From: Steve Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] New: - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12756] - [Patch] CallMethodRule/CallParamRule

2002-09-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12756. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.