Yeah, I should have said the real issues :-)
Phil
On 12/5/05, Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Sorry to be so late checking / trying to help. I am +1 for the
release assuming Stephen's points (other than the ones listed as
optional) and the following issues are
Phil Steitz wrote:
Sorry to be so late checking / trying to help. I am +1 for the
release assuming Stephen's points (other than the ones listed as
optional) and the following issues are addressed:
- You should either modify configs, fix issues or eliminate PMD and
checkstyle reports
I fixed
snip/
Hi Phil,
I think I am now at a point where I have a maven build, which should satisfy
almost all points noticed by you and other reviewers - except for the line
ending issue. After some documentation improvements I hope I can publish the
(hopefully final) RC3 in some days.
I had a
Oliver Heger wrote:
snip/
Hi Phil,
I think I am now at a point where I have a maven build, which should satisfy
almost all points noticed by you and other reviewers - except for the line
ending issue. After some documentation improvements I hope I can publish the
(hopefully final) RC3 in
Oliver Heger wrote:
---
[ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[X] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
Stephen,
thanks for your feedback. I will address your points. Some questions follow:
- What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything
about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the
*.java files and the LICENSE and NOTICE files, right?
- Line endings:
Oliver Heger wrote:
- What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything
about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the
*.java files and the LICENSE and NOTICE files, right?
The purpose is so users can attach the source of the component to the
binary jar
On 12/3/05, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen,
thanks for your feedback. I will address your points. Some questions follow:
- What is the purpose of the -src-ide.zip file? I didn't find anything
about that in the releasing components instructions. It contains the
*.java files
Sorry Oliver I was on vacation this week.
Here is my +1
Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Heger wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
Oliver
Oliver Heger wrote:
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we
Mario Ivankovits a écrit :
robert burrell donkin wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration is
supposed to support 1.3 jdks
Nicolas De Loof schrieb:
Mario Ivankovits a écrit :
robert burrell donkin wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration is
Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using
Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my
migration to commons-configuration.
Nico.
Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and
run under a JDK 1.3.
Unfortunately
On 12/1/05, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't this dependency be solved using jdbc2.0-stdext.jar ? I'm using
Jdk 1.3 and cannot upgrade. Not supporting 1.3 anymore will stop my
migration to commons-configuration.
Nico.
Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration
Can the project.xml be customized using jelly ?
something like this :
j:if test=${java.version == '1.3'}
dependency
idjdbc/id
/dependency
/j:if
It would be neater if something could be done in the maven.xml to
detect JDK 1.3 and add it into the class path from a property
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote on Thursday, December 01, 2005 9:26 AM:
Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and
run under a JDK 1.3.
Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of
licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient.
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Yes, with jdbc2.0-stdext.jar commons-configuration can be compiled and
run under a JDK 1.3.
Unfortunately this jar cannot be distributed via ibiblio because of
licence issues, which makes the build a bit unconvenient. But I guess
I will have to update the pom to declare
snip/
AFAIK, other apache projects require sun jars to compile. You may ask
commons-dbcp commiters that seem to have the same requirement :
!-- Note JDBC 2.0 is a pain, because it must be manually
downloaded to your Maven repository, and it's not even
required on JDK 1.4.
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
Oliver
Oliver Heger wrote:
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we have implemented a couple of fixes
and added some new features. To make these enhancements available
+0
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
Oliver
Oliver Heger wrote:
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we have implemented
+0
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
Oliver
Oliver Heger wrote:
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we have implemented
Oliver Heger wrote:
---
[ ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[X] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 15:07 +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
sorry for join a little late :-/
hopefully stephen, phil and the rest of the release experts will jump in
sometime
robert burrell donkin wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration is
supposed to support 1.3 jdks then this could be a problem unless
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 22:32 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
3 the release has been compiled using 1.4.2: if commons-configuration
robert burrell donkin schrieb:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 22:32 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
There has been no reaction on this vote thread so far.
Will I have to cancel this release because of lack of interest? :-(
3 the release has been compiled using
Here is my +1.
Oliver Heger wrote:
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we have implemented a couple of fixes
and added some new features. To make these enhancements available for the
public we are heading for a 1.2 release.
The second release candidate for Configuration 1.2 has been
Since the 1.1 release of Configuration we have implemented a couple of fixes
and added some new features. To make these enhancements available for the
public we are heading for a 1.2 release.
The second release candidate for Configuration 1.2 has been available for a
while now and no issues
27 matches
Mail list logo
